Re: Always thought it interesting/funny about Texas leaving
If one part of a country secedes from another part in a democratic fashion, then there will be serious negotiations on the "national" infrastructure, including military resources with both sides wanting to retain cordial relations.
I very much doubt it would happen anyway, but the general feeling I'm getting from the comments is a lot of hate and revenge-like comments, "cut them off", "take back everything", "dam the Colorado". If, as has been said California is a net contributor to the US federal budget, then any negotiations would take into account that California paid for that federal infrastructure, including a portion of the military.
There seems to be an assumption from many here that it would be a forced secession on hostile terms, effectively a revolution and a possible civil war. As with the last civil war, it's worth remembering that there are Californians in the military and many bases plus much military equipment in California if a worst case scenario ever happened.
Likewise, why would the rest of the US "cut off" California, block the roads, shut down pipelines etc.? Do you really think the *only* way out is a hostile way?