Re: If Trump didn't say it, it didn't happen
"Freeper"
WTF is a Freeper? Left? Right? Middle? A Freedom Keeper? Something else?
28765 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"In Chicago maybe your guy is "johnsrefrigerationchicago.com" if you're lucky (and want to type all that) but you'd find it isn't and have to search anyway."
Of course, John as a local company, could go with the .us tld and possibly a state abbrev. sub-domain below the TLD eg johnsrefridgeration.ill.us .us seems to be remarkably underused.
"There is no reason for the company to have dot-amazon. It's just polution."
I fully agree. Why would Amazon the company want a global domain anyway? They restrict access to users in various countries and re-direct them to their local ccTLD in many cases so a global .amazon TLD would almost certainly end u[ being used almost elusively as us.amazon, uk.amazon, fr.amazon, de.amazon, br.amazon etc. etc. etc.
"Then launching 600,000 people to inhabit Mars in 100 years. Really? In the entire history of space flight, some 56 years, ~550 humans have gone into space, so about ten per year on average."
If you take the first 56 years of powered flight and average out the number of people who have flown per year, how realistic would the yearly average be compared to the number of people flying in 1966? Any number of new developments could happen over such a time period.
To throw some currently ridiculous suggestions into the mix, cheaply produced strong aerogels weighing next to nothing suitable for structural jobs, single stage to orbit "space planes" a la Reaction Engines plans, maybe something clever with high temperature superconductors.
Even rocket nozzles might be improved for all I know though we think we are pretty much at the pinnacle of nozzle design. That exhaust is coming out in a pretty chaotic fashion like water out of a hose. Maybe some bright spark will come up with materials and a design to improve the lamina flow like modern "dancing fountains" nozzles. Dunno, I'm not a physicist or materials scientist.
Great if they can really build it mostly out of materials already avaiable on Mars. Minimise weight, and then send a few robots to Mars to build the domes and have them ready before the colonists arrive"
Also a handy demonstrator of the technology required to build a new air-conditioned, oasis-like community for the local ruling elite when the oil runs out and temperatures rise. </tinfoil hat mode>
How much of the "always on mic" is being sent off-device? Surely these devices have enough smarts to only wake-up on recognising their activation sound and then only process what is heard after that?
Has anyone tried acting out a "play" of terrorists organising an attack to see if there's any kind of response? Or better yet, discussing a major successful hack attack on Amazon to see if that triggers anything?
"So much for Free Speech."
As has been mentioned, there is no explicit right to Free Speech in UK law, but even in the US, a private company has the right to choose who can post on their system and/or limit what is said. You always have a right to speak out, but no one else is obliged to provide the facilities to help you out.
"Christ, I drive past TWO RAF stations on my way into work every day.... Literally alongside the airstrip!"
As do everyone driving up and down the A1 in Nth Yorks, barely 25yds from the boundaries of Catterick Garrison, RAF Leeming and RAF Dishforth. No doubt there are many other roads around the country putting much of the population into a similar situation.
For that matter, what does "in the neighbourhood" mean? GCHQ is almost surrounded by housing estates and the M5 isn't too far away.
"Or, to put it differently: managers of consultant organizations are quick to charge their customers for security services, but not as quick to pay themselves the security fees."
What;s even more sad, is these are the very companies doing the assessments for standards which in some cases are a legal requirement if you want to stay in business. You HAVE to pay them or their ilk for the service. Who does their assessments and who signed off on it?
"Or alternatively they could have been even more boring, and just sold services to the cab industry."
Strangley enough, that's what they do. Uber in Netherlands operates the app and take your payment and then subcontracts the actual journey to Uber London. If Uber London lose their licence, there's nothing stopping Uber Netherlands from sub-contracting the journey to other licensed minicab companies.
Of course, it'll never happen. But even if it did, the money stall goes out of the country with the bare minimum coming back to pay the drivers. At least with the local minicab firms, most of the money stays in the UK.
"This is Uber's behaviour, quite apart from its usual 'bending' of the rules because it's a special "disruptor" company which thinks the rules don't apply to them."
The saddest thing of this sorry affair is that is exactly what so many people seem to see Uber as. A small start-up disrupter being stamped on by the bullyboys. They spend lots of money maintaining that image when the reality is the are a multi-billion dollar, multi-national mega-corp stomping on any rules they don't like, spending their way to success. The problem Uber has over other "innovative" start-ups who grew up too fast to mature into adults is that their business model really is a shaky house of cards. They can't undercut the competition by scaling up because the fixed cost part of the journey always stays the same, no matter how big you are. The only way they can undercut is by subsidising using the VC money.
"The only actual distinguishing feature between liberalism, and neoliberalism, is the 'neo' part, which as anyone with a smattering of knowledge of the Greek language knows, means 'new'."
So are you saying the only difference between Labour and Tony Blairs New Labour was the word New?
"As long as they don't ask for my El Reg ID "
Which does raise the question as to whether this new law/guidance/whatever includes whatever they mean by "social media" account. I may, by default, have one or more "social media" accounts due to having a gmail address linked to my Android phone and Google Store account. If I do, I don't know about them nor use them.
...and considering it's a denim jacket with metal buttons or press studs, and the actual device needs to be connected to the touch area, why not just have two extra studs in the relevant place, connect the device and presto, no special, limited life, limited wash "smart" material needed.
You'd all be the ones standing round saying things like "This fire is a waste of time, if you leave your meat on too long it turns to a cinder and, although it might be able to fend off a wolf or two, it burns my fingers every time I try to pick it up!"
Oh, stuff it up your nose!!
(Grateful thanks to one Mr. D Adams)
Compared to the standards of today. Compared to what prevailed previously, not so horrendous. Unless you count more abundant and affordable food, better housing, more affordable clothing etc. as "horrendous".
I'm well aware of being cautious about comparing "then" and "now", rather than "then" and "more then" :-) and am aware that that was also the era when some of the best changes for the better began to happen. I was simply pointing out that despite the great wealth around, not that much trickled down other than from individual philanthropists such as Salt, Cadbury etc. until quite late in the era when city and town councils eventually got around to incorporating and doing stuff, often with philanthropists donated money, land donated as public parks etc. or even by public subscription.
"Shame that if we'd just focused on the science instead of the in-fighting, and allocated the budgets accordingly, we could probably be 100 years or more ahead of where we are by now."
I get your point and I'd like to agree with it, but the really big money goes to the military. Without that, we'd be many years behind where we are now. Of course, if there was no military, things would be very different, which I suspect is what you mean, but I wonder if there would be the same drive for technology without the regular international conflicts? Look at Victorian Britain. The richest, most widespread empire the world has known and industrially the most advanced but the majority lived in horrendous conditions with the country as a whole little more than a cesspit.
Driverless means we can share the car (sequentially, as another has helpfully clarified) instead of owning it. And as you point out with the Uber example, why would that not add to conjestion?"
I think the main difference bewteen driven and driverless car sharing is how the car gets between users, ie with driverless, the users don't need to be physically at the same point to swap over.
Uber, on the other hand, with their apps bookings and mapping/navigation information could offer to ride share by picking up and/or dropping off along the route, possibly with some relatively slight detours along the way. Maybe charge more for guaranteed exclusive use of the car for the trip. In a busy city I'd bet that most taxi trips could quite easily double up or better for much of the trip. Currently they are subsidising by so much that people are choosing Uber over buses and the Tube, hence the TfL complaint about congestion.
"With autonomous cars taxis could become much cheaper,"
But won't because "new technology", "safer" etc, so a premium will be charged, at least initially. Once critical mass is achieved, prices will tumble to kill off the remaining human driven taxis, then the prices will rice back up to "all the market will bear", possibly with a slight nod to competition when the newest incarnation of Uber and their ilk try to "disrupt" the new market.
"at least with a human driver people have to limit themselves most of the time."
I would expect that shared/hired AVs will have CCTV inside too. The owner will want to protect their investment. I think I find that a bit creepy. It's one thing for the taxi firm to know who you are, where you live, where and when you go places, but to have a CCTV pointed at your face at all times? And you just KNOW this is how it will work. Your choices will be a) accept it, be never use an AV "taxi" or c) be rich enough to have your own or pay for the "exclusive luxury" service.
"Presumably therefore, all the revenue raised belongs to Uber London Ltd and is subject to UK Tax, both Corporation and VAT?"
From the link above, the users use an app from Dutch UBV, pay their taxi fee to Dutch UBV and Dutch UBV then contract and pay for the ride provided by London based ULL. Profits, if any, will only ever end up in the Netherlands, possibly via an Irish subsidiary one day.
https://www.londonreconnections.com/2017/understanding-uber-not-app/
An excellent and wideranging report on how Uber operates. It seems pretty balanced and objective too. It ought to be required reading for anyone commenting on any Uber story.
I think some of the most salient points raised there include the separation of the Uber companies, where the money goes, the fact Hailo and it's app was around at the same time because other minicab firms were already using apps, ie before Uber, and the outrageously unfair competition by operating at a loss of about 50% per journey to kill the competition. Having a "loss-leader" as part of your product line to get customers is one thing, but selling your entire product range at a 50% loss is surely unfair competition.
Uber seem to have done an Apple in terms of generating the impression they invented taxi apps when the reality is they spent $billions on publicity.
In the BBC report, they stated that Uver claimed to have never used Greyball in London. Even if that is so, the fact the created (or obtained) Greyball and DID use it in other parts of the world still says a lot about the company, it's morals and it's culture, which still has a bearing on the "fit and proper" argument.
...and yet they can't afford the extra security protection of running their own mail server?
I wonder how much they pay MS Azure to host it and the cost of the reputation damage/compensation compared to running their own systems?
Deloitte remains deeply committed to ensuring that its cyber-security defences are best in class,
How can they claim that when they put their data and systems on someone else's servers where, by definition, they have less control over the security?
"I'd guess less than 1% of users read any, let alone all, of any T&C."
In the UK and the rest of the EU we have a thing called "fairness". If a contract is clearly imbalanced on one side, potentially the entire contract could be invalid if it gets to court. T&Cs, especially those where you don't get to see them until after the purchase are generally not worth the paper or pixels they are written on. Most especially those written by US lawyers for US products sold here. It's very, very rare for a challenged T&C document to reach court because the companies are terrified of legal precedent being set where they are fairly certain to lose.
"One use that I *do* remember was printing off grids of greyish, round-edged squares to represent an enlarged line screen of a print job, then overlaying them and gradually rotating them until they produced a moiré."
I used that trick to show animated data flow paths by moving one slide over another. Then we got one of the monochrome LCD panels mentioned up-thread. As mentioned, you had to be careful with animations due to the rather slow refresh rates in those days.