Re: Its not Huawei we need to worry about
It would certainly demonstrate just how much various Amazon so-called subsidiaries depend on the US mothership if the .com went dark, eg tracking links, telemetry etc.
28765 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"Both are extremely biased and wrong."
That's neither here nor there. Both statements are about Trump in particular and neither are about the Republican party as a whole. You don't seem to be able to separate the two concepts in your own mind and have supported your opponents argument in process..
"One less useless piece of "street furniture" spewing adverts at your face as you try to make your way down an already busy pavement."
On the other hand, one of the primary objections seems to be that nefarious souls could make anonymous calls for nefarious reasons. But that also applies to existing phone boxes, so is this a new reason for BT to remove the remaining ones?
"So bringing the system back in-house saved loads of cash so they decided to outsource it again in a way that prevents an upgrade..."
I can see the logic. Sort of. Bringing it back saved money, ie reduced running costs. They now have a cost benchmark to work to so outsourcers bidding have to come under that benchmark making it it cheaper again. (naturally, it will cost more, but the headline "basic service cost" will be a headline grabbing saving. They;ll just try very hard to hide the costs of the extra little tweaks and services they forgot to put into the original tender which will increase, not decrease the annual bills.)
The USA has a track record of pointing at their allies high tech achievements which compete with their own and telling them they could save a fortune by cancelling the project because the US promises a "great deal" by selling them "better" US stuff. Then not quite coming through on the deal. There was a mach 3 Canadian fighter jet too.
"Space exploration will go forth with private companies, helmed by billionaires, because they are the only forces left that have the vision and the willpower to get things done."
Even billionaires can't keep paying for stuff like this without some sort of return. Even a long term goal of a self-sustaining off-world colony will take more than they have and decades of time, at least. Not forgetting that a lot of the priavte space industry is feeding of the Government Teat for much of it's finance. Doing government work cheaper than government can is only sustainable while governments are spending on space and their spends match what the private companies want to do.
"but it does smell nicer than it tastes "
That does seem to be true of supermarket "every day" bacon, especially the unsmoked variety. If you go for the higher priced better stuff, or better yet go to a decent butcher, then bacon usually tastes as good as it smells.
I'll not mention the argument about red or brown sauce though. Oops!
I recently did compulsory survey from my employer about desks, chairs, screens, keyboards etc. There was no "not applicable" option and I'm not office based so pretty much no questions applied to me. But then these sorts of things are created by office based people and since they never see us remote people, we don't exist but are still on the mailing lists.
Maybe when it was launched the fuel reserve might have been calculated to last significantly longer than it's initial intended life span, but since then, new regulations on moving "dead" sats out of orbit mean it must be moved now while there enough fuel to move it to a safe orbit. It was launched 15 years ago and probably designed and specified at least 5 years prior to that when there was probably a lot less concern about what happens to expired sats.
Although I agree with your sentiment, because like most readers here I have at least a basic understanding of statistics and a reasonable understanding of the state of facial recognition technology, I suspect the majority of the population have little idea about either and thing what they see in TV crime shows is all true and therefore this is a "good" thing "because it'll help catch criminals, innit"
"FTFY. Nothing particularly unusual about IT guys (not to mention gals) there."
There's no need to add "gals" as an alternative to guys. Every Youtube how-to video starts off with "hi guys", whether it be a male or female showing you their latest "clever life hack". Guys is now an all inclusive term.
"I've occasionally boarded a Friday evening train at Kings Cross and arrived ready to party in Newcastle a few hours later."
Really? You must travel very often if that occasionally happens to you. For most people, getting from Kings Cross to Newcastle in only a few hours by train is a once in a lifetime experience and very much worth celebrating!
Not sure about anal, or if it's standard practice today, but back in the days of MS-DOS PCs and Netware servers, that was pretty much the standard practice in most places, at least from small to medium businesses that I had dealings with. Smaller one might have rolled around each month simply for cost reasons rather than keeping three months worth of backups. Either way, companys with Newtware/MSDOS networks were generaly companies who had computerised properly for the first time so usually were set up by someone who knew what they were doing and a proper backup regime was set up as part of the installation/service. Likely that 3rd party would also be doing their support and there was no one on site who understood enough to make decisions over-riding the process. Things were done because the installers had told them that's how it should be done.