IE for me?
Thanks, Microsoft, for getting the news out. I don't think I'll be installing Chrome in the near future.
Of course, since I hate and despise everything to do with Windows and run only Linux, I won't be installing IE either.
765 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2007
Bruno Girin: "I do struggle to see what else I would remove out of vanilla FF to make it more lightweight."
Well, how about the database server? That, surely, has got to be high on the list of things you shouldn't include in a web browser.
If you fix that as per your point 5, I'll take a 64-bit Linux build please.
If Mozilla was to lose Gooogle funding, they'd have to revert to an unpaid volunteer development model, like some of the Linux distributions. It seems to work OK for them.
And maybe a more democratic development process would result in less bloat and questionable design decisions (let's put a database engine in our web browser). Maybe? No, I know, but I can dream, can't I?
Surely Gooogle's "speed" argument is completely bogus? I currently have a fault on my broadband (THANK YOU PLUSNET) making everything really, really, really slow, but time for DNS resolution is still negligible.
If you really wanted to speed up browsing, you'd ban Adobe Flash.
I can see where this is going though. The Gooogle Chrome appliance will have the DNS servers hardwired with no option for the user to change them.
My perception of the last.fm service is that they've been hitting the limits of their hardware and networking for some time now. Pages typically take 10 seconds or more to refresh; sometimes they just time out. Lots of other stuff is either slow or occasionally fails.
The new parent company needs to invest in infrastructure before doing anything else.