"Take-home" lesson
Have one ultra-resilient ATM on the network, then you cane always say we are sorry some customers had problems....
3573 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Nov 2007
My non-China cases graph approximately fits an exponential with a time constant of 0.2/days meaning a doubling time of 3-4 days. I suspect UK results will start to lag significantly behind this curve now because it is almost impossible to get tested. I reckon we are within a fortnight of the Italian situation.
Again, I would say that the WHO have experts in pandemic stats, from the same pool as those on the radio. Of course the "real" mortality rate (there isn't such a thing, really, it's not a property solely of the virus) could be under 1%. But it is still not the case that it could be 'a great deal' lower. If the best guess of the experts is 1-3%, a figure from the WHO largely agreed by the experts on More or Less and elsewhere, commentards need to provide better than "There are a a large number of unconfirmed yet real cases out there" to prove that "will lower that headline figure a great deal."
That was my only criticism of Julz post, and I'm not convinced that it doesn't still stand.
PS: I consider 'a great deal' in this case to be at least half an order of magnitude, if not a whole one.
I would agree with most of your post except this: "There are a a large number of unconfirmed yet real cases out there which will lower that headline figure a great deal."
Not necessarily. The stats are probably behind, but so are the mortality figures. There's not a great reason to think that "because I understand stats, the WHO mortaility estimate is wrong" --- those guys understand stats, too.
Both comfortable and uncomfortable ... 24 is not really a narrow win, but with a majority of 80, it's not that comfortable.
Personally, I'm conflicted ... I think the "Never Huawei" group are wrong but I'm encouraged that quite a number don't seem to see their role as rubber stamping government policy. But I'm still concerned that some "rebels" are acting due to other interests rather than rational analysis.
I agree with both of you: yes it's well beyond the capabilities of most people, but so is forging banknotes and, perhaps more comparably, artwork.
At $fivefigures and above, I'm pretty sure some clever person could knock up a convincing fake, even if they just made it functional by combining different working parts from several non-functional units.
Agreed ...
I've been privileged to meet some super intelligent and talented people and most of them were in the "OMG I'd love to hate them but they're too nice" category: people who are more modest about themselves and their accomplishments than I am about having met them.
There were a very small number of highly intelligent gits - maybe they succeed more outside academia and business: in both of these I suspect an inability to meet even minimal standards of interpersonal cooperation is usually a bit of a bar to progress.
Jake - the point of being careful about Covid19 is to avoid being partly responsible for the deaths of other, more vulnerable people. You may be as strong as an ox, and have no worry about catching it. I don't worry that much either. I worry about spreading it.
Technical note: it isn't the flu. And you really don't know enough biology to be spouitng an opinion on it.
I might be the last person to find this out, but my son, a Middle Ages buff, tells me this is a literal translation of a real insult: your mother is a whore (hamsters apparently being though highly sexually active) and your father is a drunk (most contemporary wine being made from elderberries).
See also Tears of a Crime
It's amazing how obvious the little tells are once the experts point them out...
My expericence is that Five Guys, not unlike a lot of Bistro pubs, suffer from what I like to call "Nandos Syndrome": perfectly acceptable food in perfectly acceptable places being sold at a price point 2-3x greater than jusifiable. As contrasted with LEON, for expample, which is, in my limited experience, a little bit pricier than many fast food places, but quite a lot better.
Food at £10/head just has to be good and fresh. Once you get over £20 and start to approach £30 per cover you need to be really special: not just the food, but the presentation, the location, the ambience and the service.
NB: I'm outside London.
The problem is not that I don't understand basic chemistry but that you don't understand that your understanding of chemistry is basic.
The only left and right that's relevant here is the the abscissa. This is a scientific issue, not a political one, and it's a simple fact that CO2 has been increasing steadily, it's not "two peaks of a 70 year cycle" you numpty.
"And plants would grow WAY faster! And they'd deplete it all, and we'd be back to where we are now at < 0.04%. Equilibrium."
Hilarious. We're already over 0.04%, which is a 25% increase in the 40 years since I was at school. You have no idea what equilibrium is, stop using the word.
BombASTIC Bob going for the Dunning Kruger, award I see.
Loads of stupid denialist points. Easiest one to refute, off the top of my head is d) the claim that CO2 is at equilibrium. Apart from the fact the statement is meaningless, CO2 was at 330ppm when I was at school and is now, what, 410?
A surfeit of capitals does not compensate for the lack of scientific capability or knowledge.
Just seems very expensive... I've realized since my earlier post that one can get USB powered monitors for games consoles etc ... £150 for a 2k 13.3" screen, then add keyboard with track pad or track point.
Would just be nice to have it in a laptop form factor, and have your own battery if the device you are USBing to struggles to power the display.
I found one of their powerpoints once on an old system and "read" it with a strange fascination --- it was like the Voynich Manuscript: looks like it should make sense to someone but eventually you have to consider the possibility that it's all just a big joke.