Wikidata:Property proposal/Water bottle volume
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Water bottle volume
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Withdrawn
| Description | Volume of the water bottle |
|---|---|
| Data type | Quantity |
| Example 1 | 14 fluid ounce for Quencher (Q123988815) (optional) |
| Example 2 | 17 fluid ounce for Q123989034 (optional) |
| Example 3 | 20 fluid ounce for Q123989034/Q123988815 (optional) |
| Example 4 | 22 fluid ounce for Q123989034 (optional) |
| Example 5 | 30 fluid ounce for Q123989034/Q123988815 (optional) |
| Example 6 | 40 fluid ounce for Q123989034/Q123988815 (optional) |
| Example 7 | 64 fluid ounce for Q123989034/Q123988815 (optional) |
| Example 8 | 96 fluid ounce for Q123989034 (optional) |
| Example 9 | 591 millilitre for Q123989034/Q12398815 (required) |
| Example 10 | 887 millilitre for Q123989034/Q12398815 (required) |
Motivation
[edit](Add your motivation for this property here and your signature)
This will be recommended for use such as water bottles. One more specific examples are Stanley water bottles such as this. Solaris5296 (talk) 01:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
As of now, this property will be required. Solaris5296 (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Oppose No nonmetric units please. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- The query service can do the conversions for you, so I don't think that's an issue. Infrastruktur (talk) 08:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment I basically wanted to say that we will also produce nonmetric and metric units, as all throughout the world can see. However, if we were about to produce nonmetric units, we should also make metric units. Metric units will be required. Nonmetric units will be optional. It's a better choice to make units available regardless of whether it's metric or not. Are you satisfied with this decision to make both metric and nonmetric units available? For example, 591 millilitre and 887 millilitre. I will update this. Solaris5296 (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Solaris5296: Who are "we", in this context? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment See this property proposal. This is required. Solaris5296 (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What's wrong with volume as quantity (P2234)??? Swpb (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose volume as quantity (P2234) suffices. --Nw520 (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unnecessary, per above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose unnecessary and far too specific. Vicarage (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, not really. volume as quantity (P2234) describes the volume of a body, while the volume of a bottle isn't identic with the content units available the bottle is designed for. Trying to make my argument more understandable, I am talking about ℮, that's the estimated sign (Q472548). for ex. 750 ml ℮, the Q15811121 according to the Council Directive of 20 January 1976 (Q25322118): it are the garantueed volume units of liquid which is sold, but the bottle indeed has more volume. I don't know real numbers as I am not a specialist on packages or bottles, except for emptying ;-) but a 750 ml ℮ bottle of wine has perhaps a volume of 800 ml as there is needed some space for the cork (Q49444) and for the liquid to extense when temperatures get higher. We at least need another volume than volume as quantity (P2234). Perhaps we already have, but seeing that Füllmenge does not have any other language expression than German it might not exist yet or it exists under another name redundantly.
- Yet I don't know wether the proposers of the property did mean what I mean. However we need a property for the estimated sign (Q472548) definitely. --Matthiasb (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn after people objecting to it and due to 2 proposals for deletion, the first of which were already deleted. Solaris5296 (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
