Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P7829
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
P7829 (P7829): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Several Non-French article ids (P7829, P7822 (P7822), P7827 (P7827), P7832 (P7832), P7841 (P7841), P7843 (P7843), P9123 (P9123), P9124 (P9124)) can be merged to P7818 (P7818), like Fandom article ID (P6262). Take Vikidia (Q3051048) as an example, its P7818 (P7818) is Vikidia, it can also be refered to as en:Vikidia which in fact points to the English Vikidia.
@Tinker Bell, Pintoch, Jura1, Trade, Eihel: What's your idea? —Kethyga (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Vladimir Alexiev Jonathan Groß Andy Mabbett Jneubert Sic19 Wikidelo ArthurPSmith PKM Ettorerizza Fuzheado Daniel Mietchen Iwan.Aucamp Epìdosis Sotho Tal Ker Bargioni Carlobia Pablo Busatto Matlin Msuicat Uomovariabile Silva Selva 1-Byte Alessandra.Moi CamelCaseNick Songceci moz AhavaCohen Kolja21 RShigapov Jason.nlw MasterRus21thCentury NGOgo Pierre Tribhou Ahatd JordanTimothyJames Silviafanti Back ache AfricanLibrarian M.roszkowski Rhagfyr 沈澄心 MrBenjo S.v.Mering Hiperterminal (talk) מקף Lovelano Ecravo Chado07 SoufiyounsNotified participants of WikiProject Authority controlKethyga (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- No
citablereliable source ["zitierfähige Quelle" in German]. Please delete. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]- @Kolja21: What do you mean with "No citable source"? --Horcrux (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- In the sence of en:WP:SOURCE. But merging is ok with me. --Kolja21 (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kolja21: We are not on Wikipedia, reliability is not a requirement for external identifiers (otherwise we should remove every property about social networks, other wiki websites, including Wikimedia Commons, etc.). --Horcrux (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- In the sence of en:WP:SOURCE. But merging is ok with me. --Kolja21 (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kolja21: What do you mean with "No citable source"? --Horcrux (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good idea, Fandom article ID (P6262) like solution makes sense. --Jklamo (talk) 00:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support merging. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 22:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kethyga: do you propose to also merge P7822 (P7822), P7827 (P7827), P7832 (P7832), P7841 (P7841), P7843 (P7843), P9123 (P9123), P9124 (P9124)? If so, please can you tag them with
{{Property for deletion}}
? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]- Yes, I proposed to merge all these properties. I will tag them soon. Kethyga (talk) 10:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kethyga: I've just did it. --Horcrux (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I proposed to merge all these properties. I will tag them soon. Kethyga (talk) 10:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Trade (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support merging all the properties. --Horcrux (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for tagging the other properties Horcrux, which Kethyga promised to do but did not — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kethyga, Kolja21, Horcrux, Jklamo, Tinker Bell: @MSGJ, Trade: Should one of the existing properties be used for the general Vikidia property or should we request creation of a new one to avoid confusion? --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- IMO a new one should be created. --Horcrux (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikidata:Property proposal/Vikidia ID --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Clear consensus for deletion, data has been migrated to Vikidia article ID (P12800) --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]