Talk:Q25833
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Placentalia (Q25833)
description: infraclass of eutherian mammals
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Placentalia” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Placentalia⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Interwiki conflict  | |||
| Items involved: Q25833Talk, Q993462Talk, Q15303756Talk, Q17092469Talk | Status:  not resolved
| ||
hu:Eutheria clearly says that Eutheria!=Placentalia and points species which are in one but not in another. So may be it was a hurry to join with Q993462. Infovarius (talk) 11:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Placentalia
[edit]Vidu: Q15303756 Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- @FelixReimann:, please comment on your merge. --Infovarius (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- @FelixReimann, Brya, Succu:, so what to do? --Infovarius (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Infovarius, it depends from the taxonomic viewpoint. I think Placentalia (Q15303756) and Eutheria (Q17092469) should connected to Placentalia (Q25833) via said to be the same as (P460). --Succu (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- I can not really tell, they don't look the same to me. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Infovarius, it depends from the taxonomic viewpoint. I think Placentalia (Q15303756) and Eutheria (Q17092469) should connected to Placentalia (Q25833) via said to be the same as (P460). --Succu (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
No rank on taxon rank (P105)
[edit]Does it make sense to have no value for a taxon rank (P105)? See this edit where @Succu: reestablish it. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why do you think so? --Succu (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can we find a source that says that it cannot be given a taxonomic rank? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's not about „cannot be given a taxonomic rank”. The first usage of the name "Placentalia" by Richard Owen (Q151556) did not included a rank assignment. --Succu (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can we find a source that says that it cannot be given a taxonomic rank? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Not a synonym of Eutheria
[edit]Please do not add Eutheria as scientific name for this item, as Placentalia and Eutheria are not synonyms (the latter including the former plus a number of prehistoric forms closer to Placentalia than to other taxa).--Leptictidium (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)