Property talk:P9533

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

audio transcription
transcription of the word/text being spoken in this file
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Allowed entity types are Wikibase MediaInfo (Q59712033), Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase form (Q54285143): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9533#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9533#Scope, SPARQL

RFC on scope

[edit]

Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/audio_transcription_(P9533) opened this day. Yug (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who proposed the property, yes it's intended to include things like signed or whistled languages.
The verb "speak" does not exclude other modalities, see the definitions/examples on wikt:en:speak. In my experience, Deaf people have no problem using the word "speak" to refer to sign language, and the claim that speaking does not include sign language usually comes from non-Deaf people (who, as a group, have a long history of discriminating against Deaf people and treating sign languages as inferior or invalid).
Having "audio" in the property name is more awkward, but over 99% of the files are audio files (I can only find around 3000 sign language videos, whereas Commons has well over 2 million audio files of words) and I can't think of a better label that would not be likely to be misused, so I don't think it would be a good idea (or very useful) to change it. More aliases would make sense though.
I don't think I would include morse code and flags, because those are codes and it seems like it would be more confusing than helpful for the primary aim of this property (which is to store transcriptions of what is being said in files in commons:Category:Pronunciation so that we can fetch examples of how specific words/phrases are said). It's also not obvious what the transcription should even be in those cases (the coded or decoded words?).
- Nikki (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]