Property talk:P1031
Documentation
legal citation of legislation or a court decision
Represents | legal citation (Q6517471) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type | String | ||||||||||||
Template parameter | "citations" in en:template:Infobox court case "citations" in en:template:Infobox SCC "citations" in en:template:Infobox English case "citation" in en:template:Infobox legislation "cite public law" and "cite statutes at large" in en:template:Infobox U.S. legislation | ||||||||||||
Domain |
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementsstatute (Q820655), bill (Q686822), legal act (Q1864008), report (Q10429085), interpellation (Q1505023), sources of law (Q846882), committee directives (Q98491862), written question (Q99045339), command paper (Q905765), white paper (Q223729), public inquiry (Q20669447) or legal concept (Q2135465) | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | .{1,200} | ||||||||||||
Usage notes | Short legal citations, see examples. Items can have more than one value if more than one publisher included it. | ||||||||||||
Example | Miranda v. Arizona (Q1642249) → 384 U.S. 436 86 S. Ct. 1602 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2817 10 A.L.R.3d 974 Criminal Code of Canada (Q2091694) → RSC 1985, c C-46 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (Q3610522) → [1892] EWCA Civ 1 [1893] 1 QB 256 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Q1414593) → 124 Stat. 119 through 124 Stat. 1025 | ||||||||||||
Format and edit filter validation | There are many formats across countries, so it would be hard to set rules. Anything over 20 characters is likely wrong. | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P1031 (Q118210305) | ||||||||||||
See also | U. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063), law identifier (P8550), Standard Citation Forms for Rare Materials Cataloging ID (P9658) | ||||||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Item P1001, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Type Q820655, Q686822, Q1864008, Q10429085, Q1505023, Q846882, Q98491862, Q99045339, Q905765, Q223729, Q20669447, Q2135465, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Entity types
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Scope
[edit]I originally proposed this property for court and tribunal cases, but I now think it can be used for the official citation of statutes and regulations. So, in the constraints I allowed "instance of" any subclass of law (Q7748). If I'm over-reaching the scope of this property, we can restrict it to judicial decisions. --Arctic.gnome (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- I changed the label to make sure that the property is used to describe the citation that corresponds to a legal document, and not to cite the document. As long as it can be sourced, I don't think there is any problem in stretching the property to other legal texts. Please, also note that when the law is actually cited, most of the time we already can compose a legal citation from the information provided.--Micru (talk) 09:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Legal citation for UK legislation
[edit]I'm trying to add this property to Q1757778 (Titles Deprivation Act 1917) with a value of 7 & 8 Geo. 5 c. 47
but, despite adding act of Parliament and Act of Parliament to the classes in the type constraint (probably redundantly), I'm being told that it's a malformed input.
I've not done anything this complicated on Wikidata before; what's the probably-obvious thing that I'm doing wrong? :)
— OwenBlacker (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Distinct values issue
[edit]Running across an interesting problem with the distinct values constraint on this property. Promotion of Bantu Self-government Act, 1959 (Q1446059) and Government Savings Certificates Act, 1959 (Q94345488) both have the value "Act No. 46 of 1959". One of them is a South African act of parliament and the other is an Indian act of parliament. I think that citation values should only be required to be distinct within a jurisdiction; that is to say it is the combination of this property and applies to jurisdiction (P1001) that need to be unique. Is it possible to modify the constraint accordingly? - Htonl (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with string-datatype
- Properties used on 100000+ items
- Properties with unique value constraints
- Properties with constraints on items using them
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with format constraints
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with entity type constraints