Property talk:P1031

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

legal citation of this text
legal citation of legislation or a court decision
Representslegal citation (Q6517471)
Data typeString
Template parameter"citations" in en:template:Infobox court case
"citations" in en:template:Infobox SCC
"citations" in en:template:Infobox English case
"citation" in en:template:Infobox legislation
"cite public law" and "cite statutes at large" in en:template:Infobox U.S. legislation
Domain
According to statements in the property:
statute (Q820655), bill (Q686822), legal act (Q1864008), report (Q10429085), interpellation (Q1505023), sources of law (Q846882), committee directives (Q98491862), written question (Q99045339), command paper (Q905765), white paper (Q223729), public inquiry (Q20669447) or legal concept (Q2135465)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values.{1,200}
Usage notesShort legal citations, see examples. Items can have more than one value if more than one publisher included it.
ExampleMiranda v. Arizona (Q1642249) → 384 U.S. 436
86 S. Ct. 1602
16 L. Ed. 2d 694
1966 U.S. LEXIS 2817
10 A.L.R.3d 974
Criminal Code of Canada (Q2091694) → RSC 1985, c C-46
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (Q3610522) → [1892] EWCA Civ 1
[1893] 1 QB 256
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Q1414593) → 124 Stat. 119 through 124 Stat. 1025
Format and edit filter validationThere are many formats across countries, so it would be hard to set rules. Anything over 20 characters is likely wrong.
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P1031 (Q118210305)
See alsoU. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063), law identifier (P8550), Standard Citation Forms for Rare Materials Cataloging ID (P9658)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total608,963
Main statement598,35498.3% of uses
Qualifier10,1781.7% of uses
Reference431<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Item “applies to jurisdiction (P1001): Items with this property should also have “applies to jurisdiction (P1001)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Item P1001, search, SPARQL
Format “.{1,200}: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1031#Entity types

Scope

[edit]

I originally proposed this property for court and tribunal cases, but I now think it can be used for the official citation of statutes and regulations. So, in the constraints I allowed "instance of" any subclass of law (Q7748). If I'm over-reaching the scope of this property, we can restrict it to judicial decisions. --Arctic.gnome (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the label to make sure that the property is used to describe the citation that corresponds to a legal document, and not to cite the document. As long as it can be sourced, I don't think there is any problem in stretching the property to other legal texts. Please, also note that when the law is actually cited, most of the time we already can compose a legal citation from the information provided.--Micru (talk) 09:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm trying to add this property to Q1757778 (Titles Deprivation Act 1917) with a value of 7 & 8 Geo. 5 c. 47 but, despite adding act of Parliament and Act of Parliament to the classes in the type constraint (probably redundantly), I'm being told that it's a malformed input.

I've not done anything this complicated on Wikidata before; what's the probably-obvious thing that I'm doing wrong? :)

OwenBlacker (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Distinct values issue

[edit]

Running across an interesting problem with the distinct values constraint on this property. Promotion of Bantu Self-government Act, 1959 (Q1446059) and Government Savings Certificates Act, 1959 (Q94345488) both have the value "Act No. 46 of 1959". One of them is a South African act of parliament and the other is an Indian act of parliament. I think that citation values should only be required to be distinct within a jurisdiction; that is to say it is the combination of this property and applies to jurisdiction (P1001) that need to be unique. Is it possible to modify the constraint accordingly? - Htonl (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]