RSS
A few weeks ago, I appeared on Post-Politika, a small Russian liberal debate/discussion YouTube channel with a thousand subscribers. A friend produced a highlight of my takes; the full video can be found here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCPug-9QAuY
Unfortunately it was all in Russian, with no translation.
But the gist of it was that they invited three people – far left sociologist Karina Pipia from the Levada Center, whose views would have made her a honorary member of this clique; a center-left demographics grad student from the HSE, Daniil Kashnitsky; and yours truly for the nationalist position.
Topics (machine translated):
– At what level is racism manifested in Russia?
– Why did the American events cause a sharp reaction in Russian society?
– What are the reasons for xenophobia in Russia and how can Soviet nationality policy be connected with it?
– How does the economy affect the problem of racism in the country?
– Is the emergence of ethnic ghettos possible in Russia?
– Does “state” culture reproduce racist stereotypes?
I was given the impression that it would be a debate, and so was a bit blindsided when it emerged that it would consist of 20-30 minute presentations instead. They also banned some of my supporters from the chat, e.g. Vile Varangian, clearly making it somewhat of a controlled forum.
So bearing that in mind, I don’t think my performance was too bad.
Here are my main points:
- Intro to Race Realism 101
- The common takes – race specific illnesses; physical differences (Kenyan marathoners, Bajau divers, etc).
- Did evolution stop above the head 50,000 years ago?
- Magic dirt theory: No evidence of full convergence after Third Worlders immigrate.
- Correlation of national IQ with socio-economic success, outliers are strictly either countries with Communist legacy or have oil windfalls.
- Immediately complain about racism when coming here, citing Nigerian scammer Roy Obonga and the fired Bryansk taxi driver.
- US institutional racism?
- Yes, it exists: Affirmative action; disparate impact laws; Federal Reserve now targeting Black unemployment.
- Arrested more than whites because 13/50
- Floyd was a criminal degenerate whose life DID NOT matter.
- Confronted those libs for trying to colonize the Russian language (current woke lib project is to change Russian language usage from Negroes/негры, to blackskins/чернокожие).
- Soviet anti-racism?
- Of course it existed!
- … And now, fully revealing my power level, I began to recount the statistics of Jewish overrepresentation in the Cheka and NKVD (at which point, the hilarious “something went wrong” comment in the internal Discord chat).
- Latvia and Estonia were only regions of Russian Empire where solid majority voted for Bolsheviks in 1917, and the Red Latvian Riflemen were key to imposing Soviet power over Russians in 1918, they thus DESERVED to be subsequently occupied by the Soviet Union.
- All republics in the USSR apart from the RSFSR enjoyed positive net transfers, what a strange system of racism and colonial exploitation.
- Russian anti-racism?
- Ethnic lobbies allowed, Russian nationalist organizations repressed – all with the support for you liberal hypocrites.
- Mentioned Russian slaves in Dagestani brick factories.
- Mentioned how Konstantin Krylov had an extremism case launched against him for saying it is “time to do away with this strange economic model” [of federal transfers to the Caucasus].
- Cited Levada’s own polls – the organization where woke sociologist Pipia herself works – that the vast majority of ethnic minorities in Russia say they do not experience racism.
- In a subsequent exchange, Pipia rejoindered that those polls are not accurate, since oppressed minorities may be too fearful to truthfully relay the reality of Russian oppression to pollsters.
- Georgians are the majority of thieves in law.
- No mention of ethnic Russians in the Constitution until 2020.
Overall, I think I succeeded in shocking and triggering those libs, while the comments in the internal Discord chat were very negative with the stereotypical SJW stuff about “when is he getting out his calipers?”, the actual YouTube live chat and subsequent comments were all positive.
This was quite encouraging, since it demonstrates that a solid majority of people, even amongst the younger/online people listening in to lib politics discussions, are still “based” as opposed to woke.
Nonetheless, it was also something of an aha moment along the lines of what I encountered in Berkeley c.2013, as more than ever I realized that Russian SJWs do exist and not just on Twitter.
In the discussion at the end, which was not recorded, someone asked me a question if dialogue between Russia, Europe, and the US was still possible on these questions (racism, culture, etc). I expressed guarded skepticism, noticing that the socio-cultural gulf between Russia and the West was arguably wider now than it had been even in the 1970s, with the spread of cultural Marxism and soft totalitarianism in the West. At this point, another participant – an outright Communist/SJW type – asked me to expound how the West is totalitarian. I mentioned how certain speech is out of bounds, on social media, with consequences potentially extending to jobs, usage of services like Uber, Airbnb, etc. He replied that, “well, if they say and write racist things, so what.” When I mentioned this includes things like sex differences in personality, such as girls being on average more interested in people while boys are more interested in mechanical objects, he said something along the lines of, “well, they should think before they justify the patriarchy.” He also happened to be a vegan. “So, like, boys preferring cars and soldiers and girls dollars is a social construct of the patriarchy?” “Yes, he’s why and why.”
I truly did not expect to encounter such a creature in the wild in Russia yet, and absent a resounding zinger, I replied that I hoped he would never get into power and said it’s time to rebuild the Iron Wall before his types infect more people. The ensuing “debate” was between him and some other extreme SJW soylings, and the majority, who were all libs but reasonably sane (at least not to the point of pretending sex differences are all a social construct). With the SJWs defending deplatforming and revolutionary violence while the libs were mostly against it, especially the latter. At that point I logged off, had nothing more to add at that point.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Persian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Please keep off topic posts to the current Open Thread.
If you are new to my work, start here.
Could you please post a source for this allegation ? And did People's Republics like Poland also enjoy such transfers from Russia ?
Thank you.Replies: @Denis, @AP
As I said before, I’m a bit skeptical of this.
The difficulty is how do we account for things other than rubles, and what methods should we use? Like, what is the value of Azerbaijani oil, if the USSR didn’t pump any of it? And how exactly do we account for it? Current prices, peak prices, or what a US company would have given, at the time? Or what a czarist Russia would have given? How do you put a price tag on the USSR having required Azerbaijani oil to survive WW2?
I’m not saying send money to them, or feel sorry for them, or open the border for them (would they even come?), but I think it’s rather unkind and probably inaccurate to call them a net drain.
Quite alarming to see these types coming out in the open in Russia. I used to work with Russians and they were all in stitches when we encountered a tranny inspector in some port in the USA. I didn’t expect to see these types in Russia. The thing to do is limit western influence via the internet (very hard).
There's also the possibility of just arresting dangerous lunatics like this. They certainly will imprison all of their political opponents when they get the chance, the authorities should respond in kind. There's even a justification within the current soft-liberal paradigm: hate speech against ethnic Russians amd Christians.Replies: @King_Ecbert, @Erik Sieven
Why can Russia not construct its own “great firewall”? China has proven the concept is sound. Every country that wants to have any level of autonomy and sovereignty from the US should be limiting the ammount of US propaganda delivered to its citizens. Of course there’s nothing that’s impossible to get around for those who want to expend the effort, but most people will just never bother. Really it serves almost the same function as state media “cancelling” or deplatforming people in the west. Sure they still exist, but their reach is extremely shortened and most people won’t bother to seek them out.
There’s also the possibility of just arresting dangerous lunatics like this. They certainly will imprison all of their political opponents when they get the chance, the authorities should respond in kind. There’s even a justification within the current soft-liberal paradigm: hate speech against ethnic Russians amd Christians.
Any Russian who drinks soy and isn’t lactose intolerant should be sent to Wrangle Island, post haste. Their naturally low TFR should leave plenty of space for de-extincting megafauna from the Pleistocene. And saber-tooths should be given precedence over woolies, in order to augment the guards.
“boys preferring cars and soldiers and girls dollars is a social construct “
Bit of a Freudian type, surely? Although ‘dollars’ for ‘dolls’ still makes sense.
Karina must be Russian name for Karen. Maybe if she wasn’t such a Karen people would not be so fearful of talking to her and her polls would be more accurate.
Not a slip….. At least I do not think so.
PEACE 😇
_______
Bit of a Freudian type, surely? Although 'dollars' for 'dolls' still makes sense.Replies: @mal
Girls do like dollars. That is no lie.
There's also the possibility of just arresting dangerous lunatics like this. They certainly will imprison all of their political opponents when they get the chance, the authorities should respond in kind. There's even a justification within the current soft-liberal paradigm: hate speech against ethnic Russians amd Christians.Replies: @King_Ecbert, @Erik Sieven
I certainly hope your enthusiasm is warranted. This current mindvirus seems to be quite strong, then again we can’t predict the future.
There's also the possibility of just arresting dangerous lunatics like this. They certainly will imprison all of their political opponents when they get the chance, the authorities should respond in kind. There's even a justification within the current soft-liberal paradigm: hate speech against ethnic Russians amd Christians.Replies: @King_Ecbert, @Erik Sieven
I´d rather live in a society where people with other views than myself do not get arrested because of that.
We'd all love a world without war, yet those societies which are never prepared to fight one that is thrust upon them won't be around to see how the world shakes out at all.
Is Twitter Russia censored like Twitter US & UK?
By the way, one reason why SJW-ism spread all over the world isn’t merely due to Jewish Media Global domination. It’s because even anti-American and anti-globalist governments and nations employ SJW talking points as counter-propaganda against the US(and the West).
Consider Chinese who say ‘black lives matter’. Why? Because it’s an easy talking point to shame the US that is always criticizing, excoriating, and condemning other nations for its ‘human rights abuses’. So naturally, to get back at the US, even anti-American nations will strike at America’s Achilles Heel by invoking ‘woke’ tropes. In a way, most criticisms of other regimes, societies, and nations tend to be ‘leftish’ in character regardless of the political orientation of the regime in charge. Why? Leftism is about complaints, whereas rightism is about appreciation and reverence. While leftism does have its heroes and saints to revere, it is fundamentally founded on discontent with reality, the system, the order, and etc. It is naturally more polemical than the right. So, the easiest way to discredit or undermine another system is by pointing out all the flaws. And in this, even right-wing regimes end up playing the ‘leftist’ game. Whether the Soviet Union or reconstituted Russia, an easy propaganda coup to smear the US has been by pointing out its racial problems, especially pertaining to blacks. Soviets made it seem like USSR is the land of the free and equal whereas the US was a nation of rich and poor, white power and black misery. And watch some RT news today, and it often pushes ‘leftist’ talking points. Of course, not so much about Russia but about the West. It hires Western ‘liberals’ and ‘leftists’ because they make the most reliable attack dogs against the West itself. Like Chris Hedges who sees the US as one big penal colony and something out of the movie BRAZIL.
Now, one can criticize a nation, people, culture, or system from the rightist perspective, but rightist energy isn’t about complaining 24/7. Even the purity spirals of Christianity are more ‘leftist’ in character. Conservative Christianity is more about acceptance and resignation and preservation of the status quo. It’s Radical Christianity that is ‘triggered’ by how much the Church has fallen or isn’t doing enough. In Martin Luther’s time, this had a salutary effect as Protestant Reformers were serious theologians on the meaning of Christ. In today’s world, with Christianity remaining as a mere shell in the West, most so-called Christians are really post-Christians who believe the church has relevance merely as a homeless shelter or outpost for various causes with higher ‘spiritual’ prestige(as decided by Jewish Power that controls the Narrative). As the main faith in the West is now Jews-Homos-Negroes and Diversity(though secondary to Jews-Homos-Negroes), so many churches feel they must accommodate to serving those holy themes. The ‘conservative’ churches tend to stick closer to the traditional faith but even they are more into Jew-worship than God-worship. What is the #1 theme of Evangelicalism? ‘Muh Israel’. And as even Evangelicals are beginning to soften on the Homo issue and get all worked up over ‘racism’, it’s becoming just another kind of SJW church.
Who are the main beneficiaries of all this? Jews and Negroes. On Jews, the argument between Russia and US isn’t about pro-Jews vs anti-Jews but about pro-pro-pro-Jews vs pro-pro-pro-pro-Jews. It’s a game of which side is more pro-Jewish. Russia will say it defeated Nazism, saved Jews, protects Jews, and has close ties with Israel. US will say it is about loving Jews, remembering Holocaust, and protecting Jews from ‘antisemitism’. Now, given that Jews have really messed up Russia with both communism and gangster capitalism, Russia should be anti-Jewish. And US should have woken up by now that Jews are a hostile minority. But as Jews have such media and financial control, all sides feel they must justify themselves as the biggest enemy of ‘antisemitism’… or else be condemned as ‘nazis’. So, even as the Jews went about undermining Trump and Russia, all we hear from both sides is ‘we love Jews’.
And Negroes are also great beneficiaries. From the US side, so much is made of how the nation has come a long way from the dark yrs of slavery and Jim Crow. US uses the black issue as a huge point of pride. “We were once bad to blacks, but now, we see how magical they are and elevate them to demigod status. We love Negroes!!!” But as blacks continue to be socially mired in poverty and complain so much about ‘white supremacist’ America, nations like Russia, China, Iran, and others jump at the chance of saying, “WE CARE ABOUT THEM POOR HELPLESS NEGROES who are so oppressed, exploited, and mistreated in the ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’ US.” As a result, both white Americans and peoples abroad come under the spell of Negrolatry. White Americans want to take pride in having come a long way and rolling out the red carpet for the Negroes. And ‘enemy nations’ of America want to take pride in standing up for Negroes as the perennial victims of American ‘racism’ and white supremacy. Indeed, whether a nation is rightist or leftist, what easier way to rhetorically strike back at the US than by invoking the Black Issue? After all, whereas Jews are super-rich and homos are very privileged in the US, many blacks are still doing poorly. Now, we know why. Blacks are tougher, more impulsive, more given to psychopathy, and less intelligent. That means black frustration with life will often turn to crime and violence and scaring whitey. But many Russians and Chinese only know about Black American Reality through Western Propaganda.
The current West(led by the US) is the most schizo kind of empire ever. Traditionally, empires totally took pride in their imperial glory. This was true of British Empire, Ottoman Empire, and Soviet Empire. Granted, the British Empire did have second thoughts and something like a conscience, as it eventually worked to end the slave trade and the sale of opium. Still, for most of its existence, it was about power and glory. The Soviet Empire was based on leftist ideology, but under Leninism-Stalinism, it allowed no criticism of the Revolution and the System. As such, it was about total revolutionary pride and almost zilch self-criticism.
In contrast, the US empire, though extremely aggressive and arrogant, has as its foundation a kind of self-loathing. US has the most powerful military, biggest economy, and the most aggressive financial imperialism around the world, but so much of US narrative is “US history sucks cuz of ‘racism’”, “Christianity sucks because of ‘homophobia’”, “white men are rapists of coeds”, “white people are a**holes, white privilege is evil, white fragility is problematic, etc.” White America has been the Core America from the beginning, but it is constantly attacked, berated, demeaned, insulted, and humiliated. And as youngsters are impressionable, so many white kids have internalized these propaganda points pushed by Jews.
In a way, one might say US is a very proud and robust empire in that there is no criticism of Jewish Power, the top power that rules. US is about Jews, Jews, Jews and ‘muh Israel’ from the elites of both parties. In that sense, US empire is like empires of old: It is indeed about the power and glory of Jews. But the neo-imperial narrative is rarely about what the US is really about: Jewish Hegemonic pride. But then, Jews are only 2% of the population and very nervous as rulers. Can an empire sustain itself by elevating the 2% over the majority of whites? Or, are Jews fixing to use Diversity as New Majority as its loyal servants? But can Diversity be as reliable as white cucks and as competent? An empire that glorifies the great majority is surely more stable than one that glorifies a tiny minority. After all, British Imperialist prestige was more stable in the mother country of UK than in India where the British elites had to keep Hindu identity and pride suppressed as a ‘national identity’.
But on the other hand, clever Jews may have come upon a formidable formula for empire. After all, what was one of the major reasons for the fall of empires? The subject peoples eventually tired of the occupying power and began to resist. So, the British, French, and Ottoman empires fell apart. But what if an empire erases all notions of conquering people and subject peoples? In other words, while the US military may invade other nations and dominate much of the world, peoples from all over the world can come to the US and become ‘Americans’. Or they can go to Europe and become ‘Europeans’. Thus, if old empires were a one-way street in the flow of power, the new empire is a two-way street. ‘Invade-Invite’ means both worlds get transformed. US changes the world with bombs and money, but the world changes the US as immigrant hordes and new elites. In time, they join in the metropole, enter the military, become professors & journalists, and etc. Indeed, consider how so many Third World elites are now pro-imperialist than anti-imperialist. They figure more Western access to their nations means more access to the West on their part. “They take from us, but we take from them.” Also, there’s the sense that “they criticize us for our human rights problems, but they are also busy criticizing themselves for their human rights problems. Indeed, white professors teach our children to criticize and condemn white supremacism and white racism.” (Now, one may argue that the Soviets pioneered this kind of empire, one where Russians had no special privileges over other peoples. A Russian could lord over others, but others could lord over Russians. It was an empire of ideology than identity. Ethnicity mattered less than dogma, i.e. a Lithuanian communist had more power than a Russian reactionary. But as communism was so repressive, it failed to capture the imagination of the world. Who wanted to emigrate to communist nations?) So, this kind of imperialism seems truly ‘enlightened’ and fair. Unlike old imperialism, it’s not about one people conquering and dominating another but ALL THE PEOPLE coming under liberal hegemony. And within this New World Order, whites are just as likely(if not more so) to come under criticism on grounds of ‘racism’ and etc.
Of course, it’s far more complicated than that. Empire of Enlightenment is really a ruse, an illusion. After all, if indeed it’s true that ALL peoples should come under criticism and scrutiny, why is there so little talk of Jewish Power, the most powerful power in the West and thus in the world? Why are Jews praised and ‘protected’ all over the world, from Russia to the US? Why does even Iran go about making a case that “We take good care of our Jews?” How come BLM and Antifa activists hardly go after Jews, and when they do, they get crushed like a bug? Empire of Enlightenment or EOE is really a Jewish Supremacist World Order that creates the impression of New Western Values of ‘Diversity’ and ‘Inclusion’ by making it seem like the West is still marked by White Supremacism. Thus, all good peoples — Jews, Muslims, blacks, yellows, browns, Hindus, ‘good white liberals’, tolerable white cuckservatives, homos, trannies, feminists, and etc. — must all join forces to fight this evil scourge. This creates the impression that all is fair in the New World Order. (Besides, Jews push Diversity on grounds of “Is it good for Jews?” More goy diversity means Jews can play divide-and-rule among bickering goyim.) Gee, the West may invade and bomb other nations, but it is NOT in the service of White Supremacism but ‘spreading democracy’ and ‘fighting terror’. How can it be about supremacism when the West is most committed to stamping out ‘white racism’ and even ‘white privilege’? If anything, the West invites tons of non-white migrants to Europe and immigrants to the US to join forces with ‘good whites’ to combat White Supremacism. The children of immigrants are taught by good whites to hate ‘white racism’ as the greatest evil. But, this is to totally overlook the fact that Jewish Supremacism than white supremacism rules the West. It overlooks the fact that Jewish Supremacists are using white mercenary soldiers to destroy other nations, mostly Muslim, and not for ‘spreading democracy’ or ‘fighting terror’ but for the interests of Zion and Jewish Power. And it is blind to the fact that Jews invoke ‘white supremacism’ to deflect attention from Jewish Supremacism as the true master of the West. Even BLM is a ploy on the part of Jews to keep blacks hating whites and to keep whites being paralyzed with ‘white guilt’. And what is globo-homo-mania but a Jewish agenda to replace Christianity and natural normality with Queertianity and minority-elite privilege?
In all this, blacks may be the greatest beneficiaries, indeed even more so than Jews. After all, whereas Jews must work very hard to maintain the current World Order, blacks need only sit back and bask in all the love from all the world. Some worthless Negro, Fentanyl Floyd, dies of drug overdose, and all the world loves blacks. Democrats cheer on black rage, GOP doesn’t object. Donald Trump says Fentanyl Floyd is an angel looking down on us. European nations broke out in BLM protests. (Some of this was naive and sincere in the spirit of Negrolatry. But it was cynical in some cases as knee-jerk Anti-Americanism. What easier way to justify Anti-Americanism than by mentioning the Black Problem, especially as the universally accepted narrative says black problems are mostly the result of ‘legacy of white racism’?) So, blacks can just sit on their ass while both pro-American and anti-American forces around the world chant BLM. After all, BLM is both a form of US imperialism and a form of anti-US imperialism. It is promoted even by US embassies. BLM has officially been declared as the new anthem of America. Americans should take pride in it as the Second Civil Rights. The fact that so many Americans care about Black Lives and condemn ‘white supremacist’ police brutality means US is a progressive and conscientious nation. So, kudos to America!! (It is also a good way to unseat the white supremacist literally hitler Trump who isn’t a real US president but Putin’s Puppet or Siberian Candidate.) But BLM is also useful for the ‘enemies’ of the US. Iran and China are having a field day, watching American cities fall to SJW insurrections that paint the US as an evil nation. The shaming of America taints its image around the world.
In either case, it becomes a game of Tug-A-Gro(Tug-A-Negro). US and its allies tug on the Negro as their darling race, and anti-American nations tug on the Negro to show their love for blacks who are oppressed by US and the West. So, blacks get everything from all sides from this. They not only get adulation in the West but from the Anti-West. The West says, “We are so sorry for the legacy of racism, and we are doing everything and much more to make things so much better for Blacks or BLACKS”, and the Anti-West says, “Oh boo hoo, we weep for those wonderful magical innocent Negroes being mistreated by Evil White Racists in the US and West.” So, blacks can just sit pretty(or ugly) and receive alms and accolades from all sides. The typical US-China insult-fest goes like this: “Look how those evil Chinese are so ‘racist’ and treating black Africans like animals whereas we good Americans care so very much about blacks” vs “Look how ‘racist’ America is oppressing those noble innocent blacks whereas we Chinese are committed to justice and invest so much in Africa to help out the poor blacks.” Pure Tug-A-Gro. With Negroes gaining so much from conflicts among non-blacks, they may inherit the world as they are now above criticism from all sides. It’s like J. Wellington Wimpy gets all the food while Popeye and Bluto fight one another. It’s like Negrollar is the Moral Currency of the World. Because blacks were slaves in the US(the most powerful nation on Earth), black nations/communities are the poorest & most pitiable, blacks tend to be shamelessly vocal(thereby gaining the most attention), and blacks have cool-cred as athletes and rappers(and dong-butt folks), they are both objects of sympathy and fascination.
By the way, one reason why SJW-ism spread all over the world isn't merely due to Jewish Media Global domination. It's because even anti-American and anti-globalist governments and nations employ SJW talking points as counter-propaganda against the US(and the West).
Consider Chinese who say 'black lives matter'. Why? Because it's an easy talking point to shame the US that is always criticizing, excoriating, and condemning other nations for its 'human rights abuses'. So naturally, to get back at the US, even anti-American nations will strike at America's Achilles Heel by invoking 'woke' tropes. In a way, most criticisms of other regimes, societies, and nations tend to be 'leftish' in character regardless of the political orientation of the regime in charge. Why? Leftism is about complaints, whereas rightism is about appreciation and reverence. While leftism does have its heroes and saints to revere, it is fundamentally founded on discontent with reality, the system, the order, and etc. It is naturally more polemical than the right. So, the easiest way to discredit or undermine another system is by pointing out all the flaws. And in this, even right-wing regimes end up playing the 'leftist' game. Whether the Soviet Union or reconstituted Russia, an easy propaganda coup to smear the US has been by pointing out its racial problems, especially pertaining to blacks. Soviets made it seem like USSR is the land of the free and equal whereas the US was a nation of rich and poor, white power and black misery. And watch some RT news today, and it often pushes 'leftist' talking points. Of course, not so much about Russia but about the West. It hires Western 'liberals' and 'leftists' because they make the most reliable attack dogs against the West itself. Like Chris Hedges who sees the US as one big penal colony and something out of the movie BRAZIL.
Now, one can criticize a nation, people, culture, or system from the rightist perspective, but rightist energy isn't about complaining 24/7. Even the purity spirals of Christianity are more 'leftist' in character. Conservative Christianity is more about acceptance and resignation and preservation of the status quo. It's Radical Christianity that is 'triggered' by how much the Church has fallen or isn't doing enough. In Martin Luther's time, this had a salutary effect as Protestant Reformers were serious theologians on the meaning of Christ. In today's world, with Christianity remaining as a mere shell in the West, most so-called Christians are really post-Christians who believe the church has relevance merely as a homeless shelter or outpost for various causes with higher 'spiritual' prestige(as decided by Jewish Power that controls the Narrative). As the main faith in the West is now Jews-Homos-Negroes and Diversity(though secondary to Jews-Homos-Negroes), so many churches feel they must accommodate to serving those holy themes. The 'conservative' churches tend to stick closer to the traditional faith but even they are more into Jew-worship than God-worship. What is the #1 theme of Evangelicalism? 'Muh Israel'. And as even Evangelicals are beginning to soften on the Homo issue and get all worked up over 'racism', it's becoming just another kind of SJW church.
Who are the main beneficiaries of all this? Jews and Negroes. On Jews, the argument between Russia and US isn't about pro-Jews vs anti-Jews but about pro-pro-pro-Jews vs pro-pro-pro-pro-Jews. It's a game of which side is more pro-Jewish. Russia will say it defeated Nazism, saved Jews, protects Jews, and has close ties with Israel. US will say it is about loving Jews, remembering Holocaust, and protecting Jews from 'antisemitism'. Now, given that Jews have really messed up Russia with both communism and gangster capitalism, Russia should be anti-Jewish. And US should have woken up by now that Jews are a hostile minority. But as Jews have such media and financial control, all sides feel they must justify themselves as the biggest enemy of 'antisemitism'... or else be condemned as 'nazis'. So, even as the Jews went about undermining Trump and Russia, all we hear from both sides is 'we love Jews'.
And Negroes are also great beneficiaries. From the US side, so much is made of how the nation has come a long way from the dark yrs of slavery and Jim Crow. US uses the black issue as a huge point of pride. "We were once bad to blacks, but now, we see how magical they are and elevate them to demigod status. We love Negroes!!!" But as blacks continue to be socially mired in poverty and complain so much about 'white supremacist' America, nations like Russia, China, Iran, and others jump at the chance of saying, "WE CARE ABOUT THEM POOR HELPLESS NEGROES who are so oppressed, exploited, and mistreated in the 'racist' and 'white supremacist' US." As a result, both white Americans and peoples abroad come under the spell of Negrolatry. White Americans want to take pride in having come a long way and rolling out the red carpet for the Negroes. And 'enemy nations' of America want to take pride in standing up for Negroes as the perennial victims of American 'racism' and white supremacy. Indeed, whether a nation is rightist or leftist, what easier way to rhetorically strike back at the US than by invoking the Black Issue? After all, whereas Jews are super-rich and homos are very privileged in the US, many blacks are still doing poorly. Now, we know why. Blacks are tougher, more impulsive, more given to psychopathy, and less intelligent. That means black frustration with life will often turn to crime and violence and scaring whitey. But many Russians and Chinese only know about Black American Reality through Western Propaganda.
The current West(led by the US) is the most schizo kind of empire ever. Traditionally, empires totally took pride in their imperial glory. This was true of British Empire, Ottoman Empire, and Soviet Empire. Granted, the British Empire did have second thoughts and something like a conscience, as it eventually worked to end the slave trade and the sale of opium. Still, for most of its existence, it was about power and glory. The Soviet Empire was based on leftist ideology, but under Leninism-Stalinism, it allowed no criticism of the Revolution and the System. As such, it was about total revolutionary pride and almost zilch self-criticism.
In contrast, the US empire, though extremely aggressive and arrogant, has as its foundation a kind of self-loathing. US has the most powerful military, biggest economy, and the most aggressive financial imperialism around the world, but so much of US narrative is "US history sucks cuz of 'racism'", "Christianity sucks because of 'homophobia'", "white men are rapists of coeds", "white people are a**holes, white privilege is evil, white fragility is problematic, etc." White America has been the Core America from the beginning, but it is constantly attacked, berated, demeaned, insulted, and humiliated. And as youngsters are impressionable, so many white kids have internalized these propaganda points pushed by Jews.
In a way, one might say US is a very proud and robust empire in that there is no criticism of Jewish Power, the top power that rules. US is about Jews, Jews, Jews and 'muh Israel' from the elites of both parties. In that sense, US empire is like empires of old: It is indeed about the power and glory of Jews. But the neo-imperial narrative is rarely about what the US is really about: Jewish Hegemonic pride. But then, Jews are only 2% of the population and very nervous as rulers. Can an empire sustain itself by elevating the 2% over the majority of whites? Or, are Jews fixing to use Diversity as New Majority as its loyal servants? But can Diversity be as reliable as white cucks and as competent? An empire that glorifies the great majority is surely more stable than one that glorifies a tiny minority. After all, British Imperialist prestige was more stable in the mother country of UK than in India where the British elites had to keep Hindu identity and pride suppressed as a 'national identity'.
But on the other hand, clever Jews may have come upon a formidable formula for empire. After all, what was one of the major reasons for the fall of empires? The subject peoples eventually tired of the occupying power and began to resist. So, the British, French, and Ottoman empires fell apart. But what if an empire erases all notions of conquering people and subject peoples? In other words, while the US military may invade other nations and dominate much of the world, peoples from all over the world can come to the US and become 'Americans'. Or they can go to Europe and become 'Europeans'. Thus, if old empires were a one-way street in the flow of power, the new empire is a two-way street. 'Invade-Invite' means both worlds get transformed. US changes the world with bombs and money, but the world changes the US as immigrant hordes and new elites. In time, they join in the metropole, enter the military, become professors & journalists, and etc. Indeed, consider how so many Third World elites are now pro-imperialist than anti-imperialist. They figure more Western access to their nations means more access to the West on their part. "They take from us, but we take from them." Also, there's the sense that "they criticize us for our human rights problems, but they are also busy criticizing themselves for their human rights problems. Indeed, white professors teach our children to criticize and condemn white supremacism and white racism." (Now, one may argue that the Soviets pioneered this kind of empire, one where Russians had no special privileges over other peoples. A Russian could lord over others, but others could lord over Russians. It was an empire of ideology than identity. Ethnicity mattered less than dogma, i.e. a Lithuanian communist had more power than a Russian reactionary. But as communism was so repressive, it failed to capture the imagination of the world. Who wanted to emigrate to communist nations?) So, this kind of imperialism seems truly 'enlightened' and fair. Unlike old imperialism, it's not about one people conquering and dominating another but ALL THE PEOPLE coming under liberal hegemony. And within this New World Order, whites are just as likely(if not more so) to come under criticism on grounds of 'racism' and etc.
Of course, it's far more complicated than that. Empire of Enlightenment is really a ruse, an illusion. After all, if indeed it's true that ALL peoples should come under criticism and scrutiny, why is there so little talk of Jewish Power, the most powerful power in the West and thus in the world? Why are Jews praised and 'protected' all over the world, from Russia to the US? Why does even Iran go about making a case that "We take good care of our Jews?" How come BLM and Antifa activists hardly go after Jews, and when they do, they get crushed like a bug? Empire of Enlightenment or EOE is really a Jewish Supremacist World Order that creates the impression of New Western Values of 'Diversity' and 'Inclusion' by making it seem like the West is still marked by White Supremacism. Thus, all good peoples — Jews, Muslims, blacks, yellows, browns, Hindus, 'good white liberals', tolerable white cuckservatives, homos, trannies, feminists, and etc. — must all join forces to fight this evil scourge. This creates the impression that all is fair in the New World Order. (Besides, Jews push Diversity on grounds of "Is it good for Jews?" More goy diversity means Jews can play divide-and-rule among bickering goyim.) Gee, the West may invade and bomb other nations, but it is NOT in the service of White Supremacism but 'spreading democracy' and 'fighting terror'. How can it be about supremacism when the West is most committed to stamping out 'white racism' and even 'white privilege'? If anything, the West invites tons of non-white migrants to Europe and immigrants to the US to join forces with 'good whites' to combat White Supremacism. The children of immigrants are taught by good whites to hate 'white racism' as the greatest evil. But, this is to totally overlook the fact that Jewish Supremacism than white supremacism rules the West. It overlooks the fact that Jewish Supremacists are using white mercenary soldiers to destroy other nations, mostly Muslim, and not for 'spreading democracy' or 'fighting terror' but for the interests of Zion and Jewish Power. And it is blind to the fact that Jews invoke 'white supremacism' to deflect attention from Jewish Supremacism as the true master of the West. Even BLM is a ploy on the part of Jews to keep blacks hating whites and to keep whites being paralyzed with 'white guilt'. And what is globo-homo-mania but a Jewish agenda to replace Christianity and natural normality with Queertianity and minority-elite privilege?
In all this, blacks may be the greatest beneficiaries, indeed even more so than Jews. After all, whereas Jews must work very hard to maintain the current World Order, blacks need only sit back and bask in all the love from all the world. Some worthless Negro, Fentanyl Floyd, dies of drug overdose, and all the world loves blacks. Democrats cheer on black rage, GOP doesn't object. Donald Trump says Fentanyl Floyd is an angel looking down on us. European nations broke out in BLM protests. (Some of this was naive and sincere in the spirit of Negrolatry. But it was cynical in some cases as knee-jerk Anti-Americanism. What easier way to justify Anti-Americanism than by mentioning the Black Problem, especially as the universally accepted narrative says black problems are mostly the result of 'legacy of white racism'?) So, blacks can just sit on their ass while both pro-American and anti-American forces around the world chant BLM. After all, BLM is both a form of US imperialism and a form of anti-US imperialism. It is promoted even by US embassies. BLM has officially been declared as the new anthem of America. Americans should take pride in it as the Second Civil Rights. The fact that so many Americans care about Black Lives and condemn 'white supremacist' police brutality means US is a progressive and conscientious nation. So, kudos to America!! (It is also a good way to unseat the white supremacist literally hitler Trump who isn't a real US president but Putin's Puppet or Siberian Candidate.) But BLM is also useful for the 'enemies' of the US. Iran and China are having a field day, watching American cities fall to SJW insurrections that paint the US as an evil nation. The shaming of America taints its image around the world.
In either case, it becomes a game of Tug-A-Gro(Tug-A-Negro). US and its allies tug on the Negro as their darling race, and anti-American nations tug on the Negro to show their love for blacks who are oppressed by US and the West. So, blacks get everything from all sides from this. They not only get adulation in the West but from the Anti-West. The West says, "We are so sorry for the legacy of racism, and we are doing everything and much more to make things so much better for Blacks or BLACKS", and the Anti-West says, "Oh boo hoo, we weep for those wonderful magical innocent Negroes being mistreated by Evil White Racists in the US and West." So, blacks can just sit pretty(or ugly) and receive alms and accolades from all sides. The typical US-China insult-fest goes like this: "Look how those evil Chinese are so 'racist' and treating black Africans like animals whereas we good Americans care so very much about blacks" vs "Look how 'racist' America is oppressing those noble innocent blacks whereas we Chinese are committed to justice and invest so much in Africa to help out the poor blacks." Pure Tug-A-Gro. With Negroes gaining so much from conflicts among non-blacks, they may inherit the world as they are now above criticism from all sides. It's like J. Wellington Wimpy gets all the food while Popeye and Bluto fight one another. It's like Negrollar is the Moral Currency of the World. Because blacks were slaves in the US(the most powerful nation on Earth), black nations/communities are the poorest & most pitiable, blacks tend to be shamelessly vocal(thereby gaining the most attention), and blacks have cool-cred as athletes and rappers(and dong-butt folks), they are both objects of sympathy and fascination.Replies: @Daniel Chieh
How do you manage to write so many words?
By the way I think Priss Factor has the highest word count of all the commentors on Unz.com 2,327,900 Words.Replies: @fnn
AK appreciates Effortposts, so I guess this is a good thing?
By the way I think Priss Factor has the highest word count of all the commentors on Unz.com 2,327,900 Words.
If you are new to my work, start here.Replies: @Maïkl Makfaïl
“All republics in the USSR apart from the RSFSR enjoyed positive net transfers, what a strange system of racism and colonial exploitation.”
Could you please post a source for this allegation ? And did People’s Republics like Poland also enjoy such transfers from Russia ?
Thank you.
Maybe the precisely why the right is losing is that instead of using facts and logic, they should try to use oratory and rhetoric instead? I mean all solutions will produce winners and losers, and the purpose of rhetoric and oratory is to convince the losers to go along with the program instead of fighting to the bitter end? And in the vast majority of situations, there is not one correct perfectly logical answer, but an array of solutions, each with its own potential advantages and pitfalls depending on what you value. Maybe the reason why the right keeps on losing is because they dismissed verbal skills as something only stupid people do, and hence not worth the time of the theirs?
Trump's excellent chances this November stem from his ability to pull Populist Main Street voters out of the "NeoCon Right DNC" fold. How is this for a headline demonstrating far-right Democrat values -- Murders continue to surge in Houston, Chicago, St. Louis, Atlanta, and other Democrat-controlled cities around the country. (1)
PEACE 😇
_______
(1) https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/27/murders-continue-surge-democrat-controlled-cities/
I would say no, it doesn’t follow. Revolutions work by riding a wave of general massive unhappiness, and not by people choosing a specific outcome. Voting for Bolshies, Menshies or Esers or any other group in 1917 was clearly not a thought-out choice. At most you can say that Latvians, Estonians, workers in the cities and landless peasants, or Jews, Armenians, and permanently dissatisfied Poles were more unhappy than others.
The real question is why they were so unhappy. That is something, Anatoly, that you seldom bother to address. The two keys 20th century questions are:
– how bad had to be the guy who lost the election to Hitler?
– how bad had to be the side that lost the civil war to the Reds?
Pretty dismal in my view, so going back to celebrate them is unseemly. In a way all else were just the consequences.
In 2020 we are facing a similar situation. One day people will look back and ask how catastrophically bad was the elite that the slow unravelling of the 2020’s became first possible and then inevitable. (Other than that, I agree with your responses.)
I know less about Russia. It’s clear that the Tsar was incompetent (AK has discussed this), as was Evert, and corruption was rampant.Replies: @Beckow
While Trump’s oratory and rhetoric via Twitter may be a bit jarring, it does prove your point. Trump devastated the “theoretically right” NeoCon’s using oratory and rhetoric. The NeoCon Right is now part of the Democrat party. The Corporate Right is also kneeling for their DNC.
Trump’s excellent chances this November stem from his ability to pull Populist Main Street voters out of the “NeoCon Right DNC” fold. How is this for a headline demonstrating far-right Democrat values — Murders continue to surge in Houston, Chicago, St. Louis, Atlanta, and other Democrat-controlled cities around the country. (1)
PEACE 😇
_______
(1) https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/27/murders-continue-surge-democrat-controlled-cities/
- how bad had to be the guy who lost the election to Hitler?
- how bad had to be the side that lost the civil war to the Reds? Pretty dismal in my view, so going back to celebrate them is unseemly. In a way all else were just the consequences. In 2020 we are facing a similar situation. One day people will look back and ask how catastrophically bad was the elite that the slow unravelling of the 2020's became first possible and then inevitable. (Other than that, I agree with your responses.)Replies: @Not Raul
A major reason that Hitler won was that the preceding regime doubled down on austerity during the Great Depression.
I know less about Russia. It’s clear that the Tsar was incompetent (AK has discussed this), as was Evert, and corruption was rampant.
Do Thorfinnsson, German_Reader, utu and reiner tor still post here? Haven’t seen them in a while.
Polish Perspective if your out there please return.
Anyway, since I've already written a comment, I want to adress a minor part of AK's post:imo AK really ought to explain something like this to his readers, because I'm sure most will never have heard about this...I certainly hadn't and had to google it:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/slaves-russia-dagestan-brick-factories-escape
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/01/15/how-to-free-a-modern-day-slave-in-dagestan-a31128
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/apr/01/slave-saviours-men-risking-their-lives-to-free-brick-workers-in-dagestan
Sounds pretty terrible, is that still going on in 2020?
Reflects pretty badly on Russia's ability to assert effective control over those bandit regions in the Caucasus tbh, just as with Kadyrov's gangsterism and promotion of Islamism. I wonder what's supposed to be the long-term solution for Russia's relationship to those regions and their retrograde inhabitants.
(btw, somewhat similarly to recent events in Dijon, last Thursday there was a major brawl in the German state of Brandenburg, between a joint group of Germans and Poles on on side, and Chechnyans on the other - who promptly called in dozens of their countrymen as reinforcements from surrounding regions; I find it very moving though that Chechnyans are helping to promote German-Polish friendship and cooperation, amazing people).Replies: @Blinky Bill
Yes, but not as frequently as before.
Polish Perspective if your out there please return.
Well then enjoy your society degrading to one where people who have views similar to yours do get arrested for it.
We’d all love a world without war, yet those societies which are never prepared to fight one that is thrust upon them won’t be around to see how the world shakes out at all.
I’ll be honest I’d have been more interested in a highlight reel of the SJW anger than what caused it because I’m pretty sure everyone here is already familiar with the main points. Still, good vid.
I’ve mostly stopped commenting on Unz review, both for personal and more general reasons (as you might notice I even had my commenter’s profile deleted, both to make identifying me more difficult and to keep me from posting here, though I still suffer occasional relapses; I probably should stop even lurking here, but apparently I’m too weak-willed, lol).
Anyway, since I’ve already written a comment, I want to adress a minor part of AK’s post:
imo AK really ought to explain something like this to his readers, because I’m sure most will never have heard about this…I certainly hadn’t and had to google it:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/slaves-russia-dagestan-brick-factories-escape
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/01/15/how-to-free-a-modern-day-slave-in-dagestan-a31128
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/apr/01/slave-saviours-men-risking-their-lives-to-free-brick-workers-in-dagestan
Sounds pretty terrible, is that still going on in 2020?
Reflects pretty badly on Russia’s ability to assert effective control over those bandit regions in the Caucasus tbh, just as with Kadyrov’s gangsterism and promotion of Islamism. I wonder what’s supposed to be the long-term solution for Russia’s relationship to those regions and their retrograde inhabitants.
(btw, somewhat similarly to recent events in Dijon, last Thursday there was a major brawl in the German state of Brandenburg, between a joint group of Germans and Poles on on side, and Chechnyans on the other – who promptly called in dozens of their countrymen as reinforcements from surrounding regions; I find it very moving though that Chechnyans are helping to promote German-Polish friendship and cooperation, amazing people).
What about the Belarusian SSR?
BTW, the part about Communists suppressing (Great) Russian nationalism in the Soviet Union wasn’t unique. I believe that Serb nationalism was suppressed in Communist Yugoslavia for similar reasons–as in, to avoid ethnic disruptions and to promote ethnic harmony within Yugoslavia.
So, why exactly is Russia a Eurasian Economic Union member?
Well, yeah, not unless you select the cream of the crop from them. That said, though, this should matter less than one thinks *if* these Third Worlders are *not* going to be committing huge amounts of crime after coming over to the West (so, if they were as peaceful as, say, Mexican-Americans were) for these two reasons:
1. Due to assortative mating, Third Worlders’ presence in the First World is unlikely to reduce the amount of extremely smart people in the First World.
2. Once we will be able to identify all of the genes for intelligence in different races, we will be able to do things such as IVF plus embryo selection for desirable traits–including intelligence–on a huge scale.
Of course, low-IQ Third Worlders–even if they are on average *not* particularly violent–could still put strain on a country’s social safety net if there are too many of them–so, this fact needs to be kept in mind. That said, though, their presence in a country could ironically sometimes result in a country eventually developing a more robust social safety net–for instance, if the US will move in a more social democratic direction as a result of mass Third World immigration into the US. Bernie did, in fact, get a lot of Hispanic support in his presidential bid this year (specifically in 2020), so it’s really not impossible.
Russia showed Turkey and China how to bully the EU.
http://www.ecfr.eu/amp-article/commentary_russia_showed_turkey_and_china_how_to_bully_eu
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I know less about Russia. It’s clear that the Tsar was incompetent (AK has discussed this), as was Evert, and corruption was rampant.Replies: @Beckow
Right. But why would elites knowing that they are already in a precarious situation choose to double down on austerity? Why would Tsar’s people double down on ‘no bread for you‘ and ‘go and die in the trenches‘?
We spend a lot of time being horrified by the consequences and by the bloody mayhem and retribution that inevitably come. It is rare to look at the elites that caused it with their stupidity. AK discusses it, but still comes down on the side of the austerity fools who lost.
There is a school of thought that people are unable to stop dysfunctional behaviour until they hit the rock bottom. Otherwise how is one to understand the elite mindlessly rushing under the guillotines when the rational solution – no austerity for a while and make an example of a few corrupt big-wigs – is alway available. We see it again today.
By the way I think Priss Factor has the highest word count of all the commentors on Unz.com 2,327,900 Words.Replies: @fnn
Priss also has about half a dozen or so websites.
Could you please post a source for this allegation ? And did People's Republics like Poland also enjoy such transfers from Russia ?
Thank you.Replies: @Denis, @AP
IIRC there is actually a source in one of the books that Unz has uploaded to the database available on this very site. I believe the book was called “The dispossession of the American Nation” or something similar. I recall there being a link in the article “Oddities of the Jewish Religion”
I hope you washed you hands after talking to those “people”.
Could you please post a source for this allegation ? And did People's Republics like Poland also enjoy such transfers from Russia ?
Thank you.Replies: @Denis, @AP
As reiner tor pointed out, much of this included military bases and housing for non-native colonists. Removing this would change the numbers somewhat.
I’d love to see the Dershowitz-Maxwell gang rounded up; but the elite isn’t scared enough of the guillotine to sacrifice them.
How does he have time to earn a living?
It’s called being a Jewish female (and you, a troll).
The entire notion of the SJW makes more or less sense based on the tribal origin of the SJW. With that said, I’d be hard pressed to find a more insane type of SJW than the Russian SJW. For non-whites, being an SJW is simply the aggressive pursuit of tribal self interest, in other words the most natural and common of human and even animal behaviors. Instead of using rocks and clubs, the nonwhite SJWs use the weapons of grievance mongering designed for them by 20th century cultural marxists and mass produced by “white” financial and media elites to attack and pillage hapless white cucks for fun and profit.
Among Western whites, SJWism is clearly an abominable and suicidal perversity but can at least be explained by nearly a century of relentless brainwashing from cradle to grave via every aspect of the culture including primary and secondary education, entertainment, and sports. In addition, while by no means an excuse for SJW cuckery, the West’s history of colonialism and global domination at least provides plenty of substrate for the cultural marxists to employ in crafting an effective programme of brainwashing.
But how to explain the Russian SJW? Have there ever been a people more victimized by foreign aggression than the Russians? And it’s not like the Russian history of victimization lies in the remote past. For those in the know, you only have to go back to the 1990’s and early 2000s to see wholesale rape and pillage of the Russian people by an ethnically alien element. Barring that, even the great mass of human cattle is aware that tens of millions of Russians were killed directly or indirectly through German aggression as recently as the 1940’s, and millions of Slavs overall were enslaved during this period as well. Compare that to American slavery, which had ended by the 1860s and in the entirety of its history never even approached the number of direct deaths as the Russians sustained in a single month in WWII! Needless to say, the 20th century is hardly an anomaly. Russians had been attacked, enslaved, and otherwise oppressed by “people of color” for centuries until eventually they became strong enough to put a stop to the abuse- again in direct contrast to the history of Western “aggression” against non whites, which stopped because Western cucks simply started to feel bad for the poor things.
All of this is to say there is no excusing the Russian SJW. I cannot imagine a more subhuman creature type to exist or have ever existed in the entire history of mankind. The common traitor at least can typically be excused as merely exercising what he perceives to be his own self interest, which while not honorable does make sense from a logical standpoint. The Russian SJW on the other hand is truly an abomination, a Kunta Kinte if Kunta Kinte had Stockholm Syndrome. The fact this sick phenomenon is gaining traction or even allowed to exist in Russia is a serious failing of Putin, as every Russian under 30 was brought up under his rule.
Mother Russia will be so much better when HSE is finally burned to the ground, all of its staff publicly quartered and all of its students sent to labor camps.
And this is the sentiment of the majority of Russians, hehehe.
Back in February when the coronavirus was beginning to spread
in Europe and the U.S. I made a prediction to myself, namely
that Western Europe and the U.S. would be the two areas most ravaged
by the virus, Central Europe (Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, …) would be
relatively unaffected, and Russia would be more affected than Visegrad 4
but less than Western Europe. My prediction has so far turned out
to be correct: the U.S. is at about 460 total deaths per million, W. Europe
at considerably higher levels on the average, Poland is at 44 deaths per
1 M, and Russia is approaching 100 deaths per 1 M. Ukraine, being
closer to Central Europe both genetically and culturally than Russia, is
not surprisingly closer to Visegrad 4’s levels of Covid-19 fatalities.
Note that I limited my predictions to the predominantly white
countries, the ones that I know best.
What model did I use in making my predictions? The same one I always
use – the evolutionary model both on the level of biological evolution
and evolution of consciousness, which says that we are animals
currently trying to rise above the level of weapon-making predatory
primates. The U.S., contrary to its own belief in American exceptionalism,
suffers from stratospheric levels of social dysfunction (murder, rape,
abortion, divorce, homelessness, drug addiction, obesity, etc) which
means it’s failing to rise above the level of predatory primates. To the
usual list of typical manifestations of social dysfunction I would
add excessive tourism which carries bacteria, viruses, and intestinal
flora to the far corners of the earth. Tourism (and business travel)
have exploded in the 20th century, and we’re paying a severe price for
it. In Western Europe the levels of social dysfunction have been
increasing in the last few decades, esp. due to the massive influx of
Third Worlders, e.g., the Chinese in Italy with their constant travel
back and forth between China and Italy. Poland, due to its extremely
low levels of social dysfunction, can be compared to Japan but Japan
suffers in comparison due to the massive levels of organized crime
(Yakuza) and the militaristic discipline of its people – I’ve been to
Japan, I saw it with my own eyes.
I ought to add that I’m not an atheist – I’m a panentheist but
currently the direct experience of immanent divinity is still so
rare that I don’t believe I err much by regarding humans as
basically smart chimps in the evolutionary models we employ.
However, even though holiness/enlightenment is beyond most
people’s reach, we can still strive to be good citizens of the
Gaia superorganism.
Let me state my conclusions more clearly. I claim that the lower
the levels of social dysfunction, the more we become immune to
contagious diseases. Low levels of social dysfunction are basically
a quantitative measure of virtue, and high levels of virtue imply
that we are rising above the level of predatory primates. These
statements I believe contain thousands of possible research
topics and Ph.D. theses but the correlation between virtue and
freedom from disease sounds so radical (and possibly right-wing!)
that I don’t see academia getting anywhere near this topic
soon.
Just one example, Americans today, in contrast to the 1960s, suffer
from stratospheric levels of venereal disease (or STD’s as they say
today), incl. HIV. This produces constant inflammation, and
forces the immune system to work overtime undermining its
response to Covid-19. Back in the ‘60s love really was free, that
is free of consequences. But realistically, when Dennis Wilson
(of the Beach Boys) briefly took the Manson girls under his wing,
they turned out to be so ridden with VD he spent over $100,000
of his own money to put them under a doctor’s care and heal
them. Of course, he was no angel, Manson offered his girls
to him, and Wilson was simply trying to protect himself.
Anyway, since I've already written a comment, I want to adress a minor part of AK's post:imo AK really ought to explain something like this to his readers, because I'm sure most will never have heard about this...I certainly hadn't and had to google it:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/slaves-russia-dagestan-brick-factories-escape
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/01/15/how-to-free-a-modern-day-slave-in-dagestan-a31128
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/apr/01/slave-saviours-men-risking-their-lives-to-free-brick-workers-in-dagestan
Sounds pretty terrible, is that still going on in 2020?
Reflects pretty badly on Russia's ability to assert effective control over those bandit regions in the Caucasus tbh, just as with Kadyrov's gangsterism and promotion of Islamism. I wonder what's supposed to be the long-term solution for Russia's relationship to those regions and their retrograde inhabitants.
(btw, somewhat similarly to recent events in Dijon, last Thursday there was a major brawl in the German state of Brandenburg, between a joint group of Germans and Poles on on side, and Chechnyans on the other - who promptly called in dozens of their countrymen as reinforcements from surrounding regions; I find it very moving though that Chechnyans are helping to promote German-Polish friendship and cooperation, amazing people).Replies: @Blinky Bill
-- Liked Barack Hussein the Submissive for his pathetic willingness to sellout U.S. Citizens for SJW Globalist values.
-- Dislike Trump's Populist successes at quashing SJW Globalism and reducing Chinese exploitation.
As Populism defeats SJW Globalism, the number will improve during Trump's second term.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Blinky Bill
I suspect you do not understand your own chart — it shows foreign countries:
— Liked Barack Hussein the Submissive for his pathetic willingness to sellout U.S. Citizens for SJW Globalist values.
— Dislike Trump’s Populist successes at quashing SJW Globalism and reducing Chinese exploitation.
As Populism defeats SJW Globalism, the number will improve during Trump’s second term.
PEACE 😇
-- Liked Barack Hussein the Submissive for his pathetic willingness to sellout U.S. Citizens for SJW Globalist values.
-- Dislike Trump's Populist successes at quashing SJW Globalism and reducing Chinese exploitation.
As Populism defeats SJW Globalism, the number will improve during Trump's second term.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Blinky Bill
I suspect.
-- Approval in the long run a moral behaviour becomes normal.Is there a (by country) chart?PEACE 😇Replies: @Blinky Bill
Yep.
Trump’s support for Democracy & Freedom in Hungary & Poland horrifies the immoral, SJW Globalist poll responders in anti-freedom European nations, like Germany.
Standing up for what is right & moral brings:
— Condemnation in the short term as the chastised resist improvement.
— Approval in the long run a moral behaviour becomes normal.
Is there a (by country) chart?
PEACE 😇
Worldwide, approval ratings of the U.S. improved most in Turkmenistan, rising 32 points from 30% in 2018 to 62% in 2019.
-- Approval in the long run a moral behaviour becomes normal.Is there a (by country) chart?PEACE 😇Replies: @Blinky Bill
Worldwide, approval ratings of the U.S. improved most in Turkmenistan, rising 32 points from 30% in 2018 to 62% in 2019.
Thanks for representing nationalism well, although I don’t like you, what you described in your post here does indeed sound good.
SJW mind virus is spreading everywhere. I said that Russia is liberalizing fast earlier. I still think west will crash before Russia turns into a shit hole. Furthermore the answer to all of this is starting your own thing. You can’t stop parasites from multiplying and activating those susceptible to them. What you can do is to focus on making your position stronger.