Mutintahabanyama's (PPT) Final

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Effects of Agricultural Technology Adoption for

Agricultural Productivity and Household Income on Small


Scale Farmers. A Case Study of Mkushi District
BY MUTINTA HABANYAMA

SUPERVISOR: DR. KELVIN CHIBOMBA

DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES
PRESENTATION OUTLINE

CHAPTER ONE:
INTRODUTION
 Background of the
CHAPTER THREE:
study METHODOLOGY
 Statement of the CHAPTER FOUR: CHAPTER FIVE:
 Research approach  Presentation Of  Discussion
problem CHAPTER TWO:
 Target population
 purpose of the study Literature Review The Findings
 Sampling technique
 Objectives  Data collection
 Research questions  Data analysis
 Significance of the CHAPTER SIX:
study  Conclusions
 Theoretical  Recommendations
framework
 Operation of
definitions
 Limitations REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION

Background of the study


• The huge challenge facing Zambia is to increase maize productivity and
incomes of smallholder farmers, both of which have remained very low.
Rising productivity could improve the competitive position of maize in
both rural and urban markets. Improving the competitive position of
maize in Zambia is also justified by the growing recognition of the need
for new strategies for developing agriculture in semi-arid areas that are
prone to drought. Zambia experiences recurrent droughts, which tend to
be severest in agro-ecological region I. Zambia has experienced 4
droughts in the last four decades. In the period 1976-2007, droughts were
experienced in the 1986/87, 1991/92, 1994/5 and 2004/05 seasons
(Environmental Council of Zambia, 2016; Mungoma, 2014; Thurlow et
al., 2014). This challenge is unfortunately shared by most other countries
in the region.
INTRODUCTION
RESEARCH
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
OBJECTIVES
Agriculture is the primary livelihood for about 70% of Africa's General Objective
The study aims at assessing the effect of agricultural
population, yet productivity remains low, posing food security
technology adoption for agricultural productivity and
challenges (Ayim, 2022). In Zambia, over half the population household income on small scale farmers. This shall be case
study of Mkushi.
lives below the poverty line, with high levels of undernutrition
and stunting among children. In Mkushi, Zambia, smallholder
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
farmers face significant barriers, such as low crop yields and
 To assess the factors that influence the adoption of
limited access to modern technologies. The low adoption rates agricultural technologies by smallholder farmers.
of technologies like improved seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation
 To determine the extent to which agricultural technology
systems hinder productivity and income growth (Akudugu et
adoption affects agricultural productivity in Mkushi.
al., 2018). This study explores the impact of agricultural
technology adoption on crop yields and household income and  To examine the effects of agricultural technology adoption
investigates barriers to adoption in Mkushi. on household income in Mkushi.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS/OPERATIONS DEFINATIONS

RESEARCH QUESTIONS OPERATION DEFINATIONS


I. What factors influence the adoption of  Agricultural technology adoption: The process by which

agricultural technologies by smallholder farmers acquire and use new or improved agricultural

farmers. technologies, such as improved seed varieties, fertilizers, and

irrigation systems. (Akudugu et al., 2018)


II. To what extent does which agricultural
technology adoption affects agricultural  Agricultural productivity: The measure of the efficiency with

productivity in Mkushi. which agricultural inputs, such as land, labor, and capital, are
converted into outputs, such as crops or livestock. ( Akudugu et al.,
III. What are the effects of agricultural 2018)
technology adoption on household  Smallholder farmers: Farmers who cultivate small plots of land
income in Mkushi. and have limited resources, including access to credit and
information. (Fischer et al., 2014).
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY/OPERATIONS DEFINATIONS

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY OPERATION DEFINATIONS


• Research inform policy makers to promote  Agricultural technology adoption: The
widespread adoption of technology, enhancing food process by which farmers acquire and use new
production and food security. or improved agricultural technologies, such as
• The study explore the role of gender dynamics, improved seed varieties, fertilizers, and
particularly the challenges women face in accessing irrigation systems. (Akudugu et al., 2018)
agricultural technologies, for more inclusive
policies. It will also  Agricultural productivity: The measure of the
• assess the environmental sustainability of efficiency with which agricultural inputs, such
technology adoption, promoting practices that as land, labor, and capital, are converted into
conserve natural resources while improving outputs, such as crops or livestock. (Akudugu et
productivity. al., 2018)
• Study aimed to demonstrate how modern farming  Smallholder farmers: Farmers who cultivate
tools can alleviate poverty and improve living small plots of land and have limited resources,
standards, ultimately supporting rural development. including access to credit and information.
• the study contributes to creating targeted (Fischer et al., 2014).
interventions that foster sustainable agricultural
growth and economic stability.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS/OPERATIONS DEFINATIONS

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OPERATION DEFINATIONS


 Agricultural technology adoption: The
process by which farmers acquire and use new
or improved agricultural technologies, such as
improved seed varieties, fertilizers, and
irrigation systems. (Akudugu et al., 2018)
 Agricultural productivity: The measure of the
efficiency with which agricultural inputs, such
as land, labor, and capital, are converted into
outputs, such as crops or livestock. (Akudugu et
al., 2018)
 Smallholder farmers: Farmers who cultivate
small plots of land and have limited resources,
including access to credit and information.
(Fischer et al., 2014).
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

Geographical Limitation
The study’s focus on Mkushi may limit the generalizability of its
findings to other regions in Zambia.

Exclusion of Larger Farms


By focusing only on small-scale farmers, the study excludes insights
from larger agricultural operations.

Data Reliability and Long-Term Trends


The study's reliance on self-reported data from smallholder farmers,
particularly regarding income and productivity, may introduce recall
bias or inaccuracies
LITERATURE REVIEW

• The study reviewed literature on the effects of agricultural technology adoption on


productivity and household income.
• Research indicates that adopting improved agricultural technologies, such as high-
yield seed varieties, fertilizers, and irrigation systems, can significantly enhance
crop yields and increase household income (Akudugu et al., 2018).
• Increased agricultural productivity, driven by technology adoption, has the potential
to improve food security and lift households out of poverty, especially in rural areas
where agriculture is the main source of livelihood. However, adoption rates remain
low due to barriers such as limited access to finance, knowledge gaps, and
inadequate infrastructure (Ayim, 2022). This study aimed to fill the knowledge gap
on the impact of technology adoption on smallholder farmers’ productivity and
income, particularly in rural Zambia.
METHODOLOGY

STUDY AREA

The study was conducted in


Mkushi district of Zambia

Study Approach Quantitative


Target population Small Scale farmers
Study sample 329 technology adopters and non-adopters
Sampling procedure Random and Purposive
Data collection tools Survey questionnaire, KII,
Data Analysis SPSS-Regression model and other statistical tests
PRESENTATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Demographic Characteristics and general views of respondents.

Figure 2. Demographic characteristics of household respondents


PRESENTATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Agricultural technology adoption and Agricultural productivity


Technology Adoption and Household Income
 Scatter plot illustrates the impact of technology adoption on household income

 Positive correlation observed between adoption rate and income increase

 Adoption rate of agricultural technologies rises, household income percentage also increases

 Red trend line with a confidence band shows a steady upward trend.

 Households with higher technology adoption rates generally experience greater income growth.
DISCUSSION

 The study reveals that socio-economic factors, such as  Agricultural technology adoption has led
age, education, and gender, significantly influence to significant productivity and income
agricultural technology adoption among smallholder gains in Mkushi, similar to patterns
farmers, reflecting broader trends in Sub-Saharan observed across SSA. Improved yields
Africa (SSA). Younger and more educated farmers tend from technologies like drought-resistant
to adopt new technologies more readily, while female crops enhance food security and reduce
farmers face greater barriers due to limited access to reliance on imports (Ayim, 2022).
resources (Michels et al., 2019; Ragasa & Mazundule,
2018).  Higher productivity also raises household
income, allowing smallholders to
 Credit access is critical for adoption, as it allows reinvest, improve their quality of life, and
farmers to invest in high-quality inputs, but high purchase diverse foods, enhancing
interest rates and collateral demands often limit nutrition and resilience (Kansiime et al.,
formal credit options (Manda et al., 2016). 2018; Michels et al., 2019). Thus,
Microfinance and mobile banking emerge as potential technology adoption not only boosts
solutions to these financial constraints in SSA (Ragasa crop yields but also promotes economic
& Mazundule, 2018). stability and food security.
CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS
The study concludes that adopting agricultural  The findings indicated financial barriers hinder technology
technologies significantly boosts productivity and adoption. The study recommends expanding affordable
household income among smallholder farmers in Sub- credit options, microfinance, and input subsidies to make
Saharan Africa (SSA), offering economic and food technology accessible.
security benefits that extend beyond individual
households to the wider economy. Key factors  The findings indicated inadequate infrastructure limits
influencing adoption include education level, access to access. The study recommends investing in rural roads and
credit, and farm size, suggesting a need to address storage facilities to enhance market access and reduce
educational and financial disparities to promote losses, encouraging technology adoption.
equitable access to technology. However, barriers such
as limited financial resources, inadequate  The findings indicated a lack of agricultural knowledge
infrastructure, and cultural preferences for traditional among farmers. The study recommends strengthening
methods continue to hinder widespread adoption. To digital agricultural extension services and public-private
maximize the economic potential of technology partnerships to provide timely information.
adoption in SSA’s agricultural sector, the study
recommends targeted policy interventions,  The findings indicated peer support aids adoption. The
infrastructure improvements, and educational study recommends promoting cooperatives, and farmer
programs to create a supportive environment for field schools to build trust in technology and share
sustainable agricultural transformation. resources.
REFERENCES

Ayim, C. K. (2022). Adoption of ICT Innovations in the Agriculture Sector in Africa: A Review of the Literature. Agr iculture & Food
Security , 11, Article No. 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00364-7

Michels, M. et al. (2019). Understanding the Adoption of Crop Protection Smartphone Apps — An Application of the Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology.

Ruzzante, S. (2021). Adoption of Agricultural Technology in the Developing World: AMeta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. World
Development , 146, Article ID: 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599.

Mignouna, B., Manyong, M., Rusike, J., Mutabazi, S., & Senkondo, M. (2011). Determinants of Adopting Imazapyr-Resistant Maize Technology and its
Impact on Household Income in Western Kenya: AgBioforum, 14(3), 158-163. Hall, B. and Khan, B. (2002) Adoption of new technology. New Economy
Handbook.

Fisher, M., & Kandiwa, V. (2014). Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption?
Evidence from Malawi. Food Policy, 45, 101-111.

Manda, J. (2016). Econometric analysis of improved maize varieties and sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs) in
Eastern Zambia (Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University and Research).

You might also like