Mutintahabanyama's (PPT) Final
Mutintahabanyama's (PPT) Final
Mutintahabanyama's (PPT) Final
DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
CHAPTER ONE:
INTRODUTION
Background of the
CHAPTER THREE:
study METHODOLOGY
Statement of the CHAPTER FOUR: CHAPTER FIVE:
Research approach Presentation Of Discussion
problem CHAPTER TWO:
Target population
purpose of the study Literature Review The Findings
Sampling technique
Objectives Data collection
Research questions Data analysis
Significance of the CHAPTER SIX:
study Conclusions
Theoretical Recommendations
framework
Operation of
definitions
Limitations REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
agricultural technologies by smallholder farmers acquire and use new or improved agricultural
productivity in Mkushi. which agricultural inputs, such as land, labor, and capital, are
converted into outputs, such as crops or livestock. ( Akudugu et al.,
III. What are the effects of agricultural 2018)
technology adoption on household Smallholder farmers: Farmers who cultivate small plots of land
income in Mkushi. and have limited resources, including access to credit and
information. (Fischer et al., 2014).
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY/OPERATIONS DEFINATIONS
Geographical Limitation
The study’s focus on Mkushi may limit the generalizability of its
findings to other regions in Zambia.
STUDY AREA
Adoption rate of agricultural technologies rises, household income percentage also increases
Red trend line with a confidence band shows a steady upward trend.
Households with higher technology adoption rates generally experience greater income growth.
DISCUSSION
The study reveals that socio-economic factors, such as Agricultural technology adoption has led
age, education, and gender, significantly influence to significant productivity and income
agricultural technology adoption among smallholder gains in Mkushi, similar to patterns
farmers, reflecting broader trends in Sub-Saharan observed across SSA. Improved yields
Africa (SSA). Younger and more educated farmers tend from technologies like drought-resistant
to adopt new technologies more readily, while female crops enhance food security and reduce
farmers face greater barriers due to limited access to reliance on imports (Ayim, 2022).
resources (Michels et al., 2019; Ragasa & Mazundule,
2018). Higher productivity also raises household
income, allowing smallholders to
Credit access is critical for adoption, as it allows reinvest, improve their quality of life, and
farmers to invest in high-quality inputs, but high purchase diverse foods, enhancing
interest rates and collateral demands often limit nutrition and resilience (Kansiime et al.,
formal credit options (Manda et al., 2016). 2018; Michels et al., 2019). Thus,
Microfinance and mobile banking emerge as potential technology adoption not only boosts
solutions to these financial constraints in SSA (Ragasa crop yields but also promotes economic
& Mazundule, 2018). stability and food security.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS
The study concludes that adopting agricultural The findings indicated financial barriers hinder technology
technologies significantly boosts productivity and adoption. The study recommends expanding affordable
household income among smallholder farmers in Sub- credit options, microfinance, and input subsidies to make
Saharan Africa (SSA), offering economic and food technology accessible.
security benefits that extend beyond individual
households to the wider economy. Key factors The findings indicated inadequate infrastructure limits
influencing adoption include education level, access to access. The study recommends investing in rural roads and
credit, and farm size, suggesting a need to address storage facilities to enhance market access and reduce
educational and financial disparities to promote losses, encouraging technology adoption.
equitable access to technology. However, barriers such
as limited financial resources, inadequate The findings indicated a lack of agricultural knowledge
infrastructure, and cultural preferences for traditional among farmers. The study recommends strengthening
methods continue to hinder widespread adoption. To digital agricultural extension services and public-private
maximize the economic potential of technology partnerships to provide timely information.
adoption in SSA’s agricultural sector, the study
recommends targeted policy interventions, The findings indicated peer support aids adoption. The
infrastructure improvements, and educational study recommends promoting cooperatives, and farmer
programs to create a supportive environment for field schools to build trust in technology and share
sustainable agricultural transformation. resources.
REFERENCES
Ayim, C. K. (2022). Adoption of ICT Innovations in the Agriculture Sector in Africa: A Review of the Literature. Agr iculture & Food
Security , 11, Article No. 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00364-7
Michels, M. et al. (2019). Understanding the Adoption of Crop Protection Smartphone Apps — An Application of the Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology.
Ruzzante, S. (2021). Adoption of Agricultural Technology in the Developing World: AMeta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. World
Development , 146, Article ID: 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105599.
Mignouna, B., Manyong, M., Rusike, J., Mutabazi, S., & Senkondo, M. (2011). Determinants of Adopting Imazapyr-Resistant Maize Technology and its
Impact on Household Income in Western Kenya: AgBioforum, 14(3), 158-163. Hall, B. and Khan, B. (2002) Adoption of new technology. New Economy
Handbook.
Fisher, M., & Kandiwa, V. (2014). Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption?
Evidence from Malawi. Food Policy, 45, 101-111.
Manda, J. (2016). Econometric analysis of improved maize varieties and sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs) in
Eastern Zambia (Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University and Research).