0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views1 page

Tle9performance Rubrics

The document outlines a performance task for MAPEH (Music) 9 at Westside Montessori Centrum Inc., detailing a grading rubric for student evaluations. It includes a list of students with their respective scores across three categories: Concept Understanding, Recall of Key Facts, and Application of Knowledge. The grading scale ranges from Excellent (10) to Unsatisfactory (6), providing definitions for each performance level.

Uploaded by

Vince Bulayog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views1 page

Tle9performance Rubrics

The document outlines a performance task for MAPEH (Music) 9 at Westside Montessori Centrum Inc., detailing a grading rubric for student evaluations. It includes a list of students with their respective scores across three categories: Concept Understanding, Recall of Key Facts, and Application of Knowledge. The grading scale ranges from Excellent (10) to Unsatisfactory (6), providing definitions for each performance level.

Uploaded by

Vince Bulayog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

WESTSIDE MONTESSORI CENTRUM INC.

Zamora St., Poblacion 1, Peñaranda, Nueva Ecija

MAPEH (MUSIC) 9

Performance Task: Understanding on _______________________________________________________

Learner's Name Concept Understanding Recall of Key Facts Application of Knowledge Total
MALE E (10) G (9) S (8) NI (7) NA (6) E (10) G (9) S (8) NI (7) NA (6) E (10) G (9) S (8) NI (7) NA (6)
Eddie Jr. C. Castillo
Lance Gio O. Dela Cruz
David Angelo S. Labios
Maui Kurt L. Madria
Alexiss T. Pangilinan
John Kenneth D. Reyes
Jace O. San Jose
Gilbert A.Valeroso
Jhon Carlos J. Victorino

FEMALE
Chelssy Nicole T. Abiog
Chiana Mari L. Bolisay
Sheila Mae M. Caballero
Aliyah Ashney Z. Calimag
Erica Jhewel S. De Guzman
Jhudiel G. Legaspi
Kim Angel P. Ramoso
Lhea Cassandra M. Rufin
Margarette Denise DC. San Jose

Excellent (10) – Outstanding, Exceptional, Superior, Top-tier


Indicates performance that far exceeds expectations, showing mastery or excellence in all areas.
Good (9)– Solid, Competent
Reflects performance that meets expectations and demonstrates proficiency in the task, but may not be outstanding.
Satisfactory (8) – Acceptable, Fair, Meets requirements
Indicates that the performance is acceptable, meeting the basic expectations or criteria, but with room for improvement.
Needs Improvement(7) – Developing, Below expectations, Room for growth, Underperforming
Indicates that the performance is lacking in some areas and requires further effort or development to meet expected standards.
Unsatisfactory(6) – Poor, Inadequate, Substandard, Unacceptable
Reflects performance that falls below expectations and does not meet the minimum criteria or standards.

You might also like