NOP2 10 6827 s001
NOP2 10 6827 s001
NOP2 10 6827 s001
1
which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included
(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were NA
categorized
(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute 7
risk for a meaningful time period
Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, NA
and sensitivity analyses
Discussion
Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 7-8
Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential 9
bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential
bias
Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, 9
limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other
relevant evidence
Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 8
Other information
Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study 9
and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is
based
Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and
published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely
available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at
http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is
available at www.strobe-statement.org.