0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views15 pages

Louisalthusser 220721085839 14ccc735

Notes

Uploaded by

98ashishhsingh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views15 pages

Louisalthusser 220721085839 14ccc735

Notes

Uploaded by

98ashishhsingh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

STRUCTURAL MARXISM

LOUIS ALTHUSSER
STRUCTURAL MARXISM

Equally opposed to Hegelo-Marxism, but much more influential


was the structuralist version of Marxism, arose in France in the
mid 1960s

Marxism as a science that examined objective structures and


rejected the humanistic, historistic and phenomenological
Marxism

om
1970s-80s Structural Marxism dominated

il.c
ma
@g
am
ss
eit
se
Louis Althusser- major proponent
LOUIS ALTHUSSER

Louis Pierre Althusser (1918-1990)

Most influential Marxist philosopher of the 20th century

A leading intellectual figure in the French Communist Party and key Parisian academic

Incorporated a more nuanced understanding of culture and human subjectivity into the
legacy of Marxian thinking

He equated humanism with individualism and considered both of them to be sins of


bourgeois thinking; tried to accommodate a cultural perspective within the framework of

om
il.c
the “scientific” later Marx

ma
@g
am
ss
Althusser’s work has a strong resemblance to the structuralist project of Levi-Strauss,

eit
se
which also saw itself as scientific
Founder of Marxian structuralism and calls himself as scientific Marxist

According to him, Neo-Marxist have not interpreted Marxian works


correctly; so he thought of developing a correct reading of the works of
Marx and this has led to his concept of “epistemological break”

He argued that Marx had undergone an epistemological break during his


life; Marx’s early writings were humanistic and subjectivist and were still
infected with Hegelian idealism

By contrast, in his later work, such as Capital, Marx advocated an


objective and scientific approach; Althusser believes that this later, more
materialist vision is the superior one

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
He sees it as broadly structural in orientation and intellectually powerful

se
Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts (1844) as an
inferior and immature

Althusser left himself with the task of developing a cultural


theory from the later works constructed from within the
tradition of dialectical materialism; in order to do so, he turned
towards structuralism for a solution

He also read Marx’s late works carefully and claimed to derive


from them the basis for a structural model of society which gave
culture and politics an independent role; assessed that there was
an economic base (the mode of production, means of production
etc) and a superstructure, consisting of a political and legal

m
.co
a il
gm
structure (the state and the legal system) and an ideological

@
am
ss
eit
structure (the church, political beliefs, etc)

se
According to Althusser, the superstructure worked to help
generate the conditions necessary for the survival of capitalism-
its major function then was to allow for the reproduction of
capitalism

“the state and legal system are a machine of repression which enables
the ruling classes… to ensure their domination over the working class”
(1971:137)

They are only concerned with regulating the supply of labour,


dealing with social discontent and ensuring that the economy ran

m
in ways that facilitated the accumulation of capital by the

.co
a il
gm
@
am
dominant class

ss
eit
se
The ideological system provided legitimation for capitalism and
offered people identities and roles that were necessary for the
reproduction of the capitalist system

Taking a structuralist position, Althusser stressed the ways that


these systems were interlinked, each one performing a vital social
function and each one messing with the others to form a
seamless, smoothly functioning industrial capitalist society

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
THE IDEOLOGICAL STATE APPARATUS
AND SUBJECT POSITIONS

Emphasised the role of the state in cultural life

In his collection entitled “Lenin and Philosophy and Other


Essays”, Althusser argued that in working to reproduce capitalism
the state made use of two kinds of system: The ISA and RSA

The Repressive State Apparatus (RSA) consisted of institutions

m
.co
which made use of coercive force. Eg. Police, Military, prisons etc;

a il
gm
@
am
ss
these might be used to crush protest and dissent on the streets

eit
se
to brea strikes and to suppress left-wing military insurgencies
The Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) consisted of institutions
that promulgated illusions about the nature and organisation of
society. Eg. the media, church and above all the school

All of these have links to the state via regulation, funding or


administration

In pre-capitalist society, Church was the most important ISA,


today it is educational system

It provided the trained, passive, and compliant workforce

m
required by capitalist enterprise

.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
“All ideology has the function…of constituting concrete individuals as
subjects”

According to Althusser, the needs of the economic base


determine the kinds of “functions” that individuals must fulfil- as
workers, administrators and so on; people are unaware of their
objective identities as functionaries within a capitalist system

Instead they inhibit Subject positions and identities which are


propagated and allocated by the ISAs

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
CRITIQUES OF ALTHUSSER

Succeeded in providing an understanding of culture and cultural


autonomy within a structural Marxian framework

However, critics argue that his work fails to reconcile historical


materialism with an understanding of the autonomy of culture
and subjectivity

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
E.P Thomson, a British Neo-Marxian Historian criticised
Althusser in his Essay “The Poverty of Theory”, on the basis of
several strands:

1. Althusser’s work was too abstract and failed to engage with


concrete data about the real struggles of real people

2. He was a master of complex word games, but failed to deliver


genuine theoretical innovation

[Link] vision of social process was too deterministic

4. His vision of social life was one which denied the potential for
human freedom and creativity-specifically the potential for people
to make their own history
Althusser’s work reached its peak of influence in the late 1960s
and 1970s among left wing academics

But replaced by the works of Gramsci, Foucault, and Bourdieu


during the 1980s

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
WRITING ACTIVITY

Explain the structural Marxism by Louis Althusser.

Define ISA & RSA

m
.co
a il
gm
@
am
ss
eit
se
REFERENCES

(21st Century Sociology) Philip Smith - Cultural Theory_ An


Introduction-Wiley-Blackwell (2001).pdf

David Mclellan - Marxism After Marx-Palgrave Macmillan (1998)


pg 328-336

You might also like