Propolis Antiinfllamatory and Healing Properties
Propolis Antiinfllamatory and Healing Properties
Propolis Antiinfllamatory and Healing Properties
CORRESPONDENCE TO:
JOÃO LUIZ DE MIRANDA, Laboratório de Patologia, Universidade Federal dos
Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória, 187, Centro, 39.100-000,
Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Email: [email protected].
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 698
propolis preparation, and other solvents such as ethyl ether, water, methanol and
chloroform may also be used for extraction and identification of propolis compounds
(24). In addition, glycerin, propylene glycol, and other solutions have been used
during propolis preparation for pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries (46). Propolis
obtained from beehives, also known as rude propolis, is composed of around 50%
balsam resin, 30% wax, 10% essential and aromatic oils, 5% pollen, and 5% other
substances, including wood fragments (31).
The resin found in propolis is collected in vegetation nearby beehives, where bees
also collect pollen and nectar for feeding. Propolis composition is mainly determined
by the phytogeographic characteristics of beehive surroundings (19). However,
seasonal variation may occur within the same place (39). Also, variation was
observed among samples collected in the same place, but by different A. mellifera
subspecies (40). Several contaminants close by beehives can be collected and
unexpectedly added to propolis, such as asphalt powder, pesticide, iron excess,
copper, magnesium, (12) and even lead (2).
It is known that bees are selective when collecting resin from a specific vegetal
source, but factors that guide them are not completely understood (37, 45). The
nature of aromatic and terpene compounds found in propolis has a biological
importance, allowing bees to determine which vegetal species to visit (23).
The pharmacological activities of propolis are more numerous in tropical regions than
in temperate climates, reproducing the richer vegetal diversity observed in the former
(4, 28).
More than 300 different compounds have been identified so far in propolis, including
aliphatic acids, esters, aromatic acids, fatty acids, carbohydrates, aldehydes, amino
acids, ketones, chalcones, dihydrochalcones, terpenoids, vitamins, and inorganic
substances (23). Of all, flavonoids are the ones which draw greater research interest
(15).
Propolis has several therapeutic properties, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory,
healing, anesthetic (13), anticariogenic (34), antifungal, antiprotozoan and antiviral
activities. The in vitro antibacterial activity was verified against several Gram-positive
and Gram-negative bacteria and results from synergism between propolis
compounds, mainly pinocembrin and galangin flavonoids. Other flavonoids, such as
chrysin and kaempferol, have shown antiviral activity with reduction of intracellular
proliferation of some viruses, such as herpes simplex (23).
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 700
Many other biological and pharmacological properties of propolis have been noted:
cartilage, bone, and dental pulp regeneration; immunological properties; liver defense
and antitoxic activity; antioxidant and immunomodulatory actions. Consequently,
there has been increasing interest on propolis, with the chemical industry searching
for viable commercial formulations. Also, investigation of isolated compounds, such
as flavonoids, has grown. These compounds are biologically more active and are
responsible for propolis’ spasmodic (quercetin, kaempferol and pectolinarigenin),
anti-inflammatory (acacetin) and antiulcerative (apigenin) activities (11).
Propolis is a low-cost potential anti-inflammatory agent for both acute and chronic
stages (6). Its properties are used mainly for muscles and articulations, and also
other types of inflammations, infections, rheumatisms and torsions. Mice and rabbit
studies have shown that hydroalcoholic solutions of propolis possess anti-
inflammatory activity following topical, injectable, or even oral administration (23).
Inflammation is the complex biological response of vascular tissues to harmful stimuli
such as cell damage by pathogens. It is a protective attempt by the organism to
remove the injurious stimuli and to initiate the healing process. The tissue
modifications induced by the causal agent are responsible for the release of
inflammatory mediators that lead to subsequent inflammatory events. Cytokine
release (IL-1, TNF-α) by activated macrophages leads to vessel dilation and results
in smooth muscle relaxation and increased local blood flow (hypothermia).
Microvascular changes associated with increased vascular permeability take place,
leading to accentuated plasmatic exudation, phagocyte accumulation (neutrophils,
monocytes, macrophages), and amplification of endogenous chemical mediators.
Simultaneously, mast cells, phagocytic cells and endothelial cells use plasma
membrane lipids to generate important inflammatory mediators (21). In an
immediately posterior stage, several intra and extracellular phospholipases are
activated by cytoplasmic membrane phospholipids and activate other enzymes, such
as cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX), which in turn act upon
arachidonic acid and eicosanoid metabolism, creating important inflammatory
mediators (prostaglandins and leukotrienes). These mediators are responsible for the
maintenance of the inflammatory process. The fibrinolytic system, kinins,
complement, vasoactive amines (histamine and serotonin), and nitric oxide (NO) may
lead to inflammation when physiologically altered (47).
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 701
capacity. The results of the study of Orsi et al. (33) corroborated the findings of
Schelle, which indicated that macrophages produce high amounts of H2O2.
While investigating the effects of individual propolis compounds complexes on lysine,
Ivanovska et al. (17) found that cinnamic acid tends to inhibit H2O2 release by
peritoneal macrophages, whereas caffeic acid induces increased metabolite
production.
The inhibition of NO production by macrophages may also be responsible for propolis
anti-inflammatory activity (32). Hu et al. (16) evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects
of ethanol (EEP) and water (WSD) extracts in ICR mice and Wistar rats on thoracic
capillary vessel leakage, carrageenan-induced edema, carrageenan-induced
pleurisy, acute lung damage, and Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA)-induced
arthritis. In the experiment, EEP and WSD inhibited the increase of PGE2 and also
had a significant inhibitory effect on NO in carrageenan-induced pleurisy exudation.
In these models, NO could accelerate an inflammatory reaction by enlarging blood
vessels and causing edema. This could increase the expression of inflammatory
reactions and accelerate the development of blood poisoning by activating
prostaglandin synthesis, as seen in the progression of rheumatism. However, other
studies indicated increased NO production by macrophages (32).
Although the mechanism of WSD and EEP on anti-inflammatory performance was
apparently similar, there were some differences. In the carrageenan-induced pleurisy
and oleic-acid plus LPS-induced acute lung damage studies, WSD not only inhibited
the increase of white blood cells (WBC) count, but also inhibited the increase of
neutrophils (but not significantly at 5%). This would explain how WSD inhibits WBC
and alleviates inflammatory reactions during acute inflammation. The results suggest
that additional propolis components, other than flavonoids, possess anti-inflammatory
effects. Although EEP did not significantly inhibit WBC, it may possibly alleviate the
inflammatory degree synergistically by inhibiting NO. The arthritic rat model induced
by FCA is associated with an immune inflammation reaction in these experiments.
The main feature of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the ongoing damage in arthrosis of
cartilage and bone, in addition to a disturbance of the immune function. Cytokines
secreted by immune cells (lymphocyte and mononuclear-macrophage), fibroblasts,
and endothelial cells play an important role in immune and inflammatory responses in
vivo. The results of the present experiment show that EEP and WSD had significant
inhibitory effects on the levels of IL-6 in FCA-induced arthritis rats, but not on IFN and
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 703
IL-2 levels. This could also mean that, in the course of the anti-inflammatory activity
of WSD and EEP, the humoral immune system plays an important role inhibiting the
activation and differentiation of mononuclear macrophages. This would be a possible
mechanism for the anti-inflammatory and immune effects of WSD and EEP (16).
Inflammation can also be related to free radicals increase in the human organism (9).
Although oxidative damage is known to be involved in inflammatory-mediated tissue
destruction, modulation of oxygen-free radicals production represents a new
approach to the treatment of inflammatory diseases (8). Propolis contains
polyphenols and a wide range of other compounds capable of removing excessive
free radicals from our organism (25). CAPE, a flavonoid-like compound, has been
identified as one of the main active ingredients of honeybee propolis and has
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (8). For that reason, Celik et al. (8)
investigated the efficiency of CAPE administration in preventing oxidative damage
due to Escherichia coli-induced pyelonephritis (PYN) in rats. The main hypothesis of
events leading to renal scarring has been that bacterial products (e.g.
lipopolysaccharide) stimulate the release of proinflammatory cytokines, which initiate
an inflammatory response, including chemotaxis with consequent extravasation of
polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PNL) (8). PNL release toxic products (e.g. free-
oxygen radicals and lysozymes) that seem to be responsible for tissue damage;
inhibition of the PNL-produced free radicals can greatly neutralize tissue damage
(14).
The levels of lipid peroxidation and NO production, and the activities of superoxide
dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and xanthine oxidase (XO) in E.
coli-induced PYN were evaluated in a rat model using kidney homogenates and were
significantly increased. However, CAPE administration reduced malondialdehyde
(MDA) levels, which is an indicator of free radical generation that increases in final
stages of lipid peroxidation. NO levels have been implicated in the mechanisms of
cell injury and long-term physiological changes in cellular excitability. This effect may
be due to decreased expression of inducible NO (iNOS) (14). In a similar study, Song
et al. (41) demonstrated that CAPE was able to inhibit iNOS expression and NO
production in macrophages. CAPE significantly increased the activities of the
antioxidant enzymes SOD and GSH-Px in the kidneys of infected rats. CAPE
administration significantly inhibited the activity of XO, a physiological source of
superoxide anions in eukaryotic cells. Histopathologic examination showed that
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 704
inflammation, fibroblastic and tissue maturation. The wound healing process can be
summarized using the healing of a linear skin wound as a prototype. With any
wound, the initial events at the site of injury are hemorrhage and formation of a fibrin-
rich clot. Fibronectin stabilizes the clot before dehydration takes place and a scab is
formed. Macrophages soon follow neutrophils to the site of tissue injury and wound
debridement is aided by the opsonization of tissue by fibronectin. The epidermal
response to wounding is initiated very rapidly and within a day or so “tongues” of
epidermal cells can be seen cleaving a path between the scab and the viable
collagenous tissue underneath; two or three days after injury, the wound floor is
covered by a sheet of regenerated epidermal cells. The formation of granulation
tissue begins at about the same time with an influx and proliferation of fibroblasts and
the beginnings of new capillary formation. Four to five days after wounding,
stratification of the wound-floor epidermis is readily apparent, fibroblasts are highly
active and secretion of extracellular matrix compounds (especially GAGs and type III
collagen) and the process of neovascularization are in full swing. To achieve this
invasive process, endothelial cells must secrete a battery of proteinases (e.g. type IV
collagenase, interstitial collagenase, elastase, stromelysin, and plasminogen
activators) to degrade the basement membrane. The diverse components of the
epidermis are restored without the reformation of rete ridges, much of the type III
collagen fibers orient parallel to lines of mechanical stress (collagen remodeling), and
the once highly vascular granulation tissue undergoes a protracted process of
vascularization as it matures into relatively avascular scar tissue (27). Sutta et al. (44)
used propolis alcoholic solutions at animal wounds treatment in clinical and also
experimental cases. Histologically, they observed that propolis treatment induced
better healing by reducing the inflammatory response; consequently, epithelial
healing was faster with propolis. The authors considered propolis suitable for wound
treatment, following elimination of the infection. It is known that healing is directly
related to the inflammatory process (36), and if the latter is less pronounced,
production of healing molecules and deposition of collagen fiber bundles increase. It
is possible that prolonged inflammation unleashes pronounced necrosis, causing
more tissue damage and rendering the healing process more difficult. Propolis tissue
regeneration properties, including healing, are possibly due to its antioxidant activity.
Whenever free radicals are produced, they hamper or even block cells regeneration.
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 706
REFERENCES
1 ACKERMANN T. Fast chromatography study of propolis crudes. Food Chemistry,
1991, 42, 135-8.
2 ALCICI NMF. Heavy metals in propolis: practical and simple procedures to reduce
the lead in the Brazilian propolis. Chemical Abstracts, 1996, 127, 236-7.
3 ALMEIDA EC., MENEZES H. Anti-inflammatory activity of propolis extracts: a
review. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins, 2002, 8, 191-212.
4 BANKOVA V. Chemical diversity of propolis and the problem of standardization. J.
Ethnopharmacol., 2005, 100, 114-7.
5 BANKOVA VS., POPOV SS., MAREKOV NL. Isopentenyl cinnamates from poplar
buds and propolis. Phytochemistry, 1989, 28, 871-3.
6 BORRELLI F., MAFFIA P., PINTO L., IANARO A., RUSSO A., CAPASSO F.,
IALENTI A. Phytochemical compounds involved in the anti-inflammatory effect of
propolis extract. Fitoterapia, 2002, 73, 53-63.
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 707
20 LEE KW., CHUN KS., LEE JS., KANG KS., SURH YJ., LEE HJ. Inhibition of
cyclooxygenase-2 expression and restoration of gap junction intercellular
communication in H-ras-transformed rat liver epithelial cells by caffeic acid phenethyl
ester. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 2004, 1030, 501-7.
21 LOPES RE., CHAPADEIRO E., RASO P., TAFURI LW. Patologia. Rio de Janeiro:
Guanabara, 1987: 67-112.
22 MAMDELBAUM SH., SANTIS EP. Cicatrização: conceitos atuais e recursos
auxiliares - Parte I. An. Bras. Dermatol., 2003, 78, 393-410.
23 MARCUCCI MC. Propolis: Chemical composition, biological properties and
therapeutic activity. Apidologie, 1995, 26, 83-99.
24 MARCUCCI MC., RODRIGUEZ J., FERREREZ F., BANKOVA V., GROTOR.,
POPOV S. Chemical composition of Brazilian propolis from São Paulo State. Z.
Neturforsch. Sect. C. Biosc., 1998, 53, 117-9.
25 MARQUELE FD., DI MAMBRO VM., GEORGETTI SR., CASAGRANDE R.,
VALIM YM., FONSECA MJ. Assessment of the antioxidant activities of Brazilian
extracts of propolis alone and in topical pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm.
Biomed. Anal., 2005, 39, 455-62.
26 MATHEWS KA., BINNINGTON AG. Wound management using honey. Comp.
Cont. Educ. Pract. Vet., 2002, 24, 53-60.
27 MCGEE JO., ISAACSON PG., WRIGHT NA. Principles of Pathology. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1994, 1, 378-9.
28 MENEZES H. Própolis: uma revisão dos recentes estudos de suas propriedades
farmacológicas. Arq. Inst. Biol., 2005, 72, 405-11.
29 MIRZOEVA OK., CALDER PC. The effect of propolis and its components on
eicosanoid production during the inflammatory response. Prostaglandins Leukot.
Essent. Fatty Acids, 1996, 55, 441-9.
30 MIYATAKA H., NISHIKI M., MATSUMOTO H., FIJIMOTO T., MATSUKA M.,
SATOH T. Evaluation of propolis. I. Evaluation of Brazilian and Chinese propolis by
enzymatic and physico-chemical methods. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 1997, 20, 496-501.
31 MONTI M., BERTI E., CARMINATI G., CUSINI M. Occupational and cosmetic
dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis, 1983, 9, 163.
32 NAGAOKA T., BANSKOTA AH., TEZUKA Y., MIDORIKAWA K., MATSUSHIGE
K., KADOTA S. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) analogues: potent nitric oxide
inhibitors from the Netherlands propolis. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 2003, 26, 487-91.
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 709
33 ORSI RO., FUNARI RSC., SOARES AMVC., CALVI AS., OLIVEIRA SL.,
SFORCIN JM., BANKOVA V. Immunomodulatory action of propolis on macrophage
activation. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins, 2000, 6, 205-19.
34 PARK YK., IKEGAKI M., ABREU JA., ALCICI NM. Estudo da preparação dos
extratos de própolis e suas aplicações. Ci. Tecnol. Aliment, 1998, 18, 313-8.
35 PARK YK., KOO MH, IKEGARI M., CONTADO JL. Comparison of the flavonoid
aglycone contents of Apis mellifera propolis from various regions of Brazil. Arq. Biol.
Tecnol., 1997, 40, 97-106.
36 PEREZ-TAMAYO R. Introduccion a la Patologia. Buenos Aires: Editoria Médica
Panamericana, 1987: 670.
37 SALATINO A., TEIXEIRA EW., NEGRI G., MESSAGE D. Origin and chemical
variation of Brazilian propolis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med., 2005, 2, 33-
8.
38 SCHELLER S., GADZA G., KROL W., CZUBA Z., ZAJUSZ A., GABRYS J.,
SHANI J. The ability of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to protect mice against
gamma irradiation. Z. Neturforsch. Sect. C. Biosc., 1989, 44, 1040-52.
39 SFORCIN JM., KANENO R., FUNARI SRC. Absence of seasonal effect on the
immunomodulatory action of Brazilian propolis on natural killer activity. J. Venom.
Anim. Toxins, 2002, 8, 19-29.
40 SILICI S., KUTLUCA S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis
collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. J.
Ethnopharmacol., 2005, 99, 69-73.
41 SONG YS., PARK EH., HUR GM., RYU YS., LEE YS., LEE JY., KIM YM., JIN C.
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits nitric oxide synthase gene expression and
enzyme activity. Cancer Lett., 2002, 175, 53-61.
42 SOSA S., BARICEVIC D., CINCO M., PADOVAN D., TUBARO A., DELLA
LOGGIA R. Preliminary investigation on the anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial
activities of propolis. Pharm. Pharmacol. Lett., 1997, 4, 168-71.
43 SURH YJ., CHUN KS., CHA HH., HAN SS., KEUM YS., PARK KK., LEE SS.
Molecular mechanisms underlying chemopreventive activities of anti-inflammatory
phytochemicals: down-regulation of COX-2 and iNOS through suppression of NK-kB
activation. Mutat. Res., 2001, 480-481, 243-68.
A. F. N. Ramos and J. L. Miranda. PROPOLIS: A REVIEW OF ITS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND HEALING
ACTIONS. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins incl. Trop. Dis., 2007, 13, 4, p. 710
44 SUTTA J., HANKO J., JANDA J., TKAC J. Experimental and clinical experiences
in the treatment of wounds in domestic animals by local application of an alcoholic
solution of propolis. Bratislava: Folia Veterinaria, 1974, 18, 143-147.
45 TEIXEIRA EW., NEGRI G., MEIRA RM., MESSAGE D., SALATINO A. Plant origin
of green propolis: Bee behavior, plant anatomy and chemistry. Evid. Based
Complement. Alternat. Med., 2005, 2, 85-92.
46 TOSI B., DONINI A., ROMAGNOLI C., BRUNI A. Antimicrobial activity of some
commercial extracts of propolis prepared with different solvents. Phytother. Res.,
1996, 1014, 335-6.
47 WU KK-Y. Biochemical pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Biochem. Pharmacol., 1998, 55, 543-7.