Matm 3601 Module
Matm 3601 Module
outline
MZUZU UNIVERSITY
Faculty of Education
Department of Mathematics
20 Learning outcomes:
By the end of this course students should be able to:
o Apply diverse teaching techniques that encourage the learning process in the
mathematics classroom.
o Use pedagogical content knowledge for appropriate lesson presentation
o Apply learner-centered approaches and other theories in mathematics teaching and
learning
o Prepare and use various resources/manipulatives in understanding the teaching
of mathematics
o Recognise the challenges of teaching mathematics for effective planning and
teaching
o Use micro/peer teaching to develop effective teaching of mathematics
21 Topics of Study
Micro/peer teaching:
o Planning lessons
o Lesson presentations and observations
o Critiquing issues from lessons
22 Recommended textbooks
1. Morgan. C., Watson. A., & Tikly. C.( 2004). Mathematics Teaching School Subjects
11-19, RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor &Francis Group London and New York .
2. Posamentier, A.S., Smith. B.S.,& Stepelman.J. ( 2006). Teaching Secondary
Mathematics, Techniques and Enrichment Units , Pearson Prentice Hall Education.
3. MIE. ( 2013). Syllabus for Mathematics . First edition. Ministry of Education
Science and Technology. Malawi Institute of Education.
4. Sidhu, S. K.( 2004). The Teaching of Mathematics, by sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd,
New Delhi.
5. Van De Walle A.J. ( 2001). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics, teaching
developmentally, Virginia Commonwealth University, Longman.
6. Sriraman, B.,&English,L.(2010). Theories of Mathematics Education; Seeking New
Frontiers. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
7. Liebeck. P. (1990). How Children Learn Mathematics, A guide for Parents and
Teachers,printed by Penguin group, Clays Ltd ,England.
8. Wadhwa, S.(2006). Modern Methods of Teaching Mathematics. Probhat Kumar
Sharma for Sarup&sons, Darya Ganj, New Delhi.
9. Johnston-Wilder S et al (1999). Learning to teach mathematics in the Secondary
school, A companion to School Experience, Routledge Falmer, Taylor &Francis Group
London and New York
10. Cathcart.G.W.,Pothier,M.Y.,Vance,J.H.,&Bezuk,N.S.(2003). Learning Mathematics in
Elementary and Middle Schools, Third Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Columbus, Ohio
One of the most important features of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics is the
articulation of six principles fundamental to high-quality mathematics education:
● Equity
● Curriculum
● Teaching
● Learning
● Assessment
● Technology
According to Principles and Standards, these principles must be “deeply intertwined with school
mathematics programs” (NCTM, 2000, p. 12). The principles make it clear that excellence in
mathematics education involves much more than simply listing content objectives.
Excellence in mathematics education requires equity— high expectations and strong support for all
students. (NCTM, 2000, p. 12) The strong message of the Equity Principle is high expectations for all
students. All students must have the opportunity and adequate support to learn mathematics
“regardless of personal characteristics, backgrounds, or physical challenges” (p. 12). The significance
of high expectations for all is interwoven throughout the document.
Effective mathematics teaching requires understanding what students know and need to learn and
then challenging and supporting them to learn it well. (NCTM, 2000, p. 16)
What students learn about mathematics depends almost entirely on the experiences that teachers
provide every day in the classroom. To provide high-quality mathematics education, teachers must
(1) understand deeply the mathematics content they are teaching;
(2) understand how students learn mathematics, including a keen awareness of the individual
mathematical development of their own students and common misconceptions; and
(3) select meaningful instructional tasks and generalizable strategies that will enhance learning.
“Teachers’ actions are what encourage students to think, question, solve problems, and discuss their
ideas, strategies, and solutions” (p. 18).
Students must learn mathematics with understanding, actively building new knowledge from
experience and prior knowledge. (NCTM, 2000, p. 20)
The learning principle is based on two fundamental ideas. First, learning mathematics with
understanding is essential. Mathematics today requires not only computational skills but also the
ability to think and reason mathematically to solve new problems and learn new ideas that students
will face in the future. Second, students can learn mathematics with understanding. Learning is
enhanced in classrooms where students are required to evaluate their own ideas and those of
others, are encouraged to make mathematical conjectures and test them, and are helped to develop
their reasoning and sense-making skills.
Assessment should support the learning of important mathematics and furnish useful information to
both teachers and students . . . Assessment should not merely be done to students; rather, it should
also be done for students, to guide and enhance their learning. (NCTM, 2000, p. 22) Ongoing
assessment highlights for students the most important mathematics concepts. Assessment that
includes ongoing observation and student interaction encourages students to articulate and, thus,
clarify their ideas. Feedback from daily assessment helps students establish goals and become more
independent learners. Assessment should be a major factor in making instructional decisions. By
continuously gathering data about students’ understanding of concepts and growth in reasoning,
teachers can better make the daily decisions that support student learning. For assessment to be
effective, teachers must use a variety of assessment techniques, understand their mathematical
goals deeply, and have a research-supported notion of students’ thinking or common
misunderstandings of the mathematics that is being developed.
The Connections standard has two parts. First, it is important to connect within and among
mathematical ideas. For example, fractional parts of a whole are connected to concepts of decimals
and percents. Students need opportunities to see how mathematical concepts build on one another
in a network of connected ideas.
Second, mathematics should be connected to the real world and to other disciplines. Students
should see that mathematics plays a significant role in art, science, language arts, and social studies.
This suggests that mathematics should frequently be integrated with other discipline areas and that
applications of mathematics should be explored in real world contexts.
The Representation standard emphasizes the use of symbols, charts, graphs, manipulatives, and
diagrams as powerful methods of expressing mathematical ideas and relationships. Symbolism in
mathematics, along with visual aids such as charts and graphs, should be understood by students as
ways of communicating mathematical ideas to others. Moving from one representation to another is
an important way to add depth of understanding to a newly formed idea. Members of NCTM have
free online access to the Principles and Standards as well as the three previous standards
documents. Non members can sign up for 120 days of free access to the Principles and Standards at
[Link]. The process standards should not be regarded as separate content or strands in the
mathematics curriculum. Rather, they direct the methods of doing all mathematics and, therefore,
should be seen as integral components of all mathematics learning and teaching. To teach in a way
that reflects these process standards is one of the best definitions of what it means to teach
“according to the Standards.”
The Problem Solving standard describes problem solving as the vehicle through which students
develop mathematical ideas. Learning and doing mathematics as you solve problems is probably the
most significant message in the Standards documents.
The Reasoning and Proof standard emphasizes the logical thinking that helps us decide if and why
our answers make sense. Students need to develop the habit of providing a rationale as an integral
part of every answer. It is essential for students to learn the value of justifying ideas through logical
argument.
The Communication standard points to the importance of being able to talk about, write about,
describe, and explain mathematical ideas. Learning to communicate in mathematics fosters
interaction and exploration of ideas in the classroom as students learn through active discussions of
their thinking. No better way exists for wrestling with or cementing an idea than attempting to
articulate it to others.
Introduction
There is a paradigm shift of teaching and learning from banking type to learner-centred (
constructivism). Knowledge is constructed by the learner and not passively received from the
teacher. Every mathematics teacher should have knowledge of theories of learning in order to
understand the learner better.
Behaviorism
Behaviorism attempts to explain learning through the observable interactions of the learner with the
environment, without inferring anything that is going on inside the learner. It is based on the
stimulus-response model of Skinner, which attempts to apply the methods of science to the study of
human learning.
Constructivism
Constructivism differs from behaviorism at the most fundamental question: from where does
knowledge come? Constructivists claim that a person’s knowledge is constructed by her or himself in
the setting of some environment.
Socio-culturalism
The work of Vygotsky has gained increased recognition in the mathematics education community. His
theory states that the development of a student’s intelligence “results from social interaction in the
world and that speech, social interaction, and co-operative activity are all important aspects of this
social world”. The role of the teacher is central to this theory in that the teacher must convey the
relationship between the sign and the meaning of the sign. Vygotsky described a Zone of Proximal
Development as the distance between the level of development of a student (working on problems)
and her or his level of potential development (working with an adult). This zone allows the adult to be
the “tool holder,” that is, having conscious control of the concept, for the child until he or she is able
to internalize external knowledge. This process is referred to as scaffolding (Vygotsky, 1978, 1986). It
seems well to note here two comparisons of Vygotsky and Piaget. Sutherland (1993) notes the
similarity of views in which the child has an active role in learning. Indeed, Vygotsky’s notion the
child needing to internalize external knowledge is very constructive. However, Sutherland cites a
lengthy passage from Vygotsky addressing his differences with Piaget’s views on the role of speech.
She also noted their different emphases on the role of the teacher, implying that Piaget does not
address teaching specifically. Confrey, in a three-part article (1994, 1995a, 1995b), seeks to combine
these two theories, supplementing them with feminist scholarship in her revised theory. She describes
at length both theories of learning and itemizes their respective strengths and limitations. Confrey
seems to exaggerate Piaget’s view of the student constructing understanding for her or himself to the
view that she or he must do it in isolation. Also, while Vygotsky values the role of social interaction,
his socio-cultural perspective can limit diversity in the classroom. These authors are comparing
different things. While Sutherland looks at the theories themselves, Confrey compares
implementations of the theory. 1.4 Theory of Embodied Mathematics Lakoff and N´u˜nez (2000)
offer a view of learning mathematics based on the notion “that conceptual metaphor plays a central,
defining role in mathematical ideas within the cognitive unconscious”. Their work extends findings in
cognitive science to describe how many mathematical concepts arise in the minds of learners through
the use of metaphor and blending. 2 Epistemological Frameworks The following set of frameworks is
my list of those authors who are leaders in mathematics education research and should not be
interpreted as complete. I describe each framework briefly, giving its distinctive characteristics and
theoretical background. While there is no explicit attempt to compare and contrast frameworks, I have
categorized them into subsections. Actions, Processes and Objects Dubinsky (1991) has developed an
epistemological framework referred to as Action-ProcessObject-Schema, or APOS. The framework
considers the development of a mathematical concept as moving from an action (intraoperational) to
a process (interoperational) via a type of reflective abstraction called interiorization. The resulting
process can be encapsulated into an object (transoperational). The framework notes that objects
constructed in this 3 manner can be de-encapsulated back to the process when needed. Schemas are
constructed by coordinating processes and actions and can also be thematized into objects (Asiala et
al., 1996). This framework results in descriptions of the mental constructions a student makes to come
to understand a concept. These descriptions are called genetic decompositions. Instructional
treatments are devised which may bring the student to make the constructions described in the genetic
decomposition. These treatments generally involve the use of a mathematical programming language
on computers, cooperative learning strategies, and alternatives to lecturing (Asiala et al., 1996). Sfard
(1991) also employs a framework which seeks to describe mental constructions in two ways:
structurally (as objects) or operationally (as processes). Her description of the reflective abstractions
necessary to move from process to object are interiorization, condensation, and reification. This
framework posits that objects and processes have a dual nature, rather than a dichotomous relation.
Thompson (1994a) also describes the development of concepts in terms of processes and objects.
He describes the student’s image of a concept as figural knowledge or a metaphor. He distinguishes
this image from the concept image of Vinner (discussed below) and from schemas (although not as
explicitly): Vinner’s idea of concept image focuses on the coalescence of mental pictures into
categories corresponding to conventional mathematical vocabulary, while the notion of image I’ve
attempted to develop focuses on the dynamics of mental operations. The two notions of image are
not inconsistent, they merely have a different focus. (Thompson, 1994a, p. 231) Thompson’s
framework proposes the development of instruction which nurtures and extends students’ images in
mathematics. 2.2 Concept Image and Concept Definition Vinner (1992), along with Dreyfus and Tall,
has distinguished the concept image and the concept definition of a student. The concept image is a
collection of all the objects, processes, and schemas possessed by a student which are associated
with the concept. This may include mental pictures, misconceptions and properties (Dreyfus, 1990).
The tension between this image and the mathematical definition is the focus of the framework. By
describing a student’s concept image, one is able to help the student reorganize it into a more
coherent structure which is consonant with the concept definition (Thompson, 1994b). Tall (1989)
uses a framework based on the concept image which includes the use of generic organizers and
computer modeling. A generic organizer is an environment (or microworld) which enables the
learner to manipulate examples and (if possible) non-examples of a specific mathematical concept or
a related system of concepts.” (Tall, 1989, p. 39 [emphasis in original]) Pedagogically, this framework
allows the learner to build from cognitive bases rather than mathematical foundations. 4 2.3
Multiple Representations Kaput (1985) explores student understanding of mathematical concepts by
observing the student’s ability to represent the concept. Five uses of representation in mathematics
are (a) mental, (b) computer, (c) explanatory, (d) mathematical, and (e) symbolic—as with external
mathematical notation. Kaput (1991) extends the idea of the student’s notational system as an
architecture which organizes her or his mathematical experience. The notational system is also used
to represent the mental structures in the physical world. The analogy to architecture is extended to
say that, as an educator, one can design elegant and functional representational systems, possibly
with computer contexts, for students. He describes the existence of three “worlds”; material,
mental, and social (or consensual). The mathematics classroom is located in the consensual world
where change can take place rapidly. Thus learning takes place in the relationship between the
student representing and interpreting mathematics and in the shared meaning with others. A
related framework is that of Greeno, who also considers a conceptual domain for mathematical
thinking. It should be noted that these frameworks are not explicitly based on any of the three
theories previously given (neither is that of Schoenfeld, below). Reasoning is accomplished by
interacting with mental models in this environment.
Activity
Think more
1. How do the knowledge of theories of learning and teaching help teachers
to effectively teach better
2. Write down why the theory of Multiple Intelligence would be appropriate
for active learning of mathematics.
3. Explain why Bloom’s Taxonomy is considered as a better guide to the
teaching and learning of mathematics .
4. Discuss how you would teach directed numbers using constructivism
approach in Form 1.
In most cases, curriculum mapping refers to the alignment of learning standards and
teaching—i.e., how well and to what extent a school or teacher has matched the content that
students are actually taught with the academic expectations described in learning standards—
but it may also refer to the mapping and alignment of all the many elements that are entailed
in educating students, including assessments, textbooks, assignments, lessons, and
instructional techniques.
Generally speaking, a coherent curriculum is (1) well organized and purposefully designed to
facilitate learning, (2) free of academic gaps and needless repetitions, and (3) aligned across
lessons, courses, subject areas, and grade levels. When educators map a curriculum, they are
working to ensure that what students are actually taught matches the academic expectations
in a particular subject area or grade level.
While the specific approach or strategies used to map a curriculum may vary widely from
district to district, school to school, or even teacher to teacher, the process typically aims to
achieve a few common goals:
Curriculum mapping aims to ensure that the assessments, tests, and other methods
teachers use to evaluate learning achievement and progress are based on what has
actually been taught to students and on the learning standards that the students are
expected to meet in a particular course, subject area, or grade level.
This curriculum focuses on student achievement. To achieve the outcomes, students must be
introduced to new knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in the context of their existing
knowledge, skills, attitudes and values so that they develop a deeper understanding as they
learn and apply the knowledge. In this way, the process of learning is integral to the final
product. The final products are the outcomes, that is, what students are expected to achieve
in terms of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values, which must be clearly stated before
teaching and learning begin. The achievements made at school, however, are only truly
beneficial when the students transfer them to life beyond the school and view learning as a
lifelong process. This is essential to keep pace with the changing social environment of home
and work.
The figure below illustrates the structure and major elements of Malawi’s secondary school
curriculum, which are elaborated in the text below.
TEACHING LEARNING
Developmental outcomes
Assessment standards
Success
criteria
ASSESSMENT
Developmental outcomes
The developmental outcomes are over-arching; they are what the student is expected to
achieve by the end of the secondary school cycle both in and out of school. These outcomes
apply to subject areas and they have been derived from the Constitution of the Republic of
Malawi, Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS), National Education Sector
Plan (NESP), Education Act and other education policy documents, including global policies
and multilateral agreements to which Malawi is a signatory, as well as from the Secondary
School Curriculum and Assessment Review (SSCAR). That is, students should be able to:
1 demonstrate appropriate moral and ethical behaviour in accordance with the accepted
norms and values of the society
2 demonstrate local, regional, and international understanding
3 communicate competently, effectively, and relevantly in a variety of contexts, in an
appropriate local or international language
4 apply mathematical concepts in socio-cultural, political, economic, environmental,
scientific, and technological contexts to solve problems
5 apply scientific, technological, vocational, and managerial skills in a creative and
innovative way to identify problems and develop appropriate solutions, so as to
participate productively in society
6 demonstrate health-promoting behaviour in their personal lives as well as in their
communities and the wider environment, with particular attention to prevalent diseases
7 appreciate and interact with the environment in a responsible and sustainable manner
8 apply the indigenous and non-indigenous knowledge and skills necessary for lifelong
learning, personal advancement, employment, and the development of society
9 use Information and Communication Technology (ICT) responsibly and productively
10 demonstrate an understanding of the functioning of the economy and the contribution of
agriculture and other sectors to national development
11 make use of entrepreneurial and vocational skills for personal and national development
12 apply research skills for problem-solving
13 demonstrate an understanding and appreciation of issues of human rights, democracy,
gender, governance, and other emerging issues
1 citizenship skills
2 ethical and socio-cultural skills
3 economic development and environmental management skills
4 occupational and entrepreneurial skills
5 practical skills
6 creativity and resourcefulness
7 scientific and technological skills
Citizenship skills
1 demonstrate an understanding and appreciation of the symbols of nationhood
2 demonstrate a spirit of patriotism and national unity
3 apply decision-making skills necessary for participation in civic affairs
4 demonstrate a spirit of leadership and service
5 show respect for one’s own and other people’s rights and responsibilities
6 tolerate other people’s attitudes and beliefs
7 demonstrate respect for the rule of law
8 understand characteristics of good governance
9 initiate and implement community development projects
10 demonstrate a sense of good neighbourliness
11 demonstrate a sense of national, regional and international understanding
12 demonstrate cooperative behaviour
13 demonstrate personal and social responsibility
Practical skills
46 acquire entrepreneurial skills related to agriculture, commerce and industry
47 apply appropriate skills to agricultural, commercial and industrial production
48 demonstrate positive attitudes to manual work
49 demonstrate excellence in any kind of workmanship
50 demonstrate sporting ability and sportsmanship
51 demonstrate the ability to use creative and innovative artistic talents for self-
employment
The students will be able to describe number systems and apply their properties in
arithmetical operations.
Structure
The students will be able to describe sets of numbers including properties of vectors,
rotation, reflection, translation and matrices in terms of quantity, structure, and space.
The students will be able to solve problems involving shape, size, space, relationships
between the sides and the angles of triangles, Pythagoras theorem and trigonometric
functions.
The students will be able to draw and interpret graphs and charts, organize and interpret
information, relationships and changes.
Statistics
The students will be able to formulate questions that can be addressed with data and collect,
organize, and display relevant data to answer them; select and use appropriate simple
statistical methods to analyze data; develop and make predictions that are based on data;
understand and apply basic concepts of probability.
A generalized lesson plan template is quite useful. Among other things, it helps unify the
overall processes and profession of teaching, giving all teachers some common ground.
However, each discipline has its own content and its own pedagogical content knowledge
(PCK). pedagogical content knowledge A good discipline-specific lesson plan reflects the
uniqueness of the content and teaching of the discipline. A good teacher in a discipline draws
heavily on that discipline’s proven PCK repertoire. A good lesson plan may well include a
discussion of PCK to employ when conducting the lesson.
The remainder of this document focuses on possible components of a math lesson plan
template. Of course, such a template will include the components of the general-purpose
lesson plan. However, the teaching of math has many differences from teaching any other
discipline. A good math lesson plan reflects these differences.
Math was an informal area of study long before the development of reading and writing. With
the development of reading and writing somewhat over 5,000 years ago, math became part of
the core curriculum in schools. Many people believe math to be second only to language arts
in importance in the curriculum.
What distinguishes math from other disciplines? Perhaps a good starting point in answering
this question is to delve into an exploration of what constitutes a discipline.
The various academic disciplines in our formal educational system have considerable
differences. Each academic discipline or area of study is delineated by such things as its:
This observation helps us to understand the relative ease of creating a one-period lesson plan
in a discipline versus the challenge of reating a multi-lesson unit of study, a course, or an
extended curriculum leading to a relatively high level of expertise in a discipline. It is quite
difficult to develop an extensive curriculum that fits the needs of a broad range of students
who are working over a period of many years to gain a particular level of expertise in the
various disciplines. This is further complicated by synergies among disciplines.
Often, large teams of "experts" in a discipline address this challenge by working to develop
appropriate scope, sequence, and benchmarks. Most professional societies have such ongoing
efforts. For example, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) plays a
leadership role in developing math education standards in the United States. From time to
time a populous state, such as California, will publish benchmarks in a discipline such as
math, and these benchmarks influence textbook companies and many other states throughout
the country.
Currently, the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) project is a dominant force in the
United State. See [Link]
What Is Math?
Precollege math curricula in the United States are sometimes described as (and criticized as)
being "a mile wide and an inch deep." So many different topics can be taught that it is hard to
decide which to emphasize. Time is limited, and curriculum developers continually face the
challenge of balancing depth and variety.
A possible lodestone is to attend to the essence of the discipline. Thus, math educators think
carefully about the math-related aspects of attitude, content, and process. Their answers to
"What is math?" will then guide development of curriculum content, teacher attitudes,
instructional processes, and assessment in our math educational system. Those who teach
teachers are expected to be mathematically competent and able to communicate a defensible
answer to the "What is math?" question.
Although there are many different approaches to learning, there are three basic types of
learning theory: behaviorist, cognitive constructivist, and social constructivist. This section
provides a brief introduction to each type of learning theory. The theories are treated in four
parts: a short historical introduction, a discussion of the view of knowledge presupposed by
the theory, an account of how the theory treats learning and student motivation, and finally,
an overview of some of the instructional methods promoted by the theory is presented.
Learning Theories
What is constructivism?
Constructivism is basically a theory -- based on observation and scientific study -- about how
people learn. It says that people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the
world, through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences. When we encounter
something new, we have to reconcile it with our previous ideas and experience, maybe
changing what we believe, or maybe discarding the new information as irrelevant. In any
case, we are active creators of our own knowledge.
In the classroom, the constructivist view of learning can point towards a number of different
teaching practices. In the most general sense, it usually means encouraging students to use
active techniques (experiments, real-world problem solving) to create more knowledge and then to
reflect on and talk about what they are doing and how their understanding is changing. The teacher
makes sure she understands the students' pre existing conceptions, and guides the activity to
address them and then build on them.
Constructivist teachers encourage students to constantly assess how the activity is helping them gain
understanding. By questioning themselves and their strategies, students in the constructivist
classroom ideally become "expert learners." This gives them ever-broadening tools to keep learning.
With a well-planned classroom environment, the students learn
4.0 Introduction
In this unit you will discuss methods used for teaching mathematics.
Furthermore you will describe the advantages and disadvantages of such
In order to prepare you well, in this chapter, we assume you have done some
courses of education and mathematics at levels one and two at university.
Activity 1
Brainstorm the methods you know in the teaching of mathemtics.
Some of the methods you have listed include Lecture, Question and Answer,
Group work, Demonstration, Pair work and Think-pair-share, Discussion
(whole class and group), Role play, Discovery, Games, Practical, Jig-saw.
Each method has its advantage and disadvantage to the teacher and to the
learner. The teacher need to use variety of methods when teaching
mathematics. Also teachers need to be aware that methods which promote
learner-centred are supposed to dominate the whole lesson. The idea
behind is to ensure that learners are engaged throughout the entire lesson
presentation. It is believed that learners who are active participants perform
better than those who are dormant. So a careful selection of methods need
to be done in order to promote an active classroom.
ACTIVITY 2
In groups discuss the merits and demerits of the teaching methods mentioned
in the previous section.
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____
In your discussion some of the ideas can also be related to large classes,
inadequate resources, saving time, promoting creativity, engaging learners,
learner-centred, maximising time versus content coverage, sharing of
knowledge between students/ students and students/ teacher.
Given a wide range of the teaching methods and knowing the learners, the
teacher is left to make choices for teaching. It is wrong for a teacher to
become a slave of only one method, and think that the same method will
serve his/her purpose for ever (Sidhu, K.S, 2004).
Activity 3
Discuss the implications of the teaching methods to mathematics teachers and
learners.
Some methods discussed may not work better all the time for the teacher.
The nature of content to be presented can also affect choices of the methods.
Variety of methods within the lesson can help all learners acquire better
skills. Learners need also to be motivated as they are doing mathematics. Let
students discover things for themselves and the teacher must only guide and
support them.
Using teaching methods alone will not help the teacher to teach his or her
learners to attain good learning. In this case the teacher employs certain
tactics to develop the potential of learning in the lesson. Mathematics
teaching skills are the strategies employed by teachers in the classroom for
the effective teaching and learning. Every teacher thinks about how best to
teach his or her learners for better understanding. The teacher uses the
teaching skills from the beginning of the lesson up to the end of the lesson.
These teaching skills are also techniques necessary for classroom
communication between the teacher and learners. When these teaching
skills are handled properly by teachers, learners’ interest and curiosity
become enhanced. There are several teaching skills you are supposed to
learn as a way of presenting quality mathematics to your students. There are
some teaching skills frequently being used in lesson presentation while others
are specifically for a purpose. The way some skills are applied in some
courses might be different due to the nature of the courses being offered.
Activity 1
Let students practice in groups on how they would introduce the topic
Similarity to form 2 students.
Activity 2
In groups students are asked to discuss what they understand by the
following communication skills:
Skill of Questioning
This skill is the most important in guiding the teaching and learning process.
Types of Questions
Within the context of open-ended mathematical tasks, it is useful to group
questions into four main categories (Badham, 1994). These questions can be
used be the teacher to guide the children through investigations while
stimulating their mathematical thinking and gathering information about their
knowledge and strategies.
1. Starter questions
These take the form of open-ended questions which focus the children's
thinking in a general direction and give them a starting point. Examples:
How could you sort these.......?
How many ways can you find to ....... ?
What happens when we ......... ?
What can be made from....?
How many different ....... can be found?
3. Assessment questions
Questions such as these ask children to explain what they are doing or how
they arrived at a solution. They allow the teacher to see how the children are
thinking, what they understand and what level they are operating at.
Obviously they are best asked after the children have had time to make
progress with the problem, to record some findings and perhaps achieved at
least one solution.
Examples:
What have you discovered?
How did you find that out?
Why do you think that?
What made you decide to do it that way?
Elliptical questions: Questions that are unclear because the teacher has
omitted specifics and these questions offer nothing to the lesson eg How
about these two angles?
Leading questions: Is one that tugs the desired response from the student
eg Seven is a factor of 35, isn’t it?. Students are not provoked in thinking
These skills require you as a teacher to consider in your lesson planning and
presentation. Teachers need to be aware that skills are for better
communication in a classroom. Good explanation, positive reinforcement,
questioning facilitates effective learning of mathematics. Most activities done
in the classrooms require clear communication and effective questioning for
deep understanding of information. communication in a classroom. good
explanation, positive reinforcement, questioning facilitates effective learning
of mathematics. Most activities done in the classrooms require clear
communication and effective questioning for deep understanding of
information.
Activity 3
Discuss in groups what mathematics teachers need to consider when using
the communication skills for teaching.
You will agree that without such skills effective teaching could not take place.
Teachers who understand the importance of such skills are able to motivate
their students. The challenges mathematics cause to some students could be
rectified if teachers consider such skills when planning lessons.
Unit Assessment
1. Which teaching skill(s) will you consider most when conducting group
work for your students.
2. Write down the components of the skill of
a) Explanation
b) Closure
c) Reinforcement
3. When teaching the topic construction in form two, which skill(s) will be
most appropriate.
4. Briefly describe why a teacher is supposed to summarize a lesson.
5. Explain what mathematics teachers have to consider when teaching the
theorem: The angle in which the chord and tangent make at the point of
contact is equal to the angle in the alternate segment.
Summary
The teaching skills need to be considered by all aspiring teachers to make
their lessons more effective. It’s not easy to develop such skills however with
time you experience them as the core of teaching. For beginners these skills
need to be practiced each one separately for masterly. In the next unit you
will be introduced to assessment which is also another important aspect of
teaching effective mathematics.
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
1. Verbal-linguistic intelligence (well-developed verbal skills and
sensitivity to the sounds, meanings and rhythms of words)
2. Logical-mathematical intelligence (ability to think conceptually and
abstractly, and capacity to discern logical and numerical patterns)
3. Spatial-visual intelligence (capacity to think in images and pictures, to
visualize accurately and abstractly)
4. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (ability to control one’s body movements
and to handle objects skillfully)
5. Musical intelligences (ability to produce and appreciate rhythm, pitch
and timber)
6. Interpersonal intelligence (capacity to detect and respond appropriately
to the moods, motivations and desires of others)
7. Intrapersonal (capacity to be self-aware and in tune with inner feelings,
values, beliefs and thinking processes)
8. Naturalist intelligence (ability to recognize and categorize plants,
animals and other objects in nature)
9. Existential intelligence (sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions
about human existence such as, What is the meaning of life? Why do we
die? How did we get here?
(Source: Thirteen ed online, 2004)
Human Potential
Human potential can be tied to one’s preferences to learning; thus, Gardner’s
focus on human potential lies in the fact that people have a unique blend of
capabilities and skills (intelligences). This model can be used to understand
“overall personality, preferences and strengths” ([Link], n.d.).
Gardner asserts that people who have an affinity toward one of the
intelligences
do so in concert with the other intelligences as “they develop skills and solve
problems” ([Link], 2009). People have different strengths and
intelligences. For example, students who are “interviewed” as a means to
gain access to a course may be mis-labeled as being less than desirable
because of inappropriate assessment (poorly written interview questions, bias
toward a perceived “perfect student,” and other narrow criteria). “In life, we
need people who collectively are good at different things. A wellbalanced
world, and well-balanced organizations and teams, are necessarily comprised
of people who possess different mixtures of intelligences. This gives that
group a fuller collective capacity than a group of identical able
specialists”([Link], 2009). Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory
can be used for curriculum development, planning instruction, selection of
course activities, and related assessment strategies. Instruction which is
designed to help students develop their strengths can also trigger their
confidence to develop areas in which they are not as strong. Students’
multiple learning preferences can be addressed when instruction includes a
range of meaningful and appropriate methods, activities, and assessments.
Summary
In summary, integrate educational theories, teaching strategies, and other
pedagogic tools in meaningful and useful ways to better address the needs of
students. Gardner himself asserts that educators should not follow one
specific
theory or educational innovation when designing instruction but instead
employ
customized goals and values appropriate to their teaching and student needs.
Addressing the multiple intelligences and potential of students can help
instructors personalize their instruction and methods of assessment
Lesson planning
Strategies for Effective Lesson Planning
A lesson plan is the instructor’s road map of what students need to learn and
how it will be done effectively during the class time. Before you plan your
lesson, you will first need to identify the learning objectives for the class
meeting. Then, you can design appropriate learning activities and develop
strategies to obtain feedback on student learning. A successful lesson plan
addresses and integrates these three key components:
Specifying concrete objectives for student learning will help you determine
the kinds of teaching and learning activities you will use in class, while those
activities will define how you will check whether the learning objectives have
been accomplished (see Fig. 1).
Steps for Preparing a Lesson Plan
Below are six steps to guide you when you create your first lesson plans.
Each step is accompanied by a set of questions meant to prompt reflection
and aid you in designing your teaching and learning activities.
The first step is to determine what you want students to learn and be able to
do at the end of class. To help you specify your objectives for student
learning, answer the following questions:
Once you outline the learning objectives for the class meeting, rank them in
terms of their importance. This step will prepare you for managing class time
and accomplishing the more important learning objectives in case you are
pressed for time. Consider the following questions:
What are the most important concepts, ideas, or skills I want students to be
able to grasp and apply?
Why are they important?
If I ran out of time, which ones could not be omitted?
And conversely, which ones could I skip if pressed for time?
(2) Develop the introduction
Now that you have your learning objectives in order of their importance,
design the specific activities you will use to get students to understand and
apply what they have learned. Because you will have a diverse body of
students with different academic and personal experiences, they may already
be familiar with the topic. That is why you might start with a question or
activity to gauge students’ knowledge of the subject or possibly, their
preconceived notions about it. For example, you can take a simple poll: “How
many of you have heard of X? Raise your hand if you have.” You can also
gather background information from your students prior to class by sending
students an electronic survey or asking them to write comments on index
cards. This additional information can help shape your introduction, learning
activities, etc. When you have an idea of the students’ familiarity with the
topic, you will also have a sense of what to focus on.
How will I check whether students know anything about the topic or have
any preconceived notions about it?
What are some commonly held ideas (or possibly misconceptions) about
this topic that students might be familiar with or might espouse?
What will I do to introduce the topic?
(3) Plan the specific learning activities (the main body of the lesson)
Now that you have explained the topic and illustrated it with different
examples, you need to check for student understanding – how will you know
that students are learning? Think about specific questions you can ask
students in order to check for understanding, write them down, and then
paraphrase them so that you are prepared to ask the questions in different
ways. Try to predict the answers your questions will generate. Decide on
whether you want students to respond orally or in writing. You can look
at Strategies to Extend Student
Thinking, [Link] to help you generate some
ideas and you can also ask yourself these questions:
What questions will I ask students to check for understanding?
What will I have students do to demonstrate that they are following?
Going back to my list of learning objectives, what activity can I have
students do to check whether each of those has been accomplished?
An important strategy that will also help you with time management is to
anticipate students’ questions. When planning your lesson, decide what kinds
of questions will be productive for discussion and what questions might
sidetrack the class. Think about and decide on the balance between covering
content (accomplishing your learning objectives) and ensuring that students
understand.
Go over the material covered in class by summarizing the main points of the
lesson. You can do this in a number of ways: you can state the main points
yourself (“Today we talked about…”), you can ask a student to help you
summarize them, or you can even ask all students to write down on a piece of
paper what they think were the main points of the lesson. You can review the
students’ answers to gauge their understanding of the topic and then explain
anything unclear the following class. Conclude the lesson not only by
summarizing the main points, but also by previewing the next lesson. How
does the topic relate to the one that’s coming? This preview will spur
students’ interest and help them connect the different ideas within a larger
context.
GSIs know how easy it is to run out of time and not cover all of the many
points they had planned to cover. A list of ten learning objectives is not
realistic, so narrow down your list to the two or three key concepts, ideas, or
skills you want students to learn. Instructors also agree that they often need
to adjust their lesson plan during class depending on what the students need.
Your list of prioritized learning objectives will help you make decisions on the
spot and adjust your lesson plan as needed. Having additional examples or
alternative activities will also allow you to be flexible. A realistic timeline will
reflect your flexibility and readiness to adapt to the specific classroom
environment. Here are some strategies for creating a realistic timeline:
Estimate how much time each of the activities will take, then plan some
extra time for each
When you prepare your lesson plan, next to each activity indicate how
much time you expect it will take
Plan a few minutes at the end of class to answer any remaining questions
and to sum up key points
Plan an extra activity or discussion question in case you have time left
Be flexible – be ready to adjust your lesson plan to students’ needs and
focus on what seems to be more productive rather than sticking to your
original plan
Presenting the Lesson Plan
Letting your students know what they will be learning and doing in class will
help keep them more engaged and on track. You can share your lesson plan
by writing a brief agenda on the board or telling students explicitly what they
will be learning and doing in class. You can outline on the board or on a
handout the learning objectives for the class. Providing a meaningful
organization of the class time can help students not only remember better,
but also follow your presentation and understand the rationale behind in-class
activities. Having a clearly visible agenda (e.g., on the board) will also help
you and students stay on track.
Conclusion
In the development of Learning Goals and Success Criteria, teachers can very
meaningfully merge mathematical content and practice standards. How
students will engage with mathematics (i.e., practice standards) should be
reflected just as much as what mathematics they will learn (i.e., content
standards).
TOPIC :
Institution:
Student Teacher’s name:
Subject:
CoreElement:
Unit/Topic: Form:
LessonTopic: Duration: from to
Date: No in Class
Rationale:
Prerequisite Knowledge:
DEVELOPMENT
Conclusion: ( 5minutes)
Evaluation:
TEACHING/
TEACHING/LEA
SUCCESS LEARNING
WEEK/DATE PLANNED ACTIVITIES RNING& REFERENCES OUTCOMES REMARKS
CRITERIA &ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
METHOD
RESOURCES
Institution: Mzuni
Student teacher’s Name: C Mpewe
Subject : Mathematics
CoreElement: Patterns, relations, functions and change
Unit/Topic: Coordinate Geometry Class: Form1
LessonTopic: Plotting points on a Cartesian plane Duration: 80 minutes
Date:
Rationale: This topic is a foundation for the study of graphs and its relationships in real world
Success Criteria:
a) Describing positions
b) Locating points
Prerequisite Knowledge: Linear equations, number patterns, algebraic expressions, number line
Teaching / Learning Materials: Sheets of paper, school map, sitting arrangements, post office boxes, bawo,
chess, school assembly, soldiers parades
Ask learners to state location of Learners describe the positions of their Describing locations
their home and school; and homes in relation to the school and
extend this to structures within the some fixed positions
school.
DEVELOPMENT
(20 minutes)
Let learners describe the set-up
of a classroom. Learners describe the arrangement of Stating and describing
the classroom. positions
Have learners state other places
or objects where a similar Learners state other similar
arrangement is observed. arrangements they might have seen.
Plotting points
Learners are given points such Plot given points.
as (1,0); (-1,3); (2,-4) ;(-3,1) and
asked to plot with reference to the
origin.
Identification of axes
(15 minutes) Scaling
Have learners identify vertical Learners identify horizontal and Plotting points
and horizontal axes on the grids. vertical axes
Evaluation: