University of San Carlos - Downtown Campus
School of Business and Economics
THE USE OF GCASH AS AN ADDITIONAL MODE OF
PAYMENT FOR THE CANTEEN STALLS
In requirements of GE-MMW (Mathematics in Modern World)
IAP Submission
Submitted by:
Atto, Mae Ann B.
Carter, Terrel Janus
De Guia, Fern Anne Cassandra P.
Fernandez, Cliff David D.
Mabanto, Rhyle Emmanuel
Marimon, Ma. Etienne Therese M.
Submitted to:
Mrs. Jovita Ravina
May 2023
I. INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked a change in mindset. When the country enacted
health and social-distancing protocols, it gave the required impetus for more users – individuals,
enterprises, and the government – to embrace digital payments. Digital payments are made
through the use of E-wallets (Ratten, 2021). An E-wallet is also known as a digital wallet, is a
software application that uses electronic devices such as computers or mobile devices for online
transactions (Uduji, 2018). Furthermore, in accordance with the BSP data, many Filipinos were
adopting e-wallet or e-payment systems compared to credit cards in 2018. Without physical cash
and credit card, Systems such as GCash and PayMaya have become the common option for
Filipinos to do digital financial transactions (Zoleta, 2021).
Despite the recent growth of the electronic payment (e-payment) industry, cash transactions
still dominate in the Philippines. The country's low bank population is one factor driving its slow
growth rate (Remo, 2018).
E-payment systems in the Philippines mostly do not require a bank account and can be
easily accessible using mobile phones. Systems such as GCash and PayMaya make it easier for
Filipinos to use digital payment platforms. With the Eliminated requirement of bank accounts,
e-payment systems have a strong potential in a low bank country like The Philippines (Raon, et.
al., 2021).
According to the Visa Consumer Payment Attitudes Study 2018. Almost 69 per cent of
Filipinos believe they can go cashless for a day, while roughly 52 per cent believe that they can
use only electronic payments for up to three days. The survey also showed that 70 per cent of
respondents have gone cashless for at least a few days (Visa, 2018).
Studies have shown that 86.2% of people are more likely to spend money if a vendor
accepts GCash as a form of payment. This evidence demonstrates the feasibility of implementing
GCash in your school canteen, as it can attract more customers and increase sales.
Apart from the benefits of convenience and security, using GCash in the lunchroom can
also promote financial literacy among students. By learning how to manage and budget their
accounts, they can gain important skills that will prepare them for future financial responsibilities.
This can help them develop a more responsible attitude towards money, which can lead to better
financial decisions in the long run.
GCash can also bring greater efficiency to the lunchroom, as it eliminates the need for cash
transactions. This can significantly reduce transaction times and shorten lines, allowing students
and staff to get their meals quickly and efficiently. Additionally, GCash can provide an added
layer of safety and security, as it eliminates the need to carry cash, which can be lost or stolen.
GCash also uses various security measures to protect user transactions, which can provide peace
of mind for both vendors and customers.
According to studies, students are more likely to purchase items from vendors who accept
GCash, which can increase sales and revenue for the lunchroom. The transition to GCash can also
attract more customers, as it provides a modern and convenient payment option that is becoming
increasingly popular among younger generations
In summary, implementing GCash as a form of payment in the lunchroom can provide
numerous benefits, including increased efficiency, security, and financial literacy. By providing a
modern and convenient payment option, your school canteen can attract more customers and
increase sales, while also preparing students for future financial responsibilities.
II. OBJECTIVES
Statement of the Problem
The main objective of this study is to determine the benefits of using Gcash as an additional mode
of payment for the canteen stalls and how effective Gcash is at handling canteen transactions. In
particular, digital payment methods continue to grow in popularity. Thus, it is necessary to assess
the efficacy of adding Gcash as an extra payment option for canteen stalls.
This study aims to further address the following:
[Link] feasibility of using Gcash as an additional payment option for canteen stalls.
2. The perceived benefits of implementing Gcash as a mode of payment in the canteen stalls.
3. The efficiency of using Gcash as a payment option in the canteen stalls.
4. The impact of adding Gcash as a payment option on the sales and revenue of the canteen stalls.
III. PRESENTATION
Table 1 : Comparison between General use of Gcash vc Canteen Use of Gcash
This is a bar chart that shows a comparison between the use of Gcash for general purposes and the use of
Gcash in purchasing products in the canteen
Table 2 : Data of students who have used Gcash in the canteen
This is a pie chart that shows how many students who have used gcash in purchasing items in the
canteen stalls
Table 3 : Having gcash as an additional mode of payment to attract customers
This is a pie chart shows the data of students who believe that having gcash as an additional mode of
payment will attract more customers for the canteen stalls
Table 4 : Having gcash will raise revenues and sales of the canteen stalls
This is a pie chart that shows the data of students who believe that having gcash as an additional
mode of payment will possibly raise the revenue of sales as.
Table 5 : Students who are in favor of having gcash as an additional mode of payment
This is a pie chart that shows the data of students who are in favor of having gcash as an additional
mode of payment..
IV. DISCUSSION
The data shown in Table 1 presents a breakdown between the comparison of General use
of and canteen use of Gcash. The researchers have created appropriate questions that may answer
the objective. When students were asked “How often do you use Gcash”, 30.8% of the
respondents answered in the scale of 4 about the question. 26.2% of the respondents answered on
the scale of 3. 21.5% of the respondents answered on the scale of 2. 16.9% of the respondents
answered on the scale of 5, while 4.6% of the respondents answered 1. The figure below showed
the partition of the said data.
Table 2 presents a data breakdown of different uses of Gcash in the canteen. When asked
“Have you used Gcash as a mode of payments for the canteen stalls before”, 66.2% of the
respondents have answered “No” while 33.8% have answered “Yes”. Majority of the students did
not use it as a mode of payment for the canteen stalls before.
The data shown in Table 3 is a cost comparison of the different implementations of
Gcash. When asked “Do you think implementing GCash as a mode of payment will attract more
customers to the canteen stalls”, 86.2% of the respondents have answered “Yes” while 13.8%
have answered “ No”. Majority of the students are attracted to implement it as a mode of payment
for the canteen stalls.
Table 4 showed the different purchases using Gcash to raise the canteen sales. When
asked “Do you think customers and students would be more likely to make purchases at the
canteen stalls if GCash is available as a mode of payment”, 90.8% of the respondents answered
“Yes” while 9.2% answered “No”. Majority of the students are attracted to purchase the
availability as a mode of payment.
In the said Table 5 of the different voting of students in Gcash as an additional payment .
When asked “Would you like GCash to be an additional mode of payment in canteen stalls”,
96.9% of the respondents answered “Yes” while 3.1% answered “ No”. Majority of the students
liked GCash to be an additional mode of payment.
V. SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
These findings of the study were summarized according to the statement of the problem:
1. To determine the feasibility of using Gcash as an additional payment option for canteen stalls.
Based on the data collected, in Table 1, 47.7% of the respondents use gcash often in their
everyday lives. While in Figure 1, 66.2% of the respondents have used Gcash as a mode of
payment for the canteen stalls. The data shows that integrating GCash as an additional payment
option for canteen stalls is feasible.
2. To determine the perceived benefits of implementing Gcash as a mode of payment in the
canteen stalls
.By minimizing the reliance on cash, the risk of errors, theft, or loss during transactions
can be significantly reduced, resulting in potential cost savings for the canteen management. With
reduced cash transactions, the canteen stall operators can save time in counting and reconciling
cash at the end of the day, leading to increased efficiency.
3. To determine the efficiency of using Gcash as a payment option in the canteen stalls.
Based on the data allocated in figure 2, 43.1 % of the respondents would often use Gcash
as a mode of payment. It is evident that providing GCash as a payment option in canteen stalls
significantly improves efficiency because customers appreciated the option to make payments
using their smartphones, eliminating the need for the customer to look for smaller bills if the store
has no change for big bills.
4. To determine the impact of adding Gcash as a payment option on the sales and revenue of the
canteen stalls.
Based on the data gathered, in figure 4, A majority of the surveyed canteen customers
(96.9%) expressed interest in using GCash as an additional payment method. The convenience of
mobile payments was identified as the primary driver for customer adoption, allowing for faster
transactions and reducing the need for cash handling. Based on the data collected, in figure 3,
90.8% of the respondents would likely make more purchases from the canteen stalls. Thus, by
providing as GCash an option, canteen stalls can attract more customers because GCash is widely
used and accepted, making it easier for individuals who prefer cashless transactions to patronize
the canteen stalls
VI. REFERENCES
[1] Ratten, V. (2021). COVID‐19 and entrepreneurship: Future research directions. Strategic
Change, 30(2), 91-98.
[2] Uduji, J. I., Okolo‐Obasi, E. N., &Asongu, S. A. (2019). The impact of e‐wallet on informal
farm entrepreneurship development in rural Nigeria. The Electronic Journal of Information
Systems in Developing Countries, 85(3), e12066.
[3] Zoleta, V. (2021, April 10). [Battle of the Brands] PayMaya vs GCash: Which Mobile Wallet
App is Right for You? Moneymax. <https:// [Link]/personal-finance/articles/
paymaya-vs-gcash>
[4] Raon, C. J. B., De Leon, M. V., & Dui, R. (2021). Adoption of E-Payment Systems in the
Philippines.
[5] Remo, A. R. (2018). E-payment gains ground. [Link]. <[Link]
net/262641/epayment-gains-ground>