Sneed2005 PDF
Sneed2005 PDF
Sneed2005 PDF
375--388
Older adults are faced with numerous physical, psychological, and social role
changes that challenge their sense of self and capacity to live happily. In addition,
they are inundated by our youth-oriented culture with negative ageist stereotypes.
Nevertheless, most older adults live happy, fulfilling lives. In this article, we review
theories of the aging individual that address this apparent paradox. These theories
can be largely divided into those that emphasize control and goal attainment,
and those that emphasize the self’s organizational capacity. Of the self-oriented
theories, we will highlight Whitbourne’s (1996) identity process perspective, which
is specific to the aging process and attempts to explain the self’s unique capacity
to remain stable yet change over time.
∗ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Joel R. Sneed, Department of Psy-
chology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003 [e-mail: [email protected]].
This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32 MH19890.
375
C 2005 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
376 Sneed and Whitbourne
Despite the existence of ageism and the normative age-related challenges that
older adults must face, the majority of older adults maintain a positive sense of
self, a phenomenon referred to as the “paradox of well-being” (Mroczek & Kolarz,
1998). Supporting this concept, Mroczek and Spiro (2003) studied the trajectories
of the personality traits of extraversion and neuroticism in over 1,600 men (mean
age = 63) from the Normative Aging Study over the course of later adulthood. They
found that although extraversion was fairly stable, neuroticism tended to decrease
over time, suggesting that people become less worried and anxious as they age.
This finding has most recently supported by a large, cross-sectional internet study,
which concluded that personality, like a fine wine, gets better with age (Srivastava,
John, Gosling, & Potter, 2003). In general, the majority of people report having
a positive evaluation of themselves and their lives, and this rosy view does not
become dimmed in old age (Diener, Suh, Lucas, & Smith, 1999).
How is that that the majority of older adults are happy in the face of nega-
tive ageist stereotypes and normative age-related declines? A number of theories
have been proposed to explain this paradox. These theories can be largely divided
into two camps: The first camp emphasizes the older adult’s sense of control over
his or her environment while the second camp focuses on the self as the guid-
ing framework for understanding life’s experiences. In this article, we will review
both control and self-oriented theories, and highlight the potential utility of Whit-
bourne’s (1996) identity processing perspective as one way of understanding the
aging individual.
In contrast to the negative views of older adults as depressed, frail, and cog-
nitively impaired are theories that support the view of aging as involving positive
growth. These theories of “successful aging” (Rowe & Kahn, 1987, 1998) empha-
size personal control and the self’s organizing function.
Self Theories
Markus and Nurius (1986) developed a model of possible selves that links
cognition and motivation by intertwining cognitive self-representation with fu-
ture goal-directed behavior. Possible selves are components of an individual’s
self-concept; a system of cognitive-affective structures or schemas that structure
self-concept salient experiences (Markus, 1977). According to the possible selves
model, self-conceptions motivate future oriented behavior to the extent that people
wish to realize ideal selves and avoid dreaded selves. Positive self-regard emerges
to the extent that people feel that they have been successful at realizing their hoped
for selves. Negative affect will emerge to the extent they people feel that they are
unable to or did not realize their desired possible selves. Thus, possible selves
function as powerful incentives for purposeful future-oriented behavior.
The possible selves model defines the working self-concept or the “now” self
as that aspect of the self-concept that is currently active in memory. Borrowing
from memory research, the self-concept can be represented as nodes in a net of
connections in memory. Possible selves remain stable to the extent that attributes of
a particular self-concept representation stay the same each time it is activated. For
example, each time the “unemployed self” is activated, it is always unemployed.
Inherent in the notion of possible selves, however, is the potential for self-concept
change. That is, the self-concept by definition changes every time a new self-
concept representation becomes activated in working memory. For example, if
one were to become employed, the model the working self-concept activated in
working memory would now represent “employed self.”
Self-discrepancy theory, proposed by Higgins (1987), is similar to the possi-
ble selves model in that it postulates that discrepancies between the actual and the
ideal selves and between the actual and the ought selves cause agitated emotions
such as fear, threat, and restlessness. Discrepancies between the actual self and the
hoped-for self cause dejection, disappointment, dissatisfaction, and sadness. Pre-
sumably, discrepancies in the first case are caused by fears of negative outcomes
(punishment), and in the second case, by failure to obtain positive outcomes (dis-
appointment). Moreover, according to self-discrepancy theory, these discrepancies
form particular self-guides (i.e., self-directive standards for being) that people are
differentially motivated to meet.
Andersen and Chen (2002) have developed a theory of the relational self based
on the phenomenon of transference and the fundamental human motivation for be-
longing, connection, and attachment. According to the relational self theory, the
self is shaped by interactions with significant others represented as relational exem-
plars in long-term memory. Such self and significant other exemplars are activated
by cues in the immediate environment which trigger transference (e.g., responding
to novel others on the basis of previously stored cognitive-affective schemas about
the self-with-significant-other) and lead to interpretive biases. This model is idio-
graphic to the extent that it emphasizes the uniqueness of each significant-other
representation in long-term memory storage, but it also maintains that activation of
382 Sneed and Whitbourne
In the next two sections, we review the basic postulates of identity process the-
ory and then move on to describe a series of empirical studies based on the model.
Identity process theory (Whitbourne, 1996) proposes that age-related changes in
adulthood are negotiated through the processes of identity assimilation, identity
accommodation, and identity balance. Individuals are postulated to use all three
processes, but at times may use one to the exclusion of the others.
Identity assimilation refers to the interpretation of identity-salient experiences
in terms of previously established cognitive and affective schemas about the self.
These self-schemas include the collection of knowledge about the self based on
previous experience and self-perceived competencies, values, and personality dis-
positions. Examples of these affectively loaded self-schemas might be physical
Models of the Aging Self 383
(able to run up a flight of stairs) and cognitive (able to remember people’s names).
Identity discrepant experiences, for example, would be experiences that challenge
an individual’s competence in specific areas such as mobility and memory. Ac-
cording to this theory, identity assimilation is a process that individuals use to
maintain a sense of self-consistency even in the face of discrepant experiences or
information about the self. To recognize unacceptable aspects of the self is painful
and produces negative affect. People who exclusively use assimilative processes
approach new experiences in a fixed and formulated way and seek out information
that is consistent with their current identity schemas.
Identity accommodation is the process of changing identity in response to new
experiences that are discrepant with existing self-schemas such as those referred
to above (changes in mobility or memory). Individuals who use identity accom-
modation to excess are readily influenced and easily shaped by new experiences
because their own identities are unstable and incoherent. The lack of internal con-
stancy, according to the theory, leads individuals who use identity accommodation
to be plagued by self-doubt and low self-esteem. Furthermore, the theory proposes
that people who use identity accommodation exclusively are highly responsive
to external influences; looking outside of themselves for inner guidance. In fact,
they may be most likely to evaluate themselves negatively when failing to gain the
approval of others. At that point, they may be vulnerable to experiencing highly
negative evaluations of their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors because other peo-
ple’s negative evaluations mirror their own inner turmoil and confusion. To return
to the above example, identity accommodation would involve re-defining one’s
physical identity schema due to the inability to run up the stairs.
When identity discrepant experiences occur, they are proposed to be first pro-
cessed through identity assimilation. In the physical schema example, the cause of
the problem would more likely be seen as a function of temporary fatigue or uncom-
fortable shoes rather than a change due to the aging process. Only when identity
assimilation fails does the individual use identity accommodation. For example,
after numerous instances of memory failure, the individual begins to question the
previous schema of the self as having mental prowess. This basic tenet of identity
process theory, derived from Piaget’s (1975/1977) cognitive developmental the-
ory, refers to a time-dependent process in which identity assimilation is always
utilized prior to identity accommodation. Although not tested in the present study,
this proposition is fundamental to the theory because it stipulates that people seek
to verify preexisting beliefs about themselves prior to making changes in the self,
which is consistent with the self-consistency perspective in personality (Lecky,
1945). Block (1982) has referred to this as the adaptive imperative, “Assimilate if
you can, accommodate if you must!” (p. 286).
A dynamic equilibrium between identity accommodation and assimilation is
theorized to be the most adaptive approach to aging and is captured in identity
process theory by the concept of identity balance. According to identity process
384 Sneed and Whitbourne
Empirical Studies
The first quantitative study investigating the hypothesis that identity balance
is the most favorable approach to aging used a scale of identity processes adapted
to evaluate how individuals reacted to specific age-related changes (Whitbourne
& Collins, 1998). Respondents ranging in age from 40 to 95 years old selected
the area of functioning most important to them and then completed scales mea-
suring identity assimilation, identity accommodation and identity balance with
regard to that change. For example, respondents might state that “loss of muscle
strength” was the most important age-related change that they had experienced.
They were then asked to rate the extent to which they used identity assimila-
tion (minimizing the importance of the change), accommodation (feeling over-
whelmed by the change), or balance (regarding the change as an impetus for
psychological growth). Scores on these scales were then correlated with a global
measure of self-esteem and examined for subgroups of respondents according to the
area of change they regarded as most important. Contrary to the original expectation
of the investigators, identity assimilation rather than balance was positively related
to self-esteem within three of the four areas of functioning assessed by the identity
scale. In particular, identity assimilation was positively related to self-esteem for
those middle-aged individuals who ranked changes in appearance and cognition
as most important. For participants 65 years and older, those who ranked basic
functioning as most important had higher self-esteem if they used identity assimi-
lation. From this pattern of findings, it appeared that the route to high self-esteem
in middle and later adulthood was the use of identity assimilation, a phenomenon
referred to the “identity assimilation effect.” Contrary to what might be expected,
older adults who were less, rather than more, self-reflective seemed to be better
adjusted in terms of self-esteem.
In subsequent studies, we sought to examine in more depth the identity as-
similation effect using a more general measure of identity processing, although
research on the specific age-change identity scales is continuing. In the first
of these studies (Sneed & Whitbourne, 2001), age, identity assimilation,
Models of the Aging Self 385
Conclusion
In addition to the normative age-related challenges that older adults must face
in terms of adapting to changes in their bodies, the array of negative stereotypes to
which they are exposed create challenges for their sense of self. Yet, the majority
of older adults experience high levels of satisfaction, and successful aging is the
norm rather than the exception. Theories that emphasize adaptation to loss and
the scaling down of cognitive and emotional resources in some ways fail to give
sufficient credit to the resilience of the average aging adult. By contrast, Erik-
son’s theory (Erikson, 1980, 1982; Erikson, Erikson, & Kivnick, 1986) provides
a framework for understanding how older adults can adapt to age-related changes
without becoming depressed or despondent. Although Erikson emphasized the
crisis element of this last psychosocial stage, based on the empirical work just
reviewed on identity process theory, it would appear that older adults are able to
maintain optimistic attitudes toward their lives without engaging in deep, reflec-
tive analysis of their lives and their accomplishments. We have suggested identity
assimilation as one such mechanism that older adults employ, but to be sure, it is
not the only route possible to positive mental health. Indeed, an empirical exam-
ination of the relationship between the different models discussed in this article
would clarify their differences and similarities in explaining adaptation in later
adulthood.
With the graying of the population, we can hope that psychologists will shift
their focus from loss and decline in later adulthood to a more balanced approach
in which gains and growth are emphasized. Rather than following behind the past
trends established by such ageist views as disengagement theory, psychologists
should be at the forefront of discovering the ways that older people not only
survive, but enjoy, the later years of life.
References
American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines for psychological practice with older adults.
Washington, DC: Author.
Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory.
Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait
construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
71, 230–244.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as
a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, Accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child
Development, 53, 281–295.
Brandstädter, J., & Greve, W. (1994). The aging self: Stabilizing and protective processes. Develop-
mental Review, 14, 52–80.
Brookmeyer, R., & Kawas, C. (1998). Projections of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and
the public health impact of delaying disease onset. American Journal of Public Health, 88,
1337–1342.
Models of the Aging Self 387
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of
socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
Cooley, S., Deitch, I. M., Harper, M. S., Hinrichsen, G., Lopez, M. A., & Molinari, V. A. (1998). What
practitioners should know about working with older adults. Professional Psychology: Research
and Practice, 29, 413–427.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological
Bulletin, 122, 5–37.
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic
Books.
Diehl, M., Coyle, N., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (1996). Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and
defense across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 127–139.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of
progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. New York:
W. W. Norton.
Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L., & Lutz, A. M. (1999). Influence of time on social preference: Implica-
tions for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 595–604.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94,
319–340.
Kite, M., & Johnson, B. (1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology
and Aging, 3, 233–244.
Lecky, P. (1945). Self-consistency: A theory of personality. New York: Island Press.
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive
self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 261–270.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A develop-
mental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.
Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2003). Modeling intraindividual change in personality traits: Findings
from the normative aging study. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58B,
P153–P165.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2002). Health: United States, 2002. Hyattsville, MD: Author.
Nelson, E. A., & Dannefer, D. (1992). Aged heterogeneity: Fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in
gerontological research. Gerontologist, 32, 17–23.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought (A. Rosin, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. (Original
work published 1975).
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, 237, 143–149.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon/Random House.
Schaie, K. W. (1988). Ageism in psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 179–183.
Schaie, K. W. (1993). Ageist language in psychological research. American Psychologist, 48, 49–51.
Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist,
51, 702–714.
Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1999). Aging, culture and control: Setting a new research agenda. The
Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P139–P145.
Sneed, J. R., & Whitbourne, S. K. (2001). Identity processing styles and the need for self-esteem in
older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 323–333.
Sneed, J. R., & Whitbourne, S. K. (2003). Identity processes and self-consciousness in middle and later
adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58B, P313–P319.
388 Sneed and Whitbourne
Snyder, M., & Miene, P. K. (1994). Stereotyping in the elderly: A functional approach. British Journal
of Social Psychology, 33, 63–82.
Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development if personality in early
and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
Whitbourne, S. K. (1996). The aging individual: Physical and psychological perspectives. New York:
Springer.
Whitbourne, S. K., & Collins, K. J. (1998). Identity processes and perceptions of physical functioning
in adults: Theoretical and clinical implications. Psychotherapy, 35, 519–530.
Whitbourne, S. K., & Hulicka, I. M. (1990). Ageism in undergraduate psychology texts. American
Psychologist, 45(10), 1127–1136.
JOEL SNEED received his PhD in Clinical Psychology at the University of Mas-
sachusetts Amherst where he focused on the self and related processes in older
adulthood and the stability and change of personality across the lifespan. He is
currently a Mental Health Statistics Fellow at New York University where he is
specializing in the analysis of longitudinal data and its application to the stability
and change of personality and psychopathology across the lifespan.