Pig Farming Info PDF

3

FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH

livestock country reviews

PIG SECTOR
Kenya
3
FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH
livestock country reviews
PIG SECTOR
Kenya
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Rome, 2012
Recommended Citation
FAO. 2012. Pig Sector Kenya. FAO Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews. No. 3. Rome.
Authors’ details
Samuel Maina Githigia is a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Nairobi and
a member of a research group from the Government ministries, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute and
University of Nairobi that is mapping the pork value chain in Kenya. He has interest in poverty alleviation among
small-holder farmers through improving livestock health and production, having extensive research experience on
the effects of parasitic infestations on these livestock systems in Kenya.
Sam Okuthe is a consultant epidemiologist based at the FAO Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal
Diseases (ECTAD) of Eastern Africa in Nairobi, Kenya. His work involves capacity building in
epidemio-surveillance, risk analysis, one health, emergency preparedness in reference to Transboundary Animal
Diseases (TADs) and general management of TADs in the eastern Africa region working very closely with the
national governments through the Department of Veterinary Services.
Bouna Diop is the Regional Manager of the FAO Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD)
of Eastern Africa in Nairobi, Kenya. He is working within the EMPRES group, providing technical assistance to
Eastern African countries on the design and implementation of programs and projects, formulation of relevant
response strategies to TADs, promoting and fostering regional networks (epidemiology, laboratories and
socio-economic).
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this

information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city
or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or
boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers,
whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have
been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar
nature that are not mentioned.
The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and
do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
E-ISBN 978-92-5-107127-4 (PDF)
All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of

material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized
free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial
purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for
permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all
queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to
[email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch,
Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO,
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
© FAO 2012
i
Foreword
Pig production is, along with poultry production, the fastest growing livestock sector
worldwide and this trend is expected to continue over the coming years. Growth in the sector
is mostly happening in developing and in-transition countries while animal numbers in
developed countries are stable or declining slightly. Pig production is gaining importance in
societies that are currently undergoing a shift from ruminant to monogastric livestock
production. Increasing demand, a shorter life cycle with higher return rates and
advantageous feed efficiency are key reasons for this development.
The role pig-keeping might play for the farmer, especially when referring to small-scale
and backyard farming systems, goes far beyond pork production and income generation. Pigs
are, from an economic perspective, an asset representing a store of wealth or safety net for
times of crisis; while, from a sociological perspective, traditional ceremonies and beliefs in
some places centre on the pig as an asset crucial to their belief system. With regard to
gender, pigs are the key income generator for women, or marginalized groups within society,
in some cultures.
The expanding pig production sector is facing diverse challenges. Sustainable sector
growth implies an accompanying growth in infrastructure which, in many countries, is not
happening at the same pace. This discrepancy, combined with the sector’s growing
importance in the livelihoods of more and more people, makes it a vulnerable component of
the economic and social backbone of a number of countries. Insecure feed availability,
insufficient sanitation and poor pig husbandry, as well as a lack of sound veterinary services
and meat inspection are factors that lead to poor animal, public, and environmental health.
In order to develop appropriate strategies for sector development, including disease
control measures, a better understanding is required of the different pig sectors, their
associated market chains, and the position of pigs within society.
This review for Kenya have been developed in collaboration with FAO ECTAD, Eastern
Africa and is part of a series of Country Reviews commissioned by the Animal Production and
Health Division (AGA). It is intended as a resource document for those seeking information
about the pig sector at a national level, and is not exhaustive. Some topics are only partially
covered or not covered at all and this document is subject to ongoing updating. The
author(s) and FAO/AGA welcome your contributions and feedback.
ii
Contents
Foreword .................................................................................................................. i
Contents .................................................................................................................. ii
Acronyms and abbreviations ................................................................................... iv
The country in brief.................................................................................................. 1
Profile of the pig sector............................................................................................ 3
2.1 LIVESTOCK DISTRIBUTION IN KENYA .................................................................. 3
2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE PIG POPULATION ..................................... 3
2.3 PRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4
2.4 CONSUMPTION ................................................................................................. 5
2.5 TRADE ............................................................................................................. 6
2.6 PRICES ............................................................................................................ 7
Pig production systems ............................................................................................ 9
3.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................. 9
3.1.1 History ................................................................................................... 9
3.1.2 Present-day ............................................................................................ 9
3.2 INDUSTRIAL / INTEGRATED PRODUCTION ......................................................... 10
3.2.1 Breeding stock / Piglet production............................................................ 10
3.2.2 Fattening .............................................................................................. 10
3.3 INTERMEDIATE (COMMERCIAL) SYSTEMS .......................................................... 11
3.3.1 Breeding stocks / Piglet production .......................................................... 11
3.3.2 Fattening .............................................................................................. 11
3.4 SCAVENGING OR BACKYARD PRODUCTION ........................................................ 12
3.5 CASE STUDIES ............................................................................................... 13
3.5.1 Case study one ...................................................................................... 13
3.5.2 Case study two ...................................................................................... 13
3.5.3 Case study three .................................................................................. 14
3.6 PIG FEEDS ..................................................................................................... 15
3.6.1 Local feed resources .............................................................................. 15
3.6.2 Imported feed resources ......................................................................... 15
3.6.3 Use of crop residues / by-products ........................................................... 15
3.6.4 Feed baskets ......................................................................................... 17
Trade, marketing and markets ............................................................................... 19
4.1 DOMESTIC MARKET ......................................................................................... 19
4.1.1 Animal trade markets ............................................................................. 19
4.1.2 Slaughtering facilities ............................................................................. 19
4.1.3 Value chains ......................................................................................... 22
4.1.4 Main trade routes .................................................................................. 26
iii
4.2 IMPORT ......................................................................................................... 26

4.3 EXPORT ......................................................................................................... 27
Socio-economic indicators ..................................................................................... 29
5.1 CULTURAL BACKGROUND INCL. TRADITIONS AND RELIGION ............................... 29
5.2 TIME ALLOCATION .......................................................................................... 29
5.3 CONTRIBUTION TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME / FAMILY ECONOMICS .......................... 30
5.4 GENDER ASPECTS ........................................................................................... 30
Breeds ................................................................................................................... 31
6.1 EXOTIC BREEDS ............................................................................................. 31
6.2 LOCAL BREEDS ............................................................................................... 32
Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 33
7.1 WILDLIFE POPULATION (SUIDAE / TAYASSUIDAE) .............................................. 33
7.2 HUNTING / CONSUMPTION............................................................................... 33
7.3 INTERACTION WITH DOMESTIC PIGS ................................................................ 33
Animal, public and environmental health ............................................................... 35
8.1. MAJOR PIG DISEASES REPORTED / PRESENT .................................................... 35
8.2 PUBLIC HEALTH / SANITATION ......................................................................... 37
8.3 BIOSECURITY ................................................................................................. 37
8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .............................................................................. 38
Policy and legal framework affecting the pig industry ........................................... 39
Analysis ................................................................................................................. 41
10.1 CURRENT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE PIG SECTOR .......................... 41
10.2 PROSPECTS OF THE PIG SECTOR OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS ........................... 42
10.3 POTENTIAL OF PIG PRODUCTION IN ACHIEVING MDGS ..................................... 42
Who is who (contact list) ....................................................................................... 45
List of major projects – pig sector ......................................................................... 47
Bibliography........................................................................................................... 49
Maps ...................................................................................................................... 51
iv
Acronyms and abbreviations
ADC Agricultural Development Corporation

ASARECA Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in East and
Central Africa
ASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy
ASF African Swine Fever
BUDIPIFA CBO Busia District Pig Farmers Community Based Organization
BVQI Bureau Veritas Quality International
CDC Centre for Disease Control of the United States of America
CDW Cold Dressed Weight
COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
DLPO District Livestock Production Officer
DVO District Veterinary Officer
DVS Director of Veterinary Services
EAC East Africa Training and Extract Company
EATEC East African Community
ECTAD Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Disease
ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FC Farmer’s Choice Limited
GCC Gulf Cooperation Countries
GNI Gross National Income
HACCP Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
IDEAL Infectious Diseases of East African Livestock
ILRI International Livestock Research Institute
IPS Aga Khan Foundation Investment Promotion Service
KARI Kenya Agricultural Research Institute
KEMRI Kenya Medical Research Institute
KENPFA Kenya National Pig Farmers Association
KNBS Kenya National Bureau of Statistics
KNFAP Kenya National Association of Agricultural Producers
KSPCA Kenyan Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
MOLD Ministry of Livestock Development
MDGS Millennium Development Goals
NAHRS National Animal Husbandry Research Station
NCC Neurocysticercosis
PDVS Provincial Director of Veterinary Services
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards
UAE United Arab Emirates
Pig sector review: KENYA 1
Chapter 1
The country in brief
Country: Kenya
Location: East Africa, bordering Indian Ocean, between Somalia and Tanzania
Population, total 38.61 million Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics,

August 2010
Population, growth rate: 2.6 % (2009) Source: World Bank, World Dev’t Indicators,
February 2011
Economy group: Low income Source: World Bank, November 2010
Kenya’s economy depends on agriculture, and includes a fast-growing livestock sector.

The country borders Tanzania, Uganda, Somalia, the Indian Ocean, Sudan and Ethiopia. It is
a member of the East African Community (EAC) and the Common Market for Eastern and
Southern Africa (COMESA). Agriculture is the mainstay of the economy and the bulk of its
industries and exports are agriculture-based. According to the 2009 population census, over
20 million of the population, which numbers 38.6 million in total, are between the ages of 15
and 64, and the male to female ratio is more or less even. The country is divided into 47
administrative counties (since August 2010) - each of which aims to be autonomous, with
central government retaining monitoring and oversight functions. In terms of the livestock
sector, all activities take place at the county level, with only the registration of veterinary
surgeons carried out by central government.
The Gross National Income (GNI) per capita has increased between 2005 and 2009, as
shown below in Figure 1. This may reflect improved living standards for the population.
FIGURE 1: Gross national income (GNI) per capita

(Atlas method, current US$)
900
800
700
600
500
Current US$
400
300
200
100
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Current US$ 520 570 660 720 770
Source: World Bank Group World Development Indicators, November 2010
Version du 17 novembre 2011

2 The country in brief
FIGURE 2: Demographic profile

Population (thousands) 60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Urban population 4273 5193 6187 7384 9015 11126 13735
Rural population 19174 22187 25085 28215 31630 35041 37956
Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of
the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: World Urbanization
Prospects 2007.
The urban population is projected to increase steadily from fewer than 5 million in 1990
to over 20 million in the year 2030, while the rural population is projected to stabilize at
about 40 million from the year 2020. This urban growth is significant but the majority of the
Kenyan population will continue to live in rural areas.
FIGURE 3: Annual population growth rates
4.5
4
3.5
3
%
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1990- 1995- 2000- 2005- 2010- 2015- 2020- 2025-
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Rural annual growth rate 2.92 2.46 2.35 2.29 2.05 1.6 1.16 0.87
Urban annual growth rate 3.9 3.44 3.6 3.99 4.21 4.21 4.21 4.03
Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of

the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: World Urbanization
Prospects 2007
The annual urban population growth rate is projected to stabilize at around 4 percent
between 2010 and 2025/30. Rural population growth is projected to drop from around two
percent to a low of 0.87 percent over the same period. Contributing factors underlying this
prediction include rural-urban migration, climate change, government policies and illicit
brews 1 in some of the densely populated rural areas.
1
Illicit brews refer to traditional strong liquors which impact on work attendance and performance
(mostly among young males), and also affect their fertility.

Chapter 2
Profile of the pig sector
2.1 LIVESTOCK DISTRIBUTION IN KENYA
FIGURE 4: Livestock distribution in KENYA
0.00/2.000.000/4.000.000/6.000.000/8.000.000/10.000.000/12.000.000/14.000.000
Source: KNBS 2009 census
2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE PIG POPULATION

As can be seen from the figures in 2.1 (Figure 4) and 2.2 (Tables 1) above, Western, Rift
Valley, Nyanza, Eastern, Central and Nairobi Provinces are the six regions with somewhat
significant pig populations. The numbers of pigs in the remaining two regions of North
Eastern and Coast, although low now, were previously non-existent, indicating a potential
new trend. The expansion and improvement of the market for pigs and pig products
generally in Kenya may explain why pig-keeping is beginning to be found outside traditional
pig-keeping areas.
Traditional/backyard systems are the main systems in Western and Nyanza Provinces
while commercial systems are predominant in Eastern and Central Provinces. In Nairobi, the
traditional/backyard systems dominate in the slums while commercial systems owned by
Farmer’s Choice and by a few commercial farmers who supply pigs to Farmer’s Choice are
found in the outskirts of the city. The pig holdings in Coast and the few in North Eastern are
commercial systems.

4 Profile of the pig sector
TABLE 1:
Distribution of pig holdings within the country 2
Province Pig population Commercial sector Traditional/Backyard sector
Western 87 838 3 512 84 325
Rift Valley 48 495 14 579 35 654
Nyanza 27 612 900 26 712
North Eastern 68 68 0
Eastern 43 480 35 654 7 826
Coast 5 243 5 243 0
Central 91 977 75 421 16 556
Nairobi 29 976 13 976 16 000
Total Kenya 335 301 149 965 187 073
Source: KNBS 2009 Census; MOLD Department of Livestock Production Estimates, 2010
2.3 PRODUCTION
FIGURE 5: National pig sector production
20000
15000
Yield in metric tonnes
10000
5000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Yield in metric tonnes 11474 14980 11370 15300 14500 12800 16800 16200 17225 18200
Source: FAOSTAT , 2010
2
Data on the production system (breeding, fattening, etc.) is not available

Production has not changed greatly over the period. There is a difference of about 700
tonnes between the lowest production figures in 2000 and the highest in 2009.
FIGURE 5.1: National pig population estimates
450000
400000
350000
300000
Population
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Pig population 419584 332600 335900 415200 388760 320000 318000 304000 330000
Source: MOLD-LPD,2009
2.4 CONSUMPTION
FIGURE 5.2: Estimated pork supply in Kenya
18000
16000
Supply (metric tonnes)
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Supply in tonnes
10780.3 14096.5 10813.3 14202.5 13076.5 11287 15431.8 14779.5
Source: MOLD-LPD, 2009

6 Profile of the pig sector
TABLE 2:
Performance of the pig sector from 2000 to 2005
Year Population No. Slaughtered Meat (MT) Value 3
2000 315 208 163 908 11 473.56 1.15 Ksh Billions
2001 332 600 172 952 12 106.64 0.85 Ksh Billions
2002 335 900 174 668 12 226.76 0.86 Ksh Billions
2003 415 200 215 904 15 113.28 1.06 Ksh Billions
2004 388 760 188 660 13 206.20 0.92 Ksh Billions
2005 320 000 153 600 10 752.00 0.86 Ksh Billions
Source: MOLD – LPD, 2006
The pig population was almost stagnant between 2000 and 2005, although in 2003 there
was a short-lived recovery in population and numbers slaughtered, reflecting market
fluctuations. The pig market is dependent on tourism, so factors that affect the performance
of the tourist industry also affect the market for pork and pork products. Over 80 percent of
the slaughter was carried out by Farmer’s Choice which is the main supplier of pork and pork
products to the domestic and export market.
2.5 TRADE
FIGURE 7.1: Import and export of pork
2500
2000
Metric tonnes
1500
1000
500
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Imports (metric
2 144 27 8 53 268 465 711
tonnes)
Exports (metric
603 960 507 2012 1364 1649 1698 1966
tonnes)
Source: FAOSTAT, 2010
3
Exchange rate ranged between 75 Kshs to 84.5 Kshs = 1US$ over the period

Imports have increased from 2005 onwards. Most of the imports were from Brazil and
Canada (MOLD 2009). Exports, most of which were to COMESA countries, were sustained at
over 1 300 tonnes per year from 2003.
FIGURE 7.2: Import and export values of pork
7000
6000
US$ 1 000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Imports (US$ 1 000) 6 251 28 19 116 660 1082 1679
Exports (US$ 1 000) 705 1996 1122 2856 4381 5241 5687 6533
Export values show a steady increase from 2003 onwards. Farmer’s Choice is the main
exporter of pork and pork products, to both COMESA and non-COMESA countries.
Farmer’s Choice is also Kenya’s main importer of pork. Prices here also show a steady
increase from 2005. The imported meat is processed into value-added pork products.
2.6 PRICES
FIGURE 8: Wholesale prices for Kenyan pork
2000
1800
Price (US$ per tonne)
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
US$ /
1184 1211 1196 1137 1101 1211 1358 1682 1747
tonne
Wholesale prices for pork produced in Kenya ranged from a low of US$ 1 101.3 per tonne
in 2004 to a high of US$ 1 747.1 per tonne in 2008, reflecting fluctuating demand for pork
and pork products. In Kenya, demand for pork is currently driven by tourism, in the main.
This may change as the popularity of pork continues to increase in the urban areas of Kenya.

Chapter 3
Pig production systems
3.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1.1 History
Pig production in Kenya dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. The
production of surplus cereals and skimmed milk provided the basis for pig-keeping as a
subsidiary activity for British settlers who operated large-scale commercial farms during the
colonial period from 1900 to 1963. After independence, small-scale farmers with between
two and twenty sows entered the market alongside large-scale producers.
TABLE 3:
Brief background of pig production in Kenya
1904 European settlers brought in pigs from the Seychelles
Colonial government imported Berkshire and large black pig breeds from
1905
Britain
1905 Proposal to build slaughter house (abattoir) at Njoro
1905 Abattoir built at Uplands, Limuru
1905 Outbreak of African Swine Fever (Tuitoek & Kosgey 1999)
Pig Producers Association and Pig Industry Board formed to control prices and
1940s
provide market facilities
1953 Pig breeding station opened in Naivasha by white settlers
Pig Producers Association dissolved and Uplands Bacon Factory became
1959
parastatal organization
Uplands Bacon Factory began large-scale production and marketing of pig
1972
products
1984-95 Uplands collapsed and Farmer’s Choice expanded
Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC) farms ceased pig farming
Late 1980s, 1990s
operations
East Africa Training and Extract Company (EATEC) stepped up pig production
1990s
at Eldoret
Suspension of pig breeding at National Animal Husbandry Research Station
2008
(NAHRS), Naivasha
3.1.2 Present-day
The livestock subsector contributes about ten percent to Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
and accounts for over 30 percent of the farm gate value of agricultural commodities.
The Kenyan government has continued to encourage pig production as it plays a major
role in the tourism sector. Up to 70 percent of all pig farmers are engaged in small-scale
production. Feeds and feeding constitute about 80 percent of the total production cost, which
is why many producers are looking for cheaper ways to feed their animals.
A variety of production systems currently operate in Kenya’s pig sector. There are large
intensive commercial pig farms, small-scale commercial farms and free range traditional
systems (including scavenging and roaming) in Western Kenya, Nyanza and the suburban
slum areas of the major cities and towns.

10 Pig production systems
The free range system is characterized by high mortality rates, low offtake, low
reproductive rates, minimal health care or supplementary feeding, lack of proper housing
and high levels of inbreeding.
In spite of this, most farmers opt for traditional rather than intensive farming because of
the high input costs associated with the latter.
In areas where traditional pig production is common, the human development index is
low and prevalence of poverty and HIV/AIDS is high. Most families are subsistence, resource-
poor farmers who have adopted small-scale pig farming to improve their living standards.
They characteristically supply pigs to local butcheries rather than to nearby urban areas. The
finished pigs are small and underweight.
Commercial pig farms are found within the city boundaries of Nairobi (e.g. Karen and
Kahawa), around Nairobi, in Central Province, Central Rift Valley (around Nakuru), North Rift
Valley (Eldoret, Kitale), parts of Eastern Province and a few in Western and Nyanza
provinces. Most of these farms keep fewer than 2 000 pigs. They supply pigs to local
butcheries, urban centres, and pork processing factories - mainly Farmer’s Choice (FC).
The improved exotic cross-breeds often farmed in this sector are bred and reared under
confinement. The breeding stock is sourced either from FC, large commercial farms or from
other small commercial pig farms.
Large commercial pig farms are found around Nairobi (FC– Kamiti and Karen), Kiambu in
Central Province (FC– Uplands), and North Rift Valley (FC– Oasis Farm Eldoret). They are
also found in Ngong and Kiserian near Nairobi, Thika and Muranga South. These farms each
have between 5 000 and 30 000 pigs. Farmer’s Choice is involved in the whole value chain.
They breed their own stock, raise piglets, slaughter and process pork products. Those in
Ngong and Kiserian raise pigs which are slaughtered on the farm. The meat is sold through
the farms’ butchery outlets in Nairobi. Farms in Thika and Muranga South raise pigs which
are mainly sold to FC. Farmer’s Choice farms supply about 50 percent of their annual
requirements, with the balance being sourced from contract farmers.
The small-scale, intensive pig-raising system is common in Central Province, Central Rift
Valley, North Rift Valley, Narok and Eastern Provinces. There are a few smallholder intensive
pig-raising systems in Busia, Bungoma and parts of Kisumu in Western and Nyanza
respectively. The numbers of pigs kept in these systems vary, at any given time, from fewer
than ten up to 100 - the higher figures relating to commercial farmers.
Most of the large-scale farmers mix their own feed rations, while small-scale farmers have
formed cooperative societies and opened feed mills, for example Meru Central Cooperative
Society. The main ingredient for feed is cereals - especially maize and wheat, with soya and
fishmeal used as sources of protein. The feed, whether milled by farmers or by their
cooperative societies, is mostly superior in quality and is cheaper than the commercially
available alternatives.
3.2 INDUSTRIAL / INTEGRATED PRODUCTION

Farmer’s Choice Limited is the only Kenyan company with an industrial/integrated
production system. The company is owned by the Aga Khan Foundation Investment
Promotion Service (IPS), whose headquarters are at Rose Mark Division Upland in Lari
District, Kiambu Central Province. This is the largest farm in the country with between 25
000 and 30 000 pigs. They have other farms in Nairobi (Karen), Kamiti on the outskirts of
Nairobi, and Eldoret (Oasis Farm).
3.2.1 Breeding stock / Piglet production

For breeding, Farmer’s Choice import their own superior parent stock from Denmark but
use the F1 generation for multiplication as they are better adapted than the parents.
Currently they have 65 Large White/Landrace/Duroc cross-breeding boars and 2 500 sows,
which are the source of breeding stock for FC, supplying cross-breed weaners for raising in
their major farms for slaughter. The parent stock is used to supply replacements and a few
are sold to contract farmers for breeding. The farms have a monthly output of 3 800 piglets,
3 600 weaners, 3 200 baconers, 120 pregnant gilts and 300 sows.
3.2.2 Fattening
The farm raises the weaners and finishes them as baconers to be sent to their factory at
Kahawa West for slaughter and processing.

3.3 INTERMEDIATE (COMMERCIAL) SYSTEMS

3.3.1 Breeding stocks / Piglet production
Sourcing good breeding material is a major challenge in these systems. There is an over-
use of good boars which leads to inbreeding, as the female offspring are sometimes mated
with the only sire boar available. The cost of a good cross-breed or pure-bred boar and sows
or gilts is sometimes prohibitive. In 2010, the costs ranged from US$ 250 for a cross-bred
boar to US$ 320 for a pregnant gilt or sow.
Breeding stock is sourced from government institutions such as the Agricultural
Development Corporation (ADC) and Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), or from
Farmer’s Choice Limited, or from neighbouring commercial farms. ADC, and the KARI farm in
Naivasha, used to be sources of breeding stock for these intermediate commercial systems.
ADC pulled out while KARI suspended breeding in 2008 owing to lack of market. Farmer’s
Choice Limited sell some good breeding stock to their contract farmers, so as to enable them
to supply finished pigs to the FC factory. These contract farmers sell the breeding stock to
other commercial farmers. These medium-sized commercial farms produce piglets which
they raise as weaners and on to finishers, to sell for slaughter. Some sell their pigs to pork-
processing enterprises such as Farmer’s Choice, Meaton Enterprise and Ideal Farm, which
add value to the pork, creating a number of finished products in the value chain.
Some commercial farmers around Nakuru, Nairobi and Thika control a further stage in the
process by owning slaughter slabs and butcheries in these towns. They raise piglets,
slaughter them and sell them at their own butcheries. Their slaughter slabs are also used by
other local pork butcheries. Some of these farmers have recently set up and registered a
trade association to champion the needs of pig farmers and lobby for government support.
The organization is called Kenya National Pig Farmers Association (KENPFA) and is currently
recruiting farmers throughout the country. They hope to be involved in the whole production
value chain and to act as a forum to address the various challenges affecting commercial
farmers.
PICTURE 1: piggery unit in a small-scale PICTURE 2: A nursing sow in one of the small-
commercial farm in Muranga South District scale commercial farms
3.3.2 Fattening
Intermediate commercial farmers produce piglets which they raise as baconers or
fatteners. Their involvement in the value chain ends, either when they sell the finished pigs
for slaughter outside the farm, or when they sell the meat in their butcheries after
slaughtering them on the farm.
These intermediate commercial farmers tend to use commercial feeds (mainly pig
finishing meal) to finish the pigs. A few own factories where they produce their own feeds.
Others buy the raw materials for home-made feed rations, which are usually cheaper and
better than commercial feeds.

3.4 SCAVENGING OR BACKYARD PRODUCTION

In the scavenging or backyard systems, pigs are left free to roam. A number of levels of
free range and scavenging styles can be distinguished, depending on the periods for which
they are free and whether there is any input/ supplementation given to the pigs.
At one extreme is the free range system practiced in the slums of the major cities and
urban areas, in various garbage dumps. The pigs are owned by people who do not own land,
and the pigs depend wholly on refuse and garbage deposited in these areas. They usually
feed on swill, kitchen leftovers, market-spoiled foods, vegetables and fruits, and any other
edible material in the garbage. It is common to see pigs in the rubbish heaps around
homesteads, chasing the garbage lorries that ferry refuse to the various dumps, and rooting
through garbage at the dump sites. This is a low- or no-investment system. The owners
invest in a sow and when she farrows, they mark the piglets by ear notching. The piglets are
raised in the garbage until they are ready for market and slaughter. The owners then
marshal the pigs and sell them as they are, at a low price, or in some cases (for instance in
Nakuru Town) they take the pigs home to wash them with water before selling them for
slaughter. Sometimes pig traders buy the animals in this condition at low prices and, by
housing them, giving them anthelmintic and commercial feeds, they are able to clean them
up and sell them - at a profit - for slaughter.
Another type of free range production is where the pigs are released in the morning to
roam and scavenge throughout the day, returning in the evening for shelter and
supplementation with kitchen leftovers and water; or confined during the day and released to
scavenge overnight. They scavenge in garbage pits, sewage drainage channels, open fields
and sometimes agricultural fields. This type of free range pig-rearing is a recipe for
neighbourhood conflict and is a menace and nuisance in many cities and municipalities. In
recent times, pigs have been shot in Nakuru, Thika, Eldoret, Homabay, Busia and Nyahururu
Towns for scavenging in this way.
Large numbers of pigs straying from the London dumpsite in Nakuru, to root among the
crops at neighbouring G.K. Prison farms, end up as meals for prisoners. The pigs are
rounded up by the authorities and confiscated. As the owners tend not to claim them, they
are stunned and slaughtered with the facilitation of the KSPCA and the office of the DVO.
After inspection, the meat is given to prisoners. Owing to low or non-existent biosecurity
measures, these first two free range systems carry a high risk of incubating outbreaks of,
and mortality from, African swine fever (ASF).
A third type of free range pig-keeping is practiced by small-scale, resource-poor farmers
in Western Kenya and Nyanza. In these systems, farmers own anything from two to five
pigs, including a sow and a grower/fattener. Some farmers specialize in producing piglets
which are sold to other farmers at the age of two months. Those farmers then either raise
them for slaughter as fatteners or finishers, or raise them for breeding purposes, supplying
piglets to other farmers. The pigs in this system are tethered around the homestead
especially during the plant-growing season. They are released during harvesting and post-
harvesting to roam until the next planting season. They are not housed, and feed themselves
on pasture, kitchen leftovers and some crop by-products such as cassava, sweet potato
tubers and vines. The pigs are usually small in size owing to prolonged underfeeding, and
there is a lack of genetic improvement because of inbreeding. The pigs take up to two years
to reach a market weight of between 50 and 70 kg. A notable characteristic in these areas is
that latrines are often not used, even where they exist. It is a major risk factor for Taenia
solium cysticercosis and taeniosis in humans, and porcine cysticercosis.
This system may be referred to as traditional free range as it is entwined with the
traditions of the local people. The people of these areas have been keeping pigs for a long
time and it is common for a homestead to keep a pig for security purposes and for protection
from evil spells and witchcraft. The ready market for pigs in these regions means that most
are sold at home. Pig traders and butchers move from homestead to homestead and from
village to village looking for these pigs. The prices they offer are low and exploitative.
The free range system of Western Kenya and Nyanza has great potential for
development. The willingness of farmers and availability of local feed materials can be
capitalized on to develop the free range pig sector here.
Most of these pigs are slaughtered at the local butcheries and some find their way to
slaughter houses in the large urban centres through pig traders and brokers.

3.5 CASE STUDIES

3.5.1 Case study one
Date of case study: 21 September 2010

Area location: Ndhiwa District, Riana Division, Ombo Location
GPS coordinates: S 00 43 45 5 - E 034 27 18 3
Description of the location:
Rural area in Homabay County near the shore of Lake Victoria, characterized by poor infrastructure
and a low human development index, with very few people attaining tertiary-level education.. The
soils are black cotton, holding a lot of water during the rainy season and cracking during the dry
season. Homesteads get water from shallow wells, small rivers and seasonal dams. Farmers grow
subsistence crops - mainly maize, millet, cassava and sweet potatoes. Pig production plays a major
role in the economic livelihood of these homesteads. In addition to pigs, they also keep some
chickens, cattle, sheep and goats.
Description of the pig sector at this location:
Free range pig-keeping is the norm here, where pigs are left free during the harvesting and post-
harvesting season and tethered under a tree or next to the cowshed during the planting and growing
seasons. The pigs are small, owing to underfeeding, and are fed on whatever is available - including
kitchen leftovers, pastures, spoiled tubers, traditional brewers’ waste and sugar cane. The pigs are
cross-breeds whose varied coat colours are a sign of inbreeding and static genetic improvement. The
very few boars in the area are shared, hence the high degree of inbreeding. These pigs were
introduced from Asumbi Mission in the early 1950s and have been bred with other pigs from Kisumu,
Uganda, Mbita and Busia. Most homesteads keep a sow and piglets. The pigs are prolific and a sow
will give birth 9 to 14 piglets per year. The sows farrow in the open and sometimes under insanitary
conditions. Piglets are not given iron injections. No special care is given to nursing sows nor to their
piglets. Piglets are sold, aged two to three months, to other farmers who raise them for slaughter.
These pigs reach a market weight of between 50 and 60 kg within two years. Most are bought by pig
traders who move from homestead to homestead and village to village and accumulate up to 40 pigs
each, before transporting them to Ndumboini slaughter house near Nairobi. A local butcher slaughters
a few pigs at the local open slaughter slab. These pigs are not inspected and the butcher hawks the
meat to prospective customers during market days in the surrounding local centres.
PICTURE 3/4: A litter of piglets at a small-scale farm in Ndhiwa District, Homabay County
3.5.2 Case study two

Area location: Rongai Division, Nakuru, Kiamunyi Village
GPS coordinates: S 00 15 57 9" - E 036 02 12 3"
Human / Pig population figures: 152 565 / 13 894
Intensive smallholder farm of about 3.5 hectares of sloping land on the northwest outskirts of Nakuru
Town, off the Kapsabet Road. The farmer grows maize in the red soils and also practices agroforestry.


At this commercial pig-raising enterprise, the farmer raises and slaughters his own pigs. He has a
slaughter slab on the farm, a feed factory in town and a pork butchery in Nakuru Town. The pigs are
housed in standard units and separated according to age and production status. They are fed on
commercial feeds from the owner’s factory in town. At the time of visiting, there were two pregnant
sows about to farrow, two sows that had farrowed a total of 22 piglets, and two nursing sows. There
were several weaned piglets and a number of grower pigs at various stages of finishing. These were
kept in individual clean houses. The farm had two mature boars which were housed separately..The
pigs were given water ad libitum, and feed according to their production status. The farmer was
supplementing the growers with market waste from the main municipal market - primarily spoiled
fruits and cabbages, along with swill from hotels in town. He was supplementing the pigs by boiling
pig blood and intestines from slaughter. The farm had 16 sows and 85 weaners between two and five
months old. There were no finishers. He was relying on other farms for the supply of slaughter pigs
for his slaughter slab and butchery in town.
Pork value chain analysis on this location (See Figure 9)
3.5.3 Case study three

Area location: Kibera, Langata Division, Nairobi, West District
GPS coordinates: S 01 30 327 - E 036 78 56
Human / Pig population figures: 200 000 / 12 891
This slum in the western part of Nairobi City is inhabited by low-income workers, most of whom work
in the informal sector as casual labour. Their dwellings are illegal and temporary, with mud walls and
roofs made of rusted cast iron or plastic sheeting. The density of these settlements is extremely high
with only narrow paths between the houses. They are not connected to the sewer system (although
the sewer lines passing through the area commonly burst), and most households lack toilet facilities
(flying toilets – where plastic bags of human waste are thrown onto a neighbour’s roof – are a
frequent hazard). Other basic infrastructure is also lacking. Water is obtained from a central point.
The government is implementing a project to upgrade these slums by building better and more
permanent houses in this area. Several households own pigs which roam and scavenge on garbage
disposal sites in the area, sewage drainage channels and the banks of a nearby highly-polluted dam.
The free range pig-raising system here involves pigs roaming and scavenging in garbage dumps,
sewage tunnels and along the banks of a highly polluted dam in the area, as well as in dirty pools of
water. They feed on garbage, pasture and any edible leftover materials in the vicinity. There is no
supplementary feeding. Owners identify their pigs through ear notching. The pigs often come near
the homestead and may be found resting outside the house. The system is illegal and a great concern
for the Department of Veterinary Services. The pigs are a menace, sometimes wandering out of the
area to neighbouring estates where the city council, without suitable pig pounds or clear legal
procedures, is not able to confiscate them, and the owners tend not to reclaim them.
PICTURE 5/6: Free range pigs scavenging at a garbage dump site in Kibera slums, Nairobi
Pork value chain analysis on this location (See Figure 9)

3.6 PIG FEEDS

3.6.1 Local feed resources
The main resources for feeding pigs are cotton seed cake and prairie meal, with gluten
feed as a source of protein. Pigs are in competition with humans for maize, their main source
of energy. Other energy sources include milled by-products such as the bran from wheat,
maize and rice, along with maize grain, wheat grain and semi-refined oil. Limestone is the
main local mineral source. Although there is no shortage of animal feed in Kenya, the cost is
high and in some areas quality is not the best. Concentrates, for instance, are available but
very expensive. The cost of feed has increased by 450 percent in the last three years
(KENPFA). The main feeds types manufactured are Pig Creep pellets for piglets, Sow &
Weaners for breeders and Pig Finisher for fatteners. Sow & Weaner, which is preferred by
most farmers, is produced in the highest volumes by most companies. Challenges facing this
area include a poor quality and high cost of ingredients as well as concentrates; inadequate
and hard-to-access mineral supplementation; unavailability of local sources of vitamins,
amino acids, macro- and micro-nutrients; frequent drought. The main local producers of pig
feeds are: Unga Feeds; Ngeca Feeds; Sigma Feeds; Belfast Millers; Wann Feeds; Pembe
Millers; Mombasa Maize Miller; Chania Feeds; Ngae Feeds Nakuru; Uzuri Feeds Nakuru.
TABLE 4:
Average retail prices ranges for commercial pig feed
Feed type Price (US$ per 70 kg bag) 4
Creep Feed 22 – 25
Sow & Weaner 20 – 22

Pig Finisher 18 – 20
Source: Interview with various retailers, September 2010
3.6.2 Imported feed resources

The main pig feed manufacturers import as source of protein are soya feed premix from
Europe and India; sunflower and cotton cake from Tanzania and Uganda and fish from
Tanzania. The following energy sources are imported especially in years when the country
experiences famine: maize from Tanzania and COMESA countries (in 2009, Farmer’s Choice
imported maize from Argentina); wheat grain from Tanzania; rice bran from Uganda,
vitamins, mineral supplements and trace minerals in pig feeds are imported from Europe.
3.6.3 Use of crop residues / by-products

Many commercial pig farmers also grow food crops, the surplus produce or by-products
which can be used to feed the pigs. This food source plays an important role in pig feeding,
especially in free range and small-scale production systems. Crops and by-products include
sweet potato vines, kales, cabbages, Napier grass, sugar cane cuttings, sugar cane tops,
garden weeds, mangoes, tomatoes, oranges, avocadoes, peelings and market by-
products/waste. The use of feeds such as cereal residues, cassava and potatoes has been
shown to save up to 20 percent on feed costs for growing pigs and 50 percent for breeding
pigs. Other by-products include brewers waste, rumen contents and slaughter blood from
slaughter slabs. These are either given to the pigs as is, or mixed with kitchen leftovers.
Some farmers also cook the blood and mix it with ugali (cooked maize meal).
Another source of feedstuffs for pigs is swill from schools, hotels and government
institutions. Farmers around these institutions collect the leftovers to feed their pigs. Some
institutions, especially schools and prisons, feed their own pigs with the available kitchen
leftovers. The drawbacks are that the safety, amount and quality of feed is not guaranteed
and pigs fed inadequate and unbalanced diets will have low weight gains.
4
Exchange rate at September 2010: US$ 1 = Kshs 80.25

PICTURES 6/7: Free range pigs (with other animals) at Nakuru Municipality’s London dump site
PICTURE 8: A tethered pig feeding on sugar cane PICTURE 9: Free range pig eating grass at a farm
cuttings in the traditional free range system in Ndhiwa District – Homabay County
PICTURE 10: Piglets feeding on cassava peelings PICTURE 11: Pig feeding on kitchen leftovers

3.6.4 Feed baskets

Feeding constitutes the greatest cost in raising pigs and affects the pig’s performance and
sustainability of the sector. Pigs are able to survive on a variety of different feedstuffs.
In the free range systems common to Nyanza and Western Kenya, pigs are primarily fed
on pasture grasses of various types, crop residues, crop by-products, cassava, sugar cane,
sweet potato tubers and vines, ugali and kitchen leftovers.
Sweet potato tubers and vines are frequently fed to pigs in these areas with the vines
providing, if used appropriately, a year round source of pig feed. Farmers are encouraged to
plant dual-purpose varieties of sweet potato tubers which are rich in carbohydrates, vitamins
and minerals.
Uncooked peelings of sweet potatoes, cassava and bananas from household consumption
are given to the pigs, as well as whole cassava or sweet potatoes (either raw or cooked), and
posho mill waste (fagia) which is cooked and may be mixed with kitchen leftovers and
offered to the pigs. Kitchen leftovers contain many of the essential nutrients required for a
healthy balanced diet. Their composition has been found to be adequate in protein and
energy but low in dry matter content, which affects growth in younger animals and should be
addressed by supplementing with other feeds.
Some farmers supplement their pigs with small quantities of omena (a small dried fish –
Rastrineobola argentea) which in addition to being a protein source they believe to be a
dewormer. Blood contains up to 80 percent protein and is another source of easily digestible
protein for pigs. The contents of the rumen of slaughtered cattle have also been found to
have a good crude protein composition, suitable for pigs.
The pigs are either tethered and the feed brought to them, or they are left to roam and
feed from various sources. Sometimes the pigs are untethered and taken to surrounding
marshy and watering areas for a bath and to feed on earthworms as a source of protein -
although these excursions are as often a source of infection by ascarids and lungworm.
A recent study in Busia and Kakamega Counties showed that only 40 percent and 30
percent, respectively, of farmers there provide water to their pigs – and those that do so
generally provide waste water from the kitchen at the time of feeding, mixed with the feed
being provided. Most farmers feed their pigs no more than three times a day, with the
majority feeding the pigs twice a day, morning and evening.
In the complete free range/backyard system found in slum areas around major towns
and cities, the pigs roam garbage heaps, pits, disposal areas and dump sites where they eat
any edible by-products, swill and domestic waste.
In some small-scale commercial system common in Central, Eastern, Central and North
Rift Valley and parts of Western and Nyanza Provinces, pigs are fed on commercial feeds and
supplemented with swill, kitchen leftovers, market by-products/ waste and crop residues.
Most farmers provide the pigs with crop residues as feed, bedding and also a source of
organic farmyard manure. The pig houses are not concreted and the pigs root in them.
Piggeries are often established near official institutions owing to the availability of swill.
However, there are small-scale commercial farmers in these areas who feed their pigs
exclusively on commercial feeds. The pigs are fed twice a day according to their age,
production status and type of feed. The piglets are fed on starter (Pig Creep) pellets. The
weaners, sows, boars, gilts and early fattening stage pig are fed on Sow & Weaners meal
while the baconers/finishers are fed on Pig Finisher meal. Most farmers will have a feeding
table as shown below from the Department of Livestock Production. Some small-scale
farmers have formed cooperatives to manufacture cheaper and higher quality pig feed.
In the large-scale commercial pig-keeping systems common in Central Kenya, Nairobi,
Central and North Rift Valley, the pigs are fed on commercial feeds according to age and
production status. Piglets are fed with starter/Pig Creep pellets. The weaners, sows, boars,
gilts and early fattening-stage pigs are fed Sow & Weaner meal while the baconers/ finishers
are fed Pig Finisher meal. Most farmers use Sow & Weaner feed across the board, with the
recommended amount given over the course of the day, usually morning and evening. The
feeding regime generally follows that set out in the recommendations from the Department
of Livestock Production, as shown below.

TABLE 5:
Recommended feeding regime for pigs
Age (wks) Weight (Kg) Feed/day (Kg) Feed type
8 – 10 12 – 15 0.66 Sow & Weaner/Starter

10 – 12 15 – 20 1.0 Sow & Weaner
12 – 16 20 – 40 2.0 Sow & Weaner
16 – 18 40 – 50 2.5 Finisher
18 – 24 50 – 84 3.0 Finisher
24 – 28 84 – 105 3.0 Finisher
Source: Ministry of Livestock Development – Livestock Production Division
The largest commercial pig enterprise, Farmer’s Choice, makes its own feed for its farms,
which it also supplies to some of its commercial contract farmers. In these cases, its field
officers monitor and advise on feeding, to produce quality finished pigs. The company
imports Creep Feeds from Britain.

Chapter 4
Trade, marketing and markets
4.1 DOMESTIC MARKET

4.1.1 Animal trade markets
There are livestock markets in all areas of the country but, unlike for other livestock,
there are no live pig markets in Kenya. Animals brought to market include cattle, sheep,
goats, donkeys and camels but not pigs. Live pigs are traded on farmers’ premises. The
farmer calls the trader, or traders visit the farmers, especially in the traditional free range
systems where traders move from village to village looking for pigs.
Farmer’s Choice Limited does not buy live pigs. Farmers transport live pigs to the factory
and are paid according to cold dressed weight (CDW) after slaughter.
Farmers buying weaner pigs get them from other farmers whose sows have farrowed.
The few breeders provide breeding stock. The National Pig Breeding Unit at KARI, Naivasha
used to sell breeding stock to farmers regularly but breeding was suspended in 2008. There
is hope that it will be revived but for the time being there is no organized or regular sale of
stock. In the meantime, there is a drive to organize pig farmers into groups and cooperatives
able to organize and manage live pig trade markets.
4.1.2 Slaughtering facilities

There are four main slaughter facilities in Kenya.
Farmer’s Choice Limited
Kenya’s largest abattoir is located at Kamiti, on the outskirts of Nairobi City. This facility
combines slaughtering and processing, and is a private company established in 1975 as
Kenya Meat Processors Ltd. - a subsidiary of the Block Hotel Group. The original purpose was
to supply the Group’s hotels with reliable pork products. In the late 1980s, Farmer’s Choice
acquired an export license when it built a slaughter and processing plant licensed for export
by the Kenyan Government. Farmer’s Choice was acquired by Lonrho in 1989 and has since
2001 been owned by IPS (Industrial Promotional Services) as part of the Aga Khan
Development Network.
Farmer’s Choice acquired BVQI (Bureau Veritas Quality International), Hazard Analysis
Critical Control Point (HACCP) and Total Quality Management standards accepted by export
partners. The FC factory is currently HACCP-certified and is inspected annually. It is
connected to the Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company main line and has a borehole to
supplement the water supply. It also has an effluent treatment plant, the sludge from which
is used as manure. The offal from slaughter is made into pet food. The factory slaughters
400 pigs per day and processes 350 pig carcasses per day into products such as ham, bacon,
sausages and burgers. Fifty percent of the carcasses come from FC farms while the rest are
supplied by contract farmers (of which there are currently about 120 nationwide, most of
whom are based within a 100 km radius of the factory) or other pig farmers.
Products from the factory has a number of outlets in the domestic market: tourist hotels
around Nairobi (20%); tourist hotels at the coast (10%); lodges and institutions (5%);
major supermarkets (Uchumi, Nakumatt, Tuskys) (15%); other mass markets (kiosks, retail
outlets) (50%). The company has its own refrigerated vehicles which transport over 90
percent of the products to various destinations in Kenya and neighbouring countries. Private
vehicles and major customers transport the remaining 10 percent (S. Mbugua, FC Production
Manager, personal communication).

20 Trade, marketing and markets
Ndumboini Farm slaughter house

This dedicated abattoir, established in 1972, is located in Kiambu County, Kikuyu District
on the western outskirts of Nairobi. It is located on a private farm owned by David Kiarie,
and receives pigs from Malaba, Bungoma, Kimilili and Busia in Western Province; Kisumu,
Homabay and Migori in Nyanza; Nakuru, Kitale, Kajiado, Ngong and Eldoret in the Rift
Valley; Thika, Nyeri, Kiambu, Kabete and Muranga in Central; and Ruai, Kibera and Dandora
slums in Nairobi. No pork processing is carried out at this abattoir.
PICTURES 12/13/14: Ndumboini slaughter house on the outskirts of Nairobi
The facility has a capacity to slaughter 40 to 50 pigs per day, most of which come from
Kiambu and surrounding areas, with a significant number coming from Nyanza. One pig
trader transports 40 to 80 pigs here every week from Homabay and Migori districts. These
pigs have a variety of skin colours and are seen in the overnight holding pens. Ante mortem
inspection is carried out before slaughter.
PICTURES 12/13/14: Ndumboini slaughter house on the outskirts of Nairobi
The abattoir is regularly inspected by the Department of Veterinary Service - Hygiene,

under whose license they operate, clean and dirty operations are kept separate, and strict
regulations adhered by all in and around the site. Adequate water is supplied via a borehole.
Hot water is used for scalding and on the slaughter floor. There is an effluent treatment
plant, the sludge from which is used as manure for the farm crops. The intestines are
cleaned and sold for human consumption. This abattoir is the main supplier of pork to most
of the butcheries in Nairobi city centre, as well as its estates and outskirts. Some meat is
transported to butcheries in Thika and Kitengela. The meat is transported in well-labelled
clean containers by bicycle, motorcycles and four-wheeled vehicles (mainly pickups). Oscar
Food Industries, Chefs Choice and Olive Enterprises (Limuru) buy carcasses from Ndumboini
Farm slaughter house for processing at their premises into value-added products such as
sausages and burgers.

Lyntano slaughter house

Located on the northern outskirts of Nairobi, off Kiambu Road, Lyntano’s was built in 1950 as
a duck abattoir before switching to pigs. It is on the site of a coffee farm and slaughters
between six and ten pigs a day from Ruai, Dandora, Mathare and Embakasi in Nairobi; and
from Limuru, Ndumberi and Kiambu Town in Kiambu. The abattoir is well-constructed, well-
maintained and clean. A borehole supplies adequate water for cleaning, and the Department
of Veterinary Services – Hygiene (Nairobi) regularly inspects and issues licenses. Blood by-
products go into a disposal tank while ingesta are used as farm manure and intestines are
cleaned and sold for human consumption. Outlets for the carcasses include Nairobi City
Market butcheries, several hotels, popular entertainment places and supermarkets. Clover
Foods and Lemok Enterprises source pork for their products from Lyntano slaughter house.
PICTURES 18/19: Lyntano slaughter house on Kiambu Road, Nairobi
Kabati slaughter house

Kabati abattoir is located in Muranga South off the dual carriageway between Thika and
Kenol. Cattle, sheep and goats are slaughtered in one section while pigs are slaughtered in
the other, keeping the two operations separate. The facility is well-constructed and
maintained, with separate areas for the clean and dirty operations and an adequate supply of
water from a borehole. It is inspected and licensed by the Department of Veterinary
Services. Operation areas are clean, sludge from the effluent treatment plant goes into
farmyard manure, and offal by-products are used for human consumption. The abattoir kills
between 18 and 25 pigs per day, limited only by the shortage of pigs for slaughter. Most of
the pigs are supplied by small-scale farmers in the district, with a few from Thika, Machakos,
Nyeri, Nyahururu and Kirinyaga and Kitale. Traders sometimes slaughter underweight pigs to
meet demand. The main market for the carcasses is Thika Town which is thought to lead
Kenya in pork consumption and has many pork butcheries and eateries. One pork outlet,
Thika Pork Centre, retails an average of 500 kg per day through four butcheries in the town.
PICTURES 20/21: Kabati slaughter house – Muranga South

Other slaughter houses / slabs

Large and medium pig commercial enterprises around Nairobi (Ngong and Kiserian) and
Nakuru have their own slaughter slabs licensed and inspected by the Department of
Veterinary Services, where they slaughter their own pigs and sometimes those of the
neighbouring small-scale farmers. These enterprises own butcheries in Nairobi (Kenyatta
Market) and Nakuru (Utugi and Ngae) where the pork is sold. Pig-raising areas in major
cities, towns and rural districts generally have several slaughter slabs varying in type and
hygiene standards. One style is a simple pole structure in the open air where the carcasses
are hanged and flayed. Another type is an open concrete structure with a killing floor, while
still others are roofed and equipped with a disposal and condemnation pit.
PICTURE 22: Open slaughter house in Busia PICTURE 23: Open air slaughter slab in
County (Kagira et al. 2010) Ndhiwa District, Homabay County
PICTURE 24/25: Popular pork eateries. Note the advertisements
Meat inspection at most of these slaughter slabs is carried out by the Department of
Veterinary Services, although it was observed that no inspection was performed in open air
slaughter slabs common among the free range traditional systems. Here butchers
slaughtered their pigs and sold them, with no license or inspection, at the pork butcheries
and eateries dotting the town centres and residential areas.
4.1.3 Value chains

About 20 percent of the meat consumed in Kenya is poultry and pork. According to the
2005 Export Processing Zone Authority (EPZA) Report, Ken Chic and Farmer’s Choice are the
two main players in poultry and pork production respectively. Hoping to stimulate the market
for value-added products, the Kenyan Government has been encouraging the private sector
and local authorities to establish small abattoirs and meat-processing facilities.

FIGURE 9: Formal pork centers supply chains

FIGURE 10: Traditional free range and scavenging systems

FIGURE 11:Value Chain - Industrial/Integrated and Commercial Systems

Some farmers specialize in piglet production and sell the weaners to other farmers who
finish the pigs (farrow-to-weaner). Others buy weaned and growing pigs which they keep
and fatten for slaughter (weaner-to-finisher). Piglets are sold at between six and eight weeks
old at a cost of between US$ 5 and US$ 10. These other farmers raise the weaners and sell
them after up to two years at a mean (farm gate) price of between US$ 30 and US$ 47,
earning a profit of around US$ 24 per pig sold.
The traders who buy them operate by moving from homestead to homestead, eventually
selling most of the pigs to butchers at a profit of between US$ 20 - 30. They also assemble a
number of finished pigs to be transported to Ndumboini slaughter house where the profit is
between US$ 50 and 100 per carcass. Among small-scale pig farmers in some rural areas, a
farmer notifies neighbours before he slaughters a pig, and requests that they book the
amounts they wish to buy. If the farmer gets enough booking in terms of weight, the pig is
slaughtered, inspected and the booked amounts distributed to the neighbours. The biggest
challenge is that some neighbours do not pay immediately.
In Western Kenya, among the traditional free range systems, a farmer informs
neighbours about slaughtering a pig by means of a hilltop drum. The neighbours get the
message and come for various amounts of the uninspected meat.
There are more players involved. The issues of policy, biosecurity and biosafety are
emphasized. The system is well-organized and value is added to every product along the
value chain.
4.1.4 Main trade routes

These are governed by the location of slaughter houses and major markets. The type of
pig production system is also a factor.
A proliferation of small firms processing pork at various levels in Kenya’s major towns has
improved the market situation and is encouraging local communities to eat this meat.
Previously, over 80 percent of pork and pork products were consumed by the rich and by
tourists but this consumption pattern is now changing.
In Western Kenya and Nyanza’s free range traditional systems, butchers and pig traders
move from homestead to homestead and village to village buying slaughter pigs. Some are
slaughtered locally while other are transported to Ndumboini slaughter house near Nairobi.
In the small-scale enterprises, the farmers will inform the traders and butchers when their
pigs are ready for slaughter. Others will visit Farmer’s Choice and secure a supply order
when the pigs are mature. FC’s contract farmers will supply pigs in line with the contract,
after inspection by field officers. Pigs are moved from the farm to the slaughter slabs and
slaughter houses.
Live pigs are transported by truck from western Kenya and Nyanza to Kiambu West
slaughterhouse. Farmer’s Choice moves pigs from North Rift Valley, Kiambu and Nairobi to
their abattoir in Kamiti.
In Central Province, Eastern and Central Rift Valley (Nakuru), trade routes branch out
from the abattoirs, with the pork being transported by container by bicycle, motorcycle and
vehicles to various market butcheries where consumers buy meat.
Farmer’s Choice and various smaller pork processing companies create a variety of value-
added products from the slaughter house pork. Farmer’s Choice sell to the export market
while the remainder sell their products in the local market.
Pig markets are mainly found in urban areas. FC takes about 80 percent of the pigs on
offer. Smaller market outlets include Oscar Foods, Gourmet Bacon, Nairobi Airport Services,
Chef's Choice and Kenya Cold Storage. Small butcheries in major towns are beginning to
take off, and some enterprising farmers are looking for export markets in the region and
beyond.
Pork barbeque joints are also becoming common in a number of urban centres such as
Thika, Nyeri, Kerugoya, Nakuru, Eldoret Trans Nzoia, Kakamega and Kajiado.
4.2 IMPORT
Kenya imports most of its pork from Brazil and Canada, and most of its processed
products from Italy, as shown below. The main importer of pork is Farmer’s Choice, which
processes the imported meat into value-added products for the export market, such as

bacon and ham. Imports are regulated by the Department of Veterinary Services and are
allowed from certified countries. Import licenses are issued after a risk assessment of the
original source of the imports.
TABLE 6:
Imports of pork and pork products
Product Country of origin Name Company importing Volumes(MT)
Pork Brazil Pork belly Farmer’s Choice 175 (2008)

164 (2009)
175 (October 2010)
Pork Canada Sirloin and leg Farmer’s Choice 50 (2008)

50 (2009)
21 (October 2010)
Pork Germany Spare rib Farmer’s Choice 25 (October 2010)
Processed Italy Salami Several Various quantities
Source: Department of Veterinary Services – Import / Export office – November 2010
4.3 EXPORT
In the last few years, Kenya has been exporting more pork products than beef, mutton
and goat meat combined. Farmer’s Choice, the leading processor and distributor of pork
products in Kenya, exports about 2 000 tonnes per year (20 percent of its total production)
to fifteen countries across Africa, the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Countries) and the Indian
subcontinent. Twenty five percent of the total Farmer’s Choice factory output of processed
pork products is exported. These include special cuts of meat, value-added pork products
such as ham, bacon and sausages.
Among COMESA and non-COMESA countries, the largest share of pork exported from
Kenya goes to Tanzania which takes over half of the exports per month. Farmer's Choice
products are sent by land, sea and air, from the factory to destinations worldwide.
TABLE 7:
Export of pork and pork products
COMESA COUNTRIES NON-COMESA COUNTRIES
Tanzania UAE
Uganda Bahrain
Eritrea Ghana
Ethiopia Nigeria
Djibouti Indian subcontinent
Mauritius Oman
The Democratic Republic of Congo Netherlands (10 000 tonnes twice a year)
Rwanda
Zanzibar
Source: Department of Veterinary Services – Export / Import Office November 2010 and
www.farmerschoice.co.ke – See map on page 56 (Annex III)

Chapter 5
Socio-economic indicators
5.1 CULTURAL BACKGROUND INCL. TRADITIONS AND RELIGION

The pig keeping tradition in Busia started when the Samia migrated from Uganda in the
seventeenth century. In this tradition, a young boy is expected to visit his uncle who will give
him a female piglet as a gift. The boy takes the piglet home to his parents to be raised.
No preparations are made to house or feed the piglet; it is fed on kitchen leftover and
pasture.
Among the Luo of Nyanza, farmers have plenty of land for pigs to roam and scavenge on,
and they keep pigs because they are easy to sell and have a short reproductive cycle. They
believe that keeping a pig in a homestead guards against witchcraft and acts as a security
guard. Children are anointed with lard to protect them against ill omens. Pork is also thought
to boost the immunity of those infected by HIV/AIDS. Farmers believe that a pig’s feeding
habits insulate it from passing diseases to people. The thinking is that, as pigs eat a variety
of feeds from different sources, their flesh accumulates essential ‘elements’ that prevent it
from transmitting diseases to humans.
In Central Province, some farmers keep pigs for providing farmyard manure, and to make
use of crop residues and by-products including kitchen leftovers. Farmers keep one or two
growers to sell for slaughter when they mature or when the family needs money.
Pigs are kept by people of every religion other than Islam. According to the 2009
population census, the pig population distribution in Kenya reflects this, with most pigs
concentrated around Nairobi, Central, Western, Nyanza and Rift Valley Provinces which are
predominantly Christian, and very few in the Muslim-dominated Coast and North Eastern
Provinces. There are more pigs in Coast Province (5 243, KNBS) owing to the influence of the
upcountry Christians, than in North Eastern Province (68, KNBS). Even the 68 was a surprise
and may reflect changing traditions if non-pig keeping communities are now keeping pigs.
The norm has previously been that, even outside Coast and North Eastern Provinces,
people tend not keep pigs wherever Muslims reside and have some influence. In some areas
they are able to influence the administration and are credited with the ban of free range pigs
in some urban areas in Western and Nyanza Provinces.
Among Christians, the Seventh Day Adventists and strict Anglicans do not keep pigs or
consume pork. Regions where these groups dominate have few pig farmers and no pig
slaughter slabs or butcheries.
There are others who have the attitude that pigs are dirty animals – possibly arising from
seeing free range pigs at garbage disposal sites. They will neither keep pigs nor eat
unprocessed pork. This belief that pigs are dirty and can eat anything should be clearly
addressed. Pigs are clean animals but can be messy if maintained in an unclean
environment. Pig can eat anything if left without food.
5.2 TIME ALLOCATION

Pigs receive a lot of attention in the commercial pig production sector. The farmers who
specialize in this sector are market/income-oriented, investing a lot of time in breeding,
feeding, housing and marketing the finished products. To these farmers, pig production is a
business.
In the traditional free range/backyard/roaming systems, the amount of time allocated to
pig-raising differs from region to region and homestead to homestead. Where pigs are kept
in a fully free range way and left to scavenge, little or no time is allocated to their upkeep
unless the farmer wants to sell the pig to meet an urgent need for money.

30 Socio-economic indicators
In the traditional free range system of Western Kenya and Nyanza, pigs will be given
some feed, morning and evening. In most cases this is not adequate and the pig will have to
scavenge (if free) or eat grass if tethered. No attention is given to the pigs at other times, so
in this sense, inadequate time is allocated to the pigs’ upkeep. Where sows farrow in the
bush with no special attention, piglet mortality ranges from 50 to 80 percent. More time is
allocated to their upkeep when the piglets are weaned for sale or the finished pigs are being
sold to pig traders.
Farmers who buy weaned piglets allocate some time to care for them as they are delicate.
Although it is common to find pigs tethered in the hot sun all day with no provision of water,
equally in some homesteads, pigs are treasured and given a lot of attention. Such owners
are proud of their clean, well-fed pigs, keep records of breeding and sales and, in most
cases, receive a higher price for their efforts.
5.3 CONTRIBUTION TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME / FAMILY ECONOMICS

In all production types, pig-keeping plays an important role in household income. The
pig’s short breeding cycle leads many farmers to take the view that smallholder pig- keeping
is the livestock equivalent to cash crops and has potential to improve rural livelihoods.
In the traditional free range system, the sale of piglets or finished pig provides money
needed to pay school fees and hospital bills, buy clothes and food, and build better houses.
The pig acts as the farmers’ bank. Improved marketing through forming farmer groups such
as KENPFA, providing access to credit, and equipping farmers with basic knowledge about pig
farming present opportunities for profitable pig production under this system.
In the commercial system, pig production plays a major role as farmers keep the pigs
wholly for income-generation. The profits are used to meet other expenses in the
homestead, including business development and investment. Improvement in the sector is
desired and possible. One of the major constraints singled out by commercial farmers is the
erratic market. Sometimes the pigs are ready for market but the market is not ready to
receive the pigs. Investment in value-added processing facilities in rural areas would offer
alternative outlets for the finished pig.
Consumer education to counter traditional attitudes would help to broaden the market for
pork and pork products. Farmer’s Choice produces products which are affordable even by
those on low incomes.
5.4 GENDER ASPECTS

In the free range pig production systems of Western Kenya and Nyanza, where men are
rarely at home, women play an important role in the management of pigs although men take
charge of selling the family pig and deciding how the family will use the proceeds. It is said
that women care for the pigs and men sell the pigs, reflecting the cultural expectation that
men are the decision-makers in most rural families. However investment in the pig sector in
this region should involve women as they play a major role.
Women also play a major role in the small-scale commercial system in Central Kenya.
They feed the pigs and are responsible for gathering and applying farmyard manure. As in
the traditional free range system, men sell the pigs and control how the money is used. The
pig traders approach the men rather than the women who have no say in pig sales. In most
cases the men buy a replacement pregnant gilt, weaner or a young boar in the expectation
that the women continue to raise whatever livestock is around.

Chapter 6
Breeds
6.1 EXOTIC BREEDS

Breeding animals are difficult to get because there are few breeding farms. Those that
exist sell breeding stock at high prices. For instance, Farmer’s Choice and a few established
breeders sell pregnant sow for US$ 200–250, Boar for US$ 225–275 5.
Popular breeds include Large White, Landrace and their crosses. A few Duroc are also
available - used as terminal sires by Farmer’s Choice Ltd. in their three-way cross-breeding
scheme, resulting in improved growth rates and carcass quality. The Large White is robust,
adaptable and high-performing, and is preferred by most pig farmers. Farmer’s Choice is the
only company that has pure bred Large White sows. These are kept at Uplands Farm (Rose
Mark Limited) and supply offspring to be used in cross-breeding at their other farms. The
Duroc–Jersey has good attributes for rearing and growing in the tropics and is widely used
for cross-breeding with the Large White. Landrace pigs have been widely used for cross-
breeding in the tropics. They do well under close confinement, requiring higher management
and feeding levels.
The KARI pig breeding station at Naivasha, which suspended its activities in 2008 because
of the lack of market, had been a source of exotic breeds for farmers since its inception in
1953. If KARI were to reverse this decision, activities at the station could still resume and
the importation of pure breeds could recommence – but at present there is no indication that
this is under consideration. The Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC) was also
involved in exotic pig breeding at their Malindi farm, Nakuru and at Uplands (which it pulled
out of in 1987).
Other farms keep mainly Large White and Landrace crosses. These are sourced from
Farmer’s Choice, large commercial farms, Catholic missions and other small-scale breeders,
and are the major sources of exotic breeding material for Kenyan pig farmers. Exotic crosses
are also common among the free range/scavenging/roaming pig enterprises found in slum
areas in major towns and cities in Kenya, and can be found in garbage dump sites, waste
disposal pits and sewer disposal channels. Exotic cross-breeds are preferred by the market.
Skin colour other than white attracts a penalty at most major slaughter facilities, especially if
the colour is black.
PICTURE 23: Large White pig at the Veterinary PICTURE 24: Pigs from the areas surrounding
Farm – University of Nairobi Ndumboini slaughter house waiting to be
slaughtered
5
Exchange rate, October 2010: US$ 1 = Ksh 80

32 Breeds
6.2 LOCAL BREEDS

Most pigs in the country are highly inbred and there is an urgent need to address this
challenge.
It is not known whether there are any local breeds in Kenya. Most experts agree that pigs
in the free range systems are the result of extensive inbreeding between exotic cross-breeds
and other types of cross-breed from neighbouring countries, especially Uganda. These inbred
pigs have adapted to the environment and feeding regimes in the free range system, giving
rise to the multi-coloured pigs seen tethered or scavenging in places where this system is
practiced. Examples of these breeds are shown in the photos below.
PICTURE 25: Varieties of pigs kept by the farmers in Busia County: a. white boar, b. black and white
sow, c. black boar, d. black and white grower (Kagira et al. 2010)
There are no organized breeding programmes. A boar is shared among several farmers
and inbreeding is very common. A farmer buys a male and female weaner piglet from the
same litter which becomes his starter stock.
Neighbours share boars and there is no support for the boar keeper. The owner can sell
the boar anytime he needs money.
The pigs have a variety of skin colours, are small in size and take a long time to mature.
Sows farrow once a year. Mature gilts and baconers are sold at two years of age, most of
them underweight at between 50 and 70 kg live weight. Piglet mortality is between 50 and
60 percent owing to starvation and disease endemic to the harsh environment.
These breeds nevertheless play a significant role in these areas, contributing to the
livelihood of the homesteads and supplying pigs to the local butcheries. Some of these pigs
are transported to an abattoir on the outskirts of Nairobi and so end up being consumed in
the capital. Upcoming pig processors also buy the carcasses of these breeds from this
particular slaughter facility for use in their various processed pork products.

Chapter 7
Wildlife
7.1 WILDLIFE POPULATION (SUIDAE / TAYASSUIDAE)

Giant forest hog and river hogs, whose population has not been estimated, are found in
Western Kenya and parts of Nyanza. They are seen only at night when they raid farms,
uprooting cassava, sweet potatoes and coco yams. Warthogs and bush pigs are widespread
in most forested areas of Kenya. It is common to see warthogs grazing along the roads in
these areas especially during the dry season.
7.2 HUNTING / CONSUMPTION

In Kenya, it is illegal to hunt wild animals but people hunt warthogs and bush pig for
meat. Poaching is common in areas where these animals are found.
Trichinellosis was previously reported in Kenya in 1960s and 1970s. Two cases were
reported in 1995 from people who had eaten warthog/wild boar. A more recent case of
trichinellosis in a Japanese tourist to Kenya who had eaten wild meat (including alligator, pig,
zebra and ostrich) indicated that the disease could still be circulating amongst the wild
animals in the country, and possibly in domestic free range pigs.
7.3 INTERACTION WITH DOMESTIC PIGS

Research conducted by ILRI around Ruma National Park in Homabay shows that domestic
pigs in the free range system in Nyanza and Western Kenya interact with these giant forest
hogs, river hogs, warthogs and bush pigs, especially if the domestic pigs are roaming at
night.
Wild pigs are also found around Ngong, Thika and Machakos. Wild pigs are important
reservoirs of African swine fever (ASF). High titers against ASF virus have been found in free
range domestic pigs in these areas (Okoth, personal communication). There is also the
possibility of offal from hunted wild pig being used to feed domestic pigs.

Chapter 8
Animal, public and environmental

health
8.1. MAJOR PIG DISEASES REPORTED / PRESENT

African swine fever (ASF)
The literature available indicates that the first case of ASF occurred in 1905 among
imported pigs. However, this viral disease was first diagnosed among pigs in 1954. It
affected Kiambu county in 1958 and Trans Nzoia in 1964. The disease re-emerged in 1994
where it affected Kiambu, Thika, Nairobi and Kajiado. Outbreaks were reported in Kiambu,
Thika and Nairobi in 2001 and the last outbreak occurred in 2006/2007 affecting Kiambu,
Thika, Nairobi, Nakuru, Eldoret, Kisumu and Busia Districts.
Contact between wild pigs and domestic pigs is one cause of ASF outbreaks. The virus is
also transmitted by the soft tick Ornithodorus moubata. The recent outbreak in Kenya was
traced to have originated in Busia and spread to all the other districts through pork and pork
products.
The outbreak of 2006/2007 wiped out most of the free range scavenging pigs in Nakuru,
Eldoret and Kisumu garbage dump sites. Numbers are slowly building up again. A recent
study has shown that 20 to 25 percent of pigs in the traditional free range systems have
antibodies against African swine fever (Okoth, unpublished).
Influenza A
So far, pigs in Kenya have tested negative for pandemic influenza H1N1 (2009). However,
serum samples and swabs from an abattoir which receives pigs from several parts of the
country, including free range backyard pigs from Nairobi, showed (using PCR and ELISA
methods) evidence of infection with influenza A viruses. Subtyping of the influenza virus
isolated is being carried out. 1 200 cases of influenza H1N1 (2009) have been confirmed in
humans using PCR and ELISA diagnostic techniques (Munyua, CDC-Kenya, personal
communication). Although pigs in Homabay and Nakuru tested negative for pandemic H1N1,
the provincial administration ordered the killing of all free range scavenging pigs.
The DVS also conducted a survey of influenza A viruses in pigs in Nairobi and Thika,
through the Department of Veterinary Services. Subtyping of the influenza viruses isolated is
being carried out.
Porcine cysticercosis
Porcine cysticercosis is the infection of pigs by larval stages of the human tapeworm
Taenia solium. The tapeworm sheds eggs in faeces which are picked up by pigs, in areas
where they are allowed to roam and scavenge, particularly where the human population does
not use latrines. The eggs hatch in the stomach of the pig and are distributed by the blood
system to various muscles and organs. Here they develop into a larval stage called
cysticercus cellulosae. Free range pigs are slaughtered when they are over a year old and
this is enough time for the cyst to develop. Humans get infected by eating raw or
undercooked pork, allowing the larvae to reach human intestines and there develop into an
adult tapeworm that starts laying eggs.
Cysticercus cellulosae is zoonotic, meaning that it is a disease that can be transmitted
between animals and humans. Poor hygiene and sanitation may lead to humans ingesting
the eggs of the Taenia solium. The larval stages lodge in various organs and lead to
blindness. When they lodge in the brain they lead to a condition called Neurocysticercosis
(NCC) which is a major cause of acquired epilepsy and can be fatal.

36 Animal, public and environmental health
The prevalence of porcine cysticercosis, using lingual palpation, among traditional free
range pigs has been estimated at between 10 and 14 percent in Busia, 5 to 9 percent in Teso
and 6 percent in Homabay District. Seroprevalence of porcine cysticercosis in pigs in Busia
District using ELISA has been found to be between 4 and 20 percent.
National prevalence of porcine cysticercosis at meat inspection is less than 0.02 percent.
This has been attributed to poor recording and reporting at the MOLD headquarters. At
Farmer’s Choice, cases of cysticercus cellulosae have been recorded since July 2002. These
involved single carcasses that were condemned. Porcine cysticercosis causes losses - owing
to condemnation of carcasses and trade restrictions as major markets shy away from regions
which have reported cases of porcine cysticercosis.
Other Diseases
Other diseases reported include helminthes, mainly the gastrointestinal Ascaris suum and
Oesophagostumum species. Free range pigs have been found to show milky spots caused by
the migratory stages of Ascaris suum and to be heavily infected by the lung worm
Metastrongylus. Pigs have also been found to be infected with various gastrointestinal
protozoa such as Coccidia, Balantidium spp, Tritrichomonas and Enteomoeba which are
zoonotic. Five cases of Anthrax have been confirmed in pigs between December 2008 and
June 2010 by the Disease Control Unit of the Department of Veterinary Services.
In the commercial production systems, pneumonia, meningitis and diarrhoea have been
reported. Mastitis has been reported in sows. Gut edema has also been reported in Eldoret in
the Rift Valley Province and Kikuyu in Central Province.
Farmer’s Choice Limited has a vaccination regime for all its pigs against Erysipelas, E.
coli, Porcine Parvovirus and Clostridium.
Mange, Pediculosis and tick infections are common among the free range systems. Jiggers
(Tunga penetrans) also affect the pigs especially in Busia County. Mange has also been
reported in some commercial farms in Central Province.
Commercial farmers in Central Province deworm their pigs monthly and this leads to
development of anthelmintic resistance.
Foot and mouth disease (FMD) in pigs has been reported in parts of Central Kenya in
2009 in commercial enterprises which combine pig- and cattle-keeping. This followed
outbreaks of FMD in cattle. The resulting ban on the transportation of live pigs and pig
products from the affected farms had a major impact on the Kabati abattoir located in the
area. The ban was lifted in early 2010.
Other conditions include lameness, tether wounds on the feet and necks of tethered free
range pigs, and trauma from various objects.
PICTURE 26/27/28: Tether wounds on the neck and forelegs of free range pigs in Nyanza

PICTURE 29: Heavy pediculosis in a 5 week PICTURE 30: Cysticercus cellulosae cyst under
old free range piglet the tongue of a free range pig in Homabay
County
8.2 PUBLIC HEALTH / SANITATION

In 2008, 32 percent of the rural population were using improved sanitation facilities, while
18 percent were using the open defecation system without latrines (Source: WHO and
UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program (JMP)). In areas where sanitation is poor, human beings do
not use latrines and pigs are allowed to roam freely, the risk of transmission and
maintenance of zoonotic pathogens is very high.
8.3 BIOSECURITY
Bioexclusion is the responsibility of pig farmers. The objective is to exclude any virus or
parasite coming onto the farm, by maintaining cleanliness and being very sure of the
provenance of pigs. It is essential that any pig entering a farm or joining a herd meets legal
and sanitary requirements. In Kenya, levels of hygiene and biosecurity vary according to the
production system. At one extreme is the free range backyard system where hygiene is poor.
In the small-scale commercial system, biosecurity and hygiene standards are higher in
establishments where pigs are housed on concrete floors. These are washed daily and the
pigs provided with clean water. A challenge in this system is disposing of manure - done at
the roadside in some enterprises. In those establishments where the floors are not concrete,
hygiene is poor with pigs rooting in the muddy waters and soil.
In the large commercial systems, hygiene standards are good and resources are allocated
to maintaining these standards.
According to several bylaws, no animals should be kept in urban areas. Those keeping
animals should have a special license. In rural areas, a farmer who plans to keep pigs is
expected to build a house and put in place other infrastructure as outlined in the Animal
Diseases Act (Control of Pig Diseases). The procedure is then to apply for a license to keep
pigs by paying US$ 2.5 to any livestock office, following which a veterinary officer will inspect
the premises. If the requirements are met, the farmer pays US$ 5 and is issued with a one
year license, to be renewed annually. The Act obliges farmers to maintain a clean
environment free from parasites, vermin and other contaminants, and covers the following
four main areas (Department of Veterinary Services - Kabete):
Import control
The Department of Veterinary Services regulates the importation of pigs and pig products
under the Animal Diseases Act (Animal Diseases Rules 1-14). Personnel stationed at all ports
of entry into the country verify the import specifications once the import is approved by the
DVS.

38 Animal, public and environmental health
Local movements of pigs

To regulate the risk posed by local movement of pigs, animals require health certification
before being issued with a Movement Permit by a DVO.
Feed Control
Cap 345 of the Act provides for standardization and sanitary management of animal
feeds. Manufacturers are expected to produce feeds to the nutritional standards identified in
the Act. The Act also requires that animal proteins be sterilized at specified temperatures to
kill all the pathogens, before they are fed to animals. Sterilization plants are licensed by the
Department of Veterinary Services.
Monitoring compliance with the requirements is the current challenge, with the inspection
network lacking manpower.
Farm biosecurity
All piggeries are licensed by the Department of Veterinary Services. Licenses are issued
according to the Animal Diseases Act (Control of Pig Diseases Rules), and specify the
architectural design of the piggery including size, area, materials to be used, and rodent-
proofing. The Act also requires that pig manure be composted for one month before being
released for crop and fodder use. The pig farmer has the following obligations:
• Report all notifiable diseases to a government veterinary officer;
• Isolate sick pigs from the healthy ones;
• Accommodate the pigs in approved housing;
• Uphold pig welfare as stated in Cap 360, i.e. maintain a clean environment free from
parasites, vermin and contaminants; feed the swine adequately; always provide
clean water; and call a qualified veterinary surgeon to attend to them when they are
sick.
These biosecurity laws are only adhered to in commercial enterprises. Small-scale farmers
apply them if and when the market demands. The main challenge in the latter sector is the
disposal of manure, procedures for which are absent in free range backyard systems and
traditional free range systems.
8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

In the free range production systems, pigs degrade the land by destroying crops, and
pollute the water sources as they go to marshy areas to wallow in mud.
Pigs kept in the backyard/scavenging systems destroy and block sewer drainage tunnels.
They expose human being to various infections and health hazards. Feeding and rooting in
garbage and waste disposal sites disturbs and destroys these areas. The pigs are a huge
nuisance to the municipal and city authorities, and a major challenge to environmental
management agencies, public health authorities, provincial administrations and the
surrounding neighbourhoods.
According to the Environmental Management Act 2008, it is illegal to keep animals in the
municipalities. Pigs kept under these conditions are an environmental hazard and a nuisance
- leading to water, air and noise pollution.
Manure and waste disposal is a major challenge in small- and large-scale commercial
systems, especially so on farms where crops are not grown, and in urban areas. On mixed
farms where livestock and crops are raised, the animal manure is used on crops after the
composting for one month required by law. Where there is no arable element to the farming
enterprise, manure accumulates and leads to air pollution. Some farms dispose of this
manure along the roadside and on uncultivated land, or into sewage and storm water
drainage channels in urban areas. The manure is washed into the water sources by rain and
storm water, leading to water pollution. Those neighbouring such livestock farms are
unhappy with the enterprises, maintaining the attitude that pigs are dirty animals and
complaining to the authorities.
Manure and waste disposal is also a challenge for small slaughter houses and slabs with
no effluent treatment facilities - leading to water and air pollution. Major abattoirs have
effluent treatment plants and the resulting sludge and compost is either sold, or given to
farmers for growing fodder such as Napier grass.

Chapter 9
Policy and legal framework affecting

the pig industry
Kenya Vision 2030

This national government policy is the economic blueprint for development up to 2030.
The vision identifies seven pillars of the national economy. Chapter 4 identifies six sectors,
including agriculture, as key drivers of growth. The agricultural sector is projected to
contribute additional benefits to the economy worth between Ksh 80 and 90 billion.
Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS)
Formerly known as the Strategy for Revitalization of Agriculture (SRA), this policy
institutionalizes Kenya Vision 2030 in the ministries relating to the agricultural sector. The
technical part of the review is complete and the policy awaits ratification, printing and re-
launching.
National Livestock Policy
The Sessional Paper for National Livestock Policy was approved in December 2008 and is
in print. With respect to disease control, this policy enables the Government to:
• Enhance control of notifiable diseases, including farmer compensation where
stamping out programmes are enacted [Section 3.4.1];
• Make available the necessary material and human resources for disease control
[Sections 3.4.1, 3.4.6, 2.4.12 and 3.9.10];
• Provide a rapid response to check the effects of disease outbreaks [Section 3.4.10];
• Develop and rehabilitate the livestock marketing infrastructure in collaboration with
relevant stakeholders, including identifying and attracting the necessary support for
infrastructure development [Sections 3.6.3 and 3.6.13];
• Facilitate the enforcement of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards (SPS) as per the
WTO Agreements of which Kenya is a signatory, including developing and enforcing
good practices which conform to national and international standards at all stages of
production and marketing.
• Install the necessary animal production and processing mechanisms acceptable to
regional and international markets in line with WTO agreements.
Animal Diseases Act
As Chapter 364 in the laws of Kenya, this Act empowers the Minister and the Director of
Veterinary Services to effectively manage animal diseases by:
• Declaring the range of animals and diseases addressed by the law [Section 2];
• Gazetting diseases as notifiable [Section 2];
• Enforcing the reporting and notification of diseases [Section 4];
• Providing and enforcing measures for managing disease outbreaks [Sections 5-7];
• Destroying infected animals and compensating producers when livestock are culled
for disease-control purposes [Sections 10–13];
• Regulating imports of animals, formites and biological products [Section 8, Rules
3–14];
• Regulating movement of animals from place to place [Section 9 and Rules 15–28];
• Enforcing mass vaccination and treatment of animals [Section 9 and Rules 38–39];
• Providing and enforcing animal health inspectorate [Section 14, Rules 17–19];
• Providing for the creation and enforcement of disease barriers [Section 9, Rule 35];
• Authorizing drugs and vaccines which may be used in the country [Section 15];
• Providing quarantine facilities and quarantine restrictions [Section 9, Rules 31–33];
Version of DATE
40 Policy and legal framework affecting the pig industry
• Enforcing the disinfection of infected premises, contaminated persons and formites

as well as the disposal of cadavers [Section 9, Rules 43, 45–47];
• Empowering the Director or Veterinary Officers to take any measure considered
necessary or advisable in order to prevent the spread of disease [Section 9,
Rule 30].
Uplands Bacon Factory Act
• Chapter 362 of the laws of Kenya addresses the regulation and operation of the pig
industry under the Pig Industry Act Cap 361 [Section 3].
• Meat Control Act
• Chapter 356 of the laws of Kenya addresses the regulation of abattoirs, the meat
inspection code, and the transportation of meat.
• Fertilizer and Animal Foodstuffs Act
• Chapter 345 of the laws of Kenya provides for sanitary controls of fertilizers of
animal origin and animal feedstuffs.
• Food, Drugs and Chemical Substances Act
• Chapter 245 of the laws of Kenya regulates standards for foodstuffs, drugs and other
chemical substances in the food value chain.
• Pharmacy and Poisons Act
• Chapter 244 of the laws of Kenya provides for the regulation of veterinary and
human medicines.
• Veterinary Surgeons Act
• Chapter 366 of the laws of Kenya provides for the regulation of animal health
providers.
• Pest Control Products Act
• Chapter 364 of the laws of Kenya provides for the regulation of animal and plant pest
control products.
• Branding of Stock Act
• Chapter 357 of the laws of Kenya provides for animal identification and traceability
using marks on the skin of animals.
• Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
• Chapter 360 of the laws of Kenya provides for animal welfare protection measures.
• Standards Act
• Chapter 496 of the laws of Kenya regulates product and process standards.
• Crop Production and Livestock Act
• Chapter 321 of the laws of Kenya provides for the regulation of animal breeding and
stocking rates.

Chapter 10
Analysis
10.1 CURRENT STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE PIG SECTOR

Opportunities
• Increasing numbers of people are interested in consuming pork and the market
base is consequently expanding.
• The price of other meats is rising compared with pork, and a recent campaign has
encouraged people to increase their consumption of poultry, rabbit and pork
products.
• An increase in the number of outlets, such as local butcheries and small-scale
processors, means that farmers have a wider choice of market for their product.
• As farm sizes continue to decrease owing to high human population and
fragmentation of land, land-intensive livestock such as pigs gain advantage over
livestock that require more land such as cattle.
• Farmers can enhance their profit margins by making their own feeds; the
potential to reduce production costs makes pig-rearing even more viable.
• Export markets for pork products already exist, increasing the market base.
• The short production cycle for pigs gives them an advantage over other livestock
such as cattle.
• The formation of pig farmers’ interest groups has been championing the interests
of pig farmers.
Major constraints in the pig industry
Marketing limitations cut across the country but the major ones are:
• Low prices: Demand for pork products determines the number of pigs bought. The
largest buyer is Farmer’s Choice and they cannot buy all the pigs produced.
Farmers otherwise sell to local butcheries; with the selling price dictated to some
extent by the fact that further maintenance of the pigs on the farm is costly. The
prices offered by local butcheries can still be higher than those offered by
Farmer’s Choice, though. The growing popularity of pork has begun to alter this
imbalance between producers and buyers in the market, making it possible for
alternative outlets such as Chef’s Choice to get established and compete with
Farmer’s Choice.
• Lack of slaughter facilities: This is a problem in some regions, requiring pigs to be
transported over long distances and resulting in further marketing issues.
• Infertility and related problems: These are because of inbreeding and
underfeeding, the root cause of which is poor management.
• Unavailability of or high prices for breeding stock: This causes inbreeding in some
areas when farmers cannot get hold of or afford quality breeding stock.
• Inadequate or non-existent credit facilities: Not all farmers who need and want
credit get it.
• Poor husbandry: Fewer than 50 percent of all pig farmers in Kenya practice
modern pig farming with proper housing, feeding and healthcare procedures,
which impacts on production levels.
• Outbreaks of disease: African swine fever, for instance, causes great losses to the
pig industry.
Strategies
• Improve quality of pig breeds-
• Import quality breeding pigs
• Revive pig breeding station at KARI Naivasha.
• Include pig farming in the National Livestock Policy.
• Improve access to extension services and training-

42 Analysis
• Intensify training to farmers and staff relating to public health and sanitation
• Increase extension workers’ mobility.
• Create incentives for pig production-
• Improve access to short- and long-term credit for pig producers and pork
processors
• Task the Kenyan Bureau of Standards (KEBS) with controlling and monitoring
industrial feed production to ensure good and constant quality.
• Encourage pig farmers to form interest groups to improve bargaining power.
• Increase demand for pork through focused communications-
• Popularize pork consumption in ASK shows, field days and demonstrations.
10.2 PROSPECTS OF THE PIG SECTOR OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
There is continued demand for pork as the tourism industry has continued to grow. Many
farmers who had stopped rearing pigs are now recommencing pig-keeping and contributing
to an increased output of pork. Another factor in the increased demand for pork is its
growing consumption by local people, being that it is cheaper than beef in some regions.
Farmer’s Choice handles about 80 percent of the pigs processed in Kenya. Recently the
factory issued a circular to farmers, through the office of the production manager, to scale
up production as demand for pork rises, and FC projects that this growth in demand will
continue to rise. Small processing firms (such as Oscar Foods –Kikuyu, Chef’s Choice and
Hurlingham Butcheries) have since proliferated in order to process pork at various levels in
Kenya’s major towns.
Pork barbeque eateries have sprung up in towns such as Thika, Nyeri, Kerugoya,
Kakamega, Busia and Eldoret, greatly increasing the market for pork. In most of these urban
areas, the demand is higher than the supply.
Pig producers in Central, Nairobi and Eastern Provinces continue to enjoy the ready
market offered by Farmer’s Choice and other small processors such as Oscar Foods. As pork
consumption patterns change from it being the preserve of tourists and the rich to being
eaten more generally, numerous local butcheries in urban centres in these areas have begun
to thrive.
Pigs are particularly suitable in high-potential smallholdings since they need less land
compared with other livestock. High human population and a corresponding reduction in
farm size have made it necessary to maximize use of land – enhancing the viability of pig
farming.
The short reproductive cycle for pigs is favourable and farmers are able to take advantage
of this if assured of market support and stability.
The recent registration and formation of the Kenya National Pig Farmers Association is a
great step towards bringing pig farmers together to address the challenges in the sector.
Such groups are able to access credit, cheaper feed sources and good markets; and lobby for
government support for the sector. Such groups will also build regional slaughter houses and
processing factories thereby improving the value of the pork.
Prospects for the pig sector over the next five years are promising.
10.3 POTENTIAL OF PIG PRODUCTION IN ACHIEVING MDGS

In September 2000 heads of state and governments met at the Millennium Summit and
agreed on a set of eight goals, 18 targets and 48 indicators on development and poverty
eradication.
These came to be known as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). They included a
set of targets for development and poverty eradication mainly inspired by the International
Development Goals (IDGS) or International Development Targets (IDTs).
The following MDGs were agreed upon:
• Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
• Halve the proportion of people living on less than a dollar a day
• Halve the proportion of people who suffer from hunger
• Achieve universal primary education
• Ensure that boys and girls alike complete primary schooling
• Promote gender equality and empower women

• Eliminate gender disparity at all levels of education

• Reduce child mortality
• Reduce by two-thirds the under-five mortality rate
• Improve maternal health
• Reduce by half the maternal mortality rate
• Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
• Reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS
• Ensure environmental sustainability
• Integrate sustainable development into country policies and reverse loss of
environmental resources.
• Halve the proportion of people without access to potable water.
• Significantly improve the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers.
• Develop a global partnership for development
• Raise official development assistance
• Expand market access
Pig production has great potential to achieve several of these MDGs. Pig-keeping can
eradicate extreme poverty as the reproductive cycle is short. One sow can farrow twice in
one year.
The capital input into pig-keeping may be high but the returns are quick and good. With
improving and new market opportunities, pig-keeping can eradicate extreme poverty and
hunger. As reported in several areas, money from the sales of pigs is used to buy foodstuffs
and commodities for households. Government can invest in improved pig production to
eradicate extreme poverty.
Money from sale of pigs is also used for paying school fees and buying uniforms. Pig
production can contribute to the achievement of the second MDGs – achieving universal
primary education.
Pig production can also contribute to the third MDGs as women manage and feed the
pigs. They can be empowered through initiatives and policies in pig production. Establishing
these new principles and practices will contribute to the achievement of MDGs four and five.
It is necessary to involve women more in the marketing of pigs to achieve these goals.
Improvement and promotion of pig production among the youth and other active group
will provide employment and engagement thereby reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS. The
formation of pig-keeping groups will also provide a forum for sharing experiences and
strategies to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS.
Pig production and marketing has the potential to contribute towards global development
partnerships.
With improved and enhanced pig production, it will be necessary to expand domestic and
foreign market access, thereby contributing to the eighth MDG.

Annex I
Who is who (contact list)
GOVERNMENT
Ministry of Livestock Development

Department of Veterinary Services
Department of Livestock Production
Ministry of Agriculture
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute - Naivasha
Ministry of Trade
Kenya Wildlife Service
RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
International Livestock Research Institute

CDC-Kenya
University of Nairobi
PRIVATE COMPANIES (PRODUCTION, FEED, BREEDING, PROCESSING, MARKETING)
Farmer’s Choice Limited

Unga Group Company Limited
King Feeds Limited
Ngae Feeds Limited
New Day Feeds Limited
Thika Pork Centre
Utugi Butchery –Nakuru
Mwangaza Limited - Homabay
Ndumboini Slaughter House
Lyntano Slaughter House
Kabati Slaughter house
FARMER ORGANIZATIONS
Kenya National Pig Farmers Association

P.O. Box 54250, 00200 Nairobi Kenya
Kenya National Fresh Produce Association

Annex II
List of major projects – pig sector
Currently there are no major development projects in the pig sector. Government and
NGOs have in the past attempted to address issues of breeding, feeding and marketing.
These have been frustrated by market fluctuations, and by the high cost and poor quality of
feeds.
The last major government intervention was in 1996 with the ADB/GOK-sponsored pig
project, which ended in the year 2000. The project was providing much needed credit and
technical information in the pig industry. Unfortunately the effects were not felt due to other
factors in the industry.
There are several projects addressing health issues coordinated by the Faculty of
Veterinary Medicine at the University of Nairobi, and by Canada and International Livestock
Research Institute (ILRI) at the University of Guelph. These projects are funded by the
Wellcome Trust and the European Union through the Association for Strengthening
Agricultural Research in East and Central Africa (ASARECA). These include:
• Diagnostic and Control Tools and Strategies for Taenia solium Cysticercosis in
Homabay
• Improving rural pig farming in Western Kenya
• Infectious Diseases of East African Livestock (IDEAL) – People, Animals and Zoonosis
in Busia (Welcome Trust and ILRI)
• International Potato Institute (CIP) – Evaluation of Dry Matter Yields and Silage
Quality of Sweet Potato Dual Purpose Varieties – Under Sweet Potato Animal Feed
project – A component of SASHA (Sweet Potato Action for Security and Health in
Africa).
• Survey of African Swine Fever (ASF) among domestic and wild pigs -ILRI – Kenya
Wildlife Service (KWS) and MOLD.

Annex III
Bibliography
Ancelle, T.; De Bruyne, A.; Niang, M.; Poisson, D.M.; Prazuck, T.; Fur, A.;
Weinbreck, P.; Dardé, M-L. & Dupouy-Camet, J. 2006. Épidémie de trichinellose à
Trichinella nativa due à la consommation de viande d’ours, France 2005 [Outbreak of
trichinellosis caused by Trichinella nativa owing to consumption of bear meat, France 2005].
B.E.H., 14: 96-98. (Available [in French] at www.invs.sante.fr/beh)
Hutcheon, R.A. & Pamba, H.O. 1972. Report of a family outbreak of trichinosis in
Kajiado district - Kenya. East African Medical Journal, 49: 663-666.Githigia, S.M.;
Murekefu, K.; Willingham, A.L. & Otieno, R.O. 2006. Prevalence of porcine cysticercosis
and risk factors for Taenia solium cysticercosis/Taeniosis in three divisions of Busia District.
Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 54, 224–229.
Kagira, J.M. 2001. The prevalence of gastro-intestinal nematodes, control practices and
occurrence of anthelmintic resistance in pig herds in Thika District, Kenya. University of
Nairobi. (MSc thesis)
Kagira, J.M. 2010. Characteristics of production system, epidemiology and control of pig
parasites in Busia district, Kenya. University of Nairobi. (PhD thesis)
Kagira, J.M.; Githigia, S.M.; Nganga, J.C.; Kanyari, P.W.N. & Maingi, N. 2010a.
Prevalence of gastrointestinal protozoa and association with risk factors in free range pigs in
Kenya. Journal of Protozoology Research, 20: 1-9.
Kagira, J.M.; Maingi, N.; Kanyari, P.W.N.; Githigia, S.M.; Nganga, J.C. & Gachohi,
J.M. 2010b. Seroprevalence of cysticercus cellulosae and associated risk factors in free range
pigs in Kenya. Journal of Helminthology, 84: 398–403.
Langat, C.K. 1999. An abattoir survey on the occurrence and prevalence of swine
parasitic helminths of public health importance in Kenya. University of Nairobi. (MSc Thesis)
Lekule, F.P. & Kyvsgaard, N.C. 2003. Improving pig husbandry in tropical resource-
poor communities and its potential to reduce risk of porcine cysticercosis. Acta Tropica, 87:
111–117.
McGlone, J. & Pond, W.G. 2003. Pig production: Biological principles and applications.
pp. 164–165.
Ministry of Finance and Planning. 2002. Busia District Development Plan 2002–2008.
Republic of Kenya.
Mutua, F.K.; Randolph, T.F.; Arimi, S.M.; Kitala, P.M.; Githigia, S.M.; Willingham,
A.L. & Njeru, F.M. 2007. Palpable lingual cysts, a possible indicator of porcine cysticercosis
in Teso District, Western Kenya. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 15 (4): 206–212.
Mutua, F.K. 2010. A study of opportunities for improved rural pig farming in Western
Kenya: Feeding, productivity, marketing and public health. University of Nairobi. (PhD thesis)
Nakamura, T.; Miura, T.; Nakaoka, T.; Nagano, I.; Takahashi, Y. & Iwamoto, A. 2003.
A case of trichinellosis with spontaneous remission. Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 77:839–843.
Nelson, G.S. & Mukundi, J.A. 1963. A strain of Trichinella spiralis from Kenya of low
infectivity to rats and domestic pigs. Journal of Helminthology, 37: 329–338.
Ngurare, V.K. 1999. Promoting pig industry to year 2000 and beyond. In Proc. Pig
Stakeholders Workshop at Agricultural Resource Centre, Egerton University, Njoro, 25–26
February 1999.

50 Bibliography
Peters, D. 2008. An assessment of the potential of sweet potatoes as livestock feed in

East Africa, Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya. Report presented to Intl. Potato Centre,
Nairobi.Selinas-Chavaria, J.M.; Dominguez-Munoz, R.; Barnal-Lorenzo, R.F.; Garcia-
Castillo & Arzola-Alvarez, C. 2007. Growth performance and carcass characterization of
feedlot lambs fed diets with pig manure and rumen contents. Journal of Animal Veterinary
Advances, 6:505–508.
Tuitoek, J.K. & Kosgey, I.S. 1999. Overview of pig production in Kenya. In Proc. Pig
February 1999.
United Nations Development Program. 2008. Human Development Report
2007/2008. United Nations Development Program New York
Wahome R.G. 1999. Pig feeds (commercial and non-commercial). In Proc. Pig
February 1999.
Westendorf, M. & Myer, R. 1998. Feeding food waste to swine (available at
edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ an143).

Annex IV
Maps
MAP 1: Map of Kenya
Source: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/africa/kenya_pol88.jpg

52 Maps
MAP 2: Modelled density of pigs in Kenya in 2005
Source of original data: Ministry of Livestock Development, Kenya.
Model based on reported statistics at administrative level 3 (Division) for 2005, developed
using the methodology described in FAO 2007 6 and adjusted to match FAOSTAT 2005
national total.
6
FAO (2007) Gridded Livestock of the World, 2007, by G.R.W. Wint and T.P. Robinson. Rome: Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division.

MAP 3: International distribution of pork and pork products by Farmer’s Choice
Source: www.farmerschoice.co.ke

Pig Farming Info PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pig Farming Info PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pig Farming Info PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3

FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH

livestock country reviews

FAO ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND HEALTH

livestock country reviews

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this

E-ISBN 978-92-5-107127-4 (PDF)

All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of

4.2 IMPORT ......................................................................................................... 26

Acronyms and abbreviations

ADC Agricultural Development Corporation

The country in brief

Population, total 38.61 million Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics,

Economy group: Low income Source: World Bank, November 2010

Kenya’s economy depends on agriculture, and includes a fast-growing livestock sector.

FIGURE 1: Gross national income (GNI) per capita

Source: World Bank Group World Development Indicators, November 2010

Version du 17 novembre 2011

FIGURE 2: Demographic profile

FIGURE 3: Annual population growth rates

Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of

Version du 17 novembre 2011

Profile of the pig sector

2.1 LIVESTOCK DISTRIBUTION IN KENYA

FIGURE 4: Livestock distribution in KENYA

Source: KNBS 2009 census

2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE PIG POPULATION

Version du 17 novembre 2011

Distribution of pig holdings within the country 2

Province Pig population Commercial sector Traditional/Backyard sector

Western 87 838 3 512 84 325

Rift Valley 48 495 14 579 35 654

Nyanza 27 612 900 26 712

Eastern 43 480 35 654 7 826

Coast 5 243 5 243 0

Central 91 977 75 421 16 556

Nairobi 29 976 13 976 16 000

Total Kenya 335 301 149 965 187 073

FIGURE 5: National pig sector production

Source: FAOSTAT , 2010

Version du 17 novembre 2011

FIGURE 5.1: National pig population estimates

FIGURE 5.2: Estimated pork supply in Kenya

Source: MOLD-LPD, 2009

Version du 17 novembre 2011

Year Population No. Slaughtered Meat (MT) Value 3

2000 315 208 163 908 11 473.56 1.15 Ksh Billions

2001 332 600 172 952 12 106.64 0.85 Ksh Billions

2002 335 900 174 668 12 226.76 0.86 Ksh Billions

2003 415 200 215 904 15 113.28 1.06 Ksh Billions

2004 388 760 188 660 13 206.20 0.92 Ksh Billions

2005 320 000 153 600 10 752.00 0.86 Ksh Billions

Source: MOLD – LPD, 2006

FIGURE 7.1: Import and export of pork

Source: FAOSTAT, 2010

Version du 17 novembre 2011

FIGURE 7.2: Import and export values of pork

Source: FAOSTAT, 2010