Aud Theo - 3
Aud Theo - 3
Aud Theo - 3
Financial statement assertions are statements or claims made by businesses about the
fundamental accuracy of the information contained in their financial statements. The balance
sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement are examples of these statements. These
claims, also known as management assertions, can be either implicit or explicit. External
auditors develop a set of audit procedures based on the assertions.
In terms of auditing, materiality refers to more than just a monetary value; it also refers
to the impact that amount will have in various contexts. During the audit planning process, the
auditor determines the level of materiality, considering the entire set of financial statements to
be audited. Materiality refers to both the content of the financial statements and the level and
type of testing to be performed. The decision is based on assessments of the size, nature, and
specific circumstances of misstatements (or omissions) that could influence users of financial
reports. Furthermore, the decision is influenced by legislative and regulatory requirements, as
well as public expectations.
5. What are the components of audit risk? Explain each one briefly.
Audit risk has two components, the risk of material misstatement and the detection risk.
The risk of material misstatement talks about the risk that the financial reports are materially
incorrect before the audit is performed. The term "material" in this context refers to a dollar
amount large enough to sway the opinion of a financial statement reader, and the percentage or
dollar amount is subjective. The risk of material misstatement is increased if insufficient
internal controls are suspected, which is also a fraud risk. This type of risk is also called
combined risk assessment. On the other hand, detection risk is defined as the risk that the
auditor’s procedures do not detect a material misstatement. It is commonly known for being a
controllable and dependent risk because its basis of being high or low is dependent on the
assessment of the risk of material misstatement or the non-controllable risks.
Risk can never be eliminated; it can only be mitigated, not eliminated. As previously
stated, one aspect of audit risk is uncontrollable: the risk of material misstatement. Inherent
risks are included in this type of audit risk. Inherent risks are those that are unavoidable or
uncontrollable due to human error or fraud which is also a risk that can be found in different
types of situations, not only in auditing. Because this type of risk is uncontrollable, risk is
impossible to be eliminated.
7. What activities does the auditor perform during the initial phase of the audit
engagement?
The auditor should plan the audit thoroughly. This standard outlines the auditor's duties
in terms of audit planning. Planning the audit entails developing an audit plan, which includes,
in particular, planned risk assessment procedures and responses to material misstatement risks.
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit; rather, it is a continuous and iterative process that
may begin shortly after (or in conjunction with) the completion of the previous audit and
continue until the completion of the current audit. At the start of the audit, the auditor should
perform the following tasks:
1) Perform procedures regarding the continuance of the client relationship and the specific
audit engagement,
2) Determine compliance with independence and ethics requirements, and
3) Establish an understanding of the terms of the audit engagement with the audit committee
in accordance with Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees.
8. What are the situations that we do not continue or reject the audit engagement?
If the audit engagement partner believes that any threats to the auditor's objectivity and
independence cannot be reduced to an acceptable level, he or she must decline to accept or
continue the audit engagement. Also, if a new client requests an auditor's services, the auditor
must first assess the client's integrity, determining whether the potential future client is not
committing wrongful acts that violate the law and human moral principles. This testing of
integrity is applicable not only to new clients, but also to existing clients who wish to continue
working with the said auditor and must maintain their integrity. Without integrity, there will
be no audit contract.
The purpose of an engagement letter is to inform the auditee about the nature of the
engagement and to clarify the roles of the parties involved. It is important in an audit
engagement because it contains lots of information about the whole process of the audit that
will happen such as the objective of audit of the financial statements, management’s
responsibility for the financial statements, the scope of the audit, and a lot more that the
company will need when presenting an audited financial statement.
10. What is the product of the audit process? Cite instances when it is appropriate to
TEST II:
For each of the following descriptions, indicate which type of audit (financial statement audit,
audit of internal control, compliance audit, operational audit, or forensic audit) best
characterizes the nature of the audit being conducted. Also indicate which type of auditor
(external auditor, internal auditor, government auditor, or forensic auditor) is likely to perform
a. Evaluate the policies and procedures of the Food and Drug Administration in terms of
b. Determine the fair presentation of Ajax Chemical’s balance sheet, income statement, and
c. Review the payment procedures of the accounts payable department for a large manufacturer.
e. Evaluate the feasibility of forecasted rental income for a planned low-income public housing
g. Audit the partnership tax return of a real estate development company. COMPLIANCE
h. Investigate the possibility of payroll fraud in a labor union pension fund. COMPLIANCE