Activity 6
Name: Irish Jane L. Avila Date: May 23, 2022
Name of Instructor: Prof. Ludivena Lagrio
Class Schedule: MTH 2:30 - 4:00 PM
SET A. GRAPHIC ORGANIZER – TIMELINE. (40pts)
Based on the readings assigned within the lesson, classify the various uprisings and revolts
according to their causes. Follow the given format below:
Uprising/Revolt Date Leader/s Place Cause/s
Lakandula and Lakandula and Lavazares inherited the
Sulayman Revolt 1574 Sulayman Manila privilege after Legazpi
pass away.
Tondo Conspiracy Lagazpi, Pagan, To reclaim control, they
Salamat, Banal, Taes, sought to oust the
1587-1588 Balinguit, Pitonggatan, Manila Spanish rulers.
Salonga, Basi
Revolt of 1596 Mangalat and his Cagayan Arbitrary levy
Mangalat brother collection
Igorots Revolt 1601 No known leader Northern Repudiation of
Luzon Christianity
Revolt of Irrayas Gabriel Dayag and Felix Cagayan Encomenderos are
1621 Cutabay Valley oppressed.
Tamblot's Revolt Tamblot, a babaylan or Natives were urged to
1621-1622 native priest Bohol revert to their own
religion.
Bankaw's Revolt Bankaw, his son Decided to go back to
1622 and Pagali Leyte old religion.
Revolt of Ladia Defeat the Spanish
1643 Pedro Ladia Bulacan government to stop
repression.
Sumoroy Revolt Governor-general
Fajardo provided forced
1649-1650 Juan Sumoroy Samar labor to work in the
Cavite shipyard.
Malong's Revolt 1660-1661 Andres Malong Pangasina Pangasinan will be
n handed over to Spain.
Zambal Revolt 1681-1683 Group of Zambales Refusal to acknowledge
Chieftains their realm's authority.
Dagohoy The priest's refusal to
Rebellion provide his brother with
1744-1829 Francisco Dagohoy Bohol an appropriate Catholic
burial.
Basi Revolt The selling of basi is
Pedro Mateo and Ilocos monopolized by the
1807 Pedro Ambaristo Norte Spanish colonial
administration.
Novales Revolt Dissatisfied with the
way the Criollo people
1823 Andres Novales Manila were handled by
Spanish rulers.
Cavite Mutiny 1872 Fuerte San Felipe Cavite A national rebellion was
plotted.
Katipunan or KKK 1892-1897 Deodato Arellano, Manila To become
Roman Basa and independent of Spain.
Andres Bonifacio
SET B. JUSTIFY YOUR ANSWERS. (10pts)
Discuss the following ideas and analysis. Choose only 2 ideas to discuss.
1. Why the Filipinos had no sense of unity.
The native Filipinos were never united when we think of the Spanish colonialism in terms of
revolts and uprisings. The Philippines' archipelagic structure was one of the key factors. This is clear
in the communication challenges that the three indigenous on three distinct islands face (Luzon,
Visayas and Mindanao). The lack of a common language among native Filipinos is also a challenge.
Furthermore, the natives had already developed their political system and religion when the
Spaniards arrived in the Philippines. Their political structure was known as 'barangay,' and it allowed
them to wield sovereign-territory over other communities or 'barangays.' And the Datu, or Sultan, was
in command. Hence, the Foreign colonizer recognized the no sense of oneness of Filipino people and
largely use it in colonizing the indigenous. Other Datu and Sultan were promised good relationship by
the Spaniards in order to persuade them to believe in their selfish ideology. For example, when one
community revolts against Spanish repression, the Spaniards, along with their friend Datus, battle
back, causing the rebellions to defeat.
2. The Spaniards and friars worked hand in hand and adopted the “divide and rule” policy.
3. The revolts were suppressed by pitting one Filipino ethnic group against another.
4. The presence of the Chinese was justified and should have left in peace.
5. The Moros were never conquered and were not part of the colonial government.
Source: Agoncillo and Mangahas, Philippine History, Quezon, Phil: C & E Publishing, Inc.: 82-83.