SOLITARY CONFINEMENT Ipc
SOLITARY CONFINEMENT Ipc
• In Kishor Singh Ravinder Dev Etc vs. State Of Rajasthan, the apex court
held that confining the prisoners for a more extended period in solitary
Confinement is a clear violation of Article 21 of the constitution. The
applicability of this section should be made only in the “rarest of the rare
case” and not on some feeble grounds. This decision was further upheld
and followed in Union of India v. Dharam Pal, where the prisoner was held
for nearly 18 years in solitary confinement out of the more than 25 years
he spent in jail. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that such
Confinement amounts to additional punishment and is not approved by
the law.
• Conclusion
• The Practice of Solitary Confinement is one of the inhumane and brutal
punishment imposed on a prisoner. Section 73 and 74 of IPC even though puts
some restrictions on its applicability but at the same time it indirectly grants
legality to solitary confinement. Similarly, the centuries old colonial legislation
Prisoners Act,1894 further adds fuel to the fire by confining the rights of death
row inmates. Despite these arbitrary rules and regulations related to solitary
confinement the judiciary played a pivotal role in upholding the fundamental
rights of the prisoners with their Judgments.
• These Judgments offers the way forward in ensuring that basic human rights of
the prisoners remain intact. The main purpose of the prison system is to ensure
the reformation of the prisoners and reduce recidivism. Solitary Confinement
neither ensures reformation nor reduces recidivism it only acts as a “Punishment
beyond Punishment” which doesn’t serve any purpose towards welfare of
prisoners. Therefore, Solitary confinement in prisons need to exercised only in
the exceptional circumstances as a last resort and not as a tool of suppression
for rights of the prisoners.