JPPIPA 7(3) (2021)

JurnalPenelitian Pendidikan IPA

Journal of Research in Science Education

http://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/index

Development of Student Worksheets Based on React Model to

Increase Student Motivation in Newton's Law Materials
Muhammad Ichsan1, Yusrizal2, Mursal2
1 Science Education Study Program Postgraduate Program at Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
2 Physics Study Program, FKIP, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.710

Article Info Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of student worksheets
Received : April 16th, 2021 based on the REACT model in increasing motivation on Newton's law material at the Aceh
Revised : May 24th, 2021 Aviation State Vocational High School. This study uses research and development methods
Accepted : June 14th, 2021 with the ADDIE model. The results obtained are the average value of the validator's
assessment shows a value of 87.3% with a very decent category, as well as the results of the
gain classification to see an increase in student motivation of 0.61 which is in the medium
category. It was concluded that the developed student worksheet based on the REACT
model was feasible to use and could increase students' motivation on Newton's law
material at the Aceh Aviation State Vocational High School.

Kata kunci: Student Worksheet; REACT Model; Learning Motivation

Citation: Ichsan, M., Yusrizal, Y., & Mursal, M. (2021). Development of Student Worksheets Based on React Model to
Increase Student Motivation in Newton's Law Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 364-369.
doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.710

Introduction activity. According to (Taufiq et al., 2016) learning

motivation must be increased because a motivation will
Learning is a plan that contains a series of produce higher learning achievement as well. In other
activities designed to achieve learning objectives words, motivation is one of the encouragements of the
(Prastowo, 2017). Learning is one of the teaching and students in learning a subject matter well. (Nasir et al.,
learning processes that causes interaction between 2015) However good the learning design by the teacher
teachers and students. Learning is not only limited to will not work optimally if the motivation of students
conveying material to students. However, the teacher who take part in the learning process is still low.
must also be able to activate these students. Students need supporting facilities and infrastructure
Understanding of learning concepts is strongly driven such as learning media. Learning media are everything
by students' learning motivation, because motivation that can be used to convey the content of teaching
itself is one of the most important elements in learning. materials (Jalinus and Ambiyar, 2016). Learning media
According to Doyan et al (2018), it is stated that is a tool in learning that contains certain learning
learning motivation is influenced by the students materials as learning resources. Learning media will
themselves. So, students who have high learning make it easier for teachers to deliver subject matter to
motivation will be very helpful in learning something. students effectively and efficiently. By using learning
Gustina and Sidin (2018) state that students with media, it is hoped that the learning objectives will be
low learning motivation may learn because they are achieved more optimally. Firdawati et al., (2021) stated
forced and do not consider learning as a necessity. that the use of learning media in the teaching and
Motivation is not only important to make a student learning process can lead to motivation in supporting
involved in learning activities, but also in determining the achievement of learning objectives.
how far the student acquires knowledge in a learning
___________
Email: [email protected]
Copyright © 2021, Author et al.
This open access article is distributed under a (CC-BY License)
JurnalPenelitian PendidikanIPA (JPPIPA) July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, 364-369

In the 2013 curriculum, there are many learning Student Worksheets Based on the REACT Model to
media that can be used to increase learning motivation, Increase Students' Motivation in Newton's Law
one of which is by using student worksheets. Materials.
According to Trianto (2009), student worksheets are in
the form of a guide for the development of cognitive Method
aspects as well as a guide for the development of all
aspects of learning in the form of an experimental or The method used in this research is Research and
demonstration guide, Nurhidayanti et al., (2017), states Development (R&D) (Sugiyono, 2013). R&D is a
that the Student Worksheet can be used to assist research method used to develop or validate products
students in finding a concept. In other words, the used in education and learning. The design used in this
Student Worksheet can be used to facilitate students' study is the ADDIE model (Hadi and Dwijananti, 2015).
understanding of the learning material. According to This model has simplicity and is easy to understand,
Ramdani et al., (2019), the Student Worksheet is very has a structure that is systematically arranged, so that
useful because it can provide opportunities to improve the steps in the study must be in sequence and should
skills in the 21st century for students. In addition, the not be random. There are five stages in the ADDIE
results of research from Maghfiroh and AuliaSyafa'ati model, namely: Analyze, Design, Development,
in 2017, stated that the use of student worksheets can Implementation, and Evaluation. The feasibility of a
improve student learning outcomes and motivation. Student Worksheet is done by first assessing the
From the results of Nasir's research (2015) Student Student Worksheet. The results of the assessment are
worksheets can improve student learning outcomes averaged and then the results are adjusted to the
and motivation. Several research results show that predetermined categories. The instrument used for the
student worksheets have a positive impact on feasibility of this Student Worksheet is by using an
increasing learning motivation. expert validation assessment questionnaire, both
Based on the results of observations and material and media, which is calculated by the
interviews at the Aceh Aviation State Vocational High percentage of respondents' overall answers using the
School, the researchers found several problems. First, percentage formula. (Sugiyono, 2009).
students need new teaching materials in the form of
Student Worksheets. Previously, the teacher had used P= x 100 % …………………….……………………. (1)
Student Worksheets. However, the Student Worksheets Information:
used had not been able to bring students to be more P = Percentage
enthusiastic in learning and doing their assignments in ∑x = Number of respondents' answers in one item
class. Second, students' learning motivation was still ∑xi = The number of ideal values
low. This can be seen from some students who look
passive and less participative when the learning Then look for the percentage of validation criteria. The
process is in class. The problems mentioned above validation criteria used can be seen in Table 1.
encourage researchers to develop a new student
worksheet so that it can be used by these students in Table 1. Student Worksheet Assessment Criteria
the hope of fostering a spirit of learning and increasing No Interval (%) Kriteria
motivation. 1 (80 < P < 100) Very worth
Physics lessons are very synonymous with 2 (60 < P < 80) worthy
3 (40 < P < 60) Decent enough
phenomena in everyday life, therefore a suitable
4 (20 < P < 40) Not feasible
learning model is needed to be developed in learning 5 (P < 20) Very unworthy
through worksheets, so that later students are more
active and motivated in learning. The suitable learning While the analysis process of increasing students'
model is the REACT learning model. A student learning motivation uses a questionnaire, which is a
worksheet based on the REACT model will be an statement related to the REACT model on learning
appropriate breakthrough if it is developed in a motivation. The scale used in this questionnaire is a
classroom learning, because a student worksheet based Likert scale. The researcher chose the alternative
on the REACT model is a student worksheet developed choices of “strongly agree”, “agree”, disagree” and
by applying the five stages contained in the REACT “strongly disagree. Analyzing students' learning
model. The five REACT stages contained in the Student motivation on the REACT learning model used the
Worksheet are the Relating, Experiencing, Applying, percentage formula according to Sudijono (2013).
Cooperating, and Transferring stages. (Ultay, 2012).
Based on the results of the description above, the P= x 100%..................................................................... (2)
authors conducted a study on the Development of
365
JurnalPenelitian PendidikanIPA (JPPIPA) July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, 364-369

Information: used it. However, the student worksheets used have

P = Percentage number not been able to make students more motivated in
F = Frequency of students who answer learning. In addition, students' learning motivation is
N = Total number of subjects still low. Some students look passive and less
The criteria for calculating student motivation participative when the learning process in class, they
responses are as Table 2. only listen when the teacher explains in front of the
class. Students still think that physics is a difficult
Table 2. Criteria for CalculatingStudentResponses. subject so that learning in class is still not optimal.
No (%) Criteria
1 (76-100) Very high Design Results
2 (56-75) High The steps for preparing product designs from
3 (40-55) Medium student worksheets based on the REACT model
4 (0-39) Low include, namely, adjusting competency standards and
basic competencies based on the k13 curriculum. The
To find out the significant level of students' design of the student worksheets is designed according
learning motivation, the gain test between before and to the REACT model and the stages of development
after being given treatment used the gain equation, and the material to be studied is Newton's law material.
namely: Using A4 paper type, and the size and type of font used
is 12 Times New Roman, with 1.5 spacing. This Student
Worksheet consists of a cover, introduction, table of
(g) = …………………………...……………… (3)
contents, core competencies, indicators, objectives,
concept maps, stages of the REACT model and
Information: evaluation questions.
Sf = Average post-test score of students
Si = Average pre-test score of students
Sm= Maximum score
The amount of the average Gain states the
normalized Gain criteria. The classification can be seen
in Table 3.

Table 3. Gain Value Classification

No Interval Classification
Figure 1. Student Worksheet Design REACT model
1 (0.70-1.00) High
2 (0.30-0.69) Medium
3 (0.00-0.39) Low Development Results
The process of developing student worksheets
based on the REACT model through the design
Results and Discussion
assessment stage by the validator. This process is done
by asking for opinions from lecturers and teachers in
Research in this development has produced a
the field of physics studies. The assessment process is
product in the form of a Student Worksheet based on
carried out until it is declared suitable for use by
the REACT model with the aim that after developing a
students. The student worksheets are first validated
Student Worksheet based on the REACT model, it can
according to their domain. The results of the validation
increase students' motivation.
by several experts are averaged and then the results are
The method used in this study is the research
adjusted to the predetermined categories. The results of
and development method with the ADDIE
the validation of student worksheets based on the
development model. The results of the stages of the
REACT model are based on two domains, namely
ADDIE model that have been carried out in this study
validation of material and media experts.
are as follows.

Analysis Results Expert validation Result of material

The results of the analysis of the observations Eligibility criteria are obtained from the
obtained on the problems that arise in learning physics percentage results. The percentage of validation of each
at the Aceh Aviation State Vocational High School are aspect in the validation of this material is obtained from
that students really need teaching materials in the form the number of respondents' answers to each aspect
of new student worksheets. Previously the teacher had divided by the number of ideal values per aspect
366
JurnalPenelitian PendidikanIPA (JPPIPA) July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, 364-369

multiplied by 100%. The average percentage is obtained After revisions are made according to
from the total percentage of all aspects divided by the suggestions from the validator, the assessment is
number of aspects. So that the interpretation criteria carried out again. The following are the results of the
that have been determined are obtained. The media validator's assessment after the revision is
assessment of the material expert validator before the shown in Table 7.
revision is presented in Table 4.
Table 7. Recapitulation of Media Expert Validation
Table 4. Recapitulation of Material Expert Validation Results after Revision
Results before Revision Aspect (∑x) (∑x1) (%) Criteria
Aspect (∑x) (∑x1) (%) Criteria Physical criteria 43.0 50.0 86.0 Very worth
Content Quality 56.0 90.0 62.2 worthy Display 48.0 50.0 96.0 Very worth
Presentation 30.0 50.0 60.0 Decentenough Use of letters 29.0 30.0 96.6 Very worth
Language 48.0 80.0 60.0 Decent enough Consistency 88.0 90.0 97.7 Very worth
REACTModel 43.0 70.0 61.4 worthy Total 208 220
Total 177 290 94.0
Average Very worth
Average 60.9 worthy
The overall average calculation of material and media
After the revision process was carried out, the expert validation is shown in Table 8.
recapitulation of the validation results from the
material experts was carried out again to see the Table 8. Average Student Worksheet Eligibility
comparison between before and after the improvement Assessment
of the Student Worksheet. The following are the results No Aspect (%) Criteria
of the material validator's assessment after being 1 Material 81.4 Very worth
revised as Table 5. 2 Media 94.0 Very worth
Average 87.7 Very worth
Table 5. Recapitulation of Material Expert Validation
Result after Revision From Table 8 it can be seen that after
Aspect (∑x) (∑x1) (%) Criteria calculating the overall average of the validation of
Content Quality 73.0 90.0 81.1 Very worth material experts and media experts, the average
Presentation 41.0 50.0 82.0 Very worth validation result is 87.7%. When viewed from the
Language 64.0 80.0 80,0 Very worth feasibility classification, the average validation of these
REACT Model 58.0 70.0 82.8 Very worth
two domains has a very feasible category.
Total 236 290
Average 81.4 Very worth Questionnaire Trial Results
The trial was carried out in two stages, namely
Expert Validation Results of Media the first stage of small group trials and the second stage
The assessment on media expert validation is of large-scale trials. After the small group trial is carried
almost the same as the assessment on material experts. out, later on any shortcomings obtained from the
The average percentage is obtained from the total results of the attractiveness questionnaire obtained
percentage of all aspects divided by the number of from the students will be corrected again until the
aspects. So that the interpretation criteria that have Student Worksheet is considered good and more
been determined are obtained. After that, it is adjusted interesting. After that, it can be tested again on a larger
to the assessment and determination of interpretation scale. This small group trial was taken with a sample of
criteria on media expert validation. The assessment of 5 students and in the large-scale test a sample of 30
the media expert validators before the revision can be students in class X at the Aceh Aviation State
seen in Table 6. Vocational High School was taken.

Table 6. Recapitulation of Media Expert Validation Small group trial

Results before Revision Small group trials were conducted by explaining
Aspect (∑x) (∑x1) (%) Criteria about the Student Worksheet that was developed. After
Physical criteria 27.0 50.0 54.0 Decent enough finishing explaining the product, respondents were
Display 27.0 50.0 54.0 Decent enough given a questionnaire to assess the attractiveness of the
Use of letters 15.0 30.0 50.0 Decent enough product. Furthermore, students are asked to provide an
Consistency 52.0 90.0 57.7 Decent enough assessment by filling out the questionnaire. The results
Total 121 220 of student responses to student worksheets based on
Average 53.9 Decent enough the REACT model can be seen in Table 9.
367
JurnalPenelitian PendidikanIPA (JPPIPA) July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, 364-369

Table 9. Trial Small Group of Students Table 12 shows that the average percentage of
No Aspect Persentage (%) students' motivation scores before using the REACT
1 Interest 86.0 model-based Student Worksheet is 47.1%, meaning that
2 Material 86.0 the students' motivation before using the REACT
3 Language 86.6 model-based Student Worksheet is in the medium
4 REACT 88.0
category. This is different after using the Student
5 Average Persentage 86.6
6 Interpretation Criteria Very interesting
Worksheet based on the REACT model, which shows
that the average percentage score of students'
Large-scale trial motivations, after using the Student Worksheet based
After doing a small group trial, then the product on the REACT model, is 79.8% which is in the very high
is tested on a larger scale. This large-scale trial was category as shown in Figure 2.
carried out to ensure data and to find out the wider
product appeal. Respondents in this field test
amounted to 30 students in class X at the Aceh Aviation
State Vocational High School, the results of large-scale
trials can be seen in Table 10.

Table 10. Results of Large-Scale Trials of Students

No Aspect Persentage (%)
1 Interest 82.5
2 Material 84.2
3 Language 88.8 Figure 2. Percentage of pre-test and post-test motivation of
4 REACT 84.4 students
5 Average Persentage 85.0 Based on the students' motivation scores before
6 Interpretation Criteria Very interesting and after using the Student Worksheet based on the
REACT model, the normalized gain classification is
Evaluation obtained as shown in Table 13.
Students were distributed motivation
questionnaires by pre-test and post-test, with the aim of Table 13. Classification of Normalized Gain on student
knowing whether there was an increase in student Motivation
motivation. Table 11.was the result of the students' Interval Sum (%) Classification
motivation questionnaire on the REACT model-based 0.70-1.00 3.0 10.0 High
Student Worksheet that they have been used. 0.30-0.69 27.0 90.0 Medium
0.00-0.39 0.0 0.0 Low
Tabel 11. Distribution of Students' Motivation Scores Average 0.6 100.0 Medium
before Using the Student Worksheet
Frequ- In Table 13 it can be seen that the average
No Score (%) Sum Categories
ency normalized gain of motivation is at a score of 0.61
1 0-39 5.0 16.6 191.3 low where the score is in the medium category. It can be
2 40-55 21 70.0 988.1 Medium
concluded that there is an increase in the motivation of
3 56-75 4.0 13.4 235.0 High
4 76-100 0.0 0.0 Very High
students with the average being in the medium
Total 30 100 1414.4 category.
Average 47.1 Medium
Conclusion
The results of the analysis of student motivation
after using the Student Worksheet based on the REACT The Student Worksheet based on the developed
model can be seen in Table 12. REACT model is feasible to use. This can be seen from
the average validator assessment of 87.3% with a very
Table 12.Distribution of students' motivation scores decent category. In addition, there is also an increase in
after using the Student Worksheet students' motivation after using the REACT model-
No Score Frequency (%) Sum Categories based worksheet on Newton's law material, in terms of
1 0-39 0.0 0.0 - Low the average value of the gain classification, which is
2 40-55 0.0 0.0 - Medium
0.61 with medium category.
3 56-75 10.0 33.4 750 High
4 76-100 20.0 66.6 1646.3 Very High
Total 30 100 2396.3
Average 79.8 Very High
368
JurnalPenelitian PendidikanIPA (JPPIPA) July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, 364-369

References Sudijono. A. (2013). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Yogyakarta: PT Raja GrafindoPersada.
Doyan, A., Taufik, M., & Anjani, R. (2018). Pengaruh [Indonesian]
Pendekatan Multi Representasi terhadap Hasil Taufiq, A.U., Tina, K. & Djafar, H. (2016). Pengaruh
Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Model Pembelajaran Awareness Training
Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Fisika. Jurnal
4(1). Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1): 10-16. doi:
doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i1.99. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v7i1.5184.
[Indonesian] [Indonesian]
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A., Gunawan, G., Hadisaputra, S., & Trianto. (2011). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif
Zulkifli, L. (2019). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana. [Indonesian]
Pembelajaran IPA Yang Mendukung Ültay, E. (2012). Implementing react strategy in a
Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Penelitian context-based physics class: Impulse and
Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). momentum example. Energy Education Science
doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.221. and Technology Part B: Social and Educational
[Indonesian] Studies, 4, 233–240. [Indonesian]
Gustina, & Sidin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Model
Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Belajar Fisika
terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika (Studi Eksperimen
Peserta Didik pada Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 40
Bulukumba). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 8(1), 15-28.
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v8i1.46
[Indonesian]
Jalinus, N., & Ambiyar. (2016). Media & Sumber
Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. [Indonesian]
Nasir, M., Harjono, A., & Sridana, N. (2015). Pengaruh
Pembelajaran Menggunakkan LKS Inkuiri
Terintegrasi Generik Sains (ITGS) Terhadap
Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Motivasi
Berprestasi Siswa di SMAN 1 Aikmel. Jurnal
Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(1).
doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v1i1.8
[Indonesian]
Nurhidayanti, A., Kun, Z., Widowati, A. (2017).
Pengembangan LKPD IPA Berbasis Inkuiri
Terbimbing Strategi Metakognisi untuk
Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Rasa
Ingin Tahu Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA
dan Sains, 6(4), Retrieved from:
http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php
/ipa/article/view/7048 [Indonesian]
Prastowo, A. (2017). Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan
Pembelajaran (RPP) Tematik Terbaru. Jakarta:
Kencana. [Indonesian]
Firdawati, R., Maison, M., & Nazarudin, N. (2021).
Development of Mobile Learning Media on
Newton's Laws Using the Appy Pie Application.
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 202-206.
doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.599.
[Indonesian]
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.
Bandung: Alfabeta. [Indonesian]
Sugiyono, (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,
dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. [Indonesian]

369