Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

    • 348 views

    Module 1 Rizal

    Uploaded by

    tahseya
    Senator Francisco Rodriguez argued against the passage of the Rizal Bill, claiming that Rizal's novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo attacked the Catholic Church and promoting them would violate freedom of conscience and religion. Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro M. Recto supported the bill, arguing that studying Rizal's works would help Filipinos understand the virtues and sacrifices needed to attain freedom and connect the past to the present and future of the Philippines. While the supporters and opposition disagreed on promoting Rizal's novels, they agreed that preserving identity, values and religion was important for teaching Filipino citizens, especially youth.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Module 1 Rizal

    Uploaded by

    tahseya
    348 views2 pages
    Senator Francisco Rodriguez argued against the passage of the Rizal Bill, claiming that Rizal's novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo attacked the Catholic Church and promoting them would violate freedom of conscience and religion. Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro M. Recto supported the bill, arguing that studying Rizal's works would help Filipinos understand the virtues and sacrifices needed to attain freedom and connect the past to the present and future of the Philippines. While the supporters and opposition disagreed on promoting Rizal's novels, they agreed that preserving identity, values and religion was important for teaching Filipino citizens, especially youth.

    Original Description:

    RIZAL

    Original Title

    MODULE 1 RIZAL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Senator Francisco Rodriguez argued against the passage of the Rizal Bill, claiming that Rizal's novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo attacked the Catholic Church and promoting them would violate freedom of conscience and religion. Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro M. Recto supported the bill, arguing that studying Rizal's works would help Filipinos understand the virtues and sacrifices needed to attain freedom and connect the past to the present and future of the Philippines. While the supporters and opposition disagreed on promoting Rizal's novels, they agreed that preserving identity, values and religion was important for teaching Filipino citizens, especially youth.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    348 views2 pages

    Module 1 Rizal

    Uploaded by

    tahseya
    Senator Francisco Rodriguez argued against the passage of the Rizal Bill, claiming that Rizal's novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo attacked the Catholic Church and promoting them would violate freedom of conscience and religion. Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro M. Recto supported the bill, arguing that studying Rizal's works would help Filipinos understand the virtues and sacrifices needed to attain freedom and connect the past to the present and future of the Philippines. While the supporters and opposition disagreed on promoting Rizal's novels, they agreed that preserving identity, values and religion was important for teaching Filipino citizens, especially youth.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    ASSIGNMENT

    1. What was the major argument raised by Senator Francisco Rodriguez


    against the passage of the Rizal Bill?

    Rizal bill underwent for numerous trial and debate on the congress
    in which Catholic Church started to be involved, and exchange of
    arguments from the both sides. It said to be one of the most controversial
    bills passed on the Philippines. Senator Rodrigo argued that the books
    that Rizal wrote (Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo) were written to
    attack the Catholic Church. This bill would violate the freedom of
    conscience and religion. They believe that it is not necessary to attack
    the faith of the church to empower and embrace the nationalism as
    Filipinos. Francisco Rodrigo even said in a statement that Filipinos can
    still honor Rizal without reading those novels.

    2. What was the major argument raised by Senators Jose P. Laurel and Claro
    M. Recto in support of the passage of the Rizal Bill?

    Senator Laurel and Senator Recto are the one who defended the
    bill in the deliberations. They believe that, we Filipinos can look back and
    be able to see ourselves and realize what virtues, sacrifices and strength
    needed to attain the freedom that will connect today’s life, changes and
    the future. Knowing Rizal on those important years and embraces our
    own on who and what we are as we stand as Filipinos in our own
    country.

    3. Are there points of convergence between the supporters and the


    opposition side of the Rizal Bill based on these statements?

    Based on these statements, Yes there is. In between the supporters


    and the opposition come up with the uniformity in a way that preserving
    the identity, values and religion shall teach Filipino citizens specially the
    youth to understand the importance and value of it as a Filipino.
    REFLECTION

    Reflect on your Secondary Education (Junior High School/


    Senior High School): did your school comply with RA 1425? How
    effective is the Rizal Law in instilling patriotism among secondary
    students?

    As far as I remember during my Secondary Education at Usant, we


    have discussed the works and life of Rizal. Grade 9 Noli Me Tángere,
    Grade 10 El Filibusterismo. Though there are some part and details that
    I forgot I can say that through it, we students can understand the root
    and importance as if like Rizal we should also stand on what we believe
    and fight for our home country in a way that we can, just like Rizal who
    wrote novel which drew attention to the unjust Spanish rule because he
    wanted a reform which later on revolutionary drawn.
    For me it is a great opportunity for all secondary students specially
    the youth in a way that Rizal ideals connect with the present and future
    conditions in our society, personal problems and issues. We go to
    appreciate and understand what Rizal had fought and died for. And serve
    as an eye opener for all to embrace what we are and what we have as a
    Filipinos. We can bring change and be part of that change if we believe
    and stand for what we’ve been fighting for. Aspire to inspire.

    You might also like