Ostomias PDF
Ostomias PDF
Ostomias PDF
M PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
ore than a million patients in North America live
with some type of intestinal stoma.1 These stomas
are typically constructed as one of the last com- Patients undergoing either elective or emergency surgery
ponents of a long and challenging surgical procedure. in which the creation of an abdominal stoma is a possibility
Stomal construction is important because their function should have adequate preparation preoperatively. Emer-
will have significant impact on the ostomate’s life. Stomal gent surgery dictates a more rapid preparation than
creation is a technical exercise that if done correctly will elective surgery, but stoma considerations must not be
result in good function and minimal complications for neglected.
the remainder of the ostomate’s life. Conversely, if created Many patients lack knowledge of intestinal stomas. A
poorly, stoma complications are common and can lead few minutes of preoperative education by the surgeon
to years of misery. Intestinal stomas are in fact enterocu- combined with printed material is very helpful. In addition,
taneous anastomoses, and all the principles that apply to if available, all patients should meet with a wound ostomy
creation of any anastomosis (i.e., using healthy intestine, care nurse (WOCN) or enterostomal therapist (ET). The
avoiding ischemia and undue tension) are important in WOCN can provide specific information regarding stoma
stoma creation. This chapter reviews construction and appliances, dietary and clothing alterations, and pouch
management of ileostomies and colostomies. management. Most importantly, the WOCN will help to
select the appropriate abdominal wall site for the future
INDICATIONS stoma. Appropriate stoma placement decreases postopera-
tive complications and may improve the ostomate’s
Stomas are created either as a temporary means of fecal well-being. Bass et al. showed that preoperative counseling
diversion when an anastomosis is unsafe or unwise, or as and marking by an ET prior to surgery improves postopera-
permanent orifices for the passage of stool or urine when tive quality of life.2
surgical resection prohibits the body’s normal orifices In addition to meeting with a WOCN, patients scheduled
from accomplishing these tasks. for stomal surgery often benefit from the opportunity to
Permanent colostomies are usually created from the meet with other ostomates. Patients who have adjusted to
sigmoid or descending colon, usually in association with life with a stoma provide an excellent, nonmedical source
distal bowel resection. Colostomies proximal to the splenic of information and are often glad to share their experience
flexure function poorly, are often placed in locations with new ostomates. In addition, local chapters of the
difficult for ostomates to manage, and are at high risk United Ostomy Association of America and the Crohn’s
for complications. If a permanent colostomy is contem- and Colitis Foundation may be of benefit in this area.
plated using the transverse or ascending colon, the surgeon Patients should have their stoma site marked prior to
should strongly consider resecting the remaining large surgery. An abdominal surgeon should be able to locate
bowel and creating an end ileostomy.1 Common indications and mark stoma sites. In most circumstances, marking is
for a colostomy are listed in Box 178.1. simple, straightforward, and requires only a few minutes.
With the development and general acceptance of the Three abdominal wall landmarks outline the ostomy triangle
ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA), permanent ileosto- (Fig. 178.1): the anterior superior iliac spine, pubic tubercle,
mies are currently less common. Nonetheless, permanent and umbilicus. The stoma should lie within this triangle
ileostomies are created for inflammatory bowel disease, overlying the rectus muscle, generally at the site of an
familial adenomatous polyposis, multiple synchronous infraumbilical bulge in the abdominal wall. A site should
colorectal cancers, and a variety of other miscellaneous be located on a flat segment of the abdominal wall 5 cm
disorders. Poor anal function, comorbid diseases, or quality away from bony prominences, the umbilicus, prior surgical
of life considerations may make an ileostomy preferable scars, or skin folds. After the site has been selected and
to more complex reconstructive options in selected marked, the patient should sit up to ensure any new skin
patients. folds do not interfere with the stoma site. The patient’s
Temporary diverting stomas are usually created in beltline should be identified and avoided if possible because
association with distal bowel resections when anastomosis this decreases postoperative clothing restrictions.
is unsafe or to protect a distal anastomosis when operative Special circumstances may require additional consider-
conditions or comorbidities make proximal diversion of ation. In obese individuals, a large pannus may preclude
the fecal stream prudent. Three types of diverting stomas stoma placement below the umbilicus. The pannus is often
predominate: end sigmoid colostomy, loop colostomy, thicker in this area and may also hide the stoma from the
and loop ileostomy. patient’s vision, making management difficult. Patients
2147
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2147.e1
ABSTRACT
More than a million patients in North America live with
some type of intestinal stoma. These stomas are typically
constructed as one of the last components of a long and
challenging surgical procedure. Stomal construction is
important because their function will have significant
impact on the ostomate’s life. Stomal creation is a technical
exercise that if done correctly will result in good function
and minimal complications for the remainder of the
ostomate’s life. Conversely, if created poorly, stoma com-
plications are common and can lead to years of misery.
Intestinal stomas are in fact enterocutaneous anastomoses,
and all the principles that apply to creation of any anas-
tomosis (i.e., using healthy intestine, avoiding ischemia
and undue tension) are important in stoma creation. This
chapter reviews construction and management of ileos-
tomies and colostomies.
KEYWORDS
End ileostomy, end colostomy, loop ileostomy, loop sigmoid
colostomy, end loop stomas, end loop ileostomy, divided
loop ileostomy, end loop colostomy, ostomy complications
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2148 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
Rectal cancer
Radiation proctopathy
Incontinence
Refractory anorectal Infection
Ischemia
Crohn disease
Diverticular disease
Sacral decubitus
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2149
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2150 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2151
A B
circumstances, an end loop or divided loop stoma, as distal staple line is transected, and the small opening in
described in the following section, is easier to create and the distal bowel is matured to the abdominal wall without
functions better than the standard loop colostomy.5 eversion. The remainder of the staple line lies buried in
There are three types of end loop stomas: end loop the subcutaneous tissue. The proximal bowel is then
ileostomy, end loop colostomy, and end loop ileocolostomy. everted and matured in a similar fashion to any end ileos-
These stomas have three main benefits: (1) they often tomy (Fig. 178.9). A single suture between the proximal
make stoma management easier in the postoperative end ileostomy and the distally matured segment connects
period because they appear very similar to end stomas, the two and completes the maturation. These stomas
(2) they can be created with remote sections of the completely divert the fecal stream and appear almost
intestine, such as an end loop ileotransverse colostomy, identical to end ileostomies.
and (3) they do not require formal laparotomy for stoma The end loop colostomy is created with a preselected
takedown. The end loop ileostomy and end loop colostomy segment of the sigmoid colon. It is mobilized appropriately
can be created in any situation in which a standard loop and passed through the previously created abdominal
ileostomy or loop colostomy might be performed. End wall defect similar to that of an end loop ileostomy. The
loop ileocolostomies can be created in association with abdominal incision is closed appropriately. The end
intestinal resection. For example, a right colectomy may colostomy is matured in a similar fashion to that of the
be performed for right colon trauma or for right colon end loop ileostomy. As previously mentioned for loop
ischemia and an anastomosis is deemed unwise. In this colostomies, the proximal end may be everted but a flush
situation, the ileostomy and the transected edge of the colostomy may also be created.
proximal transverse colon can be brought through one An end loop ileocolostomy can be performed in associa-
single stoma site, avoiding the need for a second stoma tion with resection of the right colon when an anastomosis
and laparotomy at the time of stoma takedown. is unsafe. Following resection, the terminal ileum is
Following intestinal resection and creation of an prepared as for any routine end ileostomy. Often a stoma
appropriate abdominal wall defect, the end loop or divided site will have to be created in the right upper quadrant
loop ileostomy is created as follows: A small defect is to facilitate passage of the ileostomy and the distal trans-
created in the mesentery at the preselected ileal stomal verse colon through the same abdominal aperture. After
site. The bowel is then transected with a linear stapling the stoma site has been created, the terminal ileum is
device. The proximal or functional end of the ileostomy brought through the abdominal wall, similar to an end
is brought through the abdominal wall as for a standard ileostomy. The stapled-off end of the proximal transverse
end ileostomy. The nonfunctional segment can be managed colon is brought through the abdominal wall defect. The
in several ways. It can be brought through the fascia and mesenteric defect can be closed as with any standard
sutured to the functional bowel or scarpa fascia. This colon resection.
method completely diverts the bowel. Another option is Following this, the abdominal incision is closed in
to bring the antimesenteric corner of the distal nonfunc- routine fashion. The antimesenteric corner of the trans-
tional bowel through the same stoma site. The incision verse colon staple line is then transected and matured
is closed appropriately. The antimesenteric corner of the without eversion to the abdominal wall stoma site.
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2152 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
A B C
D E
FIGURE 178.9 Creation of an end loop ileostomy. (A) The abdomen is explored through a midline incision and the ostomy opening is
created as previously described (see Figs. 178.2 to 178.4). (B) A segment of ileum that will reach the abdominal wall is selected and
divided with a liner cutting stapler. (C) Divided ends of the ileum are brought through the ostomy aperture (functional end is marked with
a suture). (D) The staples of the functional end are excised and the bowel is matured producing a 2 cm spout. Staples at the
antimesenteric end of the nonfunctioning end are excised, and the small end is sutured to the deep dermis and medial edge of
functioning stoma. (Sagittal view.) (E) Completed ileostomy.
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2153
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2154 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
A B
C D
FIGURE 178.11 Modified abdominoplasty. Redundant abdominal wall folds of skin associated with ileostomy retraction. (A) Frontal view.
(B) Sagittal section demonstrating skin and subcutaneous fat incisions. (C) Excess skin and subcutaneous fat have been excised (frontal
view) and (D) sagittal section.
The technique is similar to that used by plastic surgeons.6 tissue. Care is taken to avoid injury to the bowel or its
A low curvilinear transverse incision is made at the inferior blood supply. The dissection should err on leaving addi-
abdominal fold or 2 to 3 cm above the pubis and anterior tional subcutaneous fat attached to the intestine. This
superior iliac spines (Fig. 178.11) and carried down to can be carefully resected later. A similar maneuver may
the fascia. A flap of skin and subcutaneous tissue is created be performed at the umbilicus if the surgeon and patient
by electrocautery dissection in a cranial direction, just prefer to preserve it in its normal location. Again, care
above the fascia. Perforating vessels are identified and is taken to preserve the tissue’s blood supply. If the
ligated or cauterized. As the dissection continues, the umbilicus is not to be maintained, it can be amputated
stoma will be encountered. With the flap on traction, the at the fascial level. The flap dissection is continued cranially
intestine is separated from the skin and subcutaneous just above the fascia until enough laxity or length is
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2155
E F
FIGURE 178.11, cont’d (E) Ileostomy relocated through upper flap and skin incisions closed. Closed-suction drains placed below flaps.
(F) Sagittal section.
obtained in the upper flap for the upper edge of the If the skin flap is not redundant enough to advance
previous stomal opening to reach the inferior portion of the original ostomy opening to the midline, the subcutane-
the incision without excessive tension or to the costal ous fat can be excised and the stoma returned to its
margins. Any associated peristomal hernia can be repaired original skin opening through the thinned flap. Either
at this time with suture repair of the fascia and/or mesh method is performed in such a manner to leave a smooth,
(synthetic or biologic) reinforcement. flat, thinned flap that provides a flat surface to site the
As the flap is retracted inferiorly, new sites for the appliance. The stoma is matured, and the midline incision
ostomy and, if desired, the umbilicus are selected and is closed. Subcutaneous closed-suction drains are placed
openings created in the flap. Excess subcutaneous fat can above and below the stoma. A similar technique can be
be carefully removed to thin the flap. Fortunately, there used through an inferior or inferolateral peristomal
is usually less subcutaneous fat above the umbilicus incision.
compared with below it. The excess, distal portion of the Rapid and significant weight gain in ostomy patients
flap is excised (see Fig. 178.11). The intestine and umbi- may produce stomal retraction. If attempts at weight loss
licus are brought through the respective flap openings have not been successful and stomal revision is not desir-
and matured with interrupted absorbable sutures. Excess able or feasible (e.g., continent ileostomy or short gut
bowel or umbilical tissue can be carefully excised. Closed- patients), liposuction is an excellent option. This method
suction drains are placed below the flap to avoid seromas is preferred if there is no associated stomal stenosis or
and the inferior incision is closed in layers. Because hernia. Experienced plastic surgeons can carefully use
intraabdominal dissections are avoided with this technique, liposuction techniques to remove subcutaneous fat around
patients usually recover quickly. Morbidity is usually associ- the stoma. Obviously, care must be taken to not injure
ated with infection, flap ischemia, or seromas. These are the stoma during the procedure and to leave a flat smooth
managed with wound care. peristomal skin surface for the ostomy faceplate. After
Several types of flaps can be used to modify the abdomi- the fatty tissue is removed, it will not be redeposited
nal wall around the stomas. Most involve peristomal despite additional weight gain.
dissections and removal of skin and subcutaneous fat.
The medial approach starts with an incision through the ANTIADHESION BARRIERS AND STOMAS
midline incision down to the fascia (Fig. 178.12A). Dis- Some authors have advocated the use of carboxymethyl
section is carried laterally just above the fascia until the cellulose (CMC) and sodium hyaluronate (Seprafilm;
stoma is reached. The ostomy is dissected free of the skin Genzyme, Cambridge, Massachusetts) when creating
and subcutaneous tissue as described previously. After the temporary loop stomas to facilitate ostomy reversal.7,8 Very
stoma is freed, lateral dissection to the flanks will provide little is known about this, and it has not been subject to
enough laxity to advance the previous stoma site to the the rigors of a clinical trial. Authors suggest that wrapping
midline (advancement flap). As above, a new ostomy the ileum at the time of stoma creation will minimize
opening, in fresh skin, is created. Excess fat may be excised adhesions between the stoma and the abdominal wall,
around the stoma, and redundant midline skin is resected. making stoma takedown easier. One study by Kawamura
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2156 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
A B
FIGURE 178.12 Medial approach. (A) Frontal view with skin incisions marked. (B) Cross section demonstrating midline incision and areas
of subcutaneous fat excision. (C) After removal of excess subcutaneous tissue, incision is closed, flaps attached to fascia, and stoma
matured with adequate eversion.
et al. suggests shorter operative times in the antiadhesion responsibility to ensure the patient is educated in appliance
group.7 Another study by Salum et al. found fewer stomal management.
adhesions when an antiadhesion product was used.8 The appliance must be emptied frequently enough to
The technique is described as follows. The loop selected avoid overfilling and dislodgement of the pouch. This is
is eviscerated and a sheet of CMC is cut in half. The determined by the location of the stoma and the patient’s
proximal and distal limbs of the bowel and their adjacent natural bowel pattern. Ileostomies are usually emptied
mesentery are wrapped in a sushi roll style. After the four to six times per day, with colostomies emptied once
barrier has adhered, the loop is brought through the or twice per day or even once every other day. The entire
abdominal wall at the preselected site and the stoma appliance only needs to be changed every 4 to 7 days.
matured in standard fashion. The utility of this technique The exact details vary from individual to individual, but
has been difficult to prove, but minimizing adhesions a common technique for changing a typical one-piece
between the ileum and the abdominal wall should, in system is explained in Box 178.2.
concept, make dissection at the time of ileostomy takedown Pouches should generally be changed when the stoma
easier. is least active, which is often after a period of fasting. The
time will vary from individual to individual, but changing
the appliance when the stoma is less active avoids the
ENTEROSTOMAL THERAPY need to control fresh output during the procedure.
A dedicated WOCN or ET’s contribution to the long-term The noise and odor of gas emitted from a stoma are
quality of life of an ostomate is simply immeasurable. a major concern to most ostomates. Anything that causes
Such therapists provide preoperative counseling, early gas before creation of the stoma is likely to create gas
postoperative education and guidance, and act as a long- following its construction. Gas comes from two sources:
term resource for individuals with stomas. They supply swallowed air and bacterial breakdown of ingested food-
information on appliance choices, local support groups stuffs, particularly carbohydrates. The amount of swallowed
such as the United Ostomy Associations of America and air can be minimized by avoiding the use of straws, exces-
the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, suggest dietary or sive talking while eating, chewing gum, and smoking.
clothing modifications that may alleviate stoma-related Each individual can best identify which foods lead to gas
problems, and aid in the management of skin problems, production, but beans, broccoli, onions, Brussels sprouts,
parastomal hernias, prolapse, and other complications. beer, and dairy products in lactose-deficient individuals
In most situations, an ET or surgical nurse will provide are common culprits. Avoiding these foods is a personal
detailed postoperative education for a new ostomate. choice but will decrease the quantity and odor of stomal
However, if this support is unavailable, it is the surgeon’s flatus. Yogurt, parsley, and orange juice have been
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2157
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2158 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2159
maneuver.26 Treatment is not dissimilar to other patients end colostomy.30 The occurrence of these hernias increases
presenting with a mechanical small bowel obstruction. with time31; as such, the reported incidence depends
However, special note must be made of food bolus greatly on the length of follow-up. Most patients with a
obstruction. Many patients with an ileostomy may develop parastomal hernia can be managed expectantly or with
signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction owing to the a belted appliance; however, patients with unrelenting
accumulation of poorly digested foodstuffs (e.g., popcorn, pain, obstruction, or difficulty maintaining an appliance
peanuts, and fresh fruits and vegetables). A careful history generally require surgical repair.
may reveal dietary indiscretions. Furthermore, the possibil- Patient-specific factors such as obesity, advanced age,
ity of a food bolus obstruction should be considered in and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease appear to
any patient with an ileostomy who has radiologic evidence increase the risk of parastomal herniation.13 From the
of a distal obstruction. A red rubber catheter may be technical standpoint, making the smallest possible opening
inserted gently into the ostomy and saline irrigation initi- in the abdominal wall without making the stoma ischemic
ated. If suspicious concretions begin to pass into the seems prudent. However, many of the other preventive
stoma, the irrigations may be carefully repeated until the measures, such as lateral space closure, fascial fixation,
obstruction is relieved. or stoma placement through the rectus muscle, appear
to have no effect on the incidence of these hernias. The
ISCHEMIA use of prosthetic mesh prophylactically, especially in
Edema and venous congestion are very common after the sublay position, may reduce the risk of parastomal
stoma creation, owing to mechanical trauma and compres- herniation.32–34
sion of the small mesenteric venules as they traverse the Unfortunately, the results of surgical correction have
abdominal wall. This is typically self-limiting and requires historically been poor, highlighting the importance of
no treatment.27 However, ischemia may be related to careful patient selection and prudent attempts at conserva-
tension on the mesentery or excessive mesenteric division, tive management in patients without clear indications for
particularly in obese patients or those undergoing emer- surgery. In one of the largest reported series, 63% of
gency surgery.28 A common error is dividing the sigmoidal patients developed a recurrent hernia and 63% had at
vessels to obtain the length to allow a colostomy to reach least one complication.35 The most commonly described
the skin. In these cases, the inferior mesenteric vessels techniques are direct repair, stoma relocation, and mesh
should instead be divided proximally and/or the splenic repair. The recurrence rate with mesh repairs (0% to
flexure mobilized, preserving the sigmoid arcades. 33%) clearly appears to be lower than that of direct repair
If ischemia becomes apparent, a glass test tube or (46% to 100%) or stoma relocation (76%).30,36,37
flexible endoscope may be inserted into the stoma. If the A wide variety of mesh repairs have been described,
stoma is viable at fascial level, then the patient may be but it remains uncertain what type of mesh should be
carefully observed. However, if there is question about used and what the optimal position is for placement. The
the viability of the stoma at the fascial level, immediate intraperitoneal or underlay mesh repair, championed by
laparotomy and stoma revision is required. Early ischemia Sugarbaker, has probably been associated with the most
is seen in 1% to 10% of colostomies and 1% to 5% of encouraging results.38 Intraabdominal pressure tends to
ileostomies.29 keep the mesh in place. One benefit of the intraperitoneal
technique is that a concomitant incisional hernia may be
PARASTOMAL HERNIA repaired at the same time. Various laparoscopic techniques
Parastomal hernia is probably the most common stoma have been successfully used for intraperitoneal mesh
complication requiring operative intervention (Fig. placement.39–41 Concerns have been expressed about the
178.14). A parastomal hernia develops in 2% to 28% of long-term risk of mesh erosion, prompting interest in the
patients with an end ileostomy and 4% to 48% with an use of biologic mesh materials.37,42
Mesh may also be placed using an extraperitoneal
fascial onlay technique.43,44
A curvilinear lateral incision is made outside the outline
of the stoma wafer. The hernia sac is entered, and omentum
and bowel are reduced. An onlay mesh is secured to the
fascial defect. The advantage of this technique is that it
avoids a major intraperitoneal procedure, making it
attractive in patients who are poor candidates for
laparoscopy/laparotomy. However, the recurrence rate
with this procedure is undoubtedly much higher than
with underlay placement of the mesh.
STENOSIS
Stoma stenosis may result from ischemia, excessive tension,
retraction, or recurrent inflammatory bowel disease. The
reported incidence is typically less than 10%.27 Mild
asymptomatic stenosis does not require any treatment.
Skin-level stenosis is readily treated with local procedures
FIGURE 178.14 Large parastomal hernia. such as a Z- or W-plasty, whereas those associated with
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2160 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Ostomy Construction and Management: Personalizing the Stoma for the Patient CHAPTER 178 2161
liver transplantation, based on the patient’s life expectancy inflammatory bowel disease patients after colectomy. J Gastrointest
and the status of the associated liver disease. Surg. 2007;11:138.
21. Buchman AL, Scolapio J, Fryer J. AGA technical review on short
bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterology.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 2003;124:111.
22. Szilagyi A, Shrier I. Systematic review: the use of somatostatin or
Portions of this chapter were adapted from the previous edition octreotide in refractory diarrhea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;15:
1889.
by Cataldo and Hyman. 23. Calicis B, Parc Y, Caplin S, et al. Treatment of postoperative peritonitis
of small bowel origin with continuous enteral nutrition and succus
SUGGESTED READINGS entericus reinfusion. Arch Surg. 2002;137:296.
24. Christie PM, Knight GS, Hill GL. Comparison of relative risks of
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. urinary stone formation after surgery for ulcerative colitis: conven-
2003;90:784. tional ileostomy vs. J-pouch. A comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum.
Cottam J, Richards K, Halsted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide 1996;39:50.
prospective audit of stoma complications within three weeks of 25. Christie PM, Knight GS, Hill GL. Metabolism of body water and
surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:834. electrolytes after surgery for ulcerative colitis: conventional ileostomy
Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:113. versus J-pouch. Br J Surg. 1990;77:149.
Lavery IC, Erwin-Toth P. Stoma therapy. In: Cataldo P, MacKeigan J, 26. Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK. Life table analysis
eds. Intestinal Stomas. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004:65. of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg. 1994;81:
727.
27. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide
REFERENCES prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery.
Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:834.
1. Cataldo P, Hyman N. Ostomy management. In: Yeo CJ, Matthews 28. Robertson I, Eung E, Hughes D, et al. Prospective analysis of stoma
JB, McFadden DW, eds. Shackelford’s Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:279.
7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012:2248-2261. 29. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon
2. Bass EM, Pino AD, Tan A, Pearl RK, Orsay CP, Abcarian H. Does Rectum. 1998;41:1562.
preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal 30. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg.
therapist affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:440. 2003;90:784.
3. Meagher AP, Owen G, Gett R. Multimedia article. An improved 31. Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barolla M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR. Life
technique for end stoma creation in obese patients. Dis Colon Rectum. table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction.
2009;52:531. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:334.
4. Strong SA. The difficult stoma: challenges and strategies. Clin Colon 32. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the
Rectal Surg. 2016;29:152-159. use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg.
5. Unti JA, Abcarian H, Pearl RK, et al. Rodless end-loop stomas—a 2004;91:280.
seven year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:999. 33. Gögenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, Rosenberg J, Fischer A. Prevention
6. Beck DE. Abdominal wall modification for the difficult stoma. Clin of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the
Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;20:71-75. primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;46:1131.
7. Kawamura YJ, Kakizawa N, Tan KY, et al. Sushi-roll wrap of Seprafilm 34. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques
for ileostomy limbs facilitates ileostomy closure. Tech Coloproctol. for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.
2009;13:211. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):685-695.
8. Salum M, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, et al. Does sodium hyaluronate- 35. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma
and carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg. 1994;129:413.
(Seprafilm) decrease operative time for loopileostomy closure? Tech 36. Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY. Surgical treatment of parastomal
Coloproctol. 2006;10:187-191. hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;
9. Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook 44:266.
County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1575. 37. Steele SR, Lee P, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Sullivan ES. Is parastomal
10. Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, Boyle M, Hunt JP. Stoma hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe? Am J Surg. 2003;185:
complications: a multivariate analysis. Ann Surg. 2002;68:961. 436.
11. Pearl RK, Prasad LM, Orsay CP, Abcarian H, Tan AB, Melzl MT. 38. Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of
Early local complications from intestinal stomas. Arch Surg. 1985;120: paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985;201:344.
1145. 39. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Repair of paracolostomy hernias
12. Saghir JH, McKenzie FD, Leckie DM. Factors that predict complica- with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified
tions after construction of a stoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg. Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:185.
2001;167:531. 40. Hansson BME, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh IH. Laparoscopic parastomal
13. Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, MacDonald L, et al. A prospective audit of hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence
stomas—analysis of risk factors and complications and their manage- rate. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1456.
ment. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:49. 41. Mancini GJ, McClusky DA 3rd, Khaitan L, et al. Laparoscopic
14. Makela JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST. Analysis of late stomal complica- parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg
tions following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1997;86:305. Endosc. 2007;21:1487.
15. Leenen LPH, Kuypers JH. Some factors influencing the outcome 42. Ellis CN. Short-term outcomes with the use of bioprosthetics for
of stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:500. the management of parastomal hernias. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;46:
16. Evans JP, Brown MH, Wilkes GH, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Revising 1118.
the troublesome stoma: combined abdominal wall recontouring 43. Hansson BME, van Nieowenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP. Promising
and revision of stomas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:122. new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:
17. Tang CL, Yunos A, Leong AP, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Ileostomy 1789.
output in the early postoperative period. Br J Surg. 1995;82:607. 44. Amin SN, Armitage NC, Abercrombie JF, Scholefield JH. Lateral
18. Nehra V, Camilleri M, Burton D, Oenning L, Kelly DG. An open repair of parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83:206.
trial of octreotide long-acting release in the management of short 45. Beraldo S, Titley G, Allan A. Use of W-plasty in stenotic stoma: a
bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1494. new solution for an old problem. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:715.
19. Wood M, Hyman N, Hebert J, Blaszyk H. Catastrophic Clostridium 46. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis
difficile enteritis in a pelvic pouch patient. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;1: of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum.
350. 1994;37:916.
20. Lundeen SJ, Otterson MF, Binion DG, Carman ET, Peppard WJ. 47. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ.
Clostridium difficile enteritis: an early postoperative complication in Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
2162 SECTION IV Colon, Rectum, and Anus
colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical 50. Fucini CF, Wolff BG, Dozois RR. Bleeding from peristomal varices:
trial. Br J Surg. 2001;88:360. perspectives on prevention and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:1073.
48. Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop 51. Spier BJ, Fayyad AA, Lucey MR, et al. Bleeding stomal varices: case
colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: series and systematic review of the literature. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:479. 2008;6:346.
49. Shapiro R, Chin EH, Steinhagen RM. Reduction of an incarcerated, 52. Naidu SG, Castle EP, Kriegshauser JS, Huettl EA. Direct percutaneous
prolapsed ileostomy with the assistance of sugar as a desiccant. Tech embolization of bleeding stomal varices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
Coloproctol. 2010;14:269. 2010;33:201.
Descargado para Sofía Zárate ([email protected]) en City Hospital of Quito de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en enero 17, 2019.
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.