Stat and Prob Format of Tables 2
Stat and Prob Format of Tables 2
(insert discussion)
Table 2
Age Profile of the Students
(insert discussion)
Table 3
Favorite Subject Profile of the Students
(insert discussion)
Table 4
Students’ Attitude Towards Mathematics in Terms of Self-Confidence
(insert discussion)
Table 5
Students’ Attitude Towards Mathematics in Terms of Value
(insert discussion)
Table 6
Students’ Attitude Towards Mathematics in Terms of Enjoyment
(insert discussion)
Table 7
Students’ Attitude Towards Mathematics in Terms of Motivation
(insert discussion)
Table 8
Verbal Attitude
Indicators wx Description Interpretation
1. Self-confidence 3.24
2. Value
3. Enjoyment
4. Motivation
Composite Mean
Legend: Scale Range Verbal Description Extent Interpretation
5 4.21-5.00 Strongly Agree Very Positive
4 3.41-4.20 Agree Positive
3 2.61-3.40 Moderately Agree Moderately
2 1.81-2.60 Disagree Negative
1 1.00-1.80 Strongly Disagree Very Negative
(insert discussion)
Table 9
Table 7 shows the relationship between the profile of the respondents and their
attitude towards student teaching. It is reflected that the computed p-values of the variable
Age, Sex, Number of Subjects Left, and Monthly Family Income are greater than the level of
significance (0.05). This finding will not allow the rejection of null hypothesis, which means
that there is no significant relationship between the age, sex, number of subjects left, and
monthly family income of the respondents and their attitude towards student teaching.
(Why? Expound discussion, insert related literature and studies)
However, it is reflected on the table that the tabular value (36.42) is less than the chi-
square value (36.7). This finding will lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis. This means
that there is a significant relationship that exists between the variables at 5% level of
significance. This implies that the attitude of the respondents towards student teaching
depend on their major. (Why? Expound discussion, insert related literature and studies)