This rubric evaluates technical reports for equipment design on several criteria including writing quality, completeness, diagrams, calculations, innovation, specifications, prototype design, and timeliness. Key aspects assessed are professional formatting, inclusion of all required sections, accurate diagrams and fluid properties, proper application of calculations, a novel design element, a complete specifications table, a graphically designed prototype, and meeting the submission deadline with few modifications. Reports are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points for each criterion based on the level of quality, accuracy, and completeness demonstrated.
This rubric evaluates technical reports for equipment design on several criteria including writing quality, completeness, diagrams, calculations, innovation, specifications, prototype design, and timeliness. Key aspects assessed are professional formatting, inclusion of all required sections, accurate diagrams and fluid properties, proper application of calculations, a novel design element, a complete specifications table, a graphically designed prototype, and meeting the submission deadline with few modifications. Reports are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points for each criterion based on the level of quality, accuracy, and completeness demonstrated.
This rubric evaluates technical reports for equipment design on several criteria including writing quality, completeness, diagrams, calculations, innovation, specifications, prototype design, and timeliness. Key aspects assessed are professional formatting, inclusion of all required sections, accurate diagrams and fluid properties, proper application of calculations, a novel design element, a complete specifications table, a graphically designed prototype, and meeting the submission deadline with few modifications. Reports are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points for each criterion based on the level of quality, accuracy, and completeness demonstrated.
This rubric evaluates technical reports for equipment design on several criteria including writing quality, completeness, diagrams, calculations, innovation, specifications, prototype design, and timeliness. Key aspects assessed are professional formatting, inclusion of all required sections, accurate diagrams and fluid properties, proper application of calculations, a novel design element, a complete specifications table, a graphically designed prototype, and meeting the submission deadline with few modifications. Reports are scored on a scale of 1 to 4 points for each criterion based on the level of quality, accuracy, and completeness demonstrated.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Written Equipment Design Report Rubric
Outcome Professional Quality Adequate Needs Improvement Inadequate Score
(4 points) (3 points) (2 points) (1 point) Write a technical report English writing and report English writing and report English writing and report English writing and format is professional format is very good format is satisfactory report format is poor Completeness & All the required parts of a Some parts of a written report Many parts of a written Major parts of a written organization of the written report are included are lacking and organization report are missing; poor report are missing; looks technical report and logically organized. and some sense of logical organization. like a mixup of topics organization Draw block / process flow Block / Process flow diagrams Block/ Process flow diagrams Block/ Process flow Block/ Process flow diagrams and label are drawn extensively and are adequately drawn and diagrams drawing and diagrams are missing equipment and stream labeled ver0y accurately labeled labeling is not clear or information missing major information Determine / collect All required fluid properties Fluid properties are adequately Some fluid properties are Fluid properties are physical, chemical and are determined / collected determined / collected and missing or source may be missing or unrealistic transport properties of very accurately and source or some source or correlation is missing process fluids correlation are all indicated indicated Apply chemical Material/Energy balance Material/Energy balance Material/Energy balance Material/Energy balance engineering process calculations are used calculations are used calculations are not clearly calculations are missing calculations such as mass intensively and very adequately and accurately indicated and/or wrongly applied and energy balances accurately Demonstrate design of Equipment design is clearly Equipment design is Equipment design is Minimal evidence of chemical engineering and very accurately adequately demonstrated with partially demonstrated theoretical calculations equipment (such as demonstrated with mostly theoretical calculations and with some theoretical of equipment design and columns, heat exchanges, theoretical calculations and few use of heuristics and valid calculations and many mostly based on not pressure vessels, reactor minimal use of heuristics and assumptions unrealistic assumptions valid assumptions ... etc.) very valid assumptions and use of heuristics Include an Innovation to Innovation is truly novel, Innovation is novel and Innovation is not so new No Innovation included the Equipment that is creative and valid creative with slight validity with poor validity in the design novel, creative and valid as supported by evidences used in the design calculations Tabulate the design Specification Sheet is 100% Specification Sheet is 80-90% Specification Sheet is 60- Specification Sheet is parameters in a complete complete 80% complete less than 60 complete Specification Sheet Draw a Prototype Model Prototype is graphically Prototype design is graphically Design is graphically Prototype is unrealistic of the designed excellent using design based good and included some difficult to picture out equipment parameter calculations and arbitrary design parameters with few design includes all auxiliaries included parameters applied Submit Report on Time Submitted the report earlier Submitted the report within 2 Submitted the report 24 Submitted the report with few modifications or on the deadline with no hours after deadline with very hours after deadline with more than 2 days after after deadline further modifications few further modifications some modifications