Sociolinguistics Definition and Examples
Sociolinguistics Definition and Examples
Sociolinguistics Definition and Examples
Examples
Sociolinguistics is the study of the relation between language and society—a
branch of both linguistics and sociology.
"There are several possible relationships between language and society. One is
that social structure may either influence or determine linguistic structure and/or
behavior. . . .
Sociolinguistic Methods
Sociolinguistic Competence
1. 'Hey!',
2. 'Excuse me!', and
3. 'Sir!' or 'Ma'am!'
Sociolinguists are interested in how we speak differently in varying social contexts, and how
we may also use specific functions of language to convey social meaning or aspects of our
identity. Sociolinguistics teaches us about real-life attitudes and social situations. Below is a
video featuring Paul Cooper, a PhD student at the University of Sheffield, in which he
outlines some of the reasons studying Sociolinguistics is important in consolidating our
understanding of society.
"We can take 2 different routes to the description of social variation in language.
...We can consider various sections of the population, and determine the values of the
linguistic variables for each group... college-trained professionals... [or] longshoremen.
The alternate approach is to chart the overall distribution of the variables themselves and
then ask, for certain values of each variable, What are the characteristics of the people
who talk this way? ..[This] will tell us what group membership we can expect from a
person who talks in a certain manner.
"The first approach, through social groups, seems more fundamental and more
closely tied to the genesis of linguistic differentiation..When we have finished this type of
analysis, we may turn to the second approach.. [Thus] we will be able to avoid any error
which would arise in assuming that a group of people who speak alike is a fundamental
unit of social behavior."
[Trudgill uses 'language and society' as the broadest term, and distinguishes 3 types of study:]
1. "First, those where the objectives are purely linguistic;
2. Second, those where they are partly linguistic and partly sociological; and
3. Third, those where the objectives are wholly sociological.
"Studies of [the first] type are based on empirical work on language as it is spoken in its
social context, and are intended to answer questions and deal with topics of central
interest to linguistics... the term ‘sociolinguistics’ [here]... is being used principally to refer
to a methodology: sociolinguistics as a way of doing linguistics.
"The 2nd category... includes [areas] such as: sociology of language; the social
psychology of language; anthropological linguistics; the ethnography of speaking; &
[interactional] discourse analysis.
"[Sankoff's work] is micro-evolutionary in both its model of the human actor & its
contextualization of language... People are not tacitly reduced to what phenomenological
sociologist Harold Garfinkel has called ‘cultural dopes’, actors who can do only what
cultural roles provide. Yet the existence of indeterminacy, the fact that behavior and
meaning can be newly interpreted and constituted with each situation, does not lead to a
view of actors whose action is an unchartable miasma... What people do is variable
according to situation, interest, need, yet intelligible to themselves and others in terms of
recurrent patterns... The ingredients required for an adequate analysis of the social life of
language in the modern world are[:] technical linguistics, quantitative and mathematical
technique, ethnographic inquiry, ethnohistorical perspective."
Wm. Downes (1984: 15), Language and Society:
"Upon observing variability, we seek its social correlates. What is the purpose of
this variation? What do its variants symbolize? … [These] are the central questions of
sociolinguistics."
Ronald Wardhaugh (1998, 10-11), Sociolinguistics: An
Introduction:
"[1] Social structure may either influence or determine linguistic structure and/or
behavior… [2] Linguistic structure and/or behavior may either influence or determine
social structure [Whorf, Bernstein]… [3] The influence is bi-directional: language and
society may influence each other… [4] There is no relationship at all between linguistic
structure and social structure… each is independent of the other… [4a] Although there
might be some such relationship, present attempts to characterize it are essentially
premature… this view appears to be the one that Chomsky holds."