The Inner Meaning of The Siva Linga
The Inner Meaning of The Siva Linga
-- A. RENGASAMI IYER.
Page 1 of 53
The Inner Meaning of the Siva Linga
-- A. RENGASAMI IYER.
( All the credits to the below article belongs to the author, i have merely republished them
in my blog, to help spread the message.)
[We publish below the first instalment of an article on the above subject from a valued
friend of ours. He is a good student of Saiva Siddhanta, both in its Vedantic and Agamic
aspects, and is especially very strong in the Mantra and Tantra portions. The subject is a
good deal obscured by ignorance, prejudice, and blind bigotry, though Professor Wilson long
ago declared that he saw nothing objectionable in this sacred symbol. The word literally
means nothing more than 'Symbol;' and a really good exposition of the subject from the
stand point of our ancient Mantra and Tantra Sastra will be valuable. It is not any farfetched
or imaginary explanation that are attempted here but our friend quotes a text from the
Shastra for every one of his explanations. The article will be specially valuable as it will
contain numerous citations from the Agama Shastras which have not yet seen the light of
day. Editor Nallasami Pillai]
Page 2 of 53
The object of the present article is to remove the most erroneous idea entertained
regarding the Holiest of Hindu - nay universal - Symbol, viz : the Siva-Linga. To Swami
Vivekananda, we owe a deep debt of gratitude for retrieving the honour of this Ancient
Symbol of the land of Bharata. He did his best to repudiate the oft-repeated, but erroneous,
explanation of the Siva-Linga as a Phallic emblem. When Gustav Oppert, lately of the
Presidency College, Madras, read a paper in London on the Siva-Linga explaining it as a
Phallic emblem, the Swani who was then present in the audience refuted it and established
what it truly meant. The London Daily Chronicle reported the same in the following manner.
"The Swami said that the worship of the Siva-Lingam originated from the famous lingam in
the Atharva Veda Samhita sung in praise of the Yupastambha, the sacrifical post. In that
hymn a description is found of the beginning less and endless Stambha or skhamba, and it is
shown that the said Skhamba is put in place of the eternal Brahman. As, afterwards, the
sacrificial fire, its smoke, ashes and flames, the soma plant and the ox that used to carry on
its back, the wood for the Vedic sacrifice gave place to Siva's body, his yellow matted-hair,
his blue throat, and the bull, the Yupa-stamba gave place to the Siva Lingam and was raised
to the High Devahood of Sri Sankara. In the Atharva Veda Samhita the sacrificial cows are
also praised with the attributes of the Brahman. In the Linga Purana, the same hymn is
expanded in the shape of stories meant to establish the glory of the great Stambha and
superiority of Mahadeva." Later on he says "the explanation of the Siva Lingam as a Phallic
emblem began in India in her most thoughtless and degraded times." Yes in her thoughtless
days, and shameless days too, when the internal quarrels between the different sects were
highly rampant and were waged with an implacable hatred and when the minds of her men
were so notoriously plastic as to receive any kind of impressions. The story of the Linga
becoming sundered by a curse does not at all account for the origin of the Linga, but the
supposed, and fanciful too, resemblance to the genitive organs and the appellation of Linga
as applied to both, accounts for the story. It was a general practice in antiquity to invent
fictitious tales for the purpose of explaining names of which the origin was lost in obscurity.
It must be admitted that the worship of the Linga was almost universal in this land during
the time of Mahabharata, and it must also be admitted that long ages must have elapsed
between the time that it was first introduced and the time when it was universally
worshipped. There were innumerable temples in those times. The 5 sons of Pandu, the
Kauravas, the warriors like Aswathama, all Brahmins, Sri Krishna, Rishis like Vyasa and
almost all were worshippers of Linga or Vigraha. While on the one hand it gained in its
popularity, or, the other hand, it lost much. The thick mist of ages began at first to dim the
true significance of the symbol, till in the long distance of time the significance was so
entirely lost, that people at a comparatively later stage began to tax their ingenuity to
unravel the mysteries and began to refer to their imagination for this purpose. Many of the
indecent practices as are mentioned in the Soma, Laguda, Kapalika and Bhairava,
Pancharatra, Vama Sakta and other tantras began to appear then. Theories hitherto
unheard of were promulgated and were believed. The Vaishnavite began to hate the Saivite
Page 3 of 53
and the latter vice-versa, and interpolate texts of their own imagination. With reference to
the Mahabharata, the Saivaite, the Shakta and the Vaishnavite are all unanimous in saying
that it contains interpolations and scoring out of texts.
It is left to scholars therefore to trace out what are true and what are not true. Though it
may at first appear to prevent some difficulties, yet a little diving deep into the subject will
pave the way for correctly understanding the things, for, fortunately, the true explanations
of all those symbols are not completely ignored, much less effaced. In the Mahabharata
there are references about the Sankhya, Yoga, Pancharatra, Vedas and Pasupathas. In the
Drona parva, Mahadeva is said to be the author of the Vedas, Pancharatra, Pasupatha and
other sciences. Sankhya, Yoga, Pancharatra, Vedas and Pasupatha are the different religions.
Yudhistira asks Krishna "Tell me how Vaikanasas speak about you and how Pancharatras?"
and Krishna explains the same to him. Reference in Uttara-Ramayana about Pancharatra
and Pasupatha are very clear, and so there are references of these Agamas in Koorma,
Linga, Varaha and Vamana and other puranas. In all these Puranas there are some which
claim greater antiquity than others. The Linga Purana and the Vayu-samhita are among the
oldest being void of all embellishments of style, and of figures, as are found in later ones.
They are quite archaic in style and are strictly the Upabrahamanas of the Upanishads and
they contain views of the symbols. I do not say that the other puranas contain different
views and I can point out that these latter puranas too reproduce clearer views of the same,
but I say that in point of antiquity, they are the oldest. In these Puranas, references about
the Agamas are very numerous. As to what the Agamas teach, it is enough to quote the
opinion of the late learned Swami Vivekananda. "The Tantras represent the Vedic rituals in a
modified form, and before any one jumps into the most absurd conclusions about them, I
will advise him to read the Tantras in connection with the "Brahmanas" especially of the
"Adhvarya" portion. And most of the "Mantras" used in the Tantras will be found taken
verbatim from these Brahmanas." From the very ancient times, the practices as established
in the Agamas have continued unaltered. Temples are being built in the same fashion. The
same observances are observed and the same Mantras are repeated. Literate or illiterate,
the Gurus of the Siva temple observe the poojah and other ceremonies in that self same
manner as their fore-fathers did on the banks of the Ganges thousands of years ago. It
stands to reason therefore that these observances should have been long practised more or
less in that self same manner as we find them depicted in the treatises, before they were
actually reduced to writing. The treatises themselves should have only copied those
observances as they were in vogue in those times. Thus, from those remote times down to
the present time, the observances continue to be the same and will continue to be so, till a
last relic of temple worship is left in this country.
Page 4 of 53
Do not the Brahmins of the present day form the Cape Comorin to the Himalayas, be they
removed from each other by any number of customs or dogmas, be they immersed in the
verbal whirlpools of Dvaita, Advaita and Visishtadvaita, continue to offer the same prayers
of (Imam me Varuna) etc., mantras, which their ancestors used to offer to Varuna etc., on
the banks of the Indus. Thus, in order to have a correct and succinct idea of the symbols, we
must refer to these sciences which alone have tried to explain the mysteries connected with
them. Those sciences are the Agamas and the Silpa-sastras. Let the Upanishads, the Puranas
and the Ithihasas contain in chapter after chapter eulogiums of these symbols, let
Bodhayana in his Nityapooja Vidhi, Pratisthavidhi and Pradoshapooja Vidhi, Asvalayana in
his Soolagava, Apasthamaba in his Isana-bali, Katyayana and Sadya Jashada in their grihyas
offer praises of Siva-linga or Siva Vigraha, still we must only turn to the Agamas. Hence
Haradatta, the author of the Ujjvala a commentary on the Apasthamaba Sutras, observes in
his Srutisookthimala thus, "Just as the kalpas stand to the Vedic sacrifices, so Thy Agamas
stand for Thy dhyana, etc."
What then is Linga. It means "a Symbol." The Vyakaranis (grammarians) and the
Mimamsakas have profusely used this word in this sense. The lexicographers have other
words to denote the male organ, and the Namalinganusasana of Amarasimha, especially in
the Nanartha Varga employs the word in the sense of any human organ. Why then of the so
many other symbols prevailing in this country, this symbol alone should be termed pre-
eminently as the "Symbol." Because this alone has been regarded pre-eminently as emblem
of the "Great unknown."
We may at the outset say that the Linga stands for the sacred fire of the old "Yagna Salas,"
while the temple itself stands for the sacrificial grounds - be the said temple built as the
Hridaya prastharas such as the temple of Chidambaram, or Sariraprasthara as in other
places. The old Yupastamba of the Yagnasala is the Dwajas tamba of the Siva Alaya. The
Altar is the Balipitam and the ashes are the Bhasma, while the Pasu (victim) of the old
sacrifice is the bull or nandi. While one bull near the dwajastamba is the Pasu, another bull
on the other side of the Balipitam stands for the freed one and hence called Nandi or God.*
Page 5 of 53
[* அனாதிசிவரூபமாகிய ஆன்மா தனாதிமலத்தாற் தடைப்பட்டு நின்றது
தனாதிமலமும் தடையற்றபோதே, அனாதிசிவரூபமாகிய வாறே.]
We are enjoined in the Sastras that we should on no account cross between the 2nd Nandi
and Sivalingam. The penalty for transgressing this injunction is great. The first Nandi near
the dwajastamba corresponds to the soul bound by the 3 pasas, Anava, Karma, and Maya,
and the 2nd Nandi on the other side of the Balipitam (the altar where the victim is
sacrificed) represents the soul freed from the pasas. The 2nd nandi has offered itself as an
oblation into the sacred fire of Brahman. No one can separate the offering from the fire into
which it has been offered. The priest who officiates in this sacrifice of the Atma is alike
called the Dikshita. The Ritwicks here are the Sadhaka-Acharyas. The mantra 'Vonshat' plays
an important part in this Yaga as in the old sacrifices. In the old yagas such as
Garudachayana etc., certain mounds were erected while there was also other minor kundas
and mandalas and Vedis. This is Howthri. In all acts done in the Sivalaya from Karshna to
Prathishta and from Prathishta to Ootsava and from Ootsava to Prayaschitta, some of the
same processes are repated a number of times. The construction of kundas, mantapas, and
the performance of ceremonies thereto, homas, rearing of palikas are all repeated several
times. During the Balastapana, Pavitrotsava, Yagas, Linga-stapana, Nrutta Saba, Vimana
stapana, Soola stapana Prasada and Gopura-stapana during car-stapana etc., are repeated.
The Acharya, who has had Acharya-abhisheka done to him, is the fit man to establish both
the sthira linga and Chara linga. The Sthira linga (immoveable emblem) is the linga in the
temple and chara linga is the Acharya. Both of them become objects of worship and both of
them become god's emblem by the same kind of processes. Hence the Agama says:
"Stavara (immoveable) and Jangama are two kinds of lingas. The stavara linga is the one
established in the temple and the dikshita is the Jangama linga. The stavara linga worship
will be of no avail if you have no regard for the Jangama linga." The Agamas mention 7 kinds
of lingas. They are the Gopuras, Sikhara, portals Prakaras (Walls), Balipitam, the Archaka,
and the linga in the inner sanctuary.
The Balipeetam is called the Bhadra-lingam. It is on the Balipitam that the deovtee is
converted into Sivam. Hence it is called the Bhadra linga. The Sikhara is identically the
Moola linga as we shall hereafter show. The portals and the prakaras are Siva linga as they
Page 6 of 53
remind us of the Eternal Lord. In all these and in the thousand and one references, the word
"Linga" is used in the sense of 'Symbol". Thus Sivalingam is that Symbol which reminds us of
the "Unknown Deity" residing over all the universe. We said that the temple is the old
yagasala. What is the most important thing in the yagas? Certainly the sacred Fire. If the
pasu is Nandi and the Balipitam is the place where the victim is sacrificed, where is the
sacred fire in this yaga sala in which the Aham-homa is performed? Certainly that is the
linga.
Thus the linga shooting upwards is the pillar of fire climbing upwards. Those who are
acquainted with the eternal as the Pasupathi - "Imam Pasum Pasupathe the Adya Badnami,"
"I now tie this pasu for thee, oh Pasupathi," says the Veda. 'Avorajanam Adhvarasya
Page 7 of 53
Rudram," (Rudra who is the king of sacrifices). "Ghathapathim Medhapathim Rudram"
(Rudra the lord of the slain and the marrow). "Ayam Somaha Kapardine kritham" (This soma
is performed for the one with braided hair) "Rowdri Vai Gowha" (This cow belongs to Rudra)
are the Srutis. The 21 yagnas, 7 paka yagas, 7 haviryagnas and 7 somayagnas are all
propitiated to Rudra. The Karmakanda says: 'Eka eva Rudro nadvitiyaya tasthe," "Esham
Isaha Pasupathihi Pasoonam chathushpadam," Ethavantho vai Pasavaha
Dwipadachathushpadascha," "Thasmath Rudraha Pasoonam Adhi pathihi," Rudra alone
stands without a second"- and the Gnanakanda (Upanishads) reproduces the same in a
higher sense - "Ekohi Rudro nadwithiyaya thastheehu - ya Iman Lokan Adhi Srithaha - ya Ise
asya Dvipadaha chathushpadaha kasmai Devaya Havisha Videma" "Rudra is the Pasupathi
and the pasus are these two legged and four legged beings." "Pasoogumsthagumschakre
Vayavyan - Aranyan - Gramyascha ye - Tham Yagnam Barhishi Prowksham - Purusham
Jatham Agrathaha - Thema Deva Ayajantha - Yagnena yagnam Ayantha Devaha." 'The birds,
the beasts and men became pasus. The devas sacrificed the first born purusha." The
Upanishads too borrow the same language. 'Vrathamethath Pasupatham Pasupasa
Vimokshaya", 'Gnatva Devam Muchyathe sarva Pasaihi", "Gnatva Devam sarva
Pasapahanihi", "Visvaroopaikapasam", "Dhyananirmathanabhyasath Pasam Dahathi
Pandithaha."
Indeed in all the Atyasramopanishads such as the Svetesvatara this Pasupathi is praised.
Thus if there is truth in the fact that the Alayas are only sacrifical grounds in a higher sense,
then the sacred fire must be the sivalinga. If the sivalinga does not stand for the 'Sacred fire"
what else could it represent, especially when there is a Balipitam, a Pasu and a Yupastamba
before it. The old Iranian have perpetuated the Eternal One in the form of "fire"; and the
Aryans too might have had the very same emblem of fire in their public places of worship.
Why had they represented the fire in the form of a stone pillar? The answer is plain enough.
They had not only to represent the sacrificial fire, but also the sacrificial mound, the
sacrificial post and the victim to be sacrificed. All this they represented in the same kind of
material. Their idea was not only to represent the "Unknown Principle" in the resplendent
form of fire, but also to perpetuate the working of Pasupathi in His manifold ways, without
altering His form as a pillar of fire. In one and the same place, they had perpetuated the
nature of the Pathi, the Pasu and the Pasas, of the 36 tatwas resolving into the 3 kinds of
Maya viz., the Moolaprakriti, the Asuddha maya and the Kutila (Suddha maya) controlled by
the Ichcha, Gnana, and Kriya Saktis of the Lord, of the 5 kinds of pranava, indeed of the
workings of the Divine Lord and of the end and aim of all creation. Hence it is, they have
Page 8 of 53
established the temples from the Himalayas to the Cape Comorin in the same granite rocks.
This lingam of fire is made to rest on a pitam. In some cases the pitam can be removed. This
Pitam too is in some places circular (Vrithakara) and at other places square (Chaturasra). But
the most common one is the circular pitam. Imagine a lotus supported on its long stalk while
its petals are open. There are whorls of petals rising one over the other. In the midst of this
flower you see a small ovary of yellow colour with small yellow coloured stamens round it
and with pollen sticking to them in the centre. Here you see a lingam. It is only in reference
to this the Agama says "Pattika kanja kantabja pattika dyapratharika." This abja (lotus)
contains a pattika, a neck etc.
The following stanza from the works of Sri Ulagudya nayanar will clearly show the nature of
the Sivalinga.
The tank is Anava. The soil is karma. The root is Maya. The 24 tatwas from prithivi to
Prakriti, the stalk. The 8 petals are the 7 vidya tatvas and suddhavidya. The kesaras
(stamens) are the Isvara tatvas and Sadakya tatva. The pistil of the flower is the Sakti tatva.
The Nadha and bindu form the ovary." Here, apart from the Atma Vidya tatvas and
suddhavidya, the linga proper is made up of Isvara and Sadakya, Bindu and Nadu tatwas.
The Agama acharyas prescribe internal as well as external poojas and Homas. The heart is
the place of pooja and the Nabhi (abdomen) is the place for homa. Corresponding to the
heart there is a place of worship outside, and corresponding to the Nabhi there is the
Sivagnihotra kundam. A true saivite is enjoined to do both the pooja and homa, both
internally and externally. He alone who has done the pooja in the heart is qualified to do the
pooja outside. Indeed without Siva poojah in the heart, there cannot be poojah outsied.
Similarly, without the homa in the Nabhi, there cannot be agnihotra in the fire pot outside.
Page 9 of 53
The heart is a lotus, the nabhi kunda is another lotus. Similarly the linga outside is described
to be seated in a lotus, and the fire-pot outside is lotus. After the completion of the pooja
and the homa internally and externally, there is the place for Samadhi (deep
contemplation). The seat for that in the inner side is the Brain; and outside, he is required to
select a lonely place for doing this Samadhi. The brain too is a lotus. The lotus of the heart is
considered to possess 8 petals and the lotus of the brain thousand petals. Of course, in all
these various flowers there are lingas. The lingas are all jyothies or colloquially pillars of fire.
Sreemat Aghora Sivacharya in his Nityanushtana rules observes thus regarding the
contemplation of the Lord in the Brain.
'Wetting his body all over with the discharges of the honey (nectar) exuding from the lotus
whose petals are blown downwards, and thinking that the heart is a lotus possessing a stalk,
petals, karnika (bud) and making it the seat of Suddha Vidya and seating on it, the Atma of
the nature of Siva, of the form of Bindu, on taking him down from his seat in the Brain
(Dwadasanta) and establishing the Lord of the form of Jyothis, this Atma must make
abhishekams to the Lord with the waters of Sakti made to flow all round."
Page 10 of 53
"Then making the anganyasa as before (conversion of one's body into that one in which it
will be fit for god take his seat), thinking in his mind, the heart, the navel, and the Brain as
places respectively for making poojah, homa and Samadhi, and worshipping Sivam in the
lotus of the heart with all respect due to Him with the flowers of Ahimsa etc., in the manner
hereunder to be described blow up into flame (kunda) the fire of Gnana in the fire pot of
Navel. Then we should pour Siva, the fire of wisdom, the thick cluster of Tejas, of the sheen
of a thousand suns, the ghee nectar flowing from the Bindu. The Jvala or flame is said to rise
from the navel and reach the Dwadasanta through the heart as through the Nadi of
Sushumna. The long blazing flame is here the linga. In the heart lotus god is Jyothirupa and
in the navel, god is Gnananala, Tejahpunja pinara. The water to be poured over the linga in
the heart lotus is Sakthi Kshubda sakti prasruthabahulamrutha pravaham and the ghee to be
poured over the flame of fire rising from the navel is Bindu prasantha Amrutha roopena ajya
Bindu. The water and the ghee are the same - Sakti. He should then offer all the fruits of
pooja to the Lord and contemplating Isvara in the Bindu stana (Brain) as a shining star
(spurath tharakakara with faces on all sides sarvatho (mukha) take (anugna) his commands
and request him that he may be allowed to do pooja outside and with the permission so
Page 11 of 53
obtained, he must select a place outside for doing the pooja and must wash the place etc.
After making the Sthana suddhies and Mantra Suddhies, the devotee must do poojah
outside." Thus the Paddhathikara continues
Then after making pooja with the Gayatri mantra, washing the linga pindika (peeta) with the
Asthra mantra, pouring ordinary water on the linga, adoring the same with the 8 kinds of
flowers, then pouring the consecrated waters over the linga with the Pancha-brahma and
shadnga mantras or Vyopa voyapin mantram all along reciting the Namaka, chamaka and
Purusha sooktha mantras and rubbing it with a pure cloth, place it on a seat. "Evam Kritha
Atma sthana Dravya Mantra Linga suddhim Vidhya Sivam poojayeth." Thus finishing the 5
Suddhies (purificatory ceremonies) to Atma (the worshipper), sthana (place of worship),
Dravya (materials for worship), Mantras (prayers) and linga (Symbol of god intended for
worship), one should adore Siva. After making poojas then to the Avarana Devatas,
Ganapathy and Lakshmi in the north-west and in the north-east corners, worshipping the
seven gurus (Sadasivam Ananthamcha Srikantam Punarambikam Guham Vishnumcha
Dhatharam guroon Sapthan Smaran Yjeth) Sadasiva, Anantha Srikantha, Ambika, Guha,
Vishnu and Brahma, taking their approval with the prayer. Allow me to do poojah to the
lord" (Devam Sampoojayamithi labdanugnaya sivam yajeth) one should do pooja to the
Lord.
Behind this pita there is the Kriya Sakthi of the Lord who is pervading all the tatvas from the
earth to Kutila. In that space there is the seat of Anantesa, supported by 4 lions resting in
the 4 corners, north-east, south-east, south-west and north-west, the lions themselves
representing the Dharma, Gnana, Vairagya and Aisvarya, of different colours and supported
also by 4 legs in the North, East, South, and West corners representing the Adharma,
Agnana, Avairagya and Anaisvarya. Above that is the linga of two divisions the Adhachadana
Page 12 of 53
and Oordhva Chadana, the middle portion being called the Mekhala portion. Here the earth
is the root and the other tatvas up to kala, form the Nala (stalk) (Prithvi kandam
Kalatatvantaika nalam - Kshubda Maya Mahapadmam Anekadala Sankulam). The
Oordhvachandana are the blown petals. Here is the description of the lotus.
In the midst think of a sprout of an emerald colour and small stalk of the colour of sapphire
the bud-like-coral and the petals (small ones) of the colour of silver, the Kesara (pollen) of
the colour of gold, worship the root, sprout, stalk, the bud, the petals and the small petals
and think of the Astavidyesvaras as the 8 petals. Above these petals (i.e) above the peeta
(Pindika) rises the linga. There is the Karnika of the colour of molten gold, big with the 51
seeds (51 Aksharas) and with kesaras (pollen) 64 in number; worship that karnika and the
seeds. Thus conceive of a lotus formed of the various parts hitherto described.
Page 13 of 53
Then think of the Kesaras as the 8 Sakthis Vama, Jyesta, Rowdri, Kali, Kalavikarani,
Balavikarani Balapramathini and Sarvabhathadamani - who are so many aspects of one
Siva's sakthi - and who control and rule the 8 Vidyesvaras and think of Manonmani to rest in
the Karnika and worship them all severally by their names. In the circumference of the
petals, think of the sun's Mandala to exist with its presiding deity as Brahma, and in the
circumference of the Kesara think of the Moon's Mandala presided by Vishnu as its deity,
and in the circumference of the Karnika think of Agnimandala with Rudra as its presiding
deity and in the middle of the Karnika think of the sakthimandala of the colour of milk with
its presiding deity Mahesvara, and considering such a form as one formed of all tatvas from
Prithvi to Kutila and as the seat of the Lord, and with the mantras Siva Asanaya namaha-Siva
moorthaye namaha, think of a Thejoroopam in the form of a pillar having no hands, feet,
head etc, (Thejoroopam Dandakaramavibhakthavayavam) and thinking it to permeate
through the Siva-tatva (Nadatatvam) place the Lord's symbol in the place called the Linga
Veshtana.
In this pillar of fire we must suppose that there is a Form with Isana mantra as the head, the
tatpurusha mantra as the face, the Aghora mantra as the heart, the Vamadeva mantra as
the abdomen and the Sadyojatha mantra as the leg. Then we must consider this body as one
formed of the 38 Kalas, Sasini etc. Sakthena Anena Sakalo Vigneye nishkala Sivaha -
Kshithydai Kutila prantha Mantra Simhasana Sthithaha. Drik Kriyecha Visalaksham Gnana
chandra Kalanvitham - Samjinthya Moortherupari Sakthimathra Vijrumbanam."
Sarvakartharam Nishkalam Vibhum Gnananandamayam Svaparaprakasam Samchinthya
Arghyam Datva Isanadina brahmana Dhenu, Padma, Trisoola Makra Srigakya mudram
Namaskara mudramcha, Darasayithva Sarvesham Sivena Sadharmya Aikyam Bhavayeth."
Then we must think of the Lord as possessing a body formed of 38 Kalas - such as Sasini etc.
Thus we should think of Him as possessing a body formed of Sakthis. By this Sakthi the Lord,
who is Nishkala should be contemplated to have become Sakala. His seat is the 36 tatvas
from earth to Kutila. His Icha , Gnana and Kriya Sakthis are his 3 broad eyes. The wisdom is
in the form of the crescent Moon. Then think of God in the Brahma randhra (Brain) as
possessing Vidya-Deha thinking that this Vidya-deha is of the Linga form and must make
Page 14 of 53
nyasa to that effect. Then we must pronounce the Moola mantra (Pranava) with all its Kalas
such as medha, etc., and thinking of the same as equal to the fierce sun
(Prachandamarthandopamam) and leaving the 5 Karanesvaras Brahma, Vishnu, Rudra,
Isvara, Sadasiva while pronuncing that Pranava, in their respective places of A,U,M, bindu
and Nada. Contemplating the Nishkala Lord, the Creator of all, the Omnipresent, Sat-chit-
Ananda, the Vivifier of all and the Self-luminous Sivam and with deep reverence praying to
Him "Oh Lord, ruler of all worlds.
Be thou pleased to be present in this Linga till I finish my pooja," thus making the 8
samskaras Avahana, stapana, Sannidhana, Sannirodana, Padya and Achhamana giving,
Arghya and flower - we must do poojah. Then we must present to Him the several Mudras
(Geometrical figures with spiritual meanings) such as Dhenu (cow), Padma (lotus) Trisoola
(Trident) Makara (Turtlefish) and offering the namaskara mudras i.e., the joining of the palm
of hands. We must thank all to have attained His nature and become one with Him.
(Sarvesham Sivena sadharmya Aikyam Bhavayeth). Then waing incense and showing the
luminous form of the light, and presenting all offerings (nivedyas), the devotee should 108
times make japa of the Moola mantra (Pranava) and finishing thempraise Him in loud and
enchanting strains.
Guhyadi Guhya gopta twam -Grihanasmath kritham japam Siddhir Bhavathu me Deva
Twatprasadath Thvayi Sthitham "Sivodata Sivo Bhoktha Sivas sarvam idam jagat Sivoyajathi
Sarvathra yassivaha Soham Evathi."
"Thou art the preserver of all secrets. Therefore receive my japas and let me attain my aim.
Whatever I did, good or bad, take that as my offering. Siva is the giver, Siva is the enjoyer, all
is Siva, Eveeywhere Siva does the pooja. That Siva is I myself." By reciting these slokas, one
should resign his mental prayer, ceremonial acts, and himself in the Varada hadn of the
Lord... We have here described the mode of Sivapoojah in a shortest way possible. Then
begins agni karya, and Aghoras siva says:
Page 15 of 53
Then in the Agnikunda (of the form of a lotus) one should do homa with Panch Brahma and
shadanga mantras and prostrate before him. He who does so daily will never be tainted with
sin just as there will be no darkness when the sun has risen." Evam yo Prathyaham Bhakthya
Sampoojayathi Sankaramna thasya Jayathe Papam Yathadithyodayaththamaha."
Regarding this Antarpooja, Bahya pooja and Agnihotra, the great Trilichana Sivacharya in his
siddhanta saravali observes thus:-
Regarding the Antar pooja (Inner pooja) he says thus "Hridpadme Manasa Vibhavitha Maha
mayoparisthasane Dhyeyo Dipa Sikhakrutheessu kusumam Bhava Kshamarghyam jalam
leporavasayini Parasivaha Prananalo manase pathrehamkrithiresha Eva paramo
Doopayamanatmakaha.
In the heart-lotus there is a seat (for the Lord) above the Mahamaya. In that seat the Lord
parasiva should be contemplated in the form of the flame of a lamp. To him, Bhava (good
intention) is a good flower:- Patience is Arghya and Abhisheka waters. Knowledge of Siva is
Dhyana and lepa (smeating materials such as sandal-wood). The waving of incense is the
Ahankaran (consiousness) etc. The meaning is that the 36 tatvas from the earth to the
Mahamaya, constitute the lotus and the seat above it is sakthi and the lord is in the form of
the flame of a lamp. Regarding the outer poojah the saintly Acharya says:-
The meaning is that the whole linga consists of a peetam and linga. The Peetam is that part
of the lotus (up to Suddhavidya) as far as the petals and linga is the other part of the lotus.
Thus the lotus is the linga. In the Poojastava, a work from which saint Umapathy Sivacharya
and others have copiously quoted, the following Stanzas occur and they will also explain as
to what the linga means. "Hridpadmakhya Sivalaye Manasije thath Karnikakhye Kriya Peeta
gnanamayam Visuddha manasa Samasthapya nadatmana Lingam thathcha Suddha Mayena
Payasa Sansnapya Samyak Punaha Vyragyenacha chahandanena Vasubhihi
Pushpairahmisadibhihi."
Page 16 of 53
the Sivalaya. In it Karnika, the peetam is Kriya and gnana is linga (Nada). The Abhisheka-
water is the nectar. Vairagya is the sandal. Ahimsa and others are the flowers. The
restraining of breath is the waving of incense. The consciousness is showing the light
(Deepa). Pratyahara is Havis. Sushumna-Yoga is Japa. The ornaments (Jewels) are those
blessed sensation arising from a constant contemplation of Him - giving up on one's self is
the Offering (Neivedya). He who does this Pooja has indeed obtained what ought to be
obtained.
"Dharikadhara Sakthi bijam Anantha Pankaja Kudmalam - Punya bodhat Viraga Bhoothi
padam Viloma chathustayam. Gathraka chadana Chadam Kamalam sa Kesara Karnikam
Sakthi mandalaSangha yuktham Aham namami Sivasanam."
"Prithvi kandam kalah tathvahutaika nalam granthi granthim suddha vidya sarojam Vamadi
sakthigatha kesara karanikadyam."
The above quotations convey the very same idea. In fact it is clearly asserted in the last
verse Sadasiva's body is a huge 'Lotus" whose root (கிழங்கு) extends over 100 crores of
yojanas etc. He who is to be contemplated within is to be worshipped outside in Sivalinga -
"Jneyassivas - Sarvaghatassarire Dhyeyassa poojyassivalinga madhye." A summary of the
Sivalinga pooja is given in chapter 20 of the Vayusamhita, uttara bhaga.
Page 17 of 53
Saktha youthar manonmani karnikapara Vairagyam Nablam gnanam Sivatmakam Kandascha
Sivadharmatma karnikanthe Thrimandali etc."
The above verses convey the same idea as is expressed in our quotation from the padohathi
of Srimat Aghora Sivacharya.
We said that certain Mandalas and Vedis are erected during importatnt celebrations of
religious festivals, such as Brahmotsava, Linga pratishta or Dikshas. Sages like Aghora Siva,
Thriloghana Siva, and Anantha Siva in their treatises on Dikshas and treatises like the
Vayusamhita in its second part give lucid explanations as to how mandalas should be
contructed. The Mandalas are pictorial representations made on the floor with the powders
of precious stones or flour of rice etc. Here is the description of a mandala.
A lotus should be drawn on the floor forming the Karnika with bright yellow powder, the
Kesaras with white, blood-red and yellow powders, the petals with white powders as
spreading in 4 directions, drawing the middle portion of the petals with green powders. A
mandala called Latalingaka is hereunder described.
"A street of black colour should be drawn up on four sides in the form of a square. In the
middle of each of the 4 sides of this square, a doorway measuring 4X2 padas (feet) should
be drawn up. In the inner side, on each side of such doorway a linga should be drawn up.
Thus 8 lingas will be formed at the rate of 2 lingas for each doorway. In each of the corners
(angles) of this square a creeper measuring 4 padas should be drawn up. Within this square,
above the lingas another street one pada in breadth in green colour should be made to run
of 4 sides. In the midst of this square a full blown lotus measuring 64 padas should be drawn
up. This lotus must contain a karnika measuring 4 padas, pollen round this karnika,
measuring one pada should be made to stick up to. Then 8 petals each petal measuring 2
padas, spreading towards the eight directions should be drawn up." Here the square
represents a wide tank, the green line representing the waters. The black line represents the
Page 18 of 53
tank's bank with stairs thereon. A lotus with creepers here and there is said to rise above
the surface of the water.
First draw a lotus of 8 padas. Around it draw a pattah (a circular line) measuring one pada.
Draw with white powders a square street measuring one pada in which round the circle. The
corners of this square should contain creepers each measuring 7 padas. In the 4 quarters
door-ways each measuring 7X2 padas should be drawn. Then on each side of such a
doorway up a linga."
Page 19 of 53
Select a square each side of which should measure 7 padas. Within this, at a distance of one
pada from the centre these should be a street a side of which should measure 4 padas. In
the eight quarters of this street 8 padmas (lotuses) should be drawn up. Enclose this square
street by means of another square. On each side of this latter square construct two
doorways, each doorway being formed midway between the two lotuses of the inner
square. The other portions of this outer square should be peetahs (raised plots). The
following is a description of mandala called Gowrilata mandalam.
Enclose a square spot measuring 17X17 padas by means of cotton strings. In the angles form
4 lotuses, each lotus containing linga patta, saroja, kanta, kamala, and peeta, the linga
measuring 4 padas, patta measuring 6 padas, saroja 4 padas, kanta 2 padas, kamala 4 padas
and peeta 6 padas. On each side of the said corner construct a creeper measuring 5 padas
attached to the said Lotus. Another mandala by name Bhadra mandala, is described below.
Page 20 of 53
Enclose a square space of 11X11 padas; construct a linga of 9 padas within it. In the 4 angles
construct Swathikas of the colour of gold. On the 4 sides lingas with peetahs should be
constructed. The linga should contain of course, linga, patttah, saroja, kanta and kamala and
peetah.
Enclose a sqaure space of 32X32 padas. Form within it a lotus of 64 padas. Round it a ghatra
with peeta of 3 padas should be constructed. Near it a green Veethi of 3 padas should be
formed. On each side of this Veethi doorwasys of 7X2 padas should be made. On each side
of the doorway lingas containing linga, patta, saroja, kanta, kamala and peetah respectively
measuring, 4, 6, 6, 2, 4 and 6 padas should be constructed." "vacha varairvarsha yuth"
means "containing va, cha, va, ra, va and sha."
In all these we see that the creepers contain a lotus; this lotus containing petals, stalk,
stamens, ovary, etc., known in Sanskrit as kanda, nahla, dala, upadala, karnika, kesara, and
linga. The whole linga represents a Grand Lotus and we cannot conceive of a linga without
the corresponding petals etc. Those who have the propensity to pull asunder the petals and
the stalls etc from the flower can only be pitied and these maniacs are more fit for lunatic
asylum than for civilized society, even though such maniacs passed and still pass for great
Acharyas and the words or rather the ravings of such fools can have no value.
Let us now see what the Upanishads have to say about this Linga. If we turn to the
Hamsopanishad we see the following:-
Page 21 of 53
jagradavastha, karni kayam Swapnam, Linge sushupthihi, padama thyage Thuriyamyade
hamso Nade vilino Bhavathi thath Thureeyahtheetham."
This Paramahamsa is shining like crores of suns. His prpensity is eight fold. The
Paramahamsa's heart is compared to a lotus. The various component parts of the Lotus are
desccribed. The petals of this paramahamsa's heart spread towards the eight directions,
east, south-east, south, south-west, west, north-west, north and north-east. The east petal
is desire to practice virtue. The south-east is desire for sleep and laziness. The south petal is
hankering after cruel actions. The south-west is desire to commit sin. The west petal is
desire to play. The north-west petal is desire for walking etc. The north petal is desire for
amorous acts and the north-east is desire to amass wealth. The padma (lotus apart from the
petals) is Vairagya. The kesaras are the waking state - the Karnika (ovary) the dreaming
state, the Linga the dead- sleep state and the leaving of the lotus, padma tyaga is Thuriya
and when the Hamsa merges in Nada, that state is Thureeyahtheetham. Here the heart of
this Paramahamsa is likened to a great lotus. Indeed all upanishads, all agamas, all puranas
and other works great and small have likened the heart to the Lotus.
Why is this so? We cannot attempt to answer this. Suffice it to say that such is the
case - Here we are tempted to quote passages which go to describe the heart as a lotus. In
all these we request our readers to bear in mind the quotation from the Hamsopanishad.
The Taithiriya Mahopanishad in the Anuvaka wherein it describes the glory of the yathies
has the following description of the yathies' heart - (the upasana sthana).
First the yathies, those who have renounced the world, are praised. They are the Upasakas.
Then the Upasana Sthanu is described. That is their heart which is a Pundareeka, i.e., a
lotus.
Page 22 of 53
The Upasya is said to dwell in it and the Supreme Lord is named Mahesvara in the very next
Mantra which begins with "yo veda dow" and ends with "yaha paraha saha Mahesvaraha."
The same upanishad in the Narayana anuvaka praises Narayana with all the encomiums due
and describes a heart within him of the form of a Lotus, and dwells upon the Lord in that
heart with the Mantra "Rutam Satyam .... Krishnapingaka." Here is summary of it. The
upasaka (worshipper) Narayana is described by the Mantras "Sahasra Seersham Devam"
and a heart within Narayana, (the upasanasthana) is described by the Mantras "Padmakosa
PratheeKahsam Hridayam chapi Adhomukham." This heart lotus has its cone turned
downwards. Within it there is a cavity. (Thasyanthe Sushiragum sookshmam). There is
within it a fire (Thasya madhye Mahan Agnihi). Within it is the flame. (Thasya madhye Vahni
Sikha). Within the flame is Paramatma, (the upasya). This Paramatma is devoted by the
Mantra.
Here too the heart is described as a Lotus and the Aroopa Lord within it is the umasabaya of
3 eyes, "corresponding to the Viroopaksham and Krishnapingalam of Narayanuvaka
(Krishnapingala means umasahaya. "Ardhapullakshanam Vande Purusham Krishnapingalam"
- (Half-male-half-female form is Krishnapingala.)
The chandogya describes as well the heart as a lotus:- "Atha Yadidamasmin Brahmapure
Daharan Pundareekam Vesma Daharosmin Antharakasaha. Thasmin
Page 23 of 53
yadanthasthathanveshtavyam"... Within this Brahmpura there is a lotus seat. That which is
within it is to be sought after.
In these upanishads mention is made of Hridaya Pundarika the heart lotus, and the
Hamsopanishad alone gives the various component parts of this lotus such as the petals,
linga, Karnika etc.
The upabrahmanas explain the Narayana Anuvaka as regards the various component parts
of this lotus:- Says the Sootha Samhitha.
First one should convert himself into Vishnu the 25th principle, the pristine and natural
condition of the Kshetragna. In the middle of the heart lotus of that Vishnu, - a lotus which
has for its petals the 8 aishvaryas, the Jnana for its stalk and the Mahath for its root, and
which was blown by the restraining of breaths - in that temple of the Lord kindled by
Page 24 of 53
Pranava, there is the flame of fire. Within the fire lies Mahesvara, the Truth, the Sathya,
Parambrahman, the blue throated, the causeless cause of everything. He whom Brahma,
Vishnu and Rudra contemplate." We need not point out here that the great Vidyaranya
commented upon the Soothasamhita, and he himself says that Sankara wrote his Bhashya
on the Brama Sootras after having gone through it eighteen times.
In the Isvara gita of the Koorma Purana, it is described, "Chinthayithva thu poorvoktham
Hridaye padmam uthamam, atmanam atha kartharam Thathra anala samaprabham,
Madhye Vanni sikhakahram purusham panchavimasakam Chinthyeth paramatmanam Than
madhye gaganam param, Omkara bodhitham tathvam sasvatham sivamachyutham
avyaktham prakrithowlinam param Jyothiranuthamam, Thamasaha paramam thathvam
atmadaram Nirajanam, Dhyayitha Thanmayo Nithyam Ekaroopam Mahesvaram."
Think of a beautiful lotus flower in the heart and within it the Atma the 25th principle, and
within this a Chit Akas and within it the Lord, the Paranjyothi the great lustre. Ever think on
that one Mahesvaram by being of this form.
We see a linga in the lotus flower, and in the heart, which is described as a lotus (of course
not an actual lotus it could be); there is a linga, as the hamsopanishad assures us. What then
is the linga in the heart lotus? In the above quotations we see that this heart lotus contains
a Vannisikha, a flame of fire. This flame of fire then is the linga. That linga or flame of fire is
the form of the Lord Sikhahtanvinam Isvaram). If the petals of this lotus be blown by means
of Pranayama, there is seen the linga of flame kindled by Pranava. So say Trilochana Siva
"Hridpadma Vibhehvitha Mahamayoparisthasane Dhyeyo Deepa Sikhakruthi."
In the heart-lotus the Lord is of the form of the flame of a lamp. Srimad Aghora Siva says:-
Within the heart there is a lotus composed of stalk, petals, ovary and stamens and by means
of Pranava of three matras A, U, M, a form of flame should be established. Of course even in
our Linga pratishta in the temple, we see that a "Thejoroopam Dandakaram
Avibhakthavayavam," a form of Thejas, flame, like a pillar, had been established. Thus the
Thejas is the linga of this heart-lotus.
The Upanishad says that this heart-lotus has its cone turned downwards. "Padmakosa
Pratheekahsam Hridayamchapi Adhomukham." How are its petals blown? This heart-lotus is
by an effort made to turn upwards and there the petals spread towards the eight directions.
Says the great Aghora Sivam. "Idapingalabhyam samyuktham Adho mukha padma mukhula
yuktham Sushiraroopam sushumnam sanchinthya." The Sushumna Nadi near the cavity of
Page 25 of 53
the heart with the Ida and Pingala nadis on its sides are in the form of a lotus having its cone
turned downwards. Instead of allowing the breath to escape outwards through the nostrils,
by a sustained effort the breath must be directed to reach the dwadasantha. Then the cone
is turned upwards.
Looking at the tip of the nose and not noticing the quarters, restraining the breaths and
sitting motionsless like a rock, the Yogi should contemplate on Siva with this Amba in the
temple of his heart. In the midst of the heart-lotus he should adore the Lord by means of
Dhyana yajna. Him who is Thumb-sized void of malas, shining everywhere, who is of the
form of the flame of a lamp (Deepasikhakahram). Thus it is clear that the linga is the pillar of
fire supposed to rise from the heart lotus similar to the lingas which we see situated in the
actual lotus flowers. The word "Angustamahtra roopam" in the above quotation from the
Vayu samhita reminds us of the "Sabdadeva Pramithaha" Soothra in the Brahma Soothras.
(1st Adhyaya).
Page 26 of 53
"Katavalyam asya vishaya srooyathe 'angushta mahthraha purusho madhya atmani
Thishtathi Isano bhootha bhavyasya. Thatho navijugupsathe...............Paramesvara eva
angushta mahthra Ithi yuktham ......... katham paramesvare parichinnathvam
abhyasyamahnam upapadyatha ithiyatha ah ha soothram Hridyapekshayathu
Manushyadhikahrathvath aparichinnasyahpi paramesvarasya angushtamathrathvam
upahsaka Hridayapekshaya. Manushyadhikarath vahth upahsanah sastra vidhihi
manushyanahm Hridyam yahvath pramahnam Tadavichinnam roopam paramesvaraha
paramakarunikaha parigruhnathi Tadupahsanah siddhaye thathaha Paramesvaraha
Jyothirmayo Linga roopathayo pahsakahnam Hridaya madhye thishtathi ithi nischayahn."
We will briefly summarise this. The subject matter of this Sutra is a text of the
Katavalli upanishad wherein the Lord is denoted by the word Isana and is said to be
"Thumb-sized". The prima facie view that Jiva is here meant by the term "Angushta mahtra"
is refuted and it is concluded that Paramesvara is denoted by the term "Angushta mahtra."
The Lord Isana is unlimited. How can He be termed Angushta mahthra (Thumb-sized)? He is
not limited. The heart of man is of the size of a thumb. Paramesvara, the merciful Lord is
pervading it; for the purpose of accepting the worship of the worshiper, He is present in that
Thumb-sized heart. Therefore it is concluded that Paramesvara as Jyothirmaya is in the form
of a Linga within the heart of the worshippers (upahsuka)" Mark well that the Lord is
Jyothirmaya and is in the shape of a Linga. Thus it is clearly seen that the Jyothi, the form of
the flame of a lamp, is the Linga in the heart lotus.
Engrave a lovely shape of a lotus in gold or with precious stones according to one's
circumstances and amidst the kesaras establish a small Lingam of the size of a thumb. Why
should it be conceived as thumb sized? The word Dahara itself means small. Says the
Katavalli 'Thasyacha Oordhvam Pranamunnayathi Apahnam prathyagasyathi Madhye
Vahmanamahsinam Visvedevah Upasathe." The Prana goes upwards, the Apahna goes
downwards and within the narrow space rests the small being worshipped by all Devas. The
Mahopanishad too has the following.
Page 27 of 53
"Angushta mahthraha purusho angushtam cha Samahsrithaha Isa sarvasya Jagathaha
prabhuhu preenahthi visvabhuk."
Isa is thumb sized and He resides in the thumb-sized heart and being Jyothi devours all. This
mantra is but a continuation of the mantras. "Prahnahnahm grandhirasi Rudro ma
Visanthaga - Thennannena Apyahyasva" Oh Rudra, thou art the knot of all pranas showing
here that the form of the Lord is very small. This mantra too is a continuation of the
mantras.
"Pranenivishto amritham Juhomi sivo ma visa apradahaya pranaya swaha, apahene nivishto
amrutham Juhomi sivo ma visa apradahaya apahmaya swaha, vyane nivisho amrutham
Juhomi sivo ma visa apradahaya vyahnaya swaha, udahne nivishto amrutham Juhomi sivo
ma visa apradahaya udanaya swaha, samahne nivishto amrutham Juhomi sivo ma visa
apradahaya samanaya swaha, Brahmani Ma Atma amruthathvaya."
Thus the Lord, the thumb-sized, is denoted by the names SIva, Rudra, Brahma, Isa and Isana.
By the Thumb-size we mean this Linga form which is of the form of the flame of a lamp
(Deepa sikha krithi). Of course Sankara, Ramanuja and others take the above Katavalli Sruthi
as the subject matter of the Sutra "Sabdadeva pramithaha." They similarly describe in the
Daharadhikaranam the heart as a lotus by quoting the chandogya text. If Ramanuja accepts
the heart as a lotus, should he not think that lotus must contain a linga as well as we find
lingas in actual lotuses and should not the thumb-size refer to the Jyothirmaya linga of that
heart lotus? We do not wish to question further.
To resume our subject, Srimad Appayya Dikshita observes in the Pancharatna Sthava thus:
His own Lingakara (the shape of linga obtained in the temples) is ibtained in the Hridayabja
(heart-lotus) which being bound in a small space (Arbhaka okaha as the Suthra asserts) has
the size of a thumb. Here the Deekshita yogi quotes the Hamsopanishad to prove the expicit
existence of a linga in the lotus:- and continues thus.
Page 28 of 53
roopathvamapi Brahmaikanthikan Thallingamithi thathopi Lingasya Parabrahmatva
siddhiraprathyooha."
"In the Vayusamhita in the chapter in which it dwells upon the rising of Mahalinga, it is thus
said. To the right side if this flaming Linga (jvala-linga) rests A and to the left side rests U and
M rests in the midst and in the top of the Linga, it is heard that Nada rests:- Therefore from
a consideration of the Katavalli Sruthi whose import is the same as that described in the
Hamsopanishad, the Linga roopathvam, having the Nada for its top which nada is the source
of the World, stands for the Parabrahmam which it represents. This theory is unassailable"
and elsewhere the Revered Deekshita points out.
The soothrakara (Vyasa) explicitly shows that Siva is parambrahma both by means of the
appellation "Isana" and the Lingaroopa (Shape of Linga) which depicts the Thmubsize in the
heart-lotus." Here we will point out that the Soothrakara in considering the subject matter
of the Soothra 'Sabdahdeva - pramithaha" takes Sabda to mean "Isana Sabda" and does not
take other words such as Purasha. By "Sabda" he means only the "Isana Sabda." The subject
matter as we pointed out is 'Angushta mahtraha Purusho madhya Atmani thistathi:- Isano
Bhootha Bhavyasya." Here the term Isana is both yoga and Roodhi." If the word be taken as
yoga alone as meaning a "Ruler of past and present," then there will be nothing peculiar in
the word "Isana as the word by which the Supreme Lord is denoted will be frustrated. Hence
the word "Isana" is not a simple yoga word but is "roodhi" as well:- After all, the heart-lotus
must explicitly contain a Linga and if not where is the warrant to think that the heart-lotus
alone is devoid of a linga? This Linga, as was already described, is the jyothi, or jwala ot
Thejas or the Deepa Sikhakruthi. As followers of Vedas we should admit that this "jyothi" is
to be sought after as existing in Atma:- The Chandogya says "Yadidamasmin Anthaha
Purushe jyothihi" and in the jyothiradhikarana, Sankara, the champion of the Nirvisesha
theory, observes that by jyothi in Man jataragni cannot be meant. Observes he
"sarvagathasyapi Brahmanaha upasanartham Pradesa Viseshadinam upadhi sambdandhath
Praikalpane Virodhabhavenacha jyothischa Sruthihi Brahma paraiva ithi Siddhanthaha."
Though the Brahman is everywhere, still for the purpose of being worshipped, He takes
Page 29 of 53
after the form wherein He is present. And here there is no contradiction. Therefore the
jyothi sruthi means only Brahma. Again sruthi says.
"Vime karnah Pathathopi chakashur vadim Jyothir Jridaye ahitahm yath" Satyam
gnanam anantham Brahmo yo Veda nihithau, Guhahyam" Hridayakasa mayam kosam
anandam paramalayam Hiranmayapare kose Virajam Brahma Nishkalam"
These srtuhis declare that the jyothi is to be found in the Hridaya pundarika, and this jyothi
must be the linga of the heart-lotus.
When we speak of God as Light, we mean that He is chaitanya and we have shown that this
light is the linga of the heart lotus; and the Linga Sooktha texts in the Vedas clearly explain
this.
Here the Linga is called Oordhva-linga, because as a pillar of fire it climbs upwards. It is
Hiranya, because it has the appearance of molten gold. It is Suvarna because of its shining
appearance. It id Divya Linga because it stands as the Emblem of Divinity. It is Siva linga
because it represents Siva. It is called jwala Linga because of its sparkling nature. It is called
Atma linga because it rests as the linga of the heart lotus of man. It is called Parama linga
because it symbolises "Infinity and Eternity." A phallus cannot be termed Jvala, Hiranya,
Page 30 of 53
Parama, Suvarna, Divya and Atma. Maharshi Bodhayana in his Mahanyasa etc., uses these
Mantras as the Anga of Sri Rudram." There are also khila riks to describe the nature of Linga.
The khila Riks are as authoritative as the riks themselves if we give credit to Manu who says
One should recite the Vedas, the dharmas, the Akhyanas, the Ithihasas, the Puranas and
khilas during Sraddhas. The riks are:
True, Great, Eternal. This unchanging form. This alone is the shape Linga. Brahma and
Vishnu were quarrelling and there arose in their midst a great fire.
In the beginning for a conception of the Absolute Brahmam the Nishkala Linga arose. Let
this Nishkala (void of parts being a huge pillar) pillar, which proclaims "My Brahmatva stand
as my mark or sign or symbol because it possesses the characteristics necessary for
symbolising eternal Brahm."
Page 31 of 53
He the Nishkala, became a dreadful huge pillar of fire in the midst of Brahma and Vishnu.
"What is this wonderful form? Why arose this huge pillar of fire which is inconceivable to all
our senses? Let us try to find out its top and bottom." So spoke the two among themselves.
The Lord says "Did I not appear formerly in the form of a pillar?" (Note here that the author
says that the Lord Himself became a pillar or took the form of a pillar, not that his
generative organ was found there. "Aham stambha roopena Avirasam." I appeared in the
form of a stambha). This Beginningless and Endless Sthamba Pillar will dwindle into an atom
so that the world may gaze at it and worship it. "First as a pillar and then as a figure (roopa)
did I appear." Another Samhita Says:
In the three worlds this terrible form of a huge flame settled as a pillar whose top, middle
and bottom are unknown. It has no similitude. It is immeasurable. "Let us see the Grand
Lingam of flame which is of itself shining amidst the Ocean." Thus said Brahma and Vishnu.
This endless Linga form studded with streams of flaming beams. Within that Linga is the
figure adorned with the crescent moon. In the midst of the vast Ocean this High terrible
Linga"- These are upabrahmanas of the text in the Ambasyapare portion of the
Mahopanishad.
His top, middle and bottom are not known. His form is not cognizable to our eyes. No man
has seen it with his eyes. He is grasped by the Mind. His name is the "Great Glory."
Page 32 of 53
of a pillar. That form being subtle is called jyothi roopa. "This flaming Linga is formed of
Pranava. A rests to its right side, U in the left and M in the middle.
This jyothi is the Eternal Brahmam "jyothirjvalathi Brahma hamasmi" "Aham Visvam
Bhuvanamapyabhavahm Suvarna jyptheehi" "jyothi sparkles. I am therefore Brahm." I have
become the entire world. I am the shining jyothi."
It is the jyothi that Yogis in their Samadhi states and Videha Mukthi Avasthas realises and
become one with it. It is on realising this jyothi that the soul never returns.
So says the chandogya. "By ascending from this body and attaining the Grand jyothi. He
never returns, He never returns."
The Brahma Soothra Krith in his final sootra "Anavruthis sabdath Anavruthissabdath" refers
to this jyothi. By jyothi we must only take the thick cluster of the fiery beams; at least we
must so imagine it. As so many other things of the world this jyothi is a word of the physical
world. Only this is symbolically used for Brahmam. The common jyothi or Light removes
darkness. The Paramjyothi or God removes Agnana, the root of evil. the Brihadaranyaka
gives out this prayer. "Asathoma Sathgamaya Thamso ma jyothirgamaya Mruthorma
Amrutham Gamaya." From Asat lead us to Sat. From darkness (ignorance) lead us to Light
(God) and from death lead us to Immortality." The Siddhanta Saravali in the very first
address to God says 'Sivakhyam Akalam jyothihi Prapadye Dhiyah"- I contemplate on that
formless jyothi which is denoted by the name Siva. this jyothi form is not the form of a man
or a woman. It is of the form of "Fire." It is Deepasikhakruthi or of the shape of the flame of
a lamp (Vannisikhakahram). The jyothiroopam does not stand for the lustrous figure of a
man or a woman. We also think that Siva-Sakthi is in the heart. But we dare say that this
figure is imbedded within that linga form. The linga form is called Sakalanishkala. The Sakala
forms are only products of this Nishkala form.
Lingasya Madhye Ruchiram chandrasekhara Vigraham. The figure of the Lord as possessing
the crescent moon on the head is within the Linga. Therefore the Linga form alone is
denoted by the term jyothiroopam and not the figure of a man or awoman. In our ordinary
Siva-deekashas, any one who has the Samaya deeksha performed to him or any one who is
intiated with the Sripanchakshara mantra can know how the disciple is required when
performing karanyasa to hold both the palms of his hands in the form of a lotus bud which is
formed by the joining of the palms of the hands with a hollow inside so that the fingers of
Page 33 of 53
the one hand join with the fingers of the other hand; how the palms are then separated as if
to show the blowing of the petals and how the Sivah-sana is pointed by the thumb in the
place near the heart i.e. the chest, how Sivamoorthy is there contemplated. These are all
too many plain things. Again those who have had the curiosity to look at the "Lingadharana
ceremony of the Veera Saivas, whether they are done according to the Panditha achara or
the Basavachara, can see that the Linga is tied round the neck and is made to hang touching
the heart. Aradhya Acharyas like the Somanatha Aradhya and Panditha aradhya have
written treatises regarding the suspending of the Linga. The mantras and tantras used on
the occasion all describe the linga a part of the lotus. The Linga thus suspended has nothing
to do with the phallus. Is the heart the place for suspending the phallus?
Even the great Yagnavalkya when intiating Gargi into the secret of yoga says
Page 34 of 53
The Brahma pura is the heart. The heart lotus is the place of the Brahmam. Having thus
established the jyothiroopam as the Linga of the heart-lotus, it is our purpose now to show
what this jyothi is. In our quotation from the Vayu Samhita we said that to the right side of
the flaming linga rests in the top of the Linga. Now we all know that the combination of A,
U, M, and Nanda constitutes Pranava. In the Hamsopanishad we learnt that when the
Hamsa merges himself in Nada that state is called Thuriyatheetham. Yadah Hamso Nade
Vileenobhavathi Thath Thuriyatheetham. In the Sootha samhita "Gnana nahle Maha kande
Pranavena prabodhithe and in the Isvara gira we learn "(Omkara bodhitham tatvam)" and
Aghora Siva himself says "(Akaradi mahthrah thraya Yukthena Pranavena-jyothiroopam
samsthapya)" and in our quotation from poojastava we said "Hridpadmakhya Sivahlaye .......
Visuddha manasah, samsthapya Nahdathmana Lingam thatcha etc." What connection then
is there between the jyothi the Pranava or the Nada and the linga. All upanishads, the
Taithriya, the Chandogya, the Mandookya, the Prasna, the Swetasvatara, the Atharva sikha,
the Atharvasiras and the kaivalya upanishad are unanimous in describing the efficacy of the
Pranava Dhyana. "The body and soul are like the understicks of the sacrificial Arani while the
Pranava is the upperstick and the fire that is ignited consumes all pasas. "Atmanam Aranim
krithva-Swadeham Aranim krithva-Pranavam chotharahranim Dhyana nirmathanah
bhyasahth Pahsam Dahathi Pandithaha."
The Atharva sikha, which forms the essence of all the Vedas as the Sootha Samhita and the
Vayu Samhita assert, thus says
Page 35 of 53
In the beginning of creation the kutila (Pranava) stands in the form of kundali, a sleeping
serpent with its coils folded. In it sprang a sound (Nahda) and Bindu is kundalini itself.
"Sa Bindurith manthavyasaiva kundalinee mathah." The word kutila itself means "curved".
The Agamas assert that the two primary modes of pranava are Bindu and Nada. Of these
Bindu has the form of a cypher and the Nanda the form of a stick pr pillar. "Prathanam
Bindu Samyuktham Dwitheeyam Dandam Uchyathe." The Vayu Samhita asserts that Bindu is
of crescent form and Nada has the shape of the flame of a lamp.
"Ardha Chandrahkrithir Bindu Nahdo deepasikhahkrithihi." The form of the Bindu is and of
the Nahda is -------- or again the Bindu is ○ a cypher or dot . while the shape of Nahda is a
long line. Sometimes the serpent is viewed as sleeping. Then its coils will be folded. At that
time it is in the form of a circle, or when it is distributed a little, its coils are a little unfloded;
then the shape is a semi-circle or ardhachandrahkruthi. The conjunction of Bindu and Nahda
is formed like உ or like or like . The two joining together is called Ardha mahtra. While A, U,
and M have distinct sounds, the Ardha mahtra has a subtle sound. Hence it is called
Anahatha. Hence this ardhamatra is called Mownaksharam or the Silent Letter or as it is
called by Saint Thirumoolar ஊமை எழுத்து. Saint Pattanathar characterises it as பேசாத
மந்திரம் and வெட்டாத சக்கரம்.
Now we all know tha the symbol உ is called Pillayar-shuli and is written at the beginning of
any Tamil or Grantha work. All of us (Tamils) have been in the habit of writing such a symbol
at the commencement of any letter, but alas even here the western influence has made
itself felt. We are gradually losing our Pranava. People ignorant of the meaning of this
symbol have come to view it with disfavour to designate it as a sectarian symbol and in its
place to substitute ஸ்ரீ for which we have no warrant. We have authorities requiring us to
sound the Pranava or to contemplate on the Pranava at the commencement of any holy act
but we have yet to find authority for the use of the novel ஸ்ரீ. This simply shows that these
people have lost the Pranava and that they are far-removed from the Pranava. We will be
very glad if these people can cite authorities for the use of ஸ்ரீ or for the pranava being void
of Ardhamatra or for the ardhmahtra not being like உ. Such is the perverseness of man! If
the Pillaya-shuli is augmented with the A, U, and M, then the whole figure is the shape of
Ekadanta Ganesa - the head of an Elephant with one tusk. This also determines the
correctness of the South Indian Alphabets. For instance consider the vowels and consonants
of the Tamil language. We place dots over the consonant, but we do not do so in the case of
vowels. Why is this? We know that the vowesl are called உயிரெழுத்து or life letters and
that the consonants are called மெய்யெழுத்து or உடலெழுத்து body letters. We also
know that without the help of the vowel or உயிர் the consonants or உடல் cannot sound.
The relation between the vowels and consonants is like the relation which subsists between
Page 36 of 53
Atma and Deha. One is not derivable from the other. The consonants are not products of
the vowels even as the Deha (body) is not a product of Atma (soul). Still the consonants
depend upon the vowels for their sound. There will be no consonant without the help of the
vowels. The vowels partake of the nature of Nada. The consonants partake of the nature of
Bindu. Nada is one which has its own sound; this Nada does not depend upon any other for
its sound. But what is Bindu? The Bindu, though it has its own Mahtra or Sound, depends
upon the Nada for the very existence. The Nada is life and the Bindu is body. It is to show
that the Bindu is body or உடல் that we place dots over the consonants. The dots represent
the Bindu. The vowels need no such signs. Hence we do not use them in the case of vowels.
In the Sivalinga itself the peeta is called Bindu while the pillar is Nada. Hence the Vathula
Agama says 'Linga peeta prakahrena karmasadahkhya Lakshanam Nahdam Lingamithi
jneyam Binduh Peetam udahrutham Nahda Binduyutham roopam karma sadakaym
uchyathe," The karma sadakhya is siva-linga. The peetam is Bindu and the Linga is Nadam.
The combination of Nada and Bindu is karmaroopam. The Vidyesvara Samhita says "Bindu
Nadatmakam Sarvam jagatha sthavara jangamam. Bindu sakthi Sivo Nahda
Sivasakthyahthmakam jagath. Nadahdharam idam Bindu Bindvahdharam idam jagath
jagadadharabhoothouhi BinduNadow Vyavasthithou." The Gnana Siddhi says Gnanenathu
kriyothpannam Thadroopam Bindu ruchyathe. The entire world is formed of Bindu and
Nada. Bindu is Sakthi and Nada is Siva. The whole world is Sivasakthi mayam. The Bindu is
dependant upon Nada. The world is dependant upon Bindu. Therefore Nada and Bindu are
the Adhara, (Substratum) of the wordl mobile and immobile things.
Thus the Linga being Nada partakes of the nature of உயிர் and the Peeta
being Bindu partakes of the nature of மெய். The relation betwen linga and peeta is
exactly the same as that between உயிர் எழுத்து and மெய்யெழுத்து? What is the
realtion between the உயிர் எழுத்து and மெய்யெழுத்து. Tholkappiar, that sage who
flourished 7000 years before Panini describes this in the Sutras மெய்யினியக்கம்
அகரமொடு சிவனும் and மெய்யின் வழியதுயிர்தோன்று நிலையே and
Nachinarkiniyar, the commentator, likens this to the undifferentiated condition of salt and
water, and of finger and finger. Observes he " முன்னின்ற சூத்திரத்தான்
மெய்முன்னர் நிற்ப உயிர் பின் வந்தேறுமென்றார் அம்முறையே யோசையும்
பிறக்குமென்றார் இதனால் மாத்திரைக்கொள்ளுங்கால் உப்பு நீரும் போல
Page 37 of 53
வொன்றேயாய் நிற்றலும், வேறுபடுத்துங்கால் விரலும் விரலுஞ்சேர
நின்றாற்போல வேறாய் நிற்றலும் பெற்றாம்."
The vowel has 1 matra and the consonant has half matra. The vowel and the consonant
both combined should have 1+½or 1½matras. But the matra actually obtained is only one
---- not 'one and a half'. Hence the commentator says 'மாத்திரைக்கொன்றாங்கால்
ஒன்றேயாய் நிற்றலும்.'
The matra for அ is one and matra for க is also one, though க் (the consonant) has half
mahtra. But has the vowel become the consonant? Yes in a sense it has become the
consonant and yet remains distinct as the அ in க remains distinct from க். This is the
relation of God and Soul in mukthi. This is the view of the author of the Vedantha Sutras
when he says that God alone has the power of creation and not the soul, who can only
enjoy Divine Bliss. "Bhoga matra Samya Lingath" (the 4th pada) உம்பர்பிரான்
உற்பத்தியாதிகளுக்குரியன் உயிர்தானும் சிவானுபவம் ஒன்றினுக்கே யுரித்து
(Siddhiar).
This is the view of the Upanishads when they proclaim "that a person intent on the dulcet
sounds of a vina hears nothing but the sound of Vina" etc. This is also the view of the
Gitacharya when he says "such a man never dies in me." Such an advaitic* [* Saint
Arulnandisivam defines Advaitam as " ஒன்றாய் நின்றவன்னிலையில்
ஒன்றாகாமலிரண்டாகாமல் ஒன்றுமிரண்டு மின்றாகாமல்"(இருபாஇருபஃது)]
union is proclaimed by the union of Linga and peeta or of Nada and Bindu or of உயிர் and
மெய். We said that Nada has its sound and Bindu produces shape. 'Nada (sound) produces
Bindu (shape)' is a scientifically demonstrable truth. So every sound is represented in a
shape. The first distinct sound is only அ or Akahra. The next sound is only இ ikahram and
the next sound is only உ ukahram. Of course we leave the long vowels out of consideration.
The அ + இ is எ and அ + உ is ஒ. The sequence or order is in the formation of sounds. But
where is the order in the pronunciation of the characters A, B, C, D, or in Aliph, Be, Se, The?
In pronouncing our Hindu letters, we give them certain shapes. These shapes are formed as
we pronounce them. Thus the shape of அ or A is what is formed in the pronunciation of the
sound அ. So is இ and so is உ. Of course the characters of the present day alphabet are not
what Tholkappiar gives in his immortal Grammar. The Sivagamas assert that from the
Page 38 of 53
bottom of the evolving Bindu tatva Ambika Sakthi is produced, from her issue three sakthies
Vama, Jyeshta and Rowdri. Vamah is of the form of a slumbering serpent. Jyeshta is
dandakara or a line. Rowdri has the shape of two horns (or brackets) - (கொம்பு). A
combination of these Sakthies produces the letter Akahara or the primary sound. In Akahra
Rowdri Sakthi is the head. Vamah the face, Ambika the hands, Jyeshta the long body, Of
course the Bindu and Nada are the tatvas, out of which these 3 kalas of Pranava are formed.
Thus according to the Agamas, every alphabet, vowel or consonant, is formed out of one or
more of the Nava Sakthis, Vama, Jyesta etc., that evolve out of Bindu and Nada, the Bindu
being a dot or a star or zero and the Nada being a line. The Pranava which comprises within
itself the entire alphabets of 51 letters is the only letter in which the entire 9 sakthis
conjointly play their part in producing its shape. Kalidasa thus describes the truth "Vyomethi
Bindurithi Nadaithi Indurekha roopethi Vakbhava thanoorithi Mathuruketh
Nishyandamahna sukhabodha Sudhaswaroopam Vidyothase Manasi Bhagyavatham
Jananam." The Vyoma is the sky or Akas. The Bindu is the Star, the Nada is the form of linear
lightning: the Indurekha is the various shapes of the waxing and waning moon, the
Vakbhava thanu is the body produced out of the Vaks (speech) Vaikari Madhyama,
Pasyanthi, Sookshma and Su-Sookshma which are but products of Kutila or Kundalini which
is a compound of A,U,M, Bindu and Nada. Of these 5 Vaks the Susookshama is Gnanaroopa
and the Sookshma is the originator of the 3 Vaks Pasyanthi, Madhyama and Vaikari. The
pasyanthi is Nirvikalpa (changeless) and Madhyama is Savikalpa (changing) and Vaikari is
Srothra Vishaya or the audible sound.
Vaikari is the grossest and it is caused by the udana Vayu and Prana Vayu. The Madhyama
Vak is not audible. It rests in the throat but still the Will cognizes it.
It is generated by the Prana Vayu and not by the Udana. The Pasyanthi Vak is
an undifferentiated condition of the various sounds or rather their substratum. These 5
kalahs (subtle) guide the 5 sthoola kalah Nivruthi, Prathishta Vidya, Santhi and
Santhiatheetha. There is thus here an attempt, to connect the heavenly regions with inner
organisms of the human body. A link is forged between astronomy and physiology both of
them finally merging in the Divine Philosophy of Oneness.
Page 39 of 53
The Agama says "Siva Sthithassarvajanthoonam Aksharanam Akahravath". Just
as the letter (sound) அ (A) stands among the letters (sounds), so Siva stands with reference
to all the souls. In the Devara hymn the immanence of the Lord is described as
இழைக்குமெழுத்துக்குயிரேயொத்தியால், just as the vowel induces the consonant;
and sage Thiruvalluvar says அகரமுதலவெழுத்தெல்லாமாதி
பகவன்முதற்றேயுலகு and says the sage Thayumanavar
அவ்வுயிர்போலெவ்வுயிருமாகி.
The above explanations are necessary in view of the fact that the Pranava is the chief or
Tharaka Mantra the efficacy of whose dhyana is so gloriously described in all the upanishads
and Agamas. We alluded to the Tamil alphabets in as much as the vowels and consonants
Page 40 of 53
therein are characterised உயிர் and மெய் and as the phonetic order is complete there, for
instance there are short எ and ஒ but in Sanskrit we have only long ஏ and ஓ and we cannot
conceive of long ஏ and long ஓ without the short எ and short ஒ, just as we cannot have a
long ஆ without the short அ. In other respects the rules mentioned in the Panini's grammar
may equally apply. Thus it is clear that all the shapes of the sounds have their origin from
the Divine Kutila whose Kalahs are the nine Sakthis that they are derived only from the Nada
and Bindu which constitute the Ardha mahtra of the Pranava.
This Ardha matra is the entire Siva linga, the peeta representing the Bindu and
the Linga the Nada. In the succeeding pages we will describe how the Sivalinga is the shape
or Yanthra of the sound Pranava. Only when we understand the realtion between the Linga
and Peeta or the உயிர் and உடல் or the vowels and consonants, we can have a
conception of the Pranava Linga being characterised as the symbol of the Divinity. Else mere
assertion that the Pranava is all and that the Linga is all will be a conundrum.
The same sacred books current in the South and in the North describe the Prabha or
திருவாசி of the divine forms and the shapes of Ganesa and Linga as pranava. We see no
actual difference in the shapes of Ganesa and Linga as sculptured in the North and South.
The long story of Ganesa as the offspring of two pranava kunjaras (elephant) Siva and Sakthi
(Nada and Bindu) is found in the Skandapurana. Of course any northern edition of the same
may be compared with that in the south. The Agamas give lucid explanations of the shapes
of Alphabets from A to Ha. The 51 Aksharas are the forms of Rudras. These Aksharas are the
seeds of the Lotus of Kutila. 'Panchasath rudra roopasthu- Panchasath Bija garbhitham," so
say the Agama and the Vayu Samhita. We are told in the Santhana Agama that these
Agamas were taught in the mutts that were once situated on the banks of the Ganges.
These mutts were known by the names of Mandahnakahlisa in the middle and Ahmardakee,
Golaki, Ranabhadra and Pushpagiri on the 4 sides. This shows that the alpabet as it prevailed
in the South was also extent in the north for a long time and that the men in the North lost
them with the influx of time and subject to the influence of various marauding nations such
as the Greeks, the Scythians, the Huns, the Mughals and Afghans etc, as at the present day
they are fast losing the pronunciation and nay the very language itself.
Anyhow we see that the Nada and Bindu form part and parcel of the Holy Pranava. These
two constitute Ardhamatra. The Siva Dharmottara says "Athavahnya Prajahrena Brahma
Vishnu Mahesvara kramath Mahthra Samuddhistah Tathparaschahrdhamahtrayah" and the
Vayu Samhita says "Evam Thisrubhire vaithath Mahthrabhirakhilam Tridha Abhidaya
Page 41 of 53
Sivathmahnam Bhodhayathyardha mahthraya". Thus the Ardhamatra is above the three
matras A, U, and M. The Atharva Sikha explicitly speaks of Ardhamatra and its connection
with Nada.
The 27th chapter of the second part of Vayu Samhitha treats of this Atharva sikha and the
rising of the Mahalinga.
Brahma and Vishnu began to fight. To put down their pride and to enlighten them, a grand
lingam arose amidst them, a wonderful lingam symbolising Isvara, shining with thousands of
fiery beams, an immeasurable, and unrivalled form void of decay and growth, as well as
beginning, middle and end. Brahma and Vishnu were quite stunned with the multitudes of
fiery-beams.
Page 42 of 53
Vedathmana thadavyaktho Pranavo Vikruthim gathaha
Then they prostrated before it and began to muse about its nature. But they could not. Then
the Mantra, the one Akshara, Omkara, which depicts the Supreme Brahm, with Nada, the
primary essence of sound, took shape. That too was not understood by Brahma and Vishnu,
their minds being overpowered by Rajas and Tamas. Then that word divided itself into 4
divisions, viz., A, U, M, and the Ardhamatra beyond them. Then the Matra leant towards the
right side of the Linga, U leant towards the left side, while M leant towards the middle. The
Nada which is called Ardhamatra, went to the top of the Linga. Even when this Great Word
Pranava thus divided itself, still they could not understand.
Then the Pranava changed itself into Veda. A became Rik, U became Yajus, and M became
Sama, the Nada became the Atharvana:
Then Rik stood up and began to dwell upon its import in brief. Of the gunas Rajas; among
moorthis Brahma; of actions creation; of worlds earth; of tatvas Atma tatva; of Kalahdvas
Nivruthi; of 5 mantras sadyojatha mantra; of the portions of Linga the bottom; of the 3
causes the seed; of the Anima and other prosperities 64 prosperties which pertain to
Buddhi; in this manner by means of these ten kinds, the Rik pervades the universe."
Page 43 of 53
Satvam guneshu Vishnumcha Moorthishvadyam Kriyasvapi
Then the Yajus established its own ten kinds. Of Gunas Satva; of Moorthis Vishnu, of action
Sthithi or Protection; of worlds the Anthariksha; of tatvas Vidya tatva; of kaladhvas
Pratishta; of the 5 mantras Vamadeva mantra; of the Linga portions the middle part of the
three causes the yoni (uterus); of the prosperities the prosperities which pertain to
Prakruthi; in this way the universe is Yajurmaya."
Then stood up the Sama-veda and dwelt upon its own ten divisions. Of gunas Thamas; of
Moorthis Rudra; of actions Samhara (dissolution); of worlds Swarga; of tatvas Siva tatva; of
kalahs Vidya kala; of 5 mantras the Aghora mantra; of the portions of Linga the upper part
of the Peeta; of the three causes the Beeji (the man); of the prosperities the prosperities of
Purusha tatva; Thus the Sama Veda pervades this universe.
Page 44 of 53
Tadhoordhvam unmana lokahth Soma lokamalowkikam
Page 45 of 53
Yasmath Gareeyasee thasmath visvam vyaptham Atharvanah."
Then the Atharva Veda dwelt upon its own import. Nirguna (of gunas); of Moorthis
Mahesvara and Sadasiva; of actions of the Paramatma, Siva who is void of any action
(nishkriyah) the Anugraha (Blessing) function by which all souls ae liberated, among Lokas
(worlds) the Somaloka where the Lord with Uma ever rests, the abode without reaching
which the speech along with the Mind has returned, which is (therefore) beyond the
Unmana loka, reaching which one will never return; of Kalas the Santhi, Santhi Atheetha and
Vyapika, of the 5 mantras the tathpurusha and Isana Mantras; of the portions in the Linga
the top of the Linga which is the portion for Nada where the Lord Siva who is simply
Nishkalah is to be contemplated; of the tatvas, that Tatva which transcends the Bindu, Nada
and kutila and beyond that tatvam which is really no tatva; of the causes, itself transcending
the three causes being simply the agitator of Maya, transcending Anantha and the
Suddhavidya, transcending the Mahesvara, the Lord of all Vidyesvaras, transcending even
Sadasiva, whose body is formed simply of Mantras, in whom rests the three Sakthis Icha,
Gnana and Kriya, who has five heads and ten hands who is the Sakala-nishkala transcending
Bindu, Ardhachandra, nirodi, Nada and Nadantha, transcending sushumnesa and
Brahmarandresa, transcending even the Sakthi tatva and Siva tatva, He is himself the
causeles cause, Sivam, the grand cause, the resort of all causes, the unifier of all causes and
the one to be contemplated upon, the Lord in the midst of chidakasa, the Lord transcending
all Atmas; (of prosperities) possessing all aishvaryas (omniscience and other 7 qualities)
being Sarvesvara and having no Isvara for Him, transcending the prosperities of Asuddha
Maya the prosperities of men, transcending the lower prosperities and all the higher
prosperities of Suddhadhavas, transcending the prosperities of Suddhavidya and anmana,
which possess the beginningless Aishvaryas which are limitless, the like of which cannot be
found anywhere, the transcendental aishvaryas which "are ever existent".
Thus the Atharva demonstrated its ten divisions by which it pervades the universe."
Yenahamatmathathvasya nithyamasmyabhidhayakaha
Page 46 of 53
Sahmachaha sushupthyakhyam evam sarvam mayochyathe
Again Rig Veda says: "By me is denoted the waking state. I am therefore the appellation for
ever of Atma tatva. Similarly the Yajur Veda says "By me is denoted the Swapna avastha
(dreaming state), as teh Vidya tatva which transforms itself into Bhogya (things consumable)
rests in me; The Sama says "By me is announced the state of Sushupthi and this is explained
by the Siva tatva." The Atharva Veda says. "I announce the state of Turiya and Turiyathita.
Therefore I am the condition that transcends all adhvas. The three bold divisions of Atma,
Vidya and Siva tatvas, which are the regions of the three malas (Anava, Karma and Maya),
comprise all Adhvas in them. They are of Three Gunas, capable of being accomplished by (a
knowledge of) the Trayee (Rik, Yajus and Sama) and capable of being tested or purified by
the persons desirous of padas (berths). The state of Turiya which transcends the Adhvas is
the blissful great condition (of the mukta). Being void of Thrigunas it is further beyond and is
Page 47 of 53
the purifier of adhvas. The Nada is the link that connects both i.e. the adhva and the state
beyond and Nadantha is my own sphere. Therefore my state which is independent is
preeminently supreme. Whatever substance there is in the world, that substance by the
conjunction of gunas proclaims the meaning of Pranava either in its entirety or
separateness. Therefore the Akshara (character) and one Mantra OM is designatory or
explanatory of all things. Therefore the Lord Siva creates the entire world by uttering the
word "Om".
Page 48 of 53
Pasu pasa mayasyasya prapanchasya sada pathim."
Not knowing this meaning both of you are fighting with each other. For enlightenment of
you both this Linga arose in your midst. Therefore the wise denote me by the syllable Om,
as Atharvana Veda just now explained to you.
Though the Riks, the Yajus, Samas along with their multitudes of branches spoke with their
own mouths still they did not last for a long time in their minds. All seemed to them like
phantoms in dream. Then for their enlightenment and the dispelling of their internal
darkness, all the truth proclaimed by the Vedas were engraved or imprinted in the Linga.
Seeing the above truth marked in the Linga, by the Grace of the Lord, whose symbol is Linga,
the two were enlightened. Hence the Lingathvam, state of being a linga, for the Linga -
which means symbols or Mark (அடையாளம்). As the Linga i.e. as all the truths are
marked or symbolised by this symbol, this is called symbol or Linga. As the Lord is the resort
of all the truths symbolized by the form of the Linga, He is called Lingi - literally one denoted
by Linga. This Linga depicts or inculcates the projection or creation of the entire universe
composed of pasa (non-material soul) and pasa (material) as well as their dissolution and of
the true condition of the Shaladvahs. Beyond that is the Nishkala of the Lord.
Thus it is clear that the Siva linga is Pranava engraved or sculptured. Siva linga is the yanthra
or the shape for Pranava. The Vidyesvara Samhita says:
I will now describe the order of the Linga. Listen to it. That alone is the Prime Linga which is
Pranava, the fulfiller of all desires. The Pranava form is subtle and this subtle form is
Nishkala. The linga written by one's hand is the pure Pranava Mantra. By imprinting the
Page 49 of 53
yantra Linga one should perform pratishta etc. This linga of Bindu and Nada is all the mobile
and immobile things.
Pranava (sound) is the Nada Linga of the self existent Lord. The Bindu Linga is yanthra or
shape of the Pranava and Pranava is formed of A, U, M, and beyond these is the one formed
of Bindu and Nada."
Again it says:
Page 50 of 53
Oh Yogindra, I now desire to hear of the appearance of linga. He says: When Brahma and
Vishnu were fighting in former times, for dispelling their delusion the Lord himself appeared
before them in the form of a huge pillar, void of parts. As it was marked with His mark it
became Linga. For the purpose of doing good to the world, He exhibited his own mark.
Thence forward the Nishkala forms the Divine symbol.
A, then U and M - these three in their order are called the three Mahtras. Beyond these is
the Ardhamahtra - oh Mahesani (Parvati) the Bindu and Nada constitute Ardhamahtra.
The letters A is Mahat (mind), Bija (Semen Virile), Rajas Brahma, the creator, the four faced.
The letter U is Prakruthi, Yoni (matrix) Satvam, Hari, the sustainer. The letter A is Purusha,
Beejee (the agent or Man) Thamas and Hara the destroyer. The Bindu is Mahesvara, Deva,
the Thirobhava. The Nada is Sadasiva is the Anugraha-doer. In the Summit of Nada Lord Siva
is to be contemplated.
The Samhita gives six interpretations or rather modes of viewing or understanding Pranava.
"Manthro yanthram Devatacha Prapancho Gururevacha Sishyascha Shat padarthanam
Page 51 of 53
Esham Artham Srunu priye." The six modes are Mantra, Yantra, Devata, Prapancha, Guru
and Sishya -Listen to their meanings.
The combination of 5 letters is called Mantra. The same obtains a shape or yanthra. I will
describe them. The Yanthra or shape is the form of Devata. The Devata is in the world. The
Guru is Visvaroopi. The disciple is the body of Guru.
Within the Heart lotus of eight petals shining with Kesaras and Karnika and upon a seat
formed of Adharasakti to the end of Atma Vidya and Sivatatvas - the Lord with His Sakthi is
to be contemplated by uttering the mantra Om.
Lord Subramanya thus initiates the great Sivadvaithin Vamadeva, who is mentioned in the
Aithareya upanishad and in the Brahma soothra "Sastra, Dhrushtyathoopadeso
Vamadevadivath.
"I will in detail describe the meaning of Pranava in six ways of modes of interpretation. The
1st interpretation is Mantra; the 2nd interpretation is yanthra; the 3rd interpretation is
Devatah; the 4th interpretation is prapancha; the 5 th is Guru (teacher) and the 6th is Sishya
(disciple). These are the six interpretations for the Pranava.
Page 52 of 53
"Thathra mantra Swaroopam the Vadami muni saththama - "Ahdyaswaro panchamascha
Pavarganthasthathapara Bindu mahdowcha pancharnah Proktha Vedairnachanyath Ethath
samashtiroopohi Vedadissamudahruthaha Nadassarva samashti syath Bindvadyam
yachathushtayam Vyashtiroopena samsiddham Pranave Siva Vachake."
Oh great Rishi, I will describe the nature of the Mantra. The primary sound A, the 5th sound
U, then the last sound in the pavarga (labials) i.e. M and the bindu and Nada - these are
denoted by the Vedas as constituents of Pranava. A combined form of these 5 sounds is
called the source of Vedas. The Nada is called Samashtipranava of all the various component
parts, while Bindu, M, U and A, are called Vyashtipranava of the Pranava which designates
Siva."
"Yanthra roopam srunu prahjna Siva Lingam Thadevahi Sarvadhasthath Likheth Peetam
thadoordvam prathamam svaram uvarnamcha thadoordhvasitham Pavargantham
thadoordhvagam. Thanmastha kustham Bindumeha thadoordhvam Nadamahlikheth. Evam
yanthram samah likhya Pranavenaiva Veshtayeth. Taduth thenaiva Nahdena
Bhindyahanadavasahuakam."
Oh wise one! listen to the form of the yanthra. That is only Siva linga. At the bottom of all,
the peeta must be written, above it should be written the first sound A, the letter U should
be written above it. Then M should go above that; on the top of that the Bindu and above it
should be written the Nada. Thus writing the yanthra it must be encompassed also with
Pranava and must cleave it asunder by means of the previously described Nada. The figure
thus formed will give Siva linga.
{ Source: www.shaivam.org}
Page 53 of 53