Samson Vs CA

Article IX-B.

THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

Section 2.
2. Appointments in the civil service shall be made only according to merit and fitness to be
determined, as far as practicable, and, except to positions which are policy-determining,
primarily confidential, or highly technical, by competitive examination.
Samson vs. Court of Appeals, 145 SCRA 654
Section 5 of RA 2260: Non-competitive service shall be composed of positions expressly
declared by law and those which are policy-determining, primarily confidential or highly
technical in nature Among those included in the enumeration are heads of departments
created in charters of cities and secretaries of provincial governors, city mayors and municipal
mayors.
Facts: Talens, a civil service eligible, was appointed by then City Mayor Asistio of Caloocan
City, as Assistant Secretary to the Mayor. His appointment was attested to as a permanent one
under the Civil Service Law. The succeeding mayor, Samson, issued Administrative Order No. 3
(AO 3), terminating Talens on the ground of lack and loss of confidence. Talens demurred, on
the ground that only the positions of secretaries are specified as non-competitive under the
Civil Service Law. He asked that the administrative order be recalled as he was permanently
appointed to a classified position in the city government and that in accordance with the Civil
Service Law, he can be removed only for cause and after due process has been observed.
The Mayor declined to recall AO 3. He claimed that:
1. The position of Assistant Secretary to the Mayor is inherently and primarily highly
confidential in nature.
2. An assistant secretary is also a secretary, and thus comprised within the general term
secretaries.
A petition for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and quo warranto was filed with the Court of
First Instance by Talens in order to annul AO 3, enjoin its enforcement, and to compel the
payment of salaries due him as Assistant Secretary. He also sought the ouster of Liwag, who had
been appointed as his replacement. The CFI ruled in favor of Talens by declaring AO 3 null and
void, and granting all the reliefs claimed. On appeal, the CA affirmed the decision. Hence this
petition.
Issue: The legality of the termination of Talens services as assistant secretary to the Mayor of
Caloocan City
Decision: AO 3 is null and void, the termination is illegal.
As a general rule, positions in all branches, subdivisions and instrumentalities of the
government belong to the competitive service. The only exceptions are those expressly
declared by law to be in the non-competitive service and those which are policy-determining,
primarily confidential or highly technical in nature.
Rules of statutory construction: exceptions, as a general rule, should be strictly, but reasonably
construed; all doubts should be resolved in favor of the general provisions rather than the
exception.
The general purpose of the Civil Service Law (RA 2260) is to insure and promote the
constitutional mandate regarding appointment only according to merit and fitness, and to
provide within the public service a progressive system of personal administration to insure the
maintenance of an honest and efficient progressive and courteous civil service in the
Philippines.
1. The nature of the functions attaching to the position ultimately determines whether
such position is policy-determining, primarily confidential or highly technical. Stated
differently, it is not the powers and duties exercised and discharged that makes a
position primarily confidential. While duties possibly involving confidential matters are
sometimes handled by the Assistant Secretary to the Mayor, this does not necessarily
transform the nature of the position itself into one that is primarily and highly
confidential.
2. The position of Secretary to the Mayor and that of Assistant Secretary to the Mayor are
two separate and distinct positions. While both individuals may be called secretary,
nevertheless, one is certainly of a higher category and rank than the other. An assistant
secretary, technically differs in function from the Secretaries. An assistant merely
helps, aids or serves in a subordinate capacity to the person who is actually clothed with
all the duties and responsibilities of secretary. The functions strictly attributable to a
secretary and which would repose on such person the trust and confidence of the
employer, is not automatically vested or transferred to an assistant secretary.

Samson Vs CA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Samson Vs CA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Samson Vs CA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Article IX-B.

THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

You might also like