Rapid Response Process

On April 10, 2002, the Commission adopted a Rapid Response Process to address disagreements among competing carries, i.e. between FairPoint and a CLEC and between two CLECs. The Commission delegated to Staff, the Rapid Response Process Team (RRPT), the authority to resolve these complaints. In Order to participate in the RRP, a carrier must register with the Commission by providing a RRP Contact. As described more fully below, by filing a complaint, a CLEC agrees to be bound by the decisions of the RRPT and/or Commission and becomes subject to the penalties associated with failure to obey a RRPT decision.

Rapid Response Contacts
Company Name E-mail Phone Fax Address
Versant Power Arrian Stockdell [email protected] 207-973-2877    P.O. Box 932, Bangor, ME 04402-0932
Versant Power Jerrod Crouse [email protected] 207-973-2671    P.O. Box 932, Bangor, ME 04402-0932
France Telecom Corporate Solutions L.L.C. Joe Topel [email protected] 866-280-3726   13865 Sunrise Valley Dr., Coppermine Commons, Suite 425, Herndon, VA 20171-6190
CREXENDO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC Jeff Korn [email protected] 602-714-8500    
NETWORK INNOVATIONS, INC Ron Grason [email protected] 773-770-1350    
TIME CLOCK SOLUTIONS, LLC William Werner [email protected] 855-753-0941    
VELOCITY, A MANAGED SERVICES COMPANY, INC. William Werner [email protected] 419-868-9983    
Longhorn Steakhouse Richard Brophy [email protected] (207) 450-0267    
Somerville, Town Of Christopher Johnson, First Select Board Member, Chair [email protected] Direct: (207) 632-6066, Town Office: (207) 549-3828    
AGM Telecom Corp. Miemie Wong [email protected] 908-222-4070 908-222-4076 3602 Kennedy Road, S. Plainfield, NJ 07080
Axcess Internet Solutions, Inc. Adam Solomon [email protected] 212-683-9180 x 22 212-683-9181 149 Madison Avenue; Suite 805, NY, NY 10016
Axcess Internet Solutions, Inc. Anthony Goldstein [email protected] 416-815-1771 x 281 416-815-0044 366 Bay Street, 12th Fl Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Axiom Technologies LLC Susan Corbett [email protected] 207-255-0679 207-255-5825 3 Water Street Machias, ME 04654
BCN Telecom, Inc Kathleen Gorey [email protected] 908-470-4748 908-470-4707 550 Hills Drive, Bedminster, NJ 07921
Biddeford Internet Corporation d/b/a Great Works Internet Eric Samp [email protected] 207-602-1136 207-286-2061 8 Pomerleau Street Biddeford, ME 04005
Biddeford Internet Corporation d/b/a Great Works Internet Fletcher Kittredge [email protected] 207-602-1134 207-286-2061 8 Pomerleau Street Biddeford, ME 04005
Chebeague.net, LLC David R. Hill [email protected] 207-846-4850 207-939-9643 13 South Road, Chebeague Island, ME 04017
Choice One Communications of Maine LLC d/b/a One Communications Paula Foley [email protected] 781-362-5713 781-362-1313 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803
Conversent Communications of Maine LLC d/b/a One Communications Paula Foley [email protected] 781-362-5713 781-362-1313 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803
Cornerstone Communications, LLC Andrew H. Hinkley [email protected] 207-659-9900 207-285-1234 125 School Rd, St 2, POB 1 Charleston, ME 04422
CTC Communications Corp. d/b/a One Communications Paula Foley [email protected] 781-362-5713 781-362-1313 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803
Entrix Telecom, Inc. Carl Billek [email protected] 973-738-4854 973-438-1215 550 Broad Street
France Telecom Corporate Solutions LLC Leo Topel [email protected] 918-2370-8108 918-270-8298 13775 McLearen Road Mail Stop 1100, Oak Hill, VA 20171
Global Capacity Group, Inc. David Walsh [email protected] 866-226-4244 800-505-0037 730 North Post Oak Road, Houston, TX 77024
Global Capacity Group, Inc. John Abraham info@globalcapacity,net 866-226-4244 800-505-0037 730 North Post Oak Road, Houston, TX 77024
I-Link Communications, Inc. James A. Giauque [email protected] 801-576-5000 x 5028 801-576-5072 13751 S. Wadsworth Park Drive, #200, Draper, UT 84020
I-Link Communications, Inc. Tony Oxborrow [email protected] 801-576-5000 x 7115 801-576-5072 13751 S. Wadsworth Park Drive, #200, Draper, UT 84020
IDT America, Corp Carl Billek [email protected] 973-438-4854 9734381215 550 Broad Street
Lightship Telecom LLC d/b/a One Communications Paula Foley [email protected] 781-362-5713 781-362-1313 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803
MetroCast Cablevision of New Hampshire Josh Barstow [email protected] 603-527-3632 603-524-5190 9 Apple Road, Belmont, New Hampshire 03220
MetroCast Cablevision of New Hampshire Brad Kulacz [email protected] 603-524-4425 603-524-5190  
MetroCast Cablevision of New Hampshire Marc Sylvester [email protected] 603-330-7757 603-335-4106  
New Century Telecom, Inc. Karyn Bartel [email protected] 866-515-5142 866-515-5143 700-A Hembree Place, Roswell, GA 30076
New Century Telecom, Inc. Rosalba Bertolini [email protected] 866-515-5142 866-515-5143 700-A Hembree Place, Roswell, GA 30076
Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC d/b/a FairPoint Communications-NNE RoJean Tulk [email protected] 207-535-4248 207-642-7411  
Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC d/b/a FairPoint Communications-NNE Sarah A. Davis [email protected] 207-535-4188   1 Davis Farm Road, Portland, ME 04103
One Communications Paula Foley [email protected] 781-466-1220 781-622-2180 220 Bear Hill Road Waltham, MA 02451
OTT Communications Trina Bragdon [email protected] 207-992-9920 207-992-9243 900 D Hammond Street, Bangor, ME 04401
OTT Communications Ed Tisdale [email protected] 207-688-8270 207-699-3365 56 Campus Drive, New Gloucester, ME 04260
Oxford Networks Contact Dawna Hannan [email protected] 207-333-3455 207-333-3489 491 Lisbon Street, PO Box 7400 Lewiston, ME 04243-7400
Oxford Networks Contact Brian Paul [email protected] 207-333-3452 207-333-3489 491 Lisbon Street, PO Box 7400 Lewiston, ME 04243-7400
Revolution Networks Dawna Hannan [email protected] 207-333-3455 207-333-3489 491 Lisbon Street, PO Box 7400 Lewiston, ME 04243-7400
Revolution Networks Brian Paul [email protected] 207-333-3452 207-333-3489 491 Lisbon Street, PO Box 7400 Lewiston, ME 04243-7400
RNK Inc. Jim Palmisano [email protected] 781-613-6250 866-340-8416 333 Elm Street, Suite 310 Dedham, MA 02026
RNK Inc. Mark Fraser [email protected] 781-613-6224   333 Elm Street, Suite 310 Dedham, MA 02026
RNK Inc. Standford McMurty [email protected] 781-613-6116 781-297-2091 333 Elm Street, Suite 310 Dedham, MA 02026
segTEL, Inc. Kath Mullholand [email protected] 603-834-0676 530-937-9639 325 Mount SupportRoad Lebanon, NH 03766
segTEL, Inc. Jeremy Katz [email protected] 603-252-0216 603-643-9854 325 Mount SupportRoad Lebanon, NH 03766
segTEL, Inc. Carolyn Cole, Esq. [email protected] 603-676-8225 603-643-9854 325 Mount SupportRoad Lebanon, NH 03766
United Systems Access Telecom Michael Carbonneau [email protected] 207-467-8350 207-437-8341 5 Bragdon Lane Kennebunk, ME 04043
United Systems Access Telecom John Windhausen [email protected] 202-558-6164 202-558-5473 5 Bragdon Lane Kennebunk, ME 04043
XATel LLC Roland Lawler [email protected] 207-391-1000 207-283-0938 7 Green St., Biddeford, ME 04005
Zone Telecom, Inc. Daniel Boynton [email protected] 856-667-2550 856-414-6932 #3 Executive Campus, Ste. 520, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
Zone Telecom, Inc. Eamon Egan [email protected] 856-667-2550 856-414-6932 #3 Executive Campus, Ste. 520, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
Zone Telecom, Inc. Jill Papenhausen [email protected] 856-667-2550 856-414-6932 #3 Executive Campus, Ste. 520, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

RRPT Authority and Process

Types of Cases. The RRPT will have delegated authority from the Commission to hear cases that could be brought under 35-A M.R.S.A. § 1302. The RRP is intended to address disagreements among competing carriers regarding their obligations under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The RRP will not address complaints which require Commission findings or decisions which would result in substantial changes to major legal determinations or policy matters.

Necessity of Attempts to Informally Resolve Complaint. When the RRPT receives a complaint, it will first evaluate whether the carriers have made sufficient efforts to resolve the dispute informally before bringing a formal complaint to the Commission. The RRP is not a substitute for a carrier's escalation process. The RRP does, however, recognize that the escalation process itself could be the subject of dispute and completing every step is not a prerequisite for initiating a complaint. There is no bright line test; it will be the judgment of the RRPT. Complainants should exhaust as many informal channels as is possible and appropriate under the specific circumstances before filing a complaint under the RRP. When a complaint is filed, it should include a description of the informal attempts to resolve the problem.

Docketing of Complaints. When a complainant files a complaint, it should caption both the e-mail and the complaint document as follows: RRP - complainant company name - date the complaint is filed. All correspondence and other references to a particular complaint should reference the original caption. Complaints will only be given a PUC docket number if the RRPT issues a written decision. Once the PUC docket number is assigned, all correspondence should reference that number, e.g. any appeals to the full Commission.

Preliminary Findings. The RRPT will have authority to issue Preliminary Findings as outlined in 35-A M.R.S.A. § 1304 (5). A Preliminary Finding shall be defined as an order directing parties to take actions pending the final resolution of the proceeding. In determining whether to grant a preliminary finding, the RRPT shall consider the likelihood that the relief requested would be ordered at the conclusion of the proceeding, the benefit to the public or affected customers compared to the harm to the utility or other customers of issuing the order, and the public interest. In determining whether to grant preliminary relief, the RRPT will also consider the costs associated with complying with the Preliminary Finding and the willingness of the requesting party to reimburse all costs if the final decision is contrary to the Preliminary Finding. Either party may appeal an adverse Preliminary Finding to the full Commission.

Motion to Dismiss or Defer. The RRPT may dismiss or defer a complaint without prejudice and direct the parties to continue negotiations. The RRPT may indicate a date on which, if the parties have still not reached a resolution, the parties may refile the complaint with the RRPT. The RRPT may also determine that the issues in the complaint are policy issues that would be better served in the broader context of a Commission investigation. In that case, the RRPT will refer the matter to the Commission, and may also make a Preliminary Finding in the immediate case before the RRPT.

Either party may appeal to the full Commission a RRPT decision to dismiss a complaint.

Final Decision. The RRPT will have delegated authority from the Commission to issue any order that could be issued under 35-A M.R.S.A § 1306. All Final Decisions issued by the RRPT must be memorialized in a final written Order and docketed.

Appeal. All parties will have the right to appeal a final RRPT decision to the full Commission. Any such appeal must be filed with the Administrative Director of the Commission within five (5) days of the date the RRPT Final Order is issued. The full Commission will then affirm, overturn or remand the RRPT decision.

All parties will have the right to appeal a final order by the full Commission pursuant to 35-A M.R.S.A § 1320.

Penalties

Upon FairPoint's willful failure to comply with an order issued by the RRPT (or an RRPT order affirmed by the Commission), the RRPT may recommend to the Commission, and the Commission may impose, penalties up to $10,000 for the first occasion, up to $20,000 for a second willful failure to comply with the Order and up to $40,000 for any subsequent willful failures to comply with the same Order. Upon a CLEC's willful failure to comply with an order issued by the RRPT (or an RRPT order affirmed by the Commission), the RRPT may recommend to the Commission, and the Commission may impose, penalties of up to $1,000 per day.

Any RRPT penalties paid by FairPoint in a certain month will be deducted from the monthly cap level used for calculating any PAP penalties for the same month.

The filing of a complaint by the CLEC under the RRP constitutes the CLEC's consent to all provisions described above.

RFP PROCESS

Step 1

  • Complainant calls the RRP contact (listed above)
  • for the party with whom there is a dispute and gives notice that they are planning to file a complaint with the Commission Rapid Response Team the next business day.

Step 2 At least 1 business day following Step 1

  • Complainant files complaint electronically with RRPT. The email shall contain the appropriate caption for the complaint (name of company and date of filing), and the actual complaint shall be a document attached to the email.
  • A complaint shall contain sufficient information to indicate (1) the facts underlying the complaint; (2) the harm which is resulting or could result to the complainant due to the situation; (3) what specifically about the situation requires immediate redress; (4) a description of the steps which the parties have taken to resolve the situation prior to the filing of the complaint; (5) whether or not complainant is requesting a preliminary finding. The complaining party shall also indicate the times it will be available for a conference call on the 2nd business day after the complaint is filed. Copy of complaint is sent electronically to the RRPT ([email protected]) and the responding party contact.

Step 3 One business day following Step 2

  • Responding party acknowledges the complaint and provides times when the party will be available for conference call on the next business day. The party may respond to the factual issues in the complaint be dismissed or referred to the full Commission because it (1) is not ripe for review; or (2) is not a matter which should be addressed by the RRPT. The acknowledgement and any response shall be emailed to the RRPT and the complainant.
  • The RRT will schedule a time for the Preliminary Conference Call within 2 business days.

Step 4 Two Business days following Step 2

  • Preliminary Conference Call. The following may occur:
    • Responding party may provide oral response to complaint;
    • Deadline established for written response, if appropriate;
    • RRPT may request additional information from each party and set a schedule for its production;
    • RRPT may schedule follow-up telephone conference among the parties;
    • RRPT may issue a Preliminary Finding or dismiss the complaint; either party may appeal to the Commission an adverse Preliminary Finding or dismissal;
    • The issue may be resolved to both parties satisfaction.

Step 5 At a time determined by RRPT, a follow-up conference call will be held and the following may occur:

  • Parties will update RRPT on progress since last call;
  • Parties will discuss information provided in response to any RRPT requests from Step 4;
  • RRPT may issue a Preliminary Finding or dismiss the complaint; either party may appeal to the Commission an adverse Preliminary Finding or dismissal;
  • The issue may be resolved to both parties satisfaction;
  • RRPT may request written comments and/or schedule a Notice of Decision Call.

Step 6 If required by the RRPT, parties file comments at the appointed time.

Step 7 If required by RRPT, a final conference call is held and the following may occur:

  • RRPT hears closing argument from parties and issues oral decision.
  • RRPT hears closing argument from parties and schedules time for written decision.

Step 8 Final written decision is issued. Unless Final Order is stayed by RRPT, the Final Order remains in effect pending appeal.

Step 9 Within 5 business days after written decision is issued, a party may:

  • Appeal the Final Order to full Commission.
  • Request a stay of the Final Order pending appeal.