Hide IRShow include from Revise #56756
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Revise in theory wants to re-evaluate this include, but it fails at doing so, because the include call no longer works after bootstrap. It happens to work right now on master, because the lowering of `Compiler.include` happens to hide the include call from Revise, but that's a Revise bug I'm about to fix. Address this by moving the include call into the package and using an absolute include if necessary.
Keno
force-pushed
the
kf/reviseirshowinclude
branch
from
afe76b2 to
69b1872
Compare
aviatesk
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revise in theory wants to re-evaluate this include, but it fails at doing so, because the include call no longer works after bootstrap. It happens to work right now on master, because the lowering of
Compiler.includehappens to hide the include call from Revise, but that's a Revise bug I'm about to fix. Address this by moving the include call into the package and using an absolute include if necessary.