The State and Revolution
By V. I. Lenin and Antonio Negri
4/5
()
About this ebook
Lenin’s booklet The State and Revolution struck the world of Marxist theory like a lightning bolt. Written in the months running up to the October Revolution of 1917, Lenin turned the traditional socialist concept of the state on its head, arguing for the need to smash the organs of the bourgeois state to create a ‘semi-state’ of soviets, or workers’ councils, in which ordinary people would take on the functions of the state machine in a new and radically democratic manner.
This new edition includes a substantial introduction by renowned theorist Antonio Negri, who argues for the continued relevance of these ideas.
V. I. Lenin
V.I. Lenin (1870-1924) was a pivotal figure in twentieth century radical politics. He was a theoretician and the leader of the Russian Bolshevik Party. He wrote widely, authoring books such as Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (Pluto, 1996). His selected writings were collected in the volume Revolution, Democracy, Socialism (Pluto, 2008).
Read more from V. I. Lenin
Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The State and Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Is To Be Done? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Imperialism and War: Classic Writings by V.I. Lenin and Nikolai Bukharin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaterialism and Empirio-Criticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImperialism: A Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNot By Politics Alone: The Other Lenin Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lenin 2017: Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revolution at the Gates: Selected Writings of Lenin from 1917 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Day After the Revolution: Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revolution, Democracy, Socialism: Selected Writings of V.I. Lenin Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Collected Works, Volume 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Works, Volume 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Works, Volume 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Communist Manifesto / The April Theses Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Religion Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5‘Left-Wing’ Communism: An Infantile Disorder Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Works, Volume 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Communist Manifesto / The April Theses Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Imperialist War. Selected Writings: 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolution at the Gates: Selected Writings of Lenin from 1917 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Imperialism and the National Question Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Works, Volume 4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The State and Revolution
Related ebooks
The State and Revolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5In Defence of Lenin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFactory of Strategy: Thirty-Three Lessons on Lenin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchism and Socialism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe State and Revolution including full original text by Lenin Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Marxism to Post-Marxism? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5State and Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Permanent Revolution & Results and Prospects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHope and Marxism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStaging the People: The Proletarian and His Double Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsState, Power, Socialism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5October 1917 Revolution: A Century Later Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConfucianism and Autocracy: Professional Elites in the Founding of the Ming Dynasty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTen Days That Shook the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarxism: A Graphic Guide: A Graphic Guide Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lenin and Trotsky: What They Really Stood For Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistoriography: From the Hagiographic Novel to Predictive Science - Section II: The Coexistence of Two Historical Cycles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBolshevism: The Road to Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAngels and Demons: A Radical Anthology of Political Lives: A Marxist Analysis of Key Political and Historical Figures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dilemmas of Lenin: Terrorism, War, Empire, Love, Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fifteen Jugglers, Five Believers: Literary Politics and the Poetics of American Social Movements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutionary Collective: Comrades, Critics, and Dynamics in the Struggle for Socialism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Day After the Revolution: Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Removing the Stalin Stain: Marxism and the Working Class in the 21st Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Against All: Lenin and His Legacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRace, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History & Theory For You
The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Five Minds for the Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sublime Object of Ideology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Evangelicals: The Struggle to Shape America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince: Second Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Essential Chomsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nordic Theory of Everything: In Search of a Better Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Psychology of Totalitarianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5End of History and the Last Man Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5On War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wretched of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Theory of Justice: Original Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bloodbath Nation Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Consequences of Capitalism: Manufacturing Discontent and Resistance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origins Of Totalitarianism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Socialism . . . Seriously: A Brief Guide to Human Liberation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5That's What They Want You to Think: Conspiracies Real, Possible, and Paranoid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End Is Always Near: Apocalyptic Moments, from the Bronze Age Collapse to Nuclear Near Misses Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aristotle's Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReconstruction Updated Edition: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-18 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The State and Revolution
139 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Obviously The State and Revolution has had major historical impact. But it's the perverse product of an aggressive mind who is speaking without thinking clearly. Lenin misuses and abuses political terms--"dictatorship of the proletariat" comes to mind, since a dictatorship is leadership by one person, usually a military leader in times of crisis, and the proletariat is a class of people--and therefore his argument falls way short.
Book preview
The State and Revolution - V. I. Lenin
The State and Revolution
This title is one of a series published to commemorate the centenary of V. I. Lenin’s death. The others are as follows:
Imperialism and the National Question, V. I. Lenin
Lenin’s Childhood, Isaac Deutscher
The Lenin Scenario, Tariq Ali
Not by Politics Alone: The Other Lenin, edited
by Tamara Deutscher
The State and Revolution
The Marxist Theory of the State
and the Tasks of the Proletariat
in the Revolution
V. I. LENIN
Introduction by Antonio Negri
Introduction translated by Gregory Elliott
The text we have used in this edition was transcribed by Zodiac
and Brian Baggins and is available at marxists.org.
This paperback edition first published by Verso 2024
First published in English by International Publishers 1932
© Verso 2024
Introduction © Antonio Negri 2024
All rights reserved
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
Verso
UK: 6 Meard Street, London W1F 0EG
US: 388 Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11217
versobooks.com
Verso is the imprint of New Left Books
ISBN-13: 978-1-80429-284-6
ISBN-13: 978-1-80429-287-7 (US EBK)
ISBN-13: 978-1-80429-286-0 (UK EBK)
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Lenin, Vladimir Il’ich, 1870–1924, author. | Negri, Antonio, 1933 author of introduction.
Title: The state and revolution : the Marxist theory of the state and the tasks of the proletariat in the revolution / V. I. Lenin ; introduction by Antonio Negri ; introduction translated by Gregory Elliott. Other titles: Gosudarstvo i revoli . English
Description: New York : Verso, [2024] | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: LCCN 2023029345 (print) | LCCN 2023029346 (ebook) | ISBN 9781804292846 (paperback) | ISBN 9781804292877 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Marx, Karl, 1818-1883. | Socialism. | State, The. | Revolutions.
Classification: LCC HX314 .L3528313 2024 (print) | LCC HX314 (ebook) | DDC 320.1--dc23/eng/20230706
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023029345
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023029346
CONTENTS
Introduction by Antonio Negri
Preface to the First Edition
Preface to the Second Edition
1: Class Society and the State
I. The State: A Product of the Irreconcilability of Class Antagonisms
II. Special Bodies of Armed Men, Prisons, etc.
III. The State: An Instrument for the Exploitation of the Oppressed Class
IV. The ‘Withering Away’ of the State, and Violent Revolution
2: The Experience of 1848–51
I. The Eve of Revolution
II. The Revolution Summed Up
III. The Presentation of the Question by Marx in 1852
3: Experience of the Paris Commune of 1871: Marx’s Analysis
I. What Made the Communards’ Attempt Heroic?
II. What Is to Replace the Smashed State Machine?
III. Abolition of Parliamentarism
IV. Organization of National Unity
V. Abolition of the Parasite State
4: Supplementary Explanations by Engels
I. The Housing Question
II. Controversy with the Anarchists
III. Letter to Bebel
IV. Criticism of the Draft of the Erfurt Programme
V. The 1891 Preface to Marx’s The Civil War in France
VI. Engels on the Overcoming of Democracy
5: The Economic Basis of the Withering Away of the State
I. Presentation of the Question by Marx
II. The Transition from Capitalism to Communism
III. The First Phase of Communist Society
IV. The Higher Phase of Communist Society
6: The Vulgarization of Marxism by Opportunists
I. Plekhanov’s Controversy with the Anarchists
II. Kautsky’s Controversy with the Opportunists
III. Kautsky’s Controversy with Pannekoek
Postscript to the First Edition
Notes
Introduction
Antonio Negri
I
When asked which book offers the best introduction to Marxism, I answer: The State and Revolution by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.¹ Why? Because, if Marx is the brains of Marxism, Lenin is its body; and, for materialists, the brain too is located in the body. Marxism is not an economic theory, but a critique of political economy, where critique, first of all, signifies one’s capacity for analysis by immersion in a chaotic, conflict-ridden world, materially dominated by bosses who exploit you and a sovereign who commands you. These relations – ‘exploits you’, ‘commands you’ – mean that such control involves your body: that is, the bodies, energy, passions and values of those who live and work on our planet. With The State and Revolution, Lenin places bodies within the daily struggle where economic demands and political passion, emancipatory effort and emancipatory power, are conjoined. In this initial approach, The State and Revolution signifies bodies in struggle against the materiality of capitalist control.
This connection reveals an initial meaning of Marxism as critique: it signifies being within political economy, remaining inside the complex of acts of exploitation and means of power (of capitalism and sovereignty), inside the indissoluble bond that makes of them a state. The state is the exploitation of the bodies of labourers and command over the brains of subjects. Revolution is the critique exercised by bodies against this exploitation and sovereign power.
Emerging from the inside, critique, at the same time, induces the power of the against. ‘Against’ signifies understanding how bodies can proceed against capital; hence it invites translating Capital – the inexhaustible book of Marxist critique – into the materialist experiment of a possible revolution. Because the ‘within-against’ conjugation follows, and determines, the materialist mutation of the set of bodies into classes and thus constitutes the red thread of subjectivation into class struggle. The pedagogy of Marxism, which is only science qua critique and only critique qua subjectivation, is planted on this peak of Lenin’s discourse. It is not possible to be Marxist other than within the Leninist paradox of the totality and the partial viewpoint. And notice then how Capital comes, so to speak, to be subjectivated – which does not mean abandoned to the pleasures of a philology that is invariably curious and sometimes dissolute, or to the ceremonies of a rebellious dogmatism. Rather, it means re-articulated in its historical relationship with struggles, in the different technical and political compositions of the two classes. As Roman Rosdolsky noted, the initial plan of Capital envisaged a chapter on the state. Marx was unable to write it as the continuation of the great chapters of economic critique he had already composed. But, in his historical writings and interventions in the International, the people and parties it comprised, he sketched a theoretical framework. There Lenin adopted it, and imparted to it a musculature, with the experience of a victorious class struggle taking the place of unclear incidents and occasional volcanic party polemics. Here, ‘subjectivation’ assumes its true meaning, as pedagogy and also as the apex of the operative synthesis of the ‘within and against’ we have registered in the pages of The State and Revolution.
Within and against possibly suffice to put both Capital and Marx’s historical writings into prose. But The State and Revolution goes much further. The revolution, Lenin says, has begun. Where are we going? What is the beyond we are striving towards? And, here, Lenin’s subjective action twists towards reality, from utopia to science, from science to the concreteness of revolutionary force. It seems that we have returned to the beginning, and that enthusiasm for being located within and struggling against capital has matured as such in a perpetual motion. Such is not the case: here subjectivation makes it possible positively to itemize the transitions that ‘revolutionary deeds’ must accomplish in order to construct the beyond, in order to go beyond the beyond, from socialism to communism. And the road is mapped out with the intelligence and power of constituent praxis.
Utopia is connected with reality and takes shape in conjunction with the attack on current class domination. Thus, the utopian ‘withering away of the state’ is understood in materialist terms as a constituent process. And we see this process completed, because it is no longer an ideal but a test for the subjectivity that transforms the real: Marx and Lenin are definitively recomposed – and with what force! Destroying the state and reconstructing the set of institutions that make a free existence possible become tasks accomplished in common. When we finish reading The State and Revolution, our bodies are engaged in that task.
II
The preface to the first edition of The State and Revolution is dated August 1917 and the ‘Postscript to the First Edition’ is dated 30 November. According to the latter,
This pamphlet was written in August and September 1917. I had already drawn up the plan for the next, the seventh, chapter, ‘The Experience of the Russian Revolutions of 1905 and 1917’. Apart from the title, however, I had no time to write a single line of the chapter; I was ‘interrupted’ by a political crisis – the eve of the October revolution of 1917. Such an ‘interruption’ can only be welcomed; but the writing of the second part of the pamphlet (‘The Experience of the Russian Revolutions of 1905 and 1917’) will probably have to be put off for a long time. It is more pleasant and useful to go through the ‘experience of the revolution’ than to write about it.
So, the book was born inside the revolution, in August– September 1917 (when, following an initial unsuccessful attempt at insurrection in July, Lenin was compelled to flee Moscow). In composing it, Lenin used his notes on ‘Marxism and the State’, written in Switzerland in the period immediately preceding his return to Russia. In Switzerland, where he had been forced to seek refuge from Kraków, then in Austrian Poland, which refused Russian citizens residence after the outbreak of war, Lenin wrote a triple series of texts. The first was a set of philosophical studies, collected in the notebooks on Hegel; the second was devoted to the study of imperialism and was to become his popular essay on the subject; finally, there were the notebooks on ‘Marxism and the State’ which represent the immediate antecedent to August 1917.
We have already seen that the opuscule came to a halt at the seventh chapter. As regards the preceding chapters, Lenin offered a general overview of definitions of class society and the state in Chapter 1. In Chapter 2, he reconstructed this concept from Marx’s writings on the 1848 revolutions. Chapter 3 was devoted to the experience of the Paris Commune of 1871 and Marx’s analysis of it. Chapter 4 contains additional explanations and follows the writings of Marx, and especially Engels, in the polemic with German social democracy (in particular, Lenin takes up the critiques of the Erfurt and Gotha programmes). In Chapter 5, Lenin directly tackles the problem of the ‘withering away of the state’ and defines the material bases for this process. Chapter 6 contains a further ferocious attack on Georgi Plekhanov and Karl Kautsky – in short, on the social-democratic opportunism of the Second International. Of Chapter 7, as noted, only the plan exists.
In a sense, the outline of The State and Revolution is pedagogical enough, proceeding from recuperation of Engels’s hypotheses on the origins of the state and analysing the maturation in Marx of a class standpoint, nourished by the experience of the struggles of 1848 and 1871. The discourse then switches to the communist programme and confronts the positions of the parties of the Second International, polemicizing with social-democratic reformism regarded as opportunism. The original plan envisaged, in conclusion, an analysis of the experience of the 1917 Revolution, in order to affirm the actuality of the communist programme and demonstrate its mass maturity. But, at this point, Chapter 7 is missing. Let us read its outline in full:
1 New ‘popular creation’ in the Revolution. Quid est? (Plekhanov, 1906). 2 Lessons of 1905 (resolutions of the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks, 1906). 3 Eve of the 1917 Revolution: theses of October 1905. 4 Experience of 1917. Rise of mass movement, Soviets (their scope and weakness; dependency of the petty bourgeoisie. 5 Prostitution of the Soviets by the Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks: militia, armed people; military section, the ‘sections’; economic section; exploration of 3–5 July; ‘independence’ of the power of party organizations. 6 The Kornilov episode: degeneration of the Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries; the negotiation of 14–19 September. 7 ‘Messianism’. Who will begin?
Even today, rereading this conclusion makes one shiver at the incredible foresight and enormous force conveyed by this incipit.
III
However, a reader unaccustomed to studying the class struggle might get the impression from these brief mentions of the history of the text (internal to its composition) that it was, as it were, occasional, tactical. Evidence of this would be the fact that the text amasses references to the Marxist tradition in order to polemicize against social-democratic revisionism and the forces opposed at the time to the advance of the revolution. The occasional character of the essay would take precedence over its radicalism. Viewed thus, we are dealing with the continuation of an ideological battle bound up with the specific location of the Bolshevik Party in the Socialist International. The text is indeed consistent with earlier polemics and theoretical clashes, resuming and developing their themes. The battle against Plekhanov rests on the battle against Kautsky, and it, in turn, on Engels’s firm rejection of the Erfurt Programme as well as Marx’s of the Gotha Programme, and so on and so forth. From this perspective, it would not be mistaken to regard the text as a tactical, ideological weapon – or to put it another way, it does not convey truth and invention.
But to read it exclusively in this light is seriously inadequate. For what makes The State and Revolution a classical text of political thought is not the repetition of the critique of social chauvinism, but – at a crucial moment, in the heat of insurrection – a destructive critique of the very concept of the state and the foundation of a different concept of power, with greetings to all those who for more than a century have repeated that Marxism lacks a doctrine of the state.
Let us see, then, how this project unfolds in Lenin’s thinking in a dramatic, dawning situation. On the one hand, the concept of the state is isolated from the powers it arrogates to itself as general organizer and motor of the functioning of society. The administrative and productive functions the state machine claims to comprise and nurture can be stripped from its definition. Already in the Paris Commune, these functions had been absorbed and expressed in new institutional forms of the social, rather than being subordinate bodies or apparatuses of