Citizens’ assemblies, health, and health policy
BMJ 2024; 386 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1886 (Published 05 September 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;386:q1886- Rebecca McKee, senior researcher1,
- Lucinda Hiam, Clarendon scholar2,
- Bob Klaber, director of strategy, research, innovation3
- 1Institute for Government, London, UK
- 2University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 3Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Correspondence to: R McKee Rebecca.McKee{at}instituteforgovernment.org.uk
The UK’s Labour government inherited a health service with waiting list times at a record high and public satisfaction at a record low.1 With markers such as life expectancy, child and infant mortality, and avoidable mortality going in the wrong direction, it is unsurprising that voters identified health as a key issue in July’s election.2 Health is more than healthcare—clinical interventions account for only around 20% of health outcomes3—and improving the nation’s health will require work both within and outside the NHS.4
Beyond the NHS, the social, commercial, political, and environmental determinants of health all require urgent attention. There is no shortage of evidence to inform policy options, but practical implementation and prioritisation are too often dictated by short term political interests and perceived public priorities, and governments fail to take the necessary action.5 So, where should the government begin?
A series of citizens’ assemblies on health could provide those in power with the backing for bold and progressive action. Assemblies convene between 50 and 250 participants, selected to represent the broader population with respect to age, …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.