Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Choosing the best shoulder replacement

BMJ 2024; 385 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q952 (Published 30 April 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;385:q952

Linked Research

Reverse total shoulder replacement versus anatomical total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis

  1. Jonathan P Evans, clinical senior lecturer in trauma and orthopaedics1 2,
  2. Christopher D Smith, trauma and orthopaedic consultant1 2,
  3. Jonathan T Evans, clinical senior lecturer in trauma and orthopaedics1 2
  1. 1University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
  2. 2Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
  1. Correspondence to: J P Evans j.p.evans2{at}exeter.ac.uk

New analyses fill an important evidence gap while we wait for trials

In 2020, the National Institute for Health and Care Research commissioned the randomised RAPSODI trial, aiming to find the best type of joint replacement for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the shoulder. This trial commenced in 2022, but will not report its results until the spring of 2027 at the earliest.1 In a linked paper in The BMJ (doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077939), Valsamis and colleagues leveraged routinely collected data from public and private hospitals in England, using modern epidemiological methods to provide faster high quality evidence to answer this important question.2 By combining data from the National Joint Registry and NHS Hospital Episode Statistics datasets, they harnessed one of the world’s largest and most comprehensive repositories of shoulder replacement information.

Joint replacement is an effective treatment for pain and reduced function caused by osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The implant design can be anatomical, where the ball and socket are replaced (which has been the conventional treatment for many years); or reverse, where the orientation of the …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription