The Odyssey is a Magic: The Gathering expert-level block. It consists of a trio of expansion sets: Odyssey (September, 2001), Torment (February, 2002) and Judgment (May, 2002).
Storyline
Odyssey
The storyline of Odyssey leaps forward 100 years after the events in the set Apocalypse on the remote continent Otaria. Odyssey 's protagonist is Kamahl, a formidable fighter-mage skilled in both throwing fireballs and melee combat. Kamahl has a close friend Chainer, a cabalist, and a cool-headed sister Jeska. The antagonist is Laquatus, a sly merfolk who uses trickery and mind control to bend others to his will. Other characters include the cephalid emperor Aboshan, Kamahl's centaur friend Seton, Kamahl and Jeska's dwarven trainer Balthor, the militaristic Kirtar, the mellow but dangerous Cabal Patriarch (The First), and the unpredictable sociopath Braids. Almost everyone in the story is after the Mirari, a legendary artifact of immense power with the ability to make its wielder's innermost wishes come true. The Mirari is relatively small, resembling a metallic ball mounted on a wiry helix. The Mirari notoriously drives its wielder insane, often causing death and massive destruction, wherein it awaits a new master.
In mathematical logic, a judgment can be an assertion about occurrence of a free variable in an expression of the object language, or about provability of a proposition (either as a tautology or from a given context), but judgments can be also other inductively definable assertions in the metatheory. Judgments are used for example in formalizing deduction systems: a logical axiom expresses a judgment, premises of a rule of inference are formed as a sequence of judgments, and their conclusion is a judgment as well. Also the result of a proof expresses a judgment, and the used hypotheses are formed as a sequence of judgments.
A characteristic feature of the variants of Hilbert-style deduction systems is that the context is not changed in any of their rules of inference, while both natural deduction and sequent calculus contain some context-changing rules. Thus, if we are interested only in the derivability of tautologies, not hypothetical judgments, then we can formalize the Hilbert-style deduction system in such a way that its rules of inference contain only judgments of a rather simple form. The same cannot be done with the other two deductions systems: as context is changed in some of their rules of inferences, they cannot be formalized so that hypothetical judgments could be avoided—not even if we want to use them just for proving derivability of tautologies.
"Judgment" is the nineteenth episode of the second season of Star Trek: Enterprise, the forty-fifth episode overall. It originally aired on April 9, 2003.
Captain Archer is tried in a Klingon tribunal for attacking a Klingon ship and inciting a rebellion.
Plot
Captain Archer finds himself in the witness stand of a Klingon tribunal where he's charged with both aiding rebels opposed to the Empire and of attacking a Klingon ship. In the chamber, the prosecutor, Orak, faces off against Archer's advocate, a veteran of the courts named Kolos. Before this, in his cell, under the pretext of needing to be checked for contagion, Archer is visited by Doctor Phlox, who gives Archer an update that efforts to have him released are under way. Archer tells Phlox to relay a message, that no matter what the outcome, Sub-Commander T'Pol will leave orbit and keep the Enterprise's crew safe.
Orak calls as his first witness Second Weapons Officer (formerly Captain) Duras to testify—a process in which Archer is not allowed to interject. Duras then relates a biased tale of himself confronting a belligerent Archer, who insidiously fires on the Klingon ship first. Archer cannot hold his tongue, and is quickly silenced with pain sticks by the tribunal guards. Back in the cells, Kolos is tasked with offering Archer a deal. Rather than plea bargain, Archer insists that Kolos actually works harder to put up a valid defense. In response, Kolos relates how the judiciary used to be about the law and honor, but more recently the warrior mindset meant that victories became the accepted norm.
A butler is a domestic worker in a large household. In great houses, the household is sometimes divided into departments with the butler in charge of the dining room, wine cellar, and pantry. Some also have charge of the entire parlour floor, and housekeepers caring for the entire house and its appearance. A butler is usually male, and in charge of male servants, while a housekeeper is usually a woman, and in charge of female servants. Traditionally, male servants (such as footmen) were rarer and therefore better paid and of higher status than female servants. The butler, as the senior male servant, has the highest servant status. He can also be sometimes used as a chauffeur.
In older houses where the butler is the most senior worker, titles such as majordomo, butler administrator, house manager, manservant, staff manager, chief of staff, staff captain, estate manager and head of household staff are sometimes given. The precise duties of the employee will vary to some extent in line with the title given, but perhaps, more importantly in line with the requirements of the individual employer. In the grandest homes or when the employer owns more than one residence, there is sometimes an estate manager of higher rank than the butler.
Jeb is a masculine given name or nickname. It can be derived from the initials "J. E. B.", or from "Jebediah", a variant of the biblical name "Jedediah". It may refer to:
Per Martin Löf: How did 'judgement' come to be a term of logic ?
# Paris - Savoirs ENS 14.10.2011
Transcription of the lecture: https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Paris14Oct11.pdf
What is logic? Is it the study of the process of inference or reasoning, called demonstration in mathematics, by means of which we justify our judgements? Or is it the study of the logical and set-theoretical concepts, like proposition, truth and consequence on the one hand, and set, element and function on the other, that make their appearance in the contents of our judgements? This is the fundamental question whether logic is in essence, or by nature, epistemological or ontological. The answer is presumably that it is both, which is to say that, within logic, one can distinguish between two parts, or two layers, the one epistemological and the other ontological. But there r...
published: 31 Mar 2020
Traditional Logic Judgment and Proposition
published: 30 Jun 2022
Logic- Judgment
Logic Subject about Judgment
published: 05 Apr 2022
Judgment and Proposition and The Logical Form
This is Chapter 6(a) of the module in Logic.
published: 20 Oct 2020
Judgment Is the Decisive Skill
Everything we've discussed so far has been setting you up to apply judgment.
• In an age of infinite leverage, judgment becomes the most important skill 0:00
• Everything else you do is setting you up to apply judgment 1:21
• Judgment is knowing the long-term consequences of your actions 2:40
• Without experience, judgment is often less than useless 3:15
• The people with the best judgment are among the least emotional 4:05
• A lot of the top investors often sound like philosophers 5:18
• The more outraged someone is, the worse their judgment 6:00
Full show notes and transcript: http://startupboy.com/2019/04/29/judgment
published: 29 Apr 2019
Critical Thinking: Judgment and Proposition - Part 1 (Jove S. Aguas)
This is the first part of my class lecture on Judgment and Proposition.
published: 02 Oct 2020
Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Discrete Mathematics: Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Topics discussed:
1. A quick and easy method to check the validity of an argument.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(https://bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(https://bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: http://www.nesoacademy.org/donate
Memberships: https://bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: http://www.nesoacademy.org/recommended-books
Website ► http://www.nesoacademy.org/
Forum ► http://forum.nesoacademy.org/
Facebook ► https://goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths
published: 06 Jun 2018
The QAFE Method - Professional Judgment and Competency Development in Mathematics
This capsule depicts a method to support professional judgment regarding the level of student competency development for the subject of mathematics.
English version of "La méthode QAFE - Jugement professionnel et développement de compétences en mathématique" - https://youtu.be/XQtceJqU0Ds
Original Text: Martin Francoeur
Adaptation and Narration: Sonya Fiocco
Graphic Design and Video Editing: Sonia Boulais
Coordination: Véronique Bernard and Vanessa Boily
Images used under licence from BigStockPhoto.com
published: 21 Mar 2018
Logic - DeMorgan's Laws of Negation
understanding demorgan's law of negation
published: 11 Jul 2012
The psychology behind irrational decisions - Sara Garofalo
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-psychology-behind-irrational-decisions-sara-garofalo
Often people make decisions that are not “rational” from a purely economical point of view — meaning that they don’t necessarily lead to the best result. Why is that? Are we just bad at dealing with numbers and odds? Or is there a psychological mechanism behind it? Sara Garofalo explains heuristics, problem-solving approaches based on previous experience and intuition rather than analysis.
Lesson by Sara Garofalo, animation by TOGETHER.
# Paris - Savoirs ENS 14.10.2011
Transcription of the lecture: https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Paris14Oct11.pdf
What is logic? Is it the study of the proces...
# Paris - Savoirs ENS 14.10.2011
Transcription of the lecture: https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Paris14Oct11.pdf
What is logic? Is it the study of the process of inference or reasoning, called demonstration in mathematics, by means of which we justify our judgements? Or is it the study of the logical and set-theoretical concepts, like proposition, truth and consequence on the one hand, and set, element and function on the other, that make their appearance in the contents of our judgements? This is the fundamental question whether logic is in essence, or by nature, epistemological or ontological. The answer is presumably that it is both, which is to say that, within logic, one can distinguish between two parts, or two layers, the one epistemological and the other ontological. But there remains the question of the order of priority between these two layers: Which comes first? Is epistemology prior to ontology, or is it the other way round? Bolzano, whose logic in four volumes, called Wissenschaftslehre, has the most clear architectonic structure of all logics that have so far been written, treated of the ontological notions of proposition, truth and logical consequence (Ableitbarkeit) in the first two volumes of his Wissenschaftslehre, relegating the epistemology to the third volume. Thus he let ontology take priority over epistemology. Although the line of demarcation between the two was drawn in exactly the right place by Bolzano, my own work on constructive type theory has forced me to the conclusion that the order of priority between ontology and epistemology is nevertheless the reverse of the order in which they are treated in the Wissenschaftslehre. The epistemological notions of judgement and inference have to be in place already when you begin to deal with propositions, truth and consequence, as well as with other purely ontological notions, like the set-theoretical ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Nagel Lectures 2013 (by Per Martin Löf)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS3uJp6P1bz8QBQ9bbBWkhuW3n_S1V-j3
# Paris - Savoirs ENS 14.10.2011
Transcription of the lecture: https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Paris14Oct11.pdf
What is logic? Is it the study of the process of inference or reasoning, called demonstration in mathematics, by means of which we justify our judgements? Or is it the study of the logical and set-theoretical concepts, like proposition, truth and consequence on the one hand, and set, element and function on the other, that make their appearance in the contents of our judgements? This is the fundamental question whether logic is in essence, or by nature, epistemological or ontological. The answer is presumably that it is both, which is to say that, within logic, one can distinguish between two parts, or two layers, the one epistemological and the other ontological. But there remains the question of the order of priority between these two layers: Which comes first? Is epistemology prior to ontology, or is it the other way round? Bolzano, whose logic in four volumes, called Wissenschaftslehre, has the most clear architectonic structure of all logics that have so far been written, treated of the ontological notions of proposition, truth and logical consequence (Ableitbarkeit) in the first two volumes of his Wissenschaftslehre, relegating the epistemology to the third volume. Thus he let ontology take priority over epistemology. Although the line of demarcation between the two was drawn in exactly the right place by Bolzano, my own work on constructive type theory has forced me to the conclusion that the order of priority between ontology and epistemology is nevertheless the reverse of the order in which they are treated in the Wissenschaftslehre. The epistemological notions of judgement and inference have to be in place already when you begin to deal with propositions, truth and consequence, as well as with other purely ontological notions, like the set-theoretical ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Nagel Lectures 2013 (by Per Martin Löf)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS3uJp6P1bz8QBQ9bbBWkhuW3n_S1V-j3
Everything we've discussed so far has been setting you up to apply judgment.
• In an age of infinite leverage, judgment becomes the most important skill 0:00
...
Everything we've discussed so far has been setting you up to apply judgment.
• In an age of infinite leverage, judgment becomes the most important skill 0:00
• Everything else you do is setting you up to apply judgment 1:21
• Judgment is knowing the long-term consequences of your actions 2:40
• Without experience, judgment is often less than useless 3:15
• The people with the best judgment are among the least emotional 4:05
• A lot of the top investors often sound like philosophers 5:18
• The more outraged someone is, the worse their judgment 6:00
Full show notes and transcript: http://startupboy.com/2019/04/29/judgment
Everything we've discussed so far has been setting you up to apply judgment.
• In an age of infinite leverage, judgment becomes the most important skill 0:00
• Everything else you do is setting you up to apply judgment 1:21
• Judgment is knowing the long-term consequences of your actions 2:40
• Without experience, judgment is often less than useless 3:15
• The people with the best judgment are among the least emotional 4:05
• A lot of the top investors often sound like philosophers 5:18
• The more outraged someone is, the worse their judgment 6:00
Full show notes and transcript: http://startupboy.com/2019/04/29/judgment
Discrete Mathematics: Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Topics discussed:
1. A quick and easy method to check the validity of an argument.
...
Discrete Mathematics: Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Topics discussed:
1. A quick and easy method to check the validity of an argument.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(https://bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(https://bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: http://www.nesoacademy.org/donate
Memberships: https://bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: http://www.nesoacademy.org/recommended-books
Website ► http://www.nesoacademy.org/
Forum ► http://forum.nesoacademy.org/
Facebook ► https://goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths
Discrete Mathematics: Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Topics discussed:
1. A quick and easy method to check the validity of an argument.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(https://bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(https://bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: http://www.nesoacademy.org/donate
Memberships: https://bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: http://www.nesoacademy.org/recommended-books
Website ► http://www.nesoacademy.org/
Forum ► http://forum.nesoacademy.org/
Facebook ► https://goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths
This capsule depicts a method to support professional judgment regarding the level of student competency development for the subject of mathematics.
English ve...
This capsule depicts a method to support professional judgment regarding the level of student competency development for the subject of mathematics.
English version of "La méthode QAFE - Jugement professionnel et développement de compétences en mathématique" - https://youtu.be/XQtceJqU0Ds
Original Text: Martin Francoeur
Adaptation and Narration: Sonya Fiocco
Graphic Design and Video Editing: Sonia Boulais
Coordination: Véronique Bernard and Vanessa Boily
Images used under licence from BigStockPhoto.com
This capsule depicts a method to support professional judgment regarding the level of student competency development for the subject of mathematics.
English version of "La méthode QAFE - Jugement professionnel et développement de compétences en mathématique" - https://youtu.be/XQtceJqU0Ds
Original Text: Martin Francoeur
Adaptation and Narration: Sonya Fiocco
Graphic Design and Video Editing: Sonia Boulais
Coordination: Véronique Bernard and Vanessa Boily
Images used under licence from BigStockPhoto.com
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-psychology-behind-irrational-decisions-sara-garofalo
Often people make decisions that are not “rational” from a...
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-psychology-behind-irrational-decisions-sara-garofalo
Often people make decisions that are not “rational” from a purely economical point of view — meaning that they don’t necessarily lead to the best result. Why is that? Are we just bad at dealing with numbers and odds? Or is there a psychological mechanism behind it? Sara Garofalo explains heuristics, problem-solving approaches based on previous experience and intuition rather than analysis.
Lesson by Sara Garofalo, animation by TOGETHER.
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-psychology-behind-irrational-decisions-sara-garofalo
Often people make decisions that are not “rational” from a purely economical point of view — meaning that they don’t necessarily lead to the best result. Why is that? Are we just bad at dealing with numbers and odds? Or is there a psychological mechanism behind it? Sara Garofalo explains heuristics, problem-solving approaches based on previous experience and intuition rather than analysis.
Lesson by Sara Garofalo, animation by TOGETHER.
# Paris - Savoirs ENS 14.10.2011
Transcription of the lecture: https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Paris14Oct11.pdf
What is logic? Is it the study of the process of inference or reasoning, called demonstration in mathematics, by means of which we justify our judgements? Or is it the study of the logical and set-theoretical concepts, like proposition, truth and consequence on the one hand, and set, element and function on the other, that make their appearance in the contents of our judgements? This is the fundamental question whether logic is in essence, or by nature, epistemological or ontological. The answer is presumably that it is both, which is to say that, within logic, one can distinguish between two parts, or two layers, the one epistemological and the other ontological. But there remains the question of the order of priority between these two layers: Which comes first? Is epistemology prior to ontology, or is it the other way round? Bolzano, whose logic in four volumes, called Wissenschaftslehre, has the most clear architectonic structure of all logics that have so far been written, treated of the ontological notions of proposition, truth and logical consequence (Ableitbarkeit) in the first two volumes of his Wissenschaftslehre, relegating the epistemology to the third volume. Thus he let ontology take priority over epistemology. Although the line of demarcation between the two was drawn in exactly the right place by Bolzano, my own work on constructive type theory has forced me to the conclusion that the order of priority between ontology and epistemology is nevertheless the reverse of the order in which they are treated in the Wissenschaftslehre. The epistemological notions of judgement and inference have to be in place already when you begin to deal with propositions, truth and consequence, as well as with other purely ontological notions, like the set-theoretical ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Nagel Lectures 2013 (by Per Martin Löf)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS3uJp6P1bz8QBQ9bbBWkhuW3n_S1V-j3
Everything we've discussed so far has been setting you up to apply judgment.
• In an age of infinite leverage, judgment becomes the most important skill 0:00
• Everything else you do is setting you up to apply judgment 1:21
• Judgment is knowing the long-term consequences of your actions 2:40
• Without experience, judgment is often less than useless 3:15
• The people with the best judgment are among the least emotional 4:05
• A lot of the top investors often sound like philosophers 5:18
• The more outraged someone is, the worse their judgment 6:00
Full show notes and transcript: http://startupboy.com/2019/04/29/judgment
Discrete Mathematics: Checking The Validity of An Argument (Shortcut Method)
Topics discussed:
1. A quick and easy method to check the validity of an argument.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(https://bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(https://bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: http://www.nesoacademy.org/donate
Memberships: https://bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: http://www.nesoacademy.org/recommended-books
Website ► http://www.nesoacademy.org/
Forum ► http://forum.nesoacademy.org/
Facebook ► https://goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths
This capsule depicts a method to support professional judgment regarding the level of student competency development for the subject of mathematics.
English version of "La méthode QAFE - Jugement professionnel et développement de compétences en mathématique" - https://youtu.be/XQtceJqU0Ds
Original Text: Martin Francoeur
Adaptation and Narration: Sonya Fiocco
Graphic Design and Video Editing: Sonia Boulais
Coordination: Véronique Bernard and Vanessa Boily
Images used under licence from BigStockPhoto.com
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/the-psychology-behind-irrational-decisions-sara-garofalo
Often people make decisions that are not “rational” from a purely economical point of view — meaning that they don’t necessarily lead to the best result. Why is that? Are we just bad at dealing with numbers and odds? Or is there a psychological mechanism behind it? Sara Garofalo explains heuristics, problem-solving approaches based on previous experience and intuition rather than analysis.
Lesson by Sara Garofalo, animation by TOGETHER.
The Odyssey is a Magic: The Gathering expert-level block. It consists of a trio of expansion sets: Odyssey (September, 2001), Torment (February, 2002) and Judgment (May, 2002).
Storyline
Odyssey
The storyline of Odyssey leaps forward 100 years after the events in the set Apocalypse on the remote continent Otaria. Odyssey 's protagonist is Kamahl, a formidable fighter-mage skilled in both throwing fireballs and melee combat. Kamahl has a close friend Chainer, a cabalist, and a cool-headed sister Jeska. The antagonist is Laquatus, a sly merfolk who uses trickery and mind control to bend others to his will. Other characters include the cephalid emperor Aboshan, Kamahl's centaur friend Seton, Kamahl and Jeska's dwarven trainer Balthor, the militaristic Kirtar, the mellow but dangerous Cabal Patriarch (The First), and the unpredictable sociopath Braids. Almost everyone in the story is after the Mirari, a legendary artifact of immense power with the ability to make its wielder's innermost wishes come true. The Mirari is relatively small, resembling a metallic ball mounted on a wiry helix. The Mirari notoriously drives its wielder insane, often causing death and massive destruction, wherein it awaits a new master.
I don't love, I don't give, I don't care' cause I've already been there I don't want, I don't need, I don't take, 'cause I had it all I don't guess, I just know, what this is, is a place to die from I am not what you see, you are real but not for real I'm not scared, I'm not high, I'm a man and I'm all right We are here, we are gone, and the rest are left to wonder What is life, in the hand of illusion, what is life to a man in confusion What is right, for a life that is losin', what is time, what is, what is, what is? Take look, open up, look inside, what is there In your heart, in your mind, in your soul there's the answer Why you want, why you need, the side effects of what you see What is life, in the hand of illusion What is life, to a man in confusion What is right for a life that is losin', what is time, what is, what is, what is? I don't pay, I just know what this is,