- published: 09 Jul 2015
- views: 15429
Create your page here
Please tell us which country and city you'd like to see the weather in.
'+tempC+' °C
'
}
weather_info += '- Pressure: '+weather_data.main.pressure+' hPa ' if (weather_data.main.humidity) { weather_info += '
- Humidity: '+weather_data.main.humidity+' % '; } if (clouds) { weather_info += '
- Clounds: '+clouds.all+'% ' } if (weather) { weather_info += '
- '+weather.description+' ' } weather_info += '
'+mobj.calendar()+'
';
weather_info += '
'
weather_info += ''
if (country == 'United States'){
weather_info += '
'+tempF+' °F
'
}else{
weather_info += ''+tempC+' °C
'
}
weather_info += '- '+value.pressure+' hPa ' if (value.humidity) { weather_info += '
- Humidity: '+value.humidity+' % '; } if (clouds) { weather_info += '
- Clouds: '+clouds+'% ' } if (weather) { weather_info += '
- ' +weather.description+' ' } weather_info += '
The New York Times Company
Coordinates: 40°45′22″N 73°59′25″W / 40.75611°N 73.99028°W / 40.75611; -73.99028
The New York Times Company is an American media company which publishes its namesake, The New York Times. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., has served as Chairman since 1997. It is headquartered in Manhattan, New York.
History
The company was founded by Henry Jarvis Raymond and George Jones in New York City. The first edition of the newspaper The New York Times, published on September 18, 1851, stated: "We publish today the first issue of the New-York Daily Times, and we intend to issue it every morning (Sundays excepted) for an indefinite number of years to come."
The company moved into the cable channel industry purchasing a 40% interest in the Popcorn Channel, a theatrical movie preview and local movie times, in November 1994.
The company completed its purchase of The Washington Post's 50 percent interest in the International Herald Tribune (IHT) for US$65 million on January 1, 2003, becoming the sole owner.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/The_New_York_Times_Company
New York City
New York—often called New York City or the City of New York to distinguish it from the State of New York, of which it is a part—is the most populous city in the United States and the center of the New York metropolitan area, the premier gateway for legal immigration to the United States and one of the most populous urban agglomerations in the world. A global power city, New York exerts a significant impact upon commerce, finance, media, art, fashion, research, technology, education, and entertainment, its fast pace defining the term New York minute. Home to the headquarters of the United Nations, New York is an important center for international diplomacy and has been described as the cultural and financial capital of the world.
Situated on one of the world's largest natural harbors, New York City consists of five boroughs, each of which is a separate county of New York State. The five boroughs – Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island – were consolidated into a single city in 1898. With a census-estimated 2014 population of 8,491,079 distributed over a land area of just 305 square miles (790 km2), New York is the most densely populated major city in the United States. As many as 800 languages are spoken in New York, making it the most linguistically diverse city in the world. By 2014 census estimates, the New York City metropolitan region remains by a significant margin the most populous in the United States, as defined by both the Metropolitan Statistical Area (20.1 million residents) and the Combined Statistical Area (23.6 million residents). In 2013, the MSA produced a gross metropolitan product (GMP) of nearly US$1.39 trillion, while in 2012, the CSA generated a GMP of over US$1.55 trillion, both ranking first nationally by a wide margin and behind the GDP of only twelve and eleven countries, respectively.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/New_York_City
New York (Anthony Burgess book)
The 1976 book New York is a work of travel and observation by Anthony Burgess. It was written for Time–Life's "The Great Cities" series of books.
Burgess lived in the city for two years in the early 1970s, teaching literature and creative writing at City College and Columbia University.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/New_York_(Anthony_Burgess_book)
New York (Glee)
"New York" is the twenty-second episode and season finale of the second season of the American musical television series Glee, and the forty-fourth overall. The episode was written and directed by series creator Brad Falchuk, filmed in part on location in New York City, and first aired on May 24, 2011 on Fox in the United States. With a $6 million budget, it was reportedly the most expensive episode of Glee at the time of broadcast. It garnered a Primetime Emmy nomination for Outstanding Costumes for a Series. The episode features an appearance by Patti LuPone as herself and guest stars Jonathan Groff, Cheyenne Jackson, and Charice. The McKinley High School glee club, New Directions, performs at the National show choir competition in New York City and finishes in twelfth place. While they are there, the glee club members see the sights, including Times Square and Central Park; and Rachel (Lea Michele) and Kurt (Chris Colfer) sing a song from a Broadway stage, as does their director, Will Schuester (Matthew Morrison).
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/New_York_(Glee)
York (group)
York is a German electronica music duo, founded in 1997 by musicians and brothers Torsten and Jörg Stenzel. Producing ambient, downtempo, chillout, house and trance, their productions are known for catchy guitar hooks, atmospheric soundscapes and delicate dance textures.
Career
Torsten Stenzel began his musical career early in his childhood, learning the piano from the age of five when he began his classical training. In the early 1990s his musical orientation changed, and he discovered the growing techno/house movement. He built his own recording studio. Torsten Stenzel is credited for several gold and platinum awards, an 'Echo' nomination and over three million record sales.
Jörg Stenzel has, since the age of eleven, been interested in stringed instruments, the guitar in particular. The two brothers combined their talents in 1997 and project 'York' was born.
York has released four successful UK singles. Their first single, "The Awakening", reached #11 in the UK Singles Chart in October 1999. Their second single, "On The Beach" (which sampled Chris Rea's song, "On The Beach") was their biggest hit, the 'CRW edit' helped the single to reach #4 in the UK chart in June 2000, and it sold over 200,000 copies. The next chart entry "Farewell To The Moon" reached #37 in November 2000. Their final UK hit single to date was "The Fields of Love" which featured ATB. It reached #16 in January 2001.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/York_(group)
York (explorer)
York (1770–1822) was an African-American slave best known for his participation with the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Enslaved by William Clark, he performed hard manual labor without pay, but participated as a full member of the expedition. Like many other expedition members, his ultimate fate is unclear. There is evidence that after the expedition's return, Clark had difficulty compelling York to resume his former status, and York may have later escaped or been freed, but nothing is entirely clear on this.
Early and family life
York was born in Caroline County near Ladysmith, Virginia. He, his father, his mother (Rose) and younger sister and brother (Nancy and Juba), were enslaved by the Clark family. York was William Clark's servant from boyhood, and was left to William in his father's will. He had a wife whom he rarely saw, and likely lost contact with her after 1811 when she was sold/sent to Mississippi. It is not known if York fathered any children.
Lewis and Clark Expedition
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/York_(explorer)
York (1995-2014 provincial electoral district)
York was a provincial electoral district for the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick, Canada in the southwestern portion of the province. It was created in 1995 from a large part of the former York South and a small part of York North.
Members of the Legislative Assembly
Election results
References
External links
Coordinates: 45°40′37″N 67°06′18″W / 45.677°N 67.105°W / 45.677; -67.105
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/York_(1995-2014_provincial_electoral_district)
Radio Stations - The_New_York_Times_Company
SEARCH FOR RADIOS
Podcasts:
-
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media World
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strategy for the future with Olivia Sterns at the Allen & Co. conference in picturesque Sun Valley, Idaho on “Bloomberg Markets.” (Source: Bloomberg)
published: 09 Jul 2015 -
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To print the paper in a timely fashion and have it arrive on readers' doorsteps by the next morning, crews at the paper's printing plants work through the night. They start their shift at 10 p.m. and end around 3 a.m. About 80,000 copies of The New York Times are printed an hour and it's a non-stop process to get the job done. We visited The New York Times’s College Point Printing Plant in Queens, NY to learn all that goes into this printing process. ------------------------------------------------------ #NewYorkTimes #Newspapers #Insider Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all ...
published: 23 Oct 2019 -
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon 🟢 Get exclusive access for my private unfiltered controversial videos that can't be released to the public: https://www.youtube.com/c/Moon-Real/join Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel): ► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal ► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
published: 14 Apr 2023 -
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan Sullivan (plaintiff) was Commissioner of the Police Department, Fire Department, Department of the Cemetery, and Department of Scales for Montgomery, Alabama. He brought a civil libel action against New York Times Co. (defendant) after it printed allegedly false and defamatory statements about Sullivan’s actions to control African American protesters and his treatment of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The newspaper article in question accused Sullivan’s police force of conducting a wave of terror against African American students and brutally harassing Dr. King. It is undisputed that several of the allegations were either false or e...
published: 12 Jul 2017 -
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT Opinion
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what they’d like us to believe. Many of the world’s biggest and most polluting companies have recently promised to curb their carbon output, by reaching net-zero emissions in the next few decades. These sweeping pledges conjure a world where we can have it all: economic growth and global trade — without the global warming that usually comes with that. While saving the planet demands an approach more ambitious than incremental change, these corporate fantasies of the future just don’t stand up to scrutiny. In a new @nytopinon video, we expose three major flaws in net-zero pledges that make them a dangerous distraction from the crisis at hand. Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n More from The New York Times V...
published: 14 Jul 2022 -
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Gravity
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
published: 24 Apr 2023 -
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Sneakers
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
published: 24 Apr 2023 -
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commissioner sues the New York Times for defamation after it runs an ad that talks trash about his department. Produced by Matt Beat (Beat Productions). All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom(Mr. Beat's band). Download the song here: https://electricneedleroom.bandcamp.com/track/we-want-to-be Mr. Beat's Supreme Court Briefs playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHtE7NbaKRef-x3QBDpwvJsr6i1Z3I6TN Here's an annotated script with footnotes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJIT7809e-BjuC1s961TdIJzbBjt1HJwO_JUVDpa5h4/edit?usp=sharing Check out coo...
published: 03 Mar 2023 -
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United States
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.us Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt In episode 24 of Supreme Court Briefs, a man exposes dark government secrets about the Vietnam War, and gets in big trouble from the government for it. Should whistleblowers be protected? Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Electric Needle Room (Matt Beat). All images found in public domain or used under fair use guidelines. Punching sound effect: Mike Koening (CC) http://soundbible.com/1773-Strong-Punch.html Check out cool primary sources here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/1873 Other sources used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Uni...
published: 12 Jan 2018 -
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s steam system is the largest in the world. Produced by: Melanie Burford and Greg Moyer Read the story here: http://nyti.ms/1ycaNts Subscribe to the Times Video newsletter for free and get a handpicked selection of the best videos from The New York Times every week: http://bit.ly/timesvideonewsletter Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n Watch more videos at: http://nytimes.com/video --------------------------------------------------------------- Want more from The New York Times? Twitter: https://twitter.com/nytvideo Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nytimes Google+: https://plus.google.com/+nytimes/ Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering t...
published: 11 Oct 2014
developed with YouTube
6:17
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media World
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:17
- Uploaded Date: 09 Jul 2015
- views: 15429
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strategy for the future with Olivia Sterns at the Allen & Co. conference in...
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strategy for the future with Olivia Sterns at the Allen & Co. conference in picturesque Sun Valley, Idaho on “Bloomberg Markets.” (Source: Bloomberg)
https://wn.com/How_New_York_Times_Survives_In_A_Social_Media_World
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strategy for the future with Olivia Sterns at the Allen & Co. conference in picturesque Sun Valley, Idaho on “Bloomberg Markets.” (Source: Bloomberg)
4:37
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:37
- Uploaded Date: 23 Oct 2019
- views: 434399
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To print the paper in a timely fashion and have it arrive on readers' door...
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To print the paper in a timely fashion and have it arrive on readers' doorsteps by the next morning, crews at the paper's printing plants work through the night. They start their shift at 10 p.m. and end around 3 a.m. About 80,000 copies of The New York Times are printed an hour and it's a non-stop process to get the job done. We visited The New York Times’s College Point Printing Plant in Queens, NY to learn all that goes into this printing process.
------------------------------------------------------
#NewYorkTimes #Newspapers #Insider
Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all the rest. It’s smart. It’s fearless. It’s fun. We push the boundaries of digital storytelling. Our mission is to inform and inspire.
Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: https://www.insider.com
Insider on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/insider/
Insider on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insider/
Insider on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/Insider/4020934530
Insider on Amazon Prime: https://www.amazon.com/v/thisisinsider
Insider on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@insider
Insider on Dailymotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/INSIDER
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
https://wn.com/How_The_New_York_Times_Is_Made_|_The_Making_Of
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To print the paper in a timely fashion and have it arrive on readers' doorsteps by the next morning, crews at the paper's printing plants work through the night. They start their shift at 10 p.m. and end around 3 a.m. About 80,000 copies of The New York Times are printed an hour and it's a non-stop process to get the job done. We visited The New York Times’s College Point Printing Plant in Queens, NY to learn all that goes into this printing process.
------------------------------------------------------
#NewYorkTimes #Newspapers #Insider
Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all the rest. It’s smart. It’s fearless. It’s fun. We push the boundaries of digital storytelling. Our mission is to inform and inspire.
Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: https://www.insider.com
Insider on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/insider/
Insider on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insider/
Insider on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/Insider/4020934530
Insider on Amazon Prime: https://www.amazon.com/v/thisisinsider
Insider on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@insider
Insider on Dailymotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/INSIDER
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
- published: 23 Oct 2019
- views: 434399
15:31
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:31
- Uploaded Date: 14 Apr 2023
- views: 146426
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk
Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon
🟢 Get exclusive access for my priva...
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk
Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon
🟢 Get exclusive access for my private unfiltered controversial videos that can't be released to the public: https://www.youtube.com/c/Moon-Real/join
Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel):
► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal
► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
https://wn.com/The_Deserved_Downfall_Of_The_New_York_Times
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk
Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon
🟢 Get exclusive access for my private unfiltered controversial videos that can't be released to the public: https://www.youtube.com/c/Moon-Real/join
Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel):
► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal
► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
- published: 14 Apr 2023
- views: 146426
5:02
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:02
- Uploaded Date: 12 Jul 2017
- views: 74366
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sulliva...
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan
Sullivan (plaintiff) was Commissioner of the Police Department, Fire Department, Department of the Cemetery, and Department of Scales for Montgomery, Alabama. He brought a civil libel action against New York Times Co. (defendant) after it printed allegedly false and defamatory statements about Sullivan’s actions to control African American protesters and his treatment of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The newspaper article in question accused Sullivan’s police force of conducting a wave of terror against African American students and brutally harassing Dr. King. It is undisputed that several of the allegations were either false or exaggerated. At trial, the trial judge charged the jury that the statements in the article were “libelous per se” and that damages were appropriate if the statements were merely “of and concerning” Sullivan. The jury returned a verdict for Sullivan and awarded him $500,000 in damages. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
https://wn.com/New_York_Times_Co._V._Sullivan_Summary_|_Quimbee.Com
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan
Sullivan (plaintiff) was Commissioner of the Police Department, Fire Department, Department of the Cemetery, and Department of Scales for Montgomery, Alabama. He brought a civil libel action against New York Times Co. (defendant) after it printed allegedly false and defamatory statements about Sullivan’s actions to control African American protesters and his treatment of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The newspaper article in question accused Sullivan’s police force of conducting a wave of terror against African American students and brutally harassing Dr. King. It is undisputed that several of the allegations were either false or exaggerated. At trial, the trial judge charged the jury that the statements in the article were “libelous per se” and that damages were appropriate if the statements were merely “of and concerning” Sullivan. The jury returned a verdict for Sullivan and awarded him $500,000 in damages. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
- published: 12 Jul 2017
- views: 74366
4:48
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT Opinion
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:48
- Uploaded Date: 14 Jul 2022
- views: 311396
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what they’d like us to believe. Many of the world’s biggest and most pollut...
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what they’d like us to believe. Many of the world’s biggest and most polluting companies have recently promised to curb their carbon output, by reaching net-zero emissions in the next few decades. These sweeping pledges conjure a world where we can have it all: economic growth and global trade — without the global warming that usually comes with that. While saving the planet demands an approach more ambitious than incremental change, these corporate fantasies of the future just don’t stand up to scrutiny. In a new @nytopinon video, we expose three major flaws in net-zero pledges that make them a dangerous distraction from the crisis at hand.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
More from The New York Times Video: http://nytimes.com/video
----------
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch.
https://wn.com/We_Debunk_The_Latest_Corporate_Climate_Lie_|_Nyt_Opinion
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what they’d like us to believe. Many of the world’s biggest and most polluting companies have recently promised to curb their carbon output, by reaching net-zero emissions in the next few decades. These sweeping pledges conjure a world where we can have it all: economic growth and global trade — without the global warming that usually comes with that. While saving the planet demands an approach more ambitious than incremental change, these corporate fantasies of the future just don’t stand up to scrutiny. In a new @nytopinon video, we expose three major flaws in net-zero pledges that make them a dangerous distraction from the crisis at hand.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
More from The New York Times Video: http://nytimes.com/video
----------
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch.
- published: 14 Jul 2022
- views: 311396
1:01
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Gravity
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:01
- Uploaded Date: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 20501
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that m...
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
https://wn.com/The_New_York_Times_|_More_Of_Life_Brought_To_Life_|_Gravity
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
- published: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 20501
1:01
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Sneakers
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:01
- Uploaded Date: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 661135
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that m...
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
https://wn.com/The_New_York_Times_|_More_Of_Life_Brought_To_Life_|_Sneakers
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
- published: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 661135
5:57
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:57
- Uploaded Date: 03 Mar 2023
- views: 75175
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join
In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commiss...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join
In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commissioner sues the New York Times for defamation after it runs an ad that talks trash about his department.
Produced by Matt Beat (Beat Productions). All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom(Mr. Beat's band). Download the song here: https://electricneedleroom.bandcamp.com/track/we-want-to-be
Mr. Beat's Supreme Court Briefs playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHtE7NbaKRef-x3QBDpwvJsr6i1Z3I6TN
Here's an annotated script with footnotes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJIT7809e-BjuC1s961TdIJzbBjt1HJwO_JUVDpa5h4/edit?usp=sharing
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/32us243
Other sources used:
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/525/barron-v-baltimore
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore
https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_barron.html
A related case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMQ5MrQfs0
For sponsorship and business inquiries or to send snail mail to Mr. Beat:
https://www.iammrbeat.com/contact.html
https://www.youtube.com/c/iammrbeat/about
How to support and donate to my channel:
On YouTube subscribe to @iammrbeat & hit the notification bell 🔔
Join for great perks on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/mrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/iammrbeat
Book me on Cameo, yo: https://www.cameo.com/iammrbeat
Subscribe to my second channel: @mattbeatgoeson
Join Patreon for The Beat Goes On: https://www.patreon.com/thebeatgoeson
Connect with me:
Links to everything: https://linktr.ee/iammrbeat
My website: https://www.iammrbeat.com/
My podcast: https://anchor.fm/thebeatpod
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/mrbeat/
@beatmastermatt on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/iammrbeat/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iammrbeat
Beatcord: https://discord.gg/g8cZPjt
Mr. Beat's TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@iammrbeat
Mr. Beat merch:
https://matt-beat-shop.fourthwall.com/
https://www.bonfire.com/store/mr-beat/
https://sfsf.shop/support-mrbeat/
https://amzn.to/3fdakiZ
#supremecourtbriefs #supremecourt #apgovt
New York City
March 29, 1960
The New York Times publishes a full-page advertisement called “Heed Their Rising Voices,” which aimed to shine a spotlight on the persecution of and violence against civil rights protestors throughout the South. It specifically talks trash about the Montgomery, Alabama police force, saying that they had arrested Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. seven times and that “truckloads” of them had stormed the Alabama State College. So uh…yeah…the ad had definitely stretched the truth. When Montgomery’s police commissioner, L.B. Sullivan, saw the ad, he was like “what the heck?!?” He viewed it as a personal attack on him and his entire police force.
Even though the ad didn’t specifically name Sullivan, he decided to write the New York Times anyway, asking the newspaper to publish a retraction of the ad. In other words, Sullivan wanted the New York Times to take it all back and admit to publishing false information. Well, the New York Times issued no such retraction. Instead, its lawyers wrote Sullivan a nice little letter that said the newspaper had no good reason to publish a retraction. Specifically, their letter said, “we…are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect on you,” adding, “you might, if you desire, let us know in what respect you claim that the statements in the advertisement reflect on you.”
Uh-huh. Sullivan didn’t like that so much, either. He sued the New York Times, saying the newspaper broke Alabama’s law for libel, a type of written defamation that hurt the reputation of someone or something. He also sued four African American ministers mentioned in the ad. After this, the New York Times did issue a retraction, but only for the Governor of Alabama, John Patterson….not Sullivan. In the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Sullivan only had to prove that the New York Times published mistakes and that they probably hurt his reputation. The court sided with Sullivan, ordering the New York Times to award him with $500,000 in damages, which is nearly $5 million in today’s money. The New York Times appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, but it agreed with the lower court. After this, the newspaper appealed again, this time to the SUPREME Supreme Court, who agreed to hear oral arguments in January 1964. The New York Times, of course, argued that the freedom of speech and freedom of the press parts of the First Amendment protected their right to publish that ad. It also argued that Alabama’s libel law specifically went against the First Amendment.
https://wn.com/Why_Most_People_Lose_Defamation_Lawsuits_|_New_York_Times_V._Sullivan
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join
In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commissioner sues the New York Times for defamation after it runs an ad that talks trash about his department.
Produced by Matt Beat (Beat Productions). All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom(Mr. Beat's band). Download the song here: https://electricneedleroom.bandcamp.com/track/we-want-to-be
Mr. Beat's Supreme Court Briefs playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHtE7NbaKRef-x3QBDpwvJsr6i1Z3I6TN
Here's an annotated script with footnotes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJIT7809e-BjuC1s961TdIJzbBjt1HJwO_JUVDpa5h4/edit?usp=sharing
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/32us243
Other sources used:
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/525/barron-v-baltimore
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore
https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_barron.html
A related case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMQ5MrQfs0
For sponsorship and business inquiries or to send snail mail to Mr. Beat:
https://www.iammrbeat.com/contact.html
https://www.youtube.com/c/iammrbeat/about
How to support and donate to my channel:
On YouTube subscribe to @iammrbeat & hit the notification bell 🔔
Join for great perks on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/mrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/iammrbeat
Book me on Cameo, yo: https://www.cameo.com/iammrbeat
Subscribe to my second channel: @mattbeatgoeson
Join Patreon for The Beat Goes On: https://www.patreon.com/thebeatgoeson
Connect with me:
Links to everything: https://linktr.ee/iammrbeat
My website: https://www.iammrbeat.com/
My podcast: https://anchor.fm/thebeatpod
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/mrbeat/
@beatmastermatt on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/iammrbeat/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iammrbeat
Beatcord: https://discord.gg/g8cZPjt
Mr. Beat's TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@iammrbeat
Mr. Beat merch:
https://matt-beat-shop.fourthwall.com/
https://www.bonfire.com/store/mr-beat/
https://sfsf.shop/support-mrbeat/
https://amzn.to/3fdakiZ
#supremecourtbriefs #supremecourt #apgovt
New York City
March 29, 1960
The New York Times publishes a full-page advertisement called “Heed Their Rising Voices,” which aimed to shine a spotlight on the persecution of and violence against civil rights protestors throughout the South. It specifically talks trash about the Montgomery, Alabama police force, saying that they had arrested Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. seven times and that “truckloads” of them had stormed the Alabama State College. So uh…yeah…the ad had definitely stretched the truth. When Montgomery’s police commissioner, L.B. Sullivan, saw the ad, he was like “what the heck?!?” He viewed it as a personal attack on him and his entire police force.
Even though the ad didn’t specifically name Sullivan, he decided to write the New York Times anyway, asking the newspaper to publish a retraction of the ad. In other words, Sullivan wanted the New York Times to take it all back and admit to publishing false information. Well, the New York Times issued no such retraction. Instead, its lawyers wrote Sullivan a nice little letter that said the newspaper had no good reason to publish a retraction. Specifically, their letter said, “we…are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect on you,” adding, “you might, if you desire, let us know in what respect you claim that the statements in the advertisement reflect on you.”
Uh-huh. Sullivan didn’t like that so much, either. He sued the New York Times, saying the newspaper broke Alabama’s law for libel, a type of written defamation that hurt the reputation of someone or something. He also sued four African American ministers mentioned in the ad. After this, the New York Times did issue a retraction, but only for the Governor of Alabama, John Patterson….not Sullivan. In the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Sullivan only had to prove that the New York Times published mistakes and that they probably hurt his reputation. The court sided with Sullivan, ordering the New York Times to award him with $500,000 in damages, which is nearly $5 million in today’s money. The New York Times appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, but it agreed with the lower court. After this, the newspaper appealed again, this time to the SUPREME Supreme Court, who agreed to hear oral arguments in January 1964. The New York Times, of course, argued that the freedom of speech and freedom of the press parts of the First Amendment protected their right to publish that ad. It also argued that Alabama’s libel law specifically went against the First Amendment.
- published: 03 Mar 2023
- views: 75175
6:10
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United States
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:10
- Uploaded Date: 12 Jan 2018
- views: 202617
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: http:/...
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.us
Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
In episode 24 of Supreme Court Briefs, a man exposes dark government secrets about the Vietnam War, and gets in big trouble from the government for it. Should whistleblowers be protected?
Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Electric Needle Room (Matt Beat). All images found in public domain or used under fair use guidelines. Punching sound effect: Mike Koening (CC) http://soundbible.com/1773-Strong-Punch.html
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/1873
Other sources used:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers
McNamara, Robert (1996). In Retrospect. Random House.
http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/pentagon-papers
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
http://magicvalley.com/opinion/columnists/other-view-trump-s-ugly-assault-on-the-first-amendment/article_435b4521-a42d-5e83-a9a8-3102c5f4e0d3.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/business/media/spielberg-post-media-trump.html
http://www.pbs.org/pov/mostdangerousman/timeline/
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara creates the Vietnam Study Task Force at the Pentagon to create a study of the Vietnam War, which, by the way, was raging on the time with no end in sight. This study was to remain classified but released to the public eventually, as McNamara wanted to leave a written record for historians.
Working on this task force was a dude named Daniel Ellsberg, who became very troubled by what he found. You see, the Pentagon was telling the American public one thing, but actually doing other things. For example, the Pentagon was lying about escalating the war even when victory was hopeless. It had covered up doing some quite horrible things, like illegal bombings in places like Cambodia and Laos, and the use of chemical warfare.
Well Ellsberg, who had become strongly against the Vietnam War, decided he was going to fight the power! In October 1969, he and his friend Anthony Russo began secretly photocopying pages from this study, which eventually became known as The Pentagon Papers. By the way, the Pentagon Papers were thousands of pages long.
So yeah, he photocopies and decides to take them to the press to expose all of the Pentagon’s dirty secrets. In March 1971, he gave 43 volumes of the Pentagon Papers to Neil Sheehan, a reporter for The New York Times. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing a series of articles based on what Ellsberg had leaked. It also included excerpts from the actual Pentagon Papers.
When President Richard Nixon read these articles, he was like, “this kind of makes our government look bad...plus, isn’t this putting our national security at risk?” By the way, that’s EXACTLY how he sounded. A couple days later, the Nixon administration got a federal court to force the New York Times to stop publishing articles about the Pentagon Papers. Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, argued that Ellsberg and Russo were guilty of breaking the Espionage Act of 1917, so this “prior restraint,” or pre-publication censorship, was justified. In fact, the Nixon administration argued that the Times publishing the Pentagon Papers put the country’s security at risk.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post got in on the action and began publishing its own articles about the Pentagon Papers. The assistant U.S. Attorney General, William Rehnquist, a future Supreme Court chief justice, also tried to prevent the Post from publishing any more Pentagon Papers secrets. Eventually, 17 other newspapers published parts of the study.
On June 28, 1971, Ellsberg surrendered to face criminal charges under the Espionage Act. The next day, a young Senator named Mike Gravel, who inexplicably throws a rock in a pond later in life, read the Pentagon Papers out loud for three hours, entering them into the Senate record. As you could imagine, by the time the American public is fired up about the revelations contained in these documents.
Newspapers kept publishing stories about the Pentagon Papers, and the District Court for the District of Columbia and Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit both let them, so the Supreme Court decided to quickly step in, combining the cases against both the New York Times and the Washington Post. In case you hadn’t figured this one out by now, this was an obvious First Amendment issue. The Court heard arguments about whether or not the Nixon administration's efforts to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers went against the First Amendment. Was prior restraint justified? Did releasing this information put national security at risk?
https://wn.com/Protecting_Whistleblowers_|_New_York_Times_Co._V._United_States
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.us
Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
In episode 24 of Supreme Court Briefs, a man exposes dark government secrets about the Vietnam War, and gets in big trouble from the government for it. Should whistleblowers be protected?
Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Electric Needle Room (Matt Beat). All images found in public domain or used under fair use guidelines. Punching sound effect: Mike Koening (CC) http://soundbible.com/1773-Strong-Punch.html
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/1873
Other sources used:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers
McNamara, Robert (1996). In Retrospect. Random House.
http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/pentagon-papers
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
http://magicvalley.com/opinion/columnists/other-view-trump-s-ugly-assault-on-the-first-amendment/article_435b4521-a42d-5e83-a9a8-3102c5f4e0d3.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/business/media/spielberg-post-media-trump.html
http://www.pbs.org/pov/mostdangerousman/timeline/
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara creates the Vietnam Study Task Force at the Pentagon to create a study of the Vietnam War, which, by the way, was raging on the time with no end in sight. This study was to remain classified but released to the public eventually, as McNamara wanted to leave a written record for historians.
Working on this task force was a dude named Daniel Ellsberg, who became very troubled by what he found. You see, the Pentagon was telling the American public one thing, but actually doing other things. For example, the Pentagon was lying about escalating the war even when victory was hopeless. It had covered up doing some quite horrible things, like illegal bombings in places like Cambodia and Laos, and the use of chemical warfare.
Well Ellsberg, who had become strongly against the Vietnam War, decided he was going to fight the power! In October 1969, he and his friend Anthony Russo began secretly photocopying pages from this study, which eventually became known as The Pentagon Papers. By the way, the Pentagon Papers were thousands of pages long.
So yeah, he photocopies and decides to take them to the press to expose all of the Pentagon’s dirty secrets. In March 1971, he gave 43 volumes of the Pentagon Papers to Neil Sheehan, a reporter for The New York Times. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing a series of articles based on what Ellsberg had leaked. It also included excerpts from the actual Pentagon Papers.
When President Richard Nixon read these articles, he was like, “this kind of makes our government look bad...plus, isn’t this putting our national security at risk?” By the way, that’s EXACTLY how he sounded. A couple days later, the Nixon administration got a federal court to force the New York Times to stop publishing articles about the Pentagon Papers. Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, argued that Ellsberg and Russo were guilty of breaking the Espionage Act of 1917, so this “prior restraint,” or pre-publication censorship, was justified. In fact, the Nixon administration argued that the Times publishing the Pentagon Papers put the country’s security at risk.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post got in on the action and began publishing its own articles about the Pentagon Papers. The assistant U.S. Attorney General, William Rehnquist, a future Supreme Court chief justice, also tried to prevent the Post from publishing any more Pentagon Papers secrets. Eventually, 17 other newspapers published parts of the study.
On June 28, 1971, Ellsberg surrendered to face criminal charges under the Espionage Act. The next day, a young Senator named Mike Gravel, who inexplicably throws a rock in a pond later in life, read the Pentagon Papers out loud for three hours, entering them into the Senate record. As you could imagine, by the time the American public is fired up about the revelations contained in these documents.
Newspapers kept publishing stories about the Pentagon Papers, and the District Court for the District of Columbia and Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit both let them, so the Supreme Court decided to quickly step in, combining the cases against both the New York Times and the Washington Post. In case you hadn’t figured this one out by now, this was an obvious First Amendment issue. The Court heard arguments about whether or not the Nixon administration's efforts to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers went against the First Amendment. Was prior restraint justified? Did releasing this information put national security at risk?
- published: 12 Jan 2018
- views: 202617
7:00
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:00
- Uploaded Date: 11 Oct 2014
- views: 672941
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s steam system is the largest in the world.
Produced by: Melanie Burford a...
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s steam system is the largest in the world.
Produced by: Melanie Burford and Greg Moyer
Read the story here: http://nyti.ms/1ycaNts
Subscribe to the Times Video newsletter for free and get a handpicked selection of the best videos from The New York Times every week: http://bit.ly/timesvideonewsletter
Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
Watch more videos at: http://nytimes.com/video
---------------------------------------------------------------
Want more from The New York Times?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/nytvideo
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nytimes
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+nytimes/
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch. On YouTube.
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheNewYorkTimes
https://wn.com/A_City_Shaped_By_Steam_|_Living_City_|_The_New_York_Times
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s steam system is the largest in the world.
Produced by: Melanie Burford and Greg Moyer
Read the story here: http://nyti.ms/1ycaNts
Subscribe to the Times Video newsletter for free and get a handpicked selection of the best videos from The New York Times every week: http://bit.ly/timesvideonewsletter
Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
Watch more videos at: http://nytimes.com/video
---------------------------------------------------------------
Want more from The New York Times?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/nytvideo
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nytimes
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+nytimes/
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch. On YouTube.
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheNewYorkTimes
- published: 11 Oct 2014
- views: 672941
6:17
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media World
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strate...
published: 09 Jul 2015
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media World
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media World
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Jul 2015
- views: 15429
Jul 9 -- New York Times Company CEO Mark Thompson discusses the newspaper’s digital strategy for the future with Olivia Sterns at the Allen & Co. conference in picturesque Sun Valley, Idaho on “Bloomberg Markets.” (Source: Bloomberg)
4:37
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To p...
published: 23 Oct 2019
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Oct 2019
- views: 434399
The New York Times is considered one of the most reputable publications in the world. To print the paper in a timely fashion and have it arrive on readers' doorsteps by the next morning, crews at the paper's printing plants work through the night. They start their shift at 10 p.m. and end around 3 a.m. About 80,000 copies of The New York Times are printed an hour and it's a non-stop process to get the job done. We visited The New York Times’s College Point Printing Plant in Queens, NY to learn all that goes into this printing process.
------------------------------------------------------
#NewYorkTimes #Newspapers #Insider
Insider is great journalism about what passionate people actually want to know. That’s everything from news to food, celebrity to science, politics to sports and all the rest. It’s smart. It’s fearless. It’s fun. We push the boundaries of digital storytelling. Our mission is to inform and inspire.
Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: https://www.insider.com
Insider on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/insider/
Insider on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insider/
Insider on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/discover/Insider/4020934530
Insider on Amazon Prime: https://www.amazon.com/v/thisisinsider
Insider on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@insider
Insider on Dailymotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/INSIDER
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of
15:31
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk
Free weekly essays written by Moon - htt...
published: 14 Apr 2023
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times
- Report rights infringement
- published: 14 Apr 2023
- views: 146426
Check out AppMySite today! http://bit.ly/3MG9qjk
Free weekly essays written by Moon - https://mailchi.mp/3ded12821743/moon
🟢 Get exclusive access for my private unfiltered controversial videos that can't be released to the public: https://www.youtube.com/c/Moon-Real/join
Support the channel here (all money goes straight back into the channel):
► Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/MoonReal
► Follow my Twitter: https://twitter.com/MoonRealYT
5:02
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full t...
published: 12 Jul 2017
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee.com
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Jul 2017
- views: 74366
A video case brief of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Read the full text brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/new-york-times-co-v-sullivan
Sullivan (plaintiff) was Commissioner of the Police Department, Fire Department, Department of the Cemetery, and Department of Scales for Montgomery, Alabama. He brought a civil libel action against New York Times Co. (defendant) after it printed allegedly false and defamatory statements about Sullivan’s actions to control African American protesters and his treatment of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The newspaper article in question accused Sullivan’s police force of conducting a wave of terror against African American students and brutally harassing Dr. King. It is undisputed that several of the allegations were either false or exaggerated. At trial, the trial judge charged the jury that the statements in the article were “libelous per se” and that damages were appropriate if the statements were merely “of and concerning” Sullivan. The jury returned a verdict for Sullivan and awarded him $500,000 in damages. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
4:48
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT Opinion
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what ...
published: 14 Jul 2022
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT Opinion
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT Opinion
- Report rights infringement
- published: 14 Jul 2022
- views: 311396
Finally, corporations are jumping into action on climate change — or at least that’s what they’d like us to believe. Many of the world’s biggest and most polluting companies have recently promised to curb their carbon output, by reaching net-zero emissions in the next few decades. These sweeping pledges conjure a world where we can have it all: economic growth and global trade — without the global warming that usually comes with that. While saving the planet demands an approach more ambitious than incremental change, these corporate fantasies of the future just don’t stand up to scrutiny. In a new @nytopinon video, we expose three major flaws in net-zero pledges that make them a dangerous distraction from the crisis at hand.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
More from The New York Times Video: http://nytimes.com/video
----------
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch.
1:01
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Gravity
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarat...
published: 24 Apr 2023
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Gravity
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Gravity
- Report rights infringement
- published: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 20501
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
1:01
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Sneakers
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarat...
published: 24 Apr 2023
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Sneakers
The New York Times | More of life brought to life | Sneakers
- Report rights infringement
- published: 24 Apr 2023
- views: 661135
Following the threads of our interests and passions — wherever they take us — is exhilarating. That’s why Times journalism not only reports on the issues that matter but illuminates how they’re connected. In our new ad, we demonstrate how our journalism helps bring your interests to life.
5:57
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCu...
published: 03 Mar 2023
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Mar 2023
- views: 75175
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmYesELO6axBrCuSpf7S9DQ/join
In episode 70 of Supreme Court Briefs, a police commissioner sues the New York Times for defamation after it runs an ad that talks trash about his department.
Produced by Matt Beat (Beat Productions). All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom(Mr. Beat's band). Download the song here: https://electricneedleroom.bandcamp.com/track/we-want-to-be
Mr. Beat's Supreme Court Briefs playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHtE7NbaKRef-x3QBDpwvJsr6i1Z3I6TN
Here's an annotated script with footnotes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJIT7809e-BjuC1s961TdIJzbBjt1HJwO_JUVDpa5h4/edit?usp=sharing
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/32us243
Other sources used:
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/525/barron-v-baltimore
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore
https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_barron.html
A related case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCMQ5MrQfs0
For sponsorship and business inquiries or to send snail mail to Mr. Beat:
https://www.iammrbeat.com/contact.html
https://www.youtube.com/c/iammrbeat/about
How to support and donate to my channel:
On YouTube subscribe to @iammrbeat & hit the notification bell 🔔
Join for great perks on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/mrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/iammrbeat
Book me on Cameo, yo: https://www.cameo.com/iammrbeat
Subscribe to my second channel: @mattbeatgoeson
Join Patreon for The Beat Goes On: https://www.patreon.com/thebeatgoeson
Connect with me:
Links to everything: https://linktr.ee/iammrbeat
My website: https://www.iammrbeat.com/
My podcast: https://anchor.fm/thebeatpod
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/mrbeat/
@beatmastermatt on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/iammrbeat/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iammrbeat
Beatcord: https://discord.gg/g8cZPjt
Mr. Beat's TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@iammrbeat
Mr. Beat merch:
https://matt-beat-shop.fourthwall.com/
https://www.bonfire.com/store/mr-beat/
https://sfsf.shop/support-mrbeat/
https://amzn.to/3fdakiZ
#supremecourtbriefs #supremecourt #apgovt
New York City
March 29, 1960
The New York Times publishes a full-page advertisement called “Heed Their Rising Voices,” which aimed to shine a spotlight on the persecution of and violence against civil rights protestors throughout the South. It specifically talks trash about the Montgomery, Alabama police force, saying that they had arrested Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. seven times and that “truckloads” of them had stormed the Alabama State College. So uh…yeah…the ad had definitely stretched the truth. When Montgomery’s police commissioner, L.B. Sullivan, saw the ad, he was like “what the heck?!?” He viewed it as a personal attack on him and his entire police force.
Even though the ad didn’t specifically name Sullivan, he decided to write the New York Times anyway, asking the newspaper to publish a retraction of the ad. In other words, Sullivan wanted the New York Times to take it all back and admit to publishing false information. Well, the New York Times issued no such retraction. Instead, its lawyers wrote Sullivan a nice little letter that said the newspaper had no good reason to publish a retraction. Specifically, their letter said, “we…are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect on you,” adding, “you might, if you desire, let us know in what respect you claim that the statements in the advertisement reflect on you.”
Uh-huh. Sullivan didn’t like that so much, either. He sued the New York Times, saying the newspaper broke Alabama’s law for libel, a type of written defamation that hurt the reputation of someone or something. He also sued four African American ministers mentioned in the ad. After this, the New York Times did issue a retraction, but only for the Governor of Alabama, John Patterson….not Sullivan. In the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Sullivan only had to prove that the New York Times published mistakes and that they probably hurt his reputation. The court sided with Sullivan, ordering the New York Times to award him with $500,000 in damages, which is nearly $5 million in today’s money. The New York Times appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, but it agreed with the lower court. After this, the newspaper appealed again, this time to the SUPREME Supreme Court, who agreed to hear oral arguments in January 1964. The New York Times, of course, argued that the freedom of speech and freedom of the press parts of the First Amendment protected their right to publish that ad. It also argued that Alabama’s libel law specifically went against the First Amendment.
6:10
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United States
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzh...
published: 12 Jan 2018
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United States
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. United States
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Jan 2018
- views: 202617
I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.us
Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt
In episode 24 of Supreme Court Briefs, a man exposes dark government secrets about the Vietnam War, and gets in big trouble from the government for it. Should whistleblowers be protected?
Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Electric Needle Room (Matt Beat). All images found in public domain or used under fair use guidelines. Punching sound effect: Mike Koening (CC) http://soundbible.com/1773-Strong-Punch.html
Check out cool primary sources here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/1873
Other sources used:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers
McNamara, Robert (1996). In Retrospect. Random House.
http://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/pentagon-papers
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/713
http://magicvalley.com/opinion/columnists/other-view-trump-s-ugly-assault-on-the-first-amendment/article_435b4521-a42d-5e83-a9a8-3102c5f4e0d3.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/business/media/spielberg-post-media-trump.html
http://www.pbs.org/pov/mostdangerousman/timeline/
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara creates the Vietnam Study Task Force at the Pentagon to create a study of the Vietnam War, which, by the way, was raging on the time with no end in sight. This study was to remain classified but released to the public eventually, as McNamara wanted to leave a written record for historians.
Working on this task force was a dude named Daniel Ellsberg, who became very troubled by what he found. You see, the Pentagon was telling the American public one thing, but actually doing other things. For example, the Pentagon was lying about escalating the war even when victory was hopeless. It had covered up doing some quite horrible things, like illegal bombings in places like Cambodia and Laos, and the use of chemical warfare.
Well Ellsberg, who had become strongly against the Vietnam War, decided he was going to fight the power! In October 1969, he and his friend Anthony Russo began secretly photocopying pages from this study, which eventually became known as The Pentagon Papers. By the way, the Pentagon Papers were thousands of pages long.
So yeah, he photocopies and decides to take them to the press to expose all of the Pentagon’s dirty secrets. In March 1971, he gave 43 volumes of the Pentagon Papers to Neil Sheehan, a reporter for The New York Times. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing a series of articles based on what Ellsberg had leaked. It also included excerpts from the actual Pentagon Papers.
When President Richard Nixon read these articles, he was like, “this kind of makes our government look bad...plus, isn’t this putting our national security at risk?” By the way, that’s EXACTLY how he sounded. A couple days later, the Nixon administration got a federal court to force the New York Times to stop publishing articles about the Pentagon Papers. Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, argued that Ellsberg and Russo were guilty of breaking the Espionage Act of 1917, so this “prior restraint,” or pre-publication censorship, was justified. In fact, the Nixon administration argued that the Times publishing the Pentagon Papers put the country’s security at risk.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post got in on the action and began publishing its own articles about the Pentagon Papers. The assistant U.S. Attorney General, William Rehnquist, a future Supreme Court chief justice, also tried to prevent the Post from publishing any more Pentagon Papers secrets. Eventually, 17 other newspapers published parts of the study.
On June 28, 1971, Ellsberg surrendered to face criminal charges under the Espionage Act. The next day, a young Senator named Mike Gravel, who inexplicably throws a rock in a pond later in life, read the Pentagon Papers out loud for three hours, entering them into the Senate record. As you could imagine, by the time the American public is fired up about the revelations contained in these documents.
Newspapers kept publishing stories about the Pentagon Papers, and the District Court for the District of Columbia and Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit both let them, so the Supreme Court decided to quickly step in, combining the cases against both the New York Times and the Washington Post. In case you hadn’t figured this one out by now, this was an obvious First Amendment issue. The Court heard arguments about whether or not the Nixon administration's efforts to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers went against the First Amendment. Was prior restraint justified? Did releasing this information put national security at risk?
7:00
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s ste...
published: 11 Oct 2014
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Oct 2014
- views: 672941
With more than 100 miles of steam piping and nearly 2,000 buildings served, New York’s steam system is the largest in the world.
Produced by: Melanie Burford and Greg Moyer
Read the story here: http://nyti.ms/1ycaNts
Subscribe to the Times Video newsletter for free and get a handpicked selection of the best videos from The New York Times every week: http://bit.ly/timesvideonewsletter
Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
Watch more videos at: http://nytimes.com/video
---------------------------------------------------------------
Want more from The New York Times?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/nytvideo
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nytimes
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+nytimes/
Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch. On YouTube.
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New York Times
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheNewYorkTimes
The New York Times Company
Coordinates: 40°45′22″N 73°59′25″W / 40.75611°N 73.99028°W / 40.75611; -73.99028
The New York Times Company is an American media company which publishes its namesake, The New York Times. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., has served as Chairman since 1997. It is headquartered in Manhattan, New York.
History
The company was founded by Henry Jarvis Raymond and George Jones in New York City. The first edition of the newspaper The New York Times, published on September 18, 1851, stated: "We publish today the first issue of the New-York Daily Times, and we intend to issue it every morning (Sundays excepted) for an indefinite number of years to come."
The company moved into the cable channel industry purchasing a 40% interest in the Popcorn Channel, a theatrical movie preview and local movie times, in November 1994.
The company completed its purchase of The Washington Post's 50 percent interest in the International Herald Tribune (IHT) for US$65 million on January 1, 2003, becoming the sole owner.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/The_New_York_Times_Company
How New York Times Survives in a Social Media Worl...
How The New York Times Is Made | The Making Of...
The Deserved Downfall of The New York Times...
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Summary | quimbee...
We Debunk the Latest Corporate Climate Lie | NYT O...
The New York Times | More of life brought to life ...
The New York Times | More of life brought to life ...
Why Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New Yor...
Protecting Whistleblowers | New York Times Co. v. ...
A City Shaped by Steam | Living City | The New Yor...
-
by Lacerda
-
by Everclear
The New York Times
by: LacerdaLet me impart some wisdom before we go our separate ways.
I've overstayed my welcome; you've been more than good to me.
That's so gauche that's so 1912 of you.
Let's get you back on track, its not too late, you could have it all.
If you'd just listen to me,
I'd impart my wisdom, its not too late, this could all be yours.
Drink Drink Drink Drink Drink to your heart's desire.
Sink Sink Sink Sink further than you've ever been.
Think Think Think Think Think, don't be admired.
Can you tell me what it is I need?
That's so gauche that's so 1912 of you.
Let's get you back on track its not too late, you could have it all.
If you'd just listen to me,
I'd impart my wisdom, its not too late, this could all be yours.
Drink Drink Drink Drink Drink to your heart's desire.
Sink Sink Sink Sink further than you've ever been.
Think Think Think Think Think don't be admired.
Can you tell me what it is I need?
Goodbye....
Goodbye...
Goodbye...
Goodbye...
I've shared my bed with all the right people and it breaks my heart to see it end.
Drink Drink Drink Drink Drink to your heart's desire
Sink Sink Sink Sink further than you've ever been.
Think Think Think Think Think don't be admired
Can you tell me what it is I need?
Can you tell me what it is I need?
(It was just a cause so I spent most of my time falling in love...guess the next line.
The cynics say that self-awareness is overrated, but they had to think about it.)
Latest News for: the new york times company
Edit
Michael Agger Joins Times Opinion (The New York Times Company)
(He stands by this position.) His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The New York Times and Film Comment ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 19, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Edit
Promotions for Meg Linehan and Emily Olsen (The New York Times Company)
Edit
Weather Team Expands (The New York Times Company)
The New York Times Company published this content on December 17, 2024, ...
Edit
Tracking Misinformation: Fabricated Opinion Headline (The New York Times Company)
The New York Times Company published this content on December 13, 2024, and is solely responsible for the ...
Edit
Dao Nguyen Joins The Times as New Mission Lead for Digital Advertising (The New York Times Company)
... and execution of our broader New York Times product roadmap ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 12, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Edit
Examining How Democracy and Power Shaped a Year of Elections (The New York Times Company)
Over the past year, reporters from The New York Times in more ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 12, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Edit
NYT Games App Wins Cultural Impact Award at Apple’s 2024 App Store Awards (The New York Times Company)
... said Jonathan Knight, head of Games at The New York Times ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 11, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Edit
Op-Docs Takes Home International Documentary Award (The New York Times Company)
Op-Docs, The New York Times's award-winning short documentary ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 10, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
Edit
Matea Gold Joins The Times (The New York Times Company)
... journalism, is joining The Times as Washington editor ... The New York Times Company published this content on December 09, 2024, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein.
- 1
- 2
- Next page »