-
Expectation epistemic - Know It ALL 🔊✅
Help us educate with a LIKE, SUBSCRIBE,and DONATION. Thank you!
https://www.patreon.com/SeeHearSayLearn , http://www.youtube.com/c/SeeHearSayLearn?sub_confirmation=1 This video is about "Expectation epistemic". This video series is something special. We're fully delving into all things everything. This breaks from merely pronouncing and discussing and goes further to deeply understand words and ideas.
Link to Amazon.com
http://amzn.to/2hFyI1h
Link above take you to amazon and then amazon kicks me some money for alerting you to some awesome goods. We thank you for clicking the links.
THANK for WATCHING, SUBSCRIBING, LIKING, COMMENTING, SHARING and DONATING!!!
It means a lot to my family!
PLEASE DONATE via VENMO for MORE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT and ENDEAVORS
https://venmo.com/SeeHearSayLe...
published: 20 Dec 2017
-
LTT: Laura Gradowski - Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Title: Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Abstract: I document historical cases of anomalies that resulted in theory changes, with an eye to the course of their reception by mainstream experts. With some regularity, a theory-changing anomaly first comes to the attention of amateurs or scientists with expertise in a domain other than the one to which the anomaly belongs. Mainstream experts, in turn, tend to deny the anomaly, either denying that it is anomalous to theory or denying the phenomenon altogether as impossible or artefactual. Expertise inhibits positive anomaly appraisal—the recognition of a phenomenon as a genuine exception, recalcitrant to explanation in terms of prevailing theory. My view is that failure to attend phenomena that are anomalous to ...
published: 15 Apr 2023
-
What is epistemic insight 2min
published: 12 Sep 2020
-
#907 Katarina Kovačević: Epistemic Responsibility and Strategic Ignorance
------------------Support the channel------------
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy
PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l
PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz
PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m
PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao
------------------Follow me on---------------------
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT
Podcast: http://bit.ly/3FeSNqb
This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/
RECORDED ON OCTOBER 19th 2023.
Katarina Kovačević is a PhD candidate in...
published: 01 Mar 2024
-
45. Epistemic Responsibility
Dr. M. Hisham Hawasli gives a short talk.
published: 09 Aug 2020
-
Sandy Goldberg: On the Epistemic Significance of Knowledge You Should Have Had
Professor Sandy Goldberg (Northwestern) speaks at a workshop on Social Epistemology, University of Edinburgh, 24th June 2015.
Abstract: Elsewhere I and others have argued that evidence one should have had can bear on the justification of one's belief, in the form of defeating one's justification. In this paper, I am interested in knowing how evidence one should have had (on the one hand) and one's higher-order evidence (on the other) interact in determinations of the justification of belief. In doing so I aim to address two types of scenario that previous discussions have left open. In one type of scenario, there is a clash between a subject's higher-order evidence and the evidence she should have had: S's higher-order evidence is misleading as to the existence or likely epistemic bearing...
published: 01 Jul 2015
-
The Epistemic Responsibilities of the University - Rene van Woudenberg
Universities, as social institutions, bear numerous responsibilities—such as financial responsibilities, management responsibilities, social responsibilities, and other. In this talk I argue that the universities’ first and foremost responsibilities are epistemic in nature, i.e. responsibilities pertaining to the acquisition of knowledge, rational belief, insight, understanding, wisdom. In order to shoulder these responsibilities it is absolutely necessary that certain values be acknowledged—values that especially in the university seem to be under constant attack, thus giving rise to what I call ‘the university paradox’. This talk presents the paradox, and indicates a solution.
- See more at www.FOCLonline.org
FOCLID 7187
published: 17 Aug 2017
-
Robert Audi - Epistemology: How Do We Know What We Know?
What do we know and how do we know it? What is knowledge? What is belief? How is belief justified? What justifies us in believing what we believe? Is justified belief knowledge? These questions constitute “epistemology” – the theory of knowledge.
Click here to watch more interviews with Robert Audi http://bit.ly/2zJmXkl
Click here to watch more interviews on epistemology http://bit.ly/2zJQ9HI
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
published: 01 Oct 2018
-
BCCCD20 Symposium 4: Epistemic Uncertainty in Development
Symposium 4 -- January 11, 2020
Epistemic Uncertainty: Implicit Encoding and Information-Seeking from Infancy to Preschool
00:00 Marina Bazhydai, Introduction
02:50 Moritz Köster, The neural dynamics of processing the unexpected in the infant brain
24:05 Marina Bazhydai, Preverbal infants’ selectively use social referencing in response to referential uncertainty
43:32 Paul Harris, Discussion*
*Due to technical issues, we could not record Paul Harris's slides. They can be found here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IAObqt5jp0mG7s1p2OM_4J2Of9oDud6aMt4NMOiI-m8/edit?usp=sharing
BCCCD: http://www.bcccd.org
CDC Web: https://cdc.ceu.edu
CDC Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CognitiveDevelopmentCenteratCEU/
CDC Twitter: https://twitter.com/cogdevceu
published: 18 Feb 2020
-
Episode 34: The Epistemic Condition and Tracing with Daniel Miller
In this episode, we talk with Daniel Miller about when and why ignorance functions as an excuse from blameworthiness, and how this is related to a phenomenon called “tracing”.
Dan's Website: http://www.danieljamesmiller.com/
Dan's Paper, "Reasonable Foreseability and Blameless Ignorance"
Dan's essay at 1000 Word Philosophy: https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2019/02/14/ignorance-and-blame/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/thefreewillshow
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefreewillshow/?hl=en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Free-Will-Show-105535031200408/
published: 21 Feb 2022
4:49
Expectation epistemic - Know It ALL 🔊✅
Help us educate with a LIKE, SUBSCRIBE,and DONATION. Thank you!
https://www.patreon.com/SeeHearSayLearn , http://www.youtube.com/c/SeeHearSayLearn?sub_confirmat...
Help us educate with a LIKE, SUBSCRIBE,and DONATION. Thank you!
https://www.patreon.com/SeeHearSayLearn , http://www.youtube.com/c/SeeHearSayLearn?sub_confirmation=1 This video is about "Expectation epistemic". This video series is something special. We're fully delving into all things everything. This breaks from merely pronouncing and discussing and goes further to deeply understand words and ideas.
Link to Amazon.com
http://amzn.to/2hFyI1h
Link above take you to amazon and then amazon kicks me some money for alerting you to some awesome goods. We thank you for clicking the links.
THANK for WATCHING, SUBSCRIBING, LIKING, COMMENTING, SHARING and DONATING!!!
It means a lot to my family!
PLEASE DONATE via VENMO for MORE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT and ENDEAVORS
https://venmo.com/SeeHearSayLearn
SeeHearSayLearn.com presents a series of videos to get you speaking and learning languages such as English, Spanish / Espanol, French, German, Albanian, Arabic, and more. We are working hard to get our videos uploaded. We provide you with word pronunciations, definitions, translations, stories, rhymes, riddles, jokes, tongue twisters, and anything that will help bridge the gap between your current fluency to your desired proficiency and understanding. Whether you're just learning or trying to bolster your intellectual quotient into a new stratosphere of concise and succinct communications, allocating the proper verbiage could be paramount to illustrating a picture for the recipient or merely shoving drab nondescript sounds of failure down their auditory meatuses. Run on sentence you say? I'd agree. Utilizing big complicated words isn't usually the most effective form of communication, but adapting your language to your recipient will be the most effective way to transfer your thoughts. Having a wide array of tools for each project will allow you to tailor your message for the most effect and efficient use of your time. To write, read, and listen to language takes fewer words than you might imagine. In each language, you could likely get away with understanding a few thousand words and be completely comfortable with many different language settings. Why even a few hundred can get you quite far.
If ever you find any of the words to be inaccurate in any way, which may most often be the pronunciation I want to thank anyone who reaches out to send me a message regarding any errors. I will do my best to read and correct any perceived errors. Be advised that many pronunciation can vary slightly between regions.
My congratulations to anyone broadening their word bank in any language. Science is clear that with more word associations languages become easier to learn and has the potential to be a protective buffer against dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.
Please visit www.seehearsaylearn.com
FACEBOOK FOLLOW
https://www.facebook.com/seehearsaylearn
TWITTER FOLLOW
https://www.twitter.com/seehearsaylearn
YOUTUBE SUBSCRIBE
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeElmCkT1hfDJ7YhLCwxG_g
PLEASE DONATE via VENMO for MORE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT and ENDEAVORS
https://venmo.com/SeeHearSayLearn
THANK for WATCHING, SUBSCRIBING, LIKING, COMMENTING, SHARING and DONATING!!!
It means a lot to my family!
This video series couldn't do what it does without the help of Wikipedia and its community along with so many other people to thank.
https://wn.com/Expectation_Epistemic_Know_It_All_🔊✅
Help us educate with a LIKE, SUBSCRIBE,and DONATION. Thank you!
https://www.patreon.com/SeeHearSayLearn , http://www.youtube.com/c/SeeHearSayLearn?sub_confirmation=1 This video is about "Expectation epistemic". This video series is something special. We're fully delving into all things everything. This breaks from merely pronouncing and discussing and goes further to deeply understand words and ideas.
Link to Amazon.com
http://amzn.to/2hFyI1h
Link above take you to amazon and then amazon kicks me some money for alerting you to some awesome goods. We thank you for clicking the links.
THANK for WATCHING, SUBSCRIBING, LIKING, COMMENTING, SHARING and DONATING!!!
It means a lot to my family!
PLEASE DONATE via VENMO for MORE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT and ENDEAVORS
https://venmo.com/SeeHearSayLearn
SeeHearSayLearn.com presents a series of videos to get you speaking and learning languages such as English, Spanish / Espanol, French, German, Albanian, Arabic, and more. We are working hard to get our videos uploaded. We provide you with word pronunciations, definitions, translations, stories, rhymes, riddles, jokes, tongue twisters, and anything that will help bridge the gap between your current fluency to your desired proficiency and understanding. Whether you're just learning or trying to bolster your intellectual quotient into a new stratosphere of concise and succinct communications, allocating the proper verbiage could be paramount to illustrating a picture for the recipient or merely shoving drab nondescript sounds of failure down their auditory meatuses. Run on sentence you say? I'd agree. Utilizing big complicated words isn't usually the most effective form of communication, but adapting your language to your recipient will be the most effective way to transfer your thoughts. Having a wide array of tools for each project will allow you to tailor your message for the most effect and efficient use of your time. To write, read, and listen to language takes fewer words than you might imagine. In each language, you could likely get away with understanding a few thousand words and be completely comfortable with many different language settings. Why even a few hundred can get you quite far.
If ever you find any of the words to be inaccurate in any way, which may most often be the pronunciation I want to thank anyone who reaches out to send me a message regarding any errors. I will do my best to read and correct any perceived errors. Be advised that many pronunciation can vary slightly between regions.
My congratulations to anyone broadening their word bank in any language. Science is clear that with more word associations languages become easier to learn and has the potential to be a protective buffer against dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.
Please visit www.seehearsaylearn.com
FACEBOOK FOLLOW
https://www.facebook.com/seehearsaylearn
TWITTER FOLLOW
https://www.twitter.com/seehearsaylearn
YOUTUBE SUBSCRIBE
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeElmCkT1hfDJ7YhLCwxG_g
PLEASE DONATE via VENMO for MORE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT and ENDEAVORS
https://venmo.com/SeeHearSayLearn
THANK for WATCHING, SUBSCRIBING, LIKING, COMMENTING, SHARING and DONATING!!!
It means a lot to my family!
This video series couldn't do what it does without the help of Wikipedia and its community along with so many other people to thank.
- published: 20 Dec 2017
- views: 99
50:17
LTT: Laura Gradowski - Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Title: Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Abstract: I document historical cases of anomalies that resulted in theory changes, wi...
Title: Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Abstract: I document historical cases of anomalies that resulted in theory changes, with an eye to the course of their reception by mainstream experts. With some regularity, a theory-changing anomaly first comes to the attention of amateurs or scientists with expertise in a domain other than the one to which the anomaly belongs. Mainstream experts, in turn, tend to deny the anomaly, either denying that it is anomalous to theory or denying the phenomenon altogether as impossible or artefactual. Expertise inhibits positive anomaly appraisal—the recognition of a phenomenon as a genuine exception, recalcitrant to explanation in terms of prevailing theory. My view is that failure to attend phenomena that are anomalous to one’s theory is the result of theory-entrenchment. Specialized training and narrow fields of experience condition experts’ expectations, delimiting their ability to recognize exceptions. The result is a delay in the scientific advancements that result from theory-change. I offer three suggestions: (1) exposure to more experiential domains and developing an armamentarium of theories to guide both training and research could benefit experts epistemically, (2) experts should not be granted absolute epistemic authority, and (3) layperson and outsider observations ought to be taken more seriously.
https://wn.com/Ltt_Laura_Gradowski_Expectation_And_Exception_Expertise_As_An_Epistemic_Constraint
Title: Expectation and exception: expertise as an epistemic constraint
Abstract: I document historical cases of anomalies that resulted in theory changes, with an eye to the course of their reception by mainstream experts. With some regularity, a theory-changing anomaly first comes to the attention of amateurs or scientists with expertise in a domain other than the one to which the anomaly belongs. Mainstream experts, in turn, tend to deny the anomaly, either denying that it is anomalous to theory or denying the phenomenon altogether as impossible or artefactual. Expertise inhibits positive anomaly appraisal—the recognition of a phenomenon as a genuine exception, recalcitrant to explanation in terms of prevailing theory. My view is that failure to attend phenomena that are anomalous to one’s theory is the result of theory-entrenchment. Specialized training and narrow fields of experience condition experts’ expectations, delimiting their ability to recognize exceptions. The result is a delay in the scientific advancements that result from theory-change. I offer three suggestions: (1) exposure to more experiential domains and developing an armamentarium of theories to guide both training and research could benefit experts epistemically, (2) experts should not be granted absolute epistemic authority, and (3) layperson and outsider observations ought to be taken more seriously.
- published: 15 Apr 2023
- views: 143
52:27
#907 Katarina Kovačević: Epistemic Responsibility and Strategic Ignorance
------------------Support the channel------------
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: htt...
------------------Support the channel------------
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy
PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l
PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz
PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m
PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao
------------------Follow me on---------------------
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT
Podcast: http://bit.ly/3FeSNqb
This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/
RECORDED ON OCTOBER 19th 2023.
Katarina Kovačević is a PhD candidate in the Department of Cognitive Science at Central European University. Her main research interest is responsibility. She investigates how people ascribe responsibility for good and bad outcomes across various situations. She is specifically interested in epistemic responsibility and strategic ignorance.
In this episode, we talk about epistemic responsibility and strategic ignorance. We start by discussing how to approach responsibility from the perspective of psychology/cognitive science, and when exactly people ascribe responsibility to others. We talk about epistemic responsibility, what happens when people lack relevant information, if the effort put into acquiring it matters, and if outcomes matter. Finally, we discuss strategic ignorance, and focus on health-related examples, particularly testing for STIs.
Time Links:
00:00 Intro
00:38 Responsibility from the perspective of psychology/cognitive science
03:24 When do people ascribe responsibility to others?
07:04 Epistemic responsibility, and when people lack relevant information
15:11 The effort put into acquiring information
19:35 What us relevant information?
23:06 Do outcomes matter?
27:08 Strategic ignorance
35:06 Strategic ignorance in healthcare, and the case of STIs
48:30 Follow Katarina’s work!
--
Follow Katarina’s work:
University page: https://bit.ly/46dyEfZ
ResearchGate profile: https://bit.ly/45eZLpP
--
A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, LUCY, YHONATAN SHEMESH, AND MANVIR SINGH!
A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN!
AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!
And check out my playlists on:
PSYCHOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/ybalf8km
PHILOSOPHY: https://tinyurl.com/yb6a7d3p
ANTHROPOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/y8b42r7g
#TheDissenter #KatarinaKovacevic #CognitiveScience
https://wn.com/907_Katarina_Kovačević_Epistemic_Responsibility_And_Strategic_Ignorance
------------------Support the channel------------
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy
PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l
PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz
PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m
PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao
------------------Follow me on---------------------
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDissenterYT
Podcast: http://bit.ly/3FeSNqb
This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/
RECORDED ON OCTOBER 19th 2023.
Katarina Kovačević is a PhD candidate in the Department of Cognitive Science at Central European University. Her main research interest is responsibility. She investigates how people ascribe responsibility for good and bad outcomes across various situations. She is specifically interested in epistemic responsibility and strategic ignorance.
In this episode, we talk about epistemic responsibility and strategic ignorance. We start by discussing how to approach responsibility from the perspective of psychology/cognitive science, and when exactly people ascribe responsibility to others. We talk about epistemic responsibility, what happens when people lack relevant information, if the effort put into acquiring it matters, and if outcomes matter. Finally, we discuss strategic ignorance, and focus on health-related examples, particularly testing for STIs.
Time Links:
00:00 Intro
00:38 Responsibility from the perspective of psychology/cognitive science
03:24 When do people ascribe responsibility to others?
07:04 Epistemic responsibility, and when people lack relevant information
15:11 The effort put into acquiring information
19:35 What us relevant information?
23:06 Do outcomes matter?
27:08 Strategic ignorance
35:06 Strategic ignorance in healthcare, and the case of STIs
48:30 Follow Katarina’s work!
--
Follow Katarina’s work:
University page: https://bit.ly/46dyEfZ
ResearchGate profile: https://bit.ly/45eZLpP
--
A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, LUCY, YHONATAN SHEMESH, AND MANVIR SINGH!
A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN!
AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!
And check out my playlists on:
PSYCHOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/ybalf8km
PHILOSOPHY: https://tinyurl.com/yb6a7d3p
ANTHROPOLOGY: https://tinyurl.com/y8b42r7g
#TheDissenter #KatarinaKovacevic #CognitiveScience
- published: 01 Mar 2024
- views: 714
7:48
45. Epistemic Responsibility
Dr. M. Hisham Hawasli gives a short talk.
Dr. M. Hisham Hawasli gives a short talk.
https://wn.com/45._Epistemic_Responsibility
Dr. M. Hisham Hawasli gives a short talk.
- published: 09 Aug 2020
- views: 224
44:51
Sandy Goldberg: On the Epistemic Significance of Knowledge You Should Have Had
Professor Sandy Goldberg (Northwestern) speaks at a workshop on Social Epistemology, University of Edinburgh, 24th June 2015.
Abstract: Elsewhere I and others ...
Professor Sandy Goldberg (Northwestern) speaks at a workshop on Social Epistemology, University of Edinburgh, 24th June 2015.
Abstract: Elsewhere I and others have argued that evidence one should have had can bear on the justification of one's belief, in the form of defeating one's justification. In this paper, I am interested in knowing how evidence one should have had (on the one hand) and one's higher-order evidence (on the other) interact in determinations of the justification of belief. In doing so I aim to address two types of scenario that previous discussions have left open. In one type of scenario, there is a clash between a subject's higher-order evidence and the evidence she should have had: S's higher-order evidence is misleading as to the existence or likely epistemic bearing of further evidence she should have. In the other, while there is further evidence S should have had, this evidence would only have offered additional support for S's belief that p. The picture I offer derives from two "epistemic ceiling" principles linking evidence to justification: one's justification for the belief that p can be no higher than it is on one's total evidence, nor can it be higher than what it would have been had one had all of the evidence one should have had. Together, these two principles entail what I call the doctrine of Epistemic Strict Liability: insofar as one fails to have evidence one should have had, one is epistemically answerable to that evidence whatever reasons one happened to have regarding the likely epistemic bearing of that evidence. I suggest that such a position can account for the battery of intuitions elicited in the full range of cases I will be considering.
https://wn.com/Sandy_Goldberg_On_The_Epistemic_Significance_Of_Knowledge_You_Should_Have_Had
Professor Sandy Goldberg (Northwestern) speaks at a workshop on Social Epistemology, University of Edinburgh, 24th June 2015.
Abstract: Elsewhere I and others have argued that evidence one should have had can bear on the justification of one's belief, in the form of defeating one's justification. In this paper, I am interested in knowing how evidence one should have had (on the one hand) and one's higher-order evidence (on the other) interact in determinations of the justification of belief. In doing so I aim to address two types of scenario that previous discussions have left open. In one type of scenario, there is a clash between a subject's higher-order evidence and the evidence she should have had: S's higher-order evidence is misleading as to the existence or likely epistemic bearing of further evidence she should have. In the other, while there is further evidence S should have had, this evidence would only have offered additional support for S's belief that p. The picture I offer derives from two "epistemic ceiling" principles linking evidence to justification: one's justification for the belief that p can be no higher than it is on one's total evidence, nor can it be higher than what it would have been had one had all of the evidence one should have had. Together, these two principles entail what I call the doctrine of Epistemic Strict Liability: insofar as one fails to have evidence one should have had, one is epistemically answerable to that evidence whatever reasons one happened to have regarding the likely epistemic bearing of that evidence. I suggest that such a position can account for the battery of intuitions elicited in the full range of cases I will be considering.
- published: 01 Jul 2015
- views: 751
55:33
The Epistemic Responsibilities of the University - Rene van Woudenberg
Universities, as social institutions, bear numerous responsibilities—such as financial responsibilities, management responsibilities, social responsibilities, a...
Universities, as social institutions, bear numerous responsibilities—such as financial responsibilities, management responsibilities, social responsibilities, and other. In this talk I argue that the universities’ first and foremost responsibilities are epistemic in nature, i.e. responsibilities pertaining to the acquisition of knowledge, rational belief, insight, understanding, wisdom. In order to shoulder these responsibilities it is absolutely necessary that certain values be acknowledged—values that especially in the university seem to be under constant attack, thus giving rise to what I call ‘the university paradox’. This talk presents the paradox, and indicates a solution.
- See more at www.FOCLonline.org
FOCLID 7187
https://wn.com/The_Epistemic_Responsibilities_Of_The_University_Rene_Van_Woudenberg
Universities, as social institutions, bear numerous responsibilities—such as financial responsibilities, management responsibilities, social responsibilities, and other. In this talk I argue that the universities’ first and foremost responsibilities are epistemic in nature, i.e. responsibilities pertaining to the acquisition of knowledge, rational belief, insight, understanding, wisdom. In order to shoulder these responsibilities it is absolutely necessary that certain values be acknowledged—values that especially in the university seem to be under constant attack, thus giving rise to what I call ‘the university paradox’. This talk presents the paradox, and indicates a solution.
- See more at www.FOCLonline.org
FOCLID 7187
- published: 17 Aug 2017
- views: 336
9:58
Robert Audi - Epistemology: How Do We Know What We Know?
What do we know and how do we know it? What is knowledge? What is belief? How is belief justified? What justifies us in believing what we believe? Is justified ...
What do we know and how do we know it? What is knowledge? What is belief? How is belief justified? What justifies us in believing what we believe? Is justified belief knowledge? These questions constitute “epistemology” – the theory of knowledge.
Click here to watch more interviews with Robert Audi http://bit.ly/2zJmXkl
Click here to watch more interviews on epistemology http://bit.ly/2zJQ9HI
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
https://wn.com/Robert_Audi_Epistemology_How_Do_We_Know_What_We_Know
What do we know and how do we know it? What is knowledge? What is belief? How is belief justified? What justifies us in believing what we believe? Is justified belief knowledge? These questions constitute “epistemology” – the theory of knowledge.
Click here to watch more interviews with Robert Audi http://bit.ly/2zJmXkl
Click here to watch more interviews on epistemology http://bit.ly/2zJQ9HI
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS
- published: 01 Oct 2018
- views: 65830
59:02
BCCCD20 Symposium 4: Epistemic Uncertainty in Development
Symposium 4 -- January 11, 2020
Epistemic Uncertainty: Implicit Encoding and Information-Seeking from Infancy to Preschool
00:00 Marina Bazhydai, Introduction
...
Symposium 4 -- January 11, 2020
Epistemic Uncertainty: Implicit Encoding and Information-Seeking from Infancy to Preschool
00:00 Marina Bazhydai, Introduction
02:50 Moritz Köster, The neural dynamics of processing the unexpected in the infant brain
24:05 Marina Bazhydai, Preverbal infants’ selectively use social referencing in response to referential uncertainty
43:32 Paul Harris, Discussion*
*Due to technical issues, we could not record Paul Harris's slides. They can be found here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IAObqt5jp0mG7s1p2OM_4J2Of9oDud6aMt4NMOiI-m8/edit?usp=sharing
BCCCD: http://www.bcccd.org
CDC Web: https://cdc.ceu.edu
CDC Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CognitiveDevelopmentCenteratCEU/
CDC Twitter: https://twitter.com/cogdevceu
https://wn.com/Bcccd20_Symposium_4_Epistemic_Uncertainty_In_Development
Symposium 4 -- January 11, 2020
Epistemic Uncertainty: Implicit Encoding and Information-Seeking from Infancy to Preschool
00:00 Marina Bazhydai, Introduction
02:50 Moritz Köster, The neural dynamics of processing the unexpected in the infant brain
24:05 Marina Bazhydai, Preverbal infants’ selectively use social referencing in response to referential uncertainty
43:32 Paul Harris, Discussion*
*Due to technical issues, we could not record Paul Harris's slides. They can be found here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IAObqt5jp0mG7s1p2OM_4J2Of9oDud6aMt4NMOiI-m8/edit?usp=sharing
BCCCD: http://www.bcccd.org
CDC Web: https://cdc.ceu.edu
CDC Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CognitiveDevelopmentCenteratCEU/
CDC Twitter: https://twitter.com/cogdevceu
- published: 18 Feb 2020
- views: 154
42:21
Episode 34: The Epistemic Condition and Tracing with Daniel Miller
In this episode, we talk with Daniel Miller about when and why ignorance functions as an excuse from blameworthiness, and how this is related to a phenomenon ca...
In this episode, we talk with Daniel Miller about when and why ignorance functions as an excuse from blameworthiness, and how this is related to a phenomenon called “tracing”.
Dan's Website: http://www.danieljamesmiller.com/
Dan's Paper, "Reasonable Foreseability and Blameless Ignorance"
Dan's essay at 1000 Word Philosophy: https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2019/02/14/ignorance-and-blame/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/thefreewillshow
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefreewillshow/?hl=en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Free-Will-Show-105535031200408/
https://wn.com/Episode_34_The_Epistemic_Condition_And_Tracing_With_Daniel_Miller
In this episode, we talk with Daniel Miller about when and why ignorance functions as an excuse from blameworthiness, and how this is related to a phenomenon called “tracing”.
Dan's Website: http://www.danieljamesmiller.com/
Dan's Paper, "Reasonable Foreseability and Blameless Ignorance"
Dan's essay at 1000 Word Philosophy: https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2019/02/14/ignorance-and-blame/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/thefreewillshow
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thefreewillshow/?hl=en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Free-Will-Show-105535031200408/
- published: 21 Feb 2022
- views: 272