Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 12

[edit]
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect. History merge of some really old edits was just completed, so this is no longer needed. --- RockMFR 21:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was speedily keep all. --Gh87 23:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing for my request below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is a serious reason to keep this redirect page, nobody else is going to type this redirect title at all, and "The Farnsworth Parabox" was non-existant before a redirective move. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

offensive, would never be used as a legit redirect MKoltnow 05:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Kept and tagged as {{R from misspelling}}. -- JLaTondre 01:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a spelling mistake. It would help to delete this redirect to identify any spelling mistakes in articles about Sydney Evangelicalism/Anglicanism. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An unlikely search term for quantification CMummert 12:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I recently moved this article since there is no other use of the name. The redirect is an unlikely (and unnecessary) search term. PC78 22:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article was moved since it was incorrectly named. The redirect is an unlikely search term. PC78 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, what makes you think the same mistake won't be made twice? For example, if somebody has bookmarked the old title, where they remember the article existing, and now there's nothing... they are likely to say "why has this been deleted? well that was an obvious mistake..." and repost the content, creating a duplicate article without realizing it's been moved else where. Also, it was in fact released in 2005, and "TV movies" and/or mini-series are sometimes mistakenly referred to as "film". — CharlotteWebb 21:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was Re-targeted to A Wonderful Life (musical). -- JLaTondre 02:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As above. PC78 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.