Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skye Riley (fictional character)

Skye Riley (fictional character)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article with little prospect of significant additional content. Proposing a Redirect to Smile 2. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merged to the movie Smile 2. The article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability standards for fictional characters WP:FICT. Meritkosy 17:109, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Delete - There are no sources to indicate that the character has come close to gaining enough notability that it would make any sense to have a separate article from the one for the one movie they appeared in. As the current article has no reliable sources cited, and contains nothing but a truncated plot summary for the movie, there is nothing to Merge. Skye Riley already Redirects to Smile 2, meaning this much less likely search term for the same name is not even useful as a Redirect. Rorshacma (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm finding little bits and pieces here and there, but so far I'm not really seeing where the character is independently notable enough for their own article. There are articles talking about how the character was developed or could be based on like this, this, and this, but it's not really the type of stuff that would show independent notability - it's more something that could be worked into the development section of the film, assuming that this info isn't already there. I think it's just a bit too soon for an article at this point in time - in most cases it takes a while for a character to really get enough steam to justify their own article. I'll hold off on an official argument until others have had a chance to look for sourcing, though. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rorshacma. There isn't the quantity/quality of sources you'd expect for this to gain notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I've updated the page and put more information about the character herself, including the development and reception of the character. Akariprescott (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the added sources are not valid as reliable sources as they are user-generated wikis, and the third is a general review of the movie. I am afraid they really do not help the character pass the WP:GNG, or justify having a separate article from the film's article. Rorshacma (talk) 04:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Rorshacma. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Smile 2. Viable AtD here and there's no harm in keeping the redirect around. Entirely non-notable but total deletion is unwarranted. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support redirect because I don't think there's anything else we can really do with this page. AHI-3000 (talk) 22:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Smile 2. The character alone has no notability outside the film, so a redirect would be ideal. Madeleine (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the concern subject lack notability and again there is no enough and reliable source to make it notable I think it should be merged with the film.