Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rat Race (video game) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rat Race (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; only notability is its announcement and subsequent cancellation, with sources being mainly on these two details. MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://www.wired.com/2007/11/writer-explains/
  2. https://www.ign.com/articles/2007/10/17/ps3-getting-caught-up-in-rat-race
  3. https://www.ign.com/articles/2007/11/28/rat-race-qa
  4. https://www.wired.com/2007/10/ps3s-episodic-c/
  5. https://www.eurogamer.net/rat-race-unveiled-for-psn
  6. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/sony-enters-the-rat-race/1100-6181209/
  7. https://web.archive.org/web/20080119145832/http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1575219/20071128/index.jhtml
  8. https://www.gamesradar.com/psn-gets-exclusive-comedyadventure-game/
  9. https://www.destructoid.com/new-ps3-exclusive-rat-race-revealed/
  10. https://www.engadget.com/2007-11-12-ps3-fanboy-inteview-rat-race.html
  11. https://mcvuk.com/business-news/consoles/super-ego-reveals-ps3s-first-episodic-game/
  12. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/2009-01-27-rat-race-may-be-crawling-back-from-the-dead.html
There's enough to support an article here. Sergecross73 msg me 18:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The notability standard is much higher for cancelled games, but there is reliable sourcing as above and in the earlier AfD about the gameplay details, development, and even some early feedback from outlets that they weren't getting good vibes from the game. This deserves to be kept. VRXCES (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Sergecross73 did post sources here, but all are passing mentions or non-significant coverage, interviews (WP:PRIMARY) or routine announcements as regurgitated press releases. Really not convinced about the notability of this game at all. If we took this as meeting WP:GNG, then every upcoming/vaporware/cancelled video game ever would be notable and have its own article too. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to List of cancelled PlayStation 3 games as an alternative to deletion - The sources are short announcements, not SIGCOV. And one of them is an interview which counts as a primary source. --Mika1h (talk) 13:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - I disagree with some of the assessments above. I've found the MTV source, which is neither routine nor short - its a pretty deep dive. MTV is an RS, and its written by Stephen Totillo, an experienced video game journalist. I also disagree that the coverage is simply routine - the Wired coverage talks about leaked footage, and the poor reception it got, which is anything but routine. And the rest - I don't agree with the label "passing mention" when they're articles entirely dedicated to the subject. Sergecross73 msg me 14:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The MTV article is not "independent of the subject", the writer is recounting an interview and a press release. Regarding the other sources, I guess what constitutes "significant coverage" is subjective but these news announcements satisfy the "directly" part of GNG but not the "in detail" part. They are basically glorified press releases, they are reciting what Sony has told them. The Wired coverage: Yes, it has critical analysis but it's one paragraph, is that 50 words? No way that is "in detail". Again, SIGCOV is subjective but that is setting the bar really low. --Mika1h (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, that's not quite right, the MTV article is reporting on someone else's interview, and covers other things, like the game's leak on GameTrailers, its poor reception, etc. It's incorrect to try to handwave that away as some sort of interview/press release, its more nuanced than that. Sergecross73 msg me 15:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to List of cancelled PlayStation 3 games (though there isn't much to be added): Doing some in-depth search, MTV's coverage at [1] is decent, but that's where it all stops. Based on my comment above and seeing Mika1h's proposal, this is where I end up. There is simply not enough significant coverage of the game - cancelled projects can be extensively covered, even lesser known ones like Heist (video game). This just doesn't meet WP:GNG, but an alternative to deletion is always preferred. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]