Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in the Pitcairn Islands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW. (and WP:NODUH...) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in the Pitcairn Islands

Contested prod. The article is about the non-existance of a religion in a territory of about 50 inhabitants. No sources available, as can be seen by the content. The only source used in the article doesn't even mention Islam at all. Jafeluv (talk) 08:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no basis for inclusion, and no need for a precedent for an article on every religion that isn't practiced in each region where it's not practiced. 7 ^{talk | Δ |} 09:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. While I could see it for a larger country where it is not practiced, it doesn't make sense on this scale. Orderinchaos 10:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Religion X" in "Country Y" articles should only exist when a religion actually exists in a given state or when it notably does not exist there (like if all of the adherents are expelled). youngamerican (wtf?) 11:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is about a "null set" which does not pass any test at all for notability, much less having notable content. Collect (talk) 12:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article about stuff that doesn't exist in a country is absolutely ridiculous. Also establishing notability in this case is not entirely possible. Aditya ^α _ß 13:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an answer in search of a question. This would set a really bad precident. One can only imagine a bunch of boilerplate articles about Catholicism in the Pitcairn Islands, Judaism in the Pitcairn Islands, Krishna Consciousness in the Pitcairn Islands, etc. User is contributing to or creating similar "non-answers," BTW. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was attempting to help out the original editor by pointing out that sources needed to be added concerning the Seventh Day Adventist missionaries and lack of Islamic religion. Once they were added I removed the original PROD tag and asked other editors for advise. The consensus was to merge the information. Since then, the original editor has been adding CSD tags and other deletion tags to several entries that have to do with Islam in other countries. I guess no good deed goes unpunished. I'll be posting this on the merge discussion as well. Wperdue (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.