Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash of Arms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn — Jack Merridew 04:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clash of Arms

Hints of notability, but all a google search comes up is with places to buy the game, this wikipedia page, and the page fore the game's official website. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 00:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Winners of Origins Awards are generally considered notable. I've cited the appropriate pages for the two awards mentioned in the article. Article could easily be expanded with further discussion of their line (which I admit I'm only passingly familiar with). --Rindis (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep I think the two Origins awards are enough. That said, expanding the article by describing the two games and redirecting them to here would be a good way to add more here. Hobit (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Winning a notable industry award twice is clear evidence of notability. Edward321 (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn - Same as said before, withdrawn, based on the fact of notable awards cited.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 01:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.