Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 shooting of Paris police officers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was request withdrawn by the original nominator. (non-admin closure). ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 shooting of Paris police officers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, though its content is notable and suitable, would be more fitting as a list, not as an article as it is now. I suggest its content be merged with a list form. Geo ^talk 20:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This has to be the quickest I've ever seen an AfD being filed. We cannot make WP:CRYSTAL guesses about enduring notability. This could be big, this may not be big. But I say we let this story develop in a few days' or weeks' time and then touch on the issue again when it's more appropriate. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pointing out that Geojournal has been making lots of deletion proposals this evening, including two within a minute on Members of Parliament with referenced articles! How much WP:BEFORE could have been done? Calm down and stop this damage. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well isn't THAT sketchy? Cyrus the Penner (talk) 20:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categorically, I'm retracting my proposal as this is best left so for now and will be best left later for the creation of a list. Geo ^talk 20:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.