User talk:Rosiestep
 | Rosiestep is out of town until 10 May 2025 and may not respond to queries. |  |
.JPG)
 | It is approximately 6:11 AM where this user lives. |
|
(2007) 1, 2 (2008) 3, 4, 5, 6 (2009) 7, 8, 9, 10 (2010) 11, 12, 13, 14 (2011) 15, 16, 17, 18 (2012) 19, 20, 21, 22 (2013) 23, 24, 25, 26 (2014) 27, 28, 29, 30 (2015) 31, 32, 33, 34 (2016) 35, 36, 37, 38 (2017) 39, 40, 41, 42 (2018) 43, 44, 45, 46 (2019) 47, 48, 49, 50 (2020) 51, 52, 53, 54 (2021) 55, 56, 57, 58 (2022) 59, 60, 61, 62 (2023) 63, 64, 65, 66 (2024) 67, 68, 69, 70 (2025) 71, 72, 73, 74 |
| Rosiestep's Newbie Central | |
|
Really, really short videos:
Read me See also |
Women in Red May 2025
[edit]
Announcements (events facilitated by others):
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:22, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Question from Kritzerdagoat (17:13, 2 May 2025)
[edit]YOOO! its ya boy, kritzerdagoat, anyways, enough with the jokes, i cant really talk now because i have state testing (which i hate with a passion even though i pass every time) next week tuesday-thursday, also, ive been trying to edit some youth futball/soccer articles, such as the Mali U-17, but i cant figure out how to do they thing where they can make the column gold, sliver, or bronze. if you can, by friday, can you please send me a tutorial (or just tell me) how to do something like that. Thank you, from ya boy-Kritzerdagoat --Kritzerdagoat (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Kritzerdagoat. I believe you're referring to this article as I saw that you edited its talkpage: 2025 U-17 Africa Cup of Nations. You wrote
... column gold, sliver, or bronze ...
, but did you mean the gold, silver, and bronze rows like in this section: 2025 U-17 Africa Cup of Nations#Tournament rankings? If yes, this is a complicated edit and I wouldn't recommend attempting it to someone who, so far, has only made 1 other edit to a Wikipedia article. That said, for reference, the gold/silver/bronze coding is here and the tables tutorial is here. Good luck with your state testing; I hope you do great! --Rosiestep (talk) 13:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi Rosie, please excuse me, but I have a question. I have been submitting the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bernhard_Wessling for some time now. It was rejected by a reviewer because the source citation was missing. I submitted all this later, but haven't heard anything since. Is there perhaps a way to move the process forward? Many thanks for your information and best regards Dirk --Buxtobe (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Buxtobe. I made some edits (headers, subheader, re-arranging, External links, categories) to the draft; take a look. Other things that I think need doing before submitting for another review:
- Add at least one reliable source as an inline citation to each paragraph (except for the lead paragraph) to address the comment made by HickoryOughtShirt?4 in their review.
- In the lead section/paragraph, add sentences that address Johannes Maximilian's comment:
"I don't see why the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. What do you reckon, why is the subject notable?"
. - In the "Career and research" section (this is a common header title for scientist biographies):
- Arrange information in chron order.
- Add additional subheaders (e.g., like the one I did) if applicable.
- Add your comment (disclosure about paid editing) to the talkpage.
- Please note that my edits or suggested edits are meant only to address your request to
... move the process forward
. It shouldn't be construed that my edits or suggested edits guarantee that the draft will eventually be accepted and moved into mainspace. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)