Jump to content

User talk:Johnpacklambert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Category:Military leaders from the Tsardom of Russia has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Military leaders from the Tsardom of Russia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

People by French province abolished in 1790

[edit]

I created Category:People by Frwnch province aboliahed in 1790. I am now thinking it might be better to remame to Category:People by former French province, to match woth its parent Category:Former French provinces. The main thing is we want to categorize people by the area of France as France was divided when they lived. We do not want to treat people who died in 1789 or earlier as if thry were from departments that did not exist until 1790. We should also only be categorizing people by regions of France when they existed. We should not be calling people French at all who lived beyond the borders of France. So people from the Duchy of Lorraine are not French if they were dead or elsewhere before 1766, unless of course thry moved to Franve before that date, but if they did so they are depending either an immigrant to France or an expatriate in France. The sane applies to those from Nice and Savoy before I think 1860, to those from the Free County of Burgandy, Alsace, the Dauphine, Provence, Artois etc. Before those places were annexed at various times.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:30, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roots of Reform Judaism for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roots of Reform Judaism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roots of Reform Judaism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

removing "non-bio" categories from articles about people

[edit]

As far as I understand, there is no prohibition against including people in categories which are not primarily biographical. All of the discussion and advice in, e.g., Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people, is exclusively about how to use categories which are strictly biographical: in particular, that such categories should be limited to articles about people, so that the top-level categories of biographies only contain people as articles in all sub-categories. But in the opposite direction, there is no rule that people can only be included in this type of category. And indeed, as far as I can tell it is normal and common to include people in other types of categories. As such, please stop removing people from relevant categories for this reason. (For example, you took Jeremiah Horrocks out from Category:Transit of Venus in special:diff/1292180039. As the first person who verifiably observed a transit of venus, Horrocks is clearly relevant to the category. –jacobolus (t) 17:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most people do a large range of things. In general non-biographical categories are not suitable for biographies. I have made a post regarding this specific categorization on the talk page. You are free to comment more there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "not suitable"? Can you cite some kind of policy stating anything like this, or an RFC with a closed discussion, or similar, or did you make it up? –jacobolus (t) 21:04, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia:Categorization page says "Keep articles about people separate". This to me indicates that in general biographies should not go in non-biographical categories. I have opened a discussion on the categories talk page to see if I can get broader impact. I know I have seen other people in CfD argue that biographies do not belong in non-biographical categories. I am not sure there is a firm and clear policy on this.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The immediately following sentence explains what this means (which does not apply here or to other categories you are, in my opinion inappropriately, removing from other pages): "Categories with a title indicating that the contents are people, should normally only contain biographical articles and lists of people". –jacobolus (t) 00:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

[edit]

Could you please slow down a bit on my talk page? I appreciate your thinking along, but there is only so much I can do. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New World

[edit]

This is a term that is clearly from a Euro-centric view. It was not a new world to the indigenous inhabitants. We should instead use terms such as "the Americas" or as appliacle "North America" or "South America". It is for similar reasons we say "East Asia" or other terms instead of "Far East" which is also very Eurocentric.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johnpacklambert&oldid=1292610617"