Talk:Stac Levenish

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More than a few of my photographs of the St Kilda archipeligo , including Levenish, have been lifted from Geograph and posted on Wikipedia without acknowledgement.

They have then been posted from here to Google Earth, again without acknowledgement.

The conditions of Geograph picture usage, under the Creative Commons licence, include attribution of all photographs. I am more than happy for the photos to be used but credit where credit is due !

I would be grateful if someone would do this here as I am unable to.

Stephen Hodges86.27.164.73 (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, this is a wonderful picture and I am grateful that Wikipedia has access to it. The specifics of crediting photographs on Wikipedia is not my area of expertise, however I can say that on one or two occasions when I have put a specific credit for a Geograph photographer on an image description in an article, a reviewer has removed this on the grounds that the accreditation is already there on "Commons" where the image is stored. If you double click on the image in the article you can immediately see that the accreditation does exist. I am not in a position to make any comment about Google Earth. If this is not a satisfactory explanation from your point of view, please respond here and I will see if I can find a more knowledgeable editor to comment in more detail. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 16:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no expert, but have worked with commons images a bit. The source does not usually appear in an article. All the correct information was copied to commons at the original upload. I have tidied the template, so more of it appears clearly. I've left the duplicate licence info - a feature of the Geograph template. Thanks again for sharing this picture. I will look for the others. Finavon (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephen, all geograph attributions can be found at the individual picture's page, which is on wikimedia commons. This is in line with the CC licence. All the best. --MacRusgail (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]