This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
The french historician Jean-Jacques Marie asserts that Melgunov ″invented″ the number of 50.000 soldiers who were executed by Trotsky in the Crimea after the defeat of Wrangel. Melgunov does not claim this number. In the english version, p.65 he writes: ″The victim count here is in the tens of thousands. Crimea was nicknamed an “all-Russia graveyard”. We heard of those thousands from those who arrived to Moscow from Crimea. 50,000 were executed – reports “For the People” (No. 1). Others calculate the total at 100 – 120 and some even at 150 thousands. We do not know which of the numbers is accurate, even if it was much lower than that!″
In the german translation, Reprint from 2017, ISBN 978-3-940452-47-4, p.121, the last sentence is: We do not know which of the numbers is accurate, we hope that the real number is much lower than those mentioned above. So, Melgunov writes about tens of thousands of victims, but he does not give a certain number and he refers his source. Marie′s claim of an inaccurate invention is wrong. -Thylacin (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]