Talk:Institute for New Economic Thinking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Wcfallon (talk · contribs) has been paid by Keating & Co. on behalf of Institute for New Economic Thinking.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Ineteconomics (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

I work at INET's communications team and wanted to request an addition to the page about the Economics and Beyond podcast: https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/podcasts Afreedm1 (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We are from INET's strategic communications/PR firm and are working with INET to develop a more comprehensive Wikipedia page. Keating & Co. Wcfallon (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for revealing your Conflict of interest. Please be aware that this is supposed to be an encyclopedia and you should not edit an article that you are professionally related to. You may however suggest improvements here in the discussion. The article is written like an advertisement and cannot remain as it is. Please make yourself familiar with wikipedia rules. First of all, read about the guidelines on conflicts of interest. Knopffabrik (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While the subject matter is notable, the presentation is horrible. Why have a list of "recommended books"? The page reads like an ad. Racepacket (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The ad version of the article was deleted and an older version was restored to which I now added external sources. Please help to make this an article of real encyclopedic value. Knopffabrik (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wcfallon aka INET's strategic communications/PR firm! ok, it's 3 years since your initial post, but where is the substance to INET, the output? Can you please insert summaries of annual reports into the article what the New Economic Thinking is? 4m$ /year should pay for that. This page is the stub of a stub.--Wuerzele (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Institute for New Economic Thinking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]